• The silliest thing you will read today

    April 4, 2016
    Sports

    It has nothing to do with the election. It comes from Sports Illustrated, which wrote what the 15 National League teams need to do to win:

    Milwaukee Brewers: Get good years from some rookies

    It was just a few years ago, in the fall of 2011, that the Brewers were two wins from the World Series. Four long seasons later, only Jonathan Lucroy and Ryan Braun remain from the team that won 96 games and the NL Central. In its stead is a roster in transition backed by one of the stronger farm systems in baseball, headlined by top 10 shortstop stud Orlando Arcia. Milwaukee, deep into a rebuild and chasing three 2015 playoff teams in its division, is admittedly one of baseball’s longest shots to win the World Series. To do so the Brewers need not only strong performances from stars Lucroy and Braun, but also big rookie seasons from Arcia (once he’s called up), rightfielder Brett Phillips and pitchers Josh Hader and Jorge Lopez. Does that sound like too much to ask? The Cubs reached the NLCS last year with three rookies in their starting lineup, so it can be done. Besides, Bud Selig’s old team should always have hope and faith.

    Why should the Brewers have “hope and faith” when the only way the Brewers could make the playoffs is if all their opponents forfeit their games? It is ludicrous that the Brewers are marketing their 2016 (and 2017, and 2018, and 2019, and …) season as Major League Baseball when the Brewers’ major league roster is full of has-beens, never-weres and never-will-bes, with the Brewers actively trying to get rid of their two players with any skill, Jonathan Lucroy and Ryan Braun. Paying full price for a Brewers ticket for the foreseeable future makes as much sense as paying full price for a UW football ticket in the late 1980s.

     

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The silliest thing you will read today
  • Whom to vote for Tuesday

    April 4, 2016
    US politics, Wisconsin politics

    Our long state nightmare will be over, for about five minutes, after tomorrow’s election. (No, not the 2016 Brewers season, which starts later today.)

    As I discovered on my Wisconsin Public Radio appearance Friday, there are many Wisconsinites with an unhealthy interest in politics, which is at best a necessary evil for government, which in itself is at best a necessary evil. There is not a single elected official anywhere in this country since my birth who has improved my life, and none ever will. My image of a more perfect union is millions of Americans who don’t know who their elected officials are, not because of ignorance (we have enough of that already), but because they’re not important.

    Since that is not the case, informed votes are necessary. I like not a single remaining presidential candidate, and there is at m0st two candidates I might vote for in November. I question whether Ted Cruz can get any non-conservatives to vote for him.

    Why not John Kasich? He does, after all, have both federal and state experience, the latter in a supposedly bellwether state. I would probably vote for him in November, but not now given his disinterest in Republican values such as not spending more money than you have (that is, the federal Medicaid money that Gov. Scott Walker correctly rejected; states that took the Medicaid bribe are seeing — surprise! — sharply higher Medicaid spending) and, unlike Walker, his inability to run a state government not run by government employee unions.

    Kasich, sort of a coreligionist, also appears to be channeling his inner crab, as shown by his claim that when St. Peter judges us at the Pearly Gates (he will?), we will be judged not on whether we reduced the size of government, but whether we took care of the poor. That’s an interesting statement given that nowhere in the Bible does Jesus Christ make a statement about the correct size of government. Jesus says a lot about caring for the poor, but He says repeatedly that that is a responsibility of individual Christians, not anyone else or anything else.

    The reason — really, the only reason — to vote for Cruz in the Republican primary is because a vote for Cruz is a vote against the national embarrassment, Donald Trump, who is so hated that if he gets the GOP presidential nomination, he will pull down Republican candidates in U.S. Senate and House and state legislative races from coast to coast. This will not kill the GOP (which has 31 governors as opposed to the Democrats’ 19), but remember 1993 and 1994, or 2009 and 2010?

    Why not Trump: Ask Stanford University’s Keith Hennessey:

    Donald Trump is an ignorant, unprincipled, amoral policy lightweight opposed to free market capitalism and limited government.

    • His ignorance of economic and national security issues is breathtaking. He makes up most of his policy views on the fly in interviews. He knows far less about policy than does a regular Wall Street Journal reader, and he cannot hold a coherent in-depth conversation about the economy or America’s role in the world. I don’t expect him to be a national security expert but it would be nice if a future commander-in-chief understood the strategic importance of NATO rather than thinking of it as a potential revenue source. In transcripts of tworecent interviews he reminds me of students who try to answer questions in class when they have not done the reading. He is faking it on policy, and not that well.
    • He is not doing his homework. I don’t blame him (much) for starting his campaign as a policy novice. Yet he appears to be no better informed today than when his campaign began. Policy is serious, hard work. He shows no interest and no effort in learning anything about the issues and decisions he might face as President. As a result he babbles in interviews, avoids Q&A sessions with voters, and changes the subject whenever he is stumped (several times per interview on average). He should be improving over time and he’s not. Even if he intends to reject the advice of experts and be an outside-the-box thinker, he should at a minimum understand what he is rejecting and where that will lead him.
    • His policy views are cartoon-like when not entirely absent. Shouting STRENGTH is not a policy. His views seem to be unmoored by any intellectual structure or philosophical approach. He is unprincipled: he appears to view the world through dual lenses of transactions and of people he likes and dislikes. He treats other nations as competing firms and acts as if America’s only overseas interest is in maximizing revenue streams paid by foreign governments. His fiscal solutions are to cut waste, fraud, and abuse and to get other nations to pay America for military protection. He wants to disengage from the Middle East, destroy ISIS, and take Iraqi oil. America faces far more important questions than who will pay for a wall, and economic policy is more than renegotiating trade agreements.
    • He promises strong but amoral leadership. He promises to make America great again, but great alone is insufficient. America must also be good. A President’s job is in part to make value choices and he cannot explain his values. I know what the other nominees think a good America looks like. All I know about Mr. Trump’s America is that it will have a huge wall and new trade deals.
    • To the extent he has expressed views on economic policy I strongly disagree with them. I want to like his tax cuts but at some magnitude you also have to propose accompanying spending cuts. He threatens a global trade war while I am a free trader. By ruling out changes to Social Security and Medicare he would guarantee massive future tax increases. He has supported single payer health care reform. He boasts that he would order firm leaders to build their factories in the U.S. and then threatens to punish them if they do not. Business leaders, not politicians, should be deciding where to invest their firm’s capital. He seems to think of the federal government as a big firm; it’s not. I have yet to see an instance of a policy view from him consistent with free market capitalism and limited government intervention in the economy. …
    • He sounds like a tyrant. I worry he could (try to) become one. His instincts and rhetoric lean authoritarian. He praises foreign despots and characterizes their repression of dissent as strength. I question his commitment to freedom and the rule of law.
    • His poor judgment and lack of self discipline are astonishing. He could start a war by acci-tweet. I will not vote to give control of nuclear weapons and the world’s most powerful military to a man who trolls on Twitter after midnight.

    Donald Trump acts like a eighth grade bully.

    • He is vulgar.
    • He mistakes bullying for strength.
    • He is bigoted—against women, against certain religions and nationalities. This is not political incorrectness. Mel Brooks movies and George Carlin skits are politically incorrect. Donald Trump’s insults are just crude and self-serving. Whether he is actually bigoted or just playing to the crowd is irrelevant. The effect is the same and some people will follow his repulsive lead.
    • He lies frequently and apparently without compunction. To support his views he cites as evidence “I read it on the internet.”
    • He personalizes every professional disagreement, smears his opponents with innuendo, and facilitates others who do the same. No matter who is the counter party, public arguments with him invariably finish at a lower level than they began. He drags all of us down into the muck. …

    A successful president must be smart, disciplined, and tireless. He or she has to use expertise effectively and to make sound decisions based on core principles and values. At the same time being president is not just about effectiveness and efficiency, it’s also about moral leadership and character.

    Donald Trump lacks the character, the values, and the sound judgment essential to fulfill this awesome responsibility. He is unqualified and unfit to be President of the United States.

    It is pathetic to suggest that a vote for Cruz takes a step toward producing a brokered convention and a candidate who is not one of the remaining three Republicans, and yet that is what we are reduced to in these evil times of ours. (My own hope is that Cruz is the next president’s first Supreme Court nomination.)

    Of course, “pathetic” is the best description for the two Democratic candidates, the pathological liar and sexual-assault enabler Hillary Clinton and Comrade Bernie Sanders. Sanders is wrong about every economic issue, and it’s remarkable to me that people give him credit for sincerity, as if emotion should trump logic. The Clintons, meanwhile, are a blight on American morals, not merely politics.

    That is the only partisan race on Tuesday’s ballot, except for the Nonpartisan In Name Only Supreme Court race between Justice Rebecca Bradley and liberal Court of Appeals Judge Joanne Kloppenburg. The highest courts are, to quote von Clausewitz, politics by other means, so voting for Bradley continues our state’s more conservative direction. Voting for Kloppenburg is a vote to let criminals out of prison for spurious reasons. Notice that there is not a single remotely conservative person endorsing Kloppenburg. Notice that lawyers and newspapers are endorsing Kloppenburg, which (1) shows off how liberal the state news media is and (2) proves that lawyers believe the court system should be run for their benefit, instead of the taxpayer’s benefit.

    Many communities are holding what are being called Move to Amend referenda to deform the First Amendment to undo previous U.S. Supreme Court decisions, most notably Citizens United, that those who believe government isn’t large or powerful enough don’t like. I do not respect anyone who does not respect my First Amendment rights. The First Amendment needs no amending.

    There are, by the way, thousands of municipal, school and county board races that are more important to your own life, and over which you have more influence, than the races listed here. Government works best (when it works at all) when issues are determined at the lowest possible level of government.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Whom to vote for Tuesday
  • Loser and loserer

    April 4, 2016
    media, US politics, Wisconsin politics

    The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel found a way to criticize Hillary Clinton:

    Nothing matters more to leadership in a democracy than support for an open, honest government in which citizens are informed and in charge. It is the foundational building block of the republic upon which all else rests. And any candidate vying for the votes of the American people needs to have demonstrated a firm commitment not only to the ideal but to the reality of open government.

    As we noted Tuesday, Republican front-runner Donald Trump is not one of those candidates. But neither is Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. Her horrible track record on transparency raises serious concerns for open government under a Clinton administration — so serious we believe they may disqualify her from public office. We hope Wisconsin voters give this issue the consideration it deserves when they go to the polls on Tuesday.

    The issue immediately at hand — and under investigation by the FBI — is Clinton’s use of a private email server for State Department communications. Clinton may have violated national security laws by making top secret documents vulnerable to hackers and available to people without proper security clearance. Violating those laws rightly ended the public service career of Gen. David Petraeus when he was President Barack Obama’s CIA director. The FBI and Justice Department must be free to fully investigate and, if warranted, prosecute Clinton in this matter without any political interference from the Obama administration.

    In addition, regardless of Clinton’s excuses, the only believable reason for the private server in her basement was to keep her emails out of the public eye by willfully avoiding freedom of information laws. No president, no secretary of state, no public official at any level is above the law. She chose to ignore it, and must face the consequences.

    In a lengthy Washington Post article on Sunday, Robert O’Harrow Jr. notes that from the earliest days of her service as secretary of state, “Clinton aides and senior officials focused intently on accommodating the secretary’s desire to use her private email account, documents and interviews show.

    “Throughout, they paid insufficient attention to laws and regulations governing the handling of classified material and the preservation of government records, interviews and documents show. They also neglected repeated warnings about the security of the BlackBerry while Clinton and her closest aides took obvious security risks in using the basement server.”

    Last month, in a hearing about a Judicial Watch lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said legitimate questions have been raised about whether Clinton’s staff was trying to help her to sidestep the Freedom of Information Act.

    “We’re talking about a Cabinet-level official who was accommodated by the government for reasons unknown to the public,” Sullivan said. “And I think that’s a fair statement: For reasons heretofore unknown to the public. And all the public can do is speculate.”

    “This is all about the public’s right to know,” Sullivan added.

    This is hardly the first time Clinton has tried to sidestep the public eye. Last year, Pro Publica noted five such episodes:

    In 1992, during Bill Clinton’s first run for office, the Clintons declined to release all of their tax returns because, it turned out, a few of the returns showed Hillary Clinton’s incredible success in commodities trading when Bill Clinton was attorney general and then governor of Arkansas. She made almost $100,000 from an initial investment of $1,000 in a matter of months — a return of 10,000% — under the guidance of a lawyer who was also outside counsel to Tyson Foods Inc., Arkansas’ largest employer. The returns weren’t made public until 1994.

    In 1993, Hillary Clinton led a presidential task force to overhaul the U.S. health care system. The effort ultimately failed but the group came under intense criticism from lawmakers and interest groups for meeting behind closed doors. Several court challenges were brought in an attempt to open the process.

    In 1994, U.S. investigators subpoenaed Clinton’s billing records from her years at the Rose Firm in Little Rock, Ark. — documents that also had been sought by reporters. Of key interest was Clinton’s legal work for a failing savings and loan, but records of those billings weren’t found. Pro Publica: “Much later, Clinton’s longtime assistant, Carolyn Huber, said she found in the White House residence an additional box of records that contained the billing memos. They were turned over to the independent counsel in 1996. Clinton testified she had no knowledge of how the records wound up where they did.”

    As a senator in 2006, Clinton set up an energy task force that produced a 40-page report. That by itself is not unusual, but this was: The existence of the group, its members and its work product were all kept secret. Turned out the leader of the task force headed an investment firm with major holdings in the energy sector.

    Public officials keep secrets because they have something to hide — something they don’t want the people they are supposed to be serving to know anything about.

    Last year, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation became an issue. Donors are identified but not the exact amount of each donation or the date of those contributions. And donations to the foundation from foreign governments have raised conflict of interest questions for Clinton as secretary of state, an office with power over foreign affairs and favors second only to the president’s.

    Then there are the closed-door speeches to Wall Street financial investment firms, for which she received hundreds of thousands of dollars apiece.

    These off-the-record speeches were delivered after Clinton left the State Department and was preparing for her second bid for the White House. Clinton has refused to release transcripts of the speeches, saying she would do so only if other politicians released transcripts of their speeches. But that, as The New York Times noted in a February editorial, is a child’s excuse.

    “Voters have every right to know what Mrs. Clinton told these groups…. By refusing to release them all, especially the bank speeches, Mrs. Clinton fuels speculation about why she’s stonewalling,” the Times editorial said.

    Sen. Bernie Sanders has used the fees she was paid for the speeches by the most powerful firms on Wall Street against Clinton in their race for the nomination. Of equal concern is the secrecy involved and Clinton’s continuing refusal to release the transcripts of what she told the investment bankers.

    Clinton has a long track record of public service but an equally long record of obfuscation, secrecy and working in the shadows to boost her power and further her ambition. We encourage voters to think long and hard about that record when choosing the next president.

    Readers will have to keep this in mind when the Journal Sentinel endorses Hillary! before Nov. 8. But, you know, stopped clocks, etc.

    Meanwhile, James Wigderson explains why Donald Trump is likely to lose in Wisconsin Tuesday:

    When you fly from New York to Las Vegas, the ground all looks the same below. But Wisconsin is not Illinois or any other state Donald Trump has won. From the now-defunct Trump Airlines flyover country may all look the same, but the Trump campaign is learning the hard way Wisconsinites are not fooled by an orange spray tan.

    The lesson began when Trump ran into the buzzsaw of conservative talk show hosts who were all in the #NeverTrump camp, starting with WTMJ’s Charlie Sykes. The only person who thought this was a good idea was John Nichols, who posted on Twitter, “.@realDonaldTrump’s all over WI conservative talk radio today –appearing w/ hosts who have actively opposed his candidacy. Bold, smart move.” It’s that kind of sage advice that has led Wisconsin liberals to so many victories.

    Who would have thought that while Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh were dazzled by the billionaire’s charm, a bunch of hick cheeseheads weren’t going to drink the Trump Water? WISN’s Mark Belling even mock-thanked the other talk show hosts, joking that Trump had had his fill of confrontations before he could appear on Belling’s late afternoon show.

    Then came news that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was finally ready to announce his endorsement in the Wisconsin presidential primary election. Trump knew the endorsement was not going to be for him and the night before he posted on Twitter, “After the way I beat Gov. Scott Walker (and Jeb, Rand, Marco and all others) in the Presidential Primaries, no way he would ever endorse me!”

    At a morning rally in Brookfield for Texas Senator Ted Cruz, the audience listened to the radio broadcast of Sykes’ interview of Walker. When the Wisconsin governor announced his endorsement of Cruz, the crowd cheered, and then listened intently while Walker explained to Sykes his decision.

    Cruz was very gracious in accepting Walker’s endorsement. He reminded the audience, “Governor Walker, with the help of the men and women gathered here today and all across the state won an election, and another election, and then another election! And when Scott stood up to the union bosses, when Scott saw death threats and attacks and protests and anger and yells, millions of men and women all across the state of Wisconsin stood with Governor Scott Walker.”

    Cruz added that it inspired millions of people across the country, including the senator. “It inspired me. It showed that when we the people stand up together we can defeat the interests that are bankrupting our country.”

    Speaking of special interests, Trump had a little different reaction to the announcement. Rather than doing what most candidates would do in his situation and ignore the endorsement, Trump took to the stage in Janesville and ranted against the Wisconsin governor. He ridiculed Walker for riding a Harley Davidson. He lied about the state budget, claiming that Wisconsin had a $2.2 billion budget deficit last year (the state had a surplus). He claimed Wisconsin had an unemployment rate of 20% when in fact the state has a lower unemployment rate than before the recession and one of the best labor participation rates in the country. He echoed every failed talking point of the Wisconsin left in attacking Walker.

    But while Trump’s attack on Walker may have resonated with the Janesville audience, it’s clear Trump doesn’t understand Wisconsin. He even told a radio talk show in Rockford, IL, a city infamous in Wisconsin history as the hideout of the Democratic senators trying to stop Act 10, that Walker should have raised taxes instead. The readers of the Capital Times are not voting in the Republican primary. Typical of the polarization of Wisconsin politics, they’re voting for Bernie Sanders.

    Meanwhile, in the latest Marquette Law School poll, Walker has an approval rating of 80% among Republican primary voters. That’s because Walker’s policies are working. We just celebrated another anniversary of Act 10 and it has saved Wisconsin taxpayers more than $5 billion. And Wisconsin’s Republicans are invested in that success in three different elections. If Trump wants to make Tuesday’s primary another referendum on Walker’s policies, he’s making a mistake – bigly.

    Given that no Wisconsin Republican not named Dale Schultz opposes Act 10, what is the possible logical explanation for Trump’s attack? Understanding that the term “logic” doesn’t really apply to Trump, it is that Trump has been getting support from Democrats who have been crossing over into open GOP primaries, or even changing their party registration, to vote for Trump believing that Trump will be the easiest candidate for Hillary! to beat. Given that suddenly the Democratic presidential primary is more of a race, this strategy appears to be backfiring on Trump.

    Trump’s campaign started unraveling one week ago about now when he made what Nichols called the “bold and smart” move of appearing on talk radio programs whose hosts oppose Trump. Nichols was right, up until Trump opened his mouth.

    The yellow and red areas are where Charlie Sykes, Mark Belling and (in the morning) Vicki McKenna are on the air. McKenna is also on the air in the afternoon in the dark blue area. Jerry Bader is on in the light blue, goldenrod (?) and green area. Everyone is available online, of course. (It is interesting to note how many Republicans complained about the so-called “Sykes effect” when he was pushing conservative legislation GOP leadership opposed or vice versa, and now Sykes and his talk show brethren are too establishment in pushing Cruz over Trump.)

     

     

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Loser and loserer
  • Presty the DJ for April 4

    April 4, 2016
    Music

    Today in 1960, RCA Victor Records announced it would release all singles in both mono and stereo.

    Today in 1964, the Beatles had 14 of the Billboard Top 100 singles, including the top five:

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for April 4
  • Presty the DJ for April 3

    April 3, 2016
    Music

    Today in 1956, Elvis Presley appeared on ABC-TV’s “Milton Berle Show” live from the flight deck of the U.S.S. Hancock, moored off San Diego.

    An estimated one of every four Americans watched, probably making it ABC’s most watched show in its history to then, and probably for several years after that.

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for April 3
  • Presty the DJ for April 2

    April 2, 2016
    Music

    This must have been quite a concert at Shreveport Auditorium in Shreveport, La., today in 1955:

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for April 2
  • A shot and three goals

    April 1, 2016
    Badgers

    SB Nation reported on six potential candidates to be Wisconsin’s next hockey coach. Two were former Badgers, Mark Osiecki and Don Granato. The latter included this mention:

    Incidentally, his older brother Tony Granato has been suggested as a potential candidate by some. Tony’s resume is more impressive at the pro level–he’s been an NHL head coach–but he has no college or junior hockey coaching experience, and seems unlikely to leave the pro ranks.

    Andy Baggot writes about Wisconsin’s new hockey coaches:

    Tony Granato was at a crossroads in his life and the pathway before him was not well-lit.

    It was the spring of 2001 and Granato had just retired after an accomplished hockey career that saw him excel on the college, international and professional stages.

    Over the course of 18 years Granato went from being an acclaimed goal-scorer at Wisconsin to a Team USA fixture in international competition to playing 852 games in the NHL with three organizations. Along the way he became a Hall of Famer, an Olympian and a respected, award-winning all-star.

    But when Granato skated his final shift at age of 36, he was at a loss.

    “You’re done playing, the itineraries stop coming in and the practices and the workouts that are mandatory, you don’t have,” he said. “There’s no structure in your life and you’re just trying to figure out where you’re going to go and what you’re going to do.”

    Granato dabbled in radio and TV as a hockey analyst for a year, but it wasn’t fulfilling. He fretted about finding a fulfilling niche that would accommodate his family of five.

    “It was a transition period of confusion, I guess would be the right word,” Granato said. “Not really sure on whether I wanted to try something else. I was lucky enough to realize the passion that I have for the game of hockey — the love I have for the game of hockey — and that I had to find a way to stay around it.”

    That path of discovery has brought Granato full circle.

    Three decades since he played for UW — becoming one of two men in program history to amass 100 goals and 100 assists in his career — Granato is back as coach of the Badgers, and he brought some impressive reinforcements with him.

    Granato prepared for this assignment by coaching in three different NHL organizations — twice as the head coach in Colorado and subsequent assistant roles in Pittsburgh and Detroit — between 2002 and 2016.

    “I don’t think my heart ever left Madison or the Badger program,” he said. “It was always there with me that someday it would be great to go back. Someday it would be an opportunity — if it ever came along — where you always think in your mind, ‘Wow, wouldn’t that be special and a great place to go back to?’”

    The chance came earlier this month when UW Director of Athletics Barry Alvarez called Granato to get his thoughts on the state of the program. Alvarez had just dismissed Mike Eaves — another prominent, highly-regarded alum — after a 14-year coaching stint that included an NCAA title in 2006, but ended with consecutive losing seasons for the first time since 1995 to ’97.

    “I wanted to talk to some respected hockey people from our program from different eras,” Alvarez said. “People who were truly interested and cared and could give me a vision for what we needed.”

    Granato, whose younger brothers Don and Robbie and cousin Kevin also played for the Badgers, certainly fit that bill.

    Granato offered some familiar recommendations, including his brother, Don, a coach with the U.S. National Team Developmental Program; Mark Johnson, the legendary UW women’s coach; and Mark Osiecki, an assistant coach with Rockford of the American Hockey League.

    “All would be outstanding for different reasons,” Granato told Alvarez.

    The discussion, not to mention the search, soon changed course.

    “Every hockey guy I spoke to all said the same thing,” Alvarez said. “Tony’s the best guy, but you can’t get him because he’s an NHL guy.”

    Alvarez proceeded to ask Granato why he wouldn’t be interested.

    “I didn’t have an answer for him,” Granato said.

    That gave way to a tantalizing brainstorm: Granato told Alvarez that he’d like to see if his brother, his coaching confidant, and Osiecki, their close friend, would join him on staff.

    “You’re kidding me,” Alvarez replied.

    Pick your metaphor: Grand slam. Hat trick. Blockbuster. Mind-blower.

    “As we kept talking,” Alvarez said, “he got more excited and I got more excited, and we were able to pull it off.”

    Granato, 51, said that in order for him to take the job he needed to have the “right people beside me to go in there and have the best chance for success, and those two people were Donny and Mark.”

    Two phone calls later — Don, 48, is a renowned cerebral tactician and Osiecki, 47, is a peerless recruiter — an extraordinary coaching staff was born. Tony received a five-year contract, while his two associate head coaches received three-year deals.

    “I think he’s the right guy for it,” Don Granato said of his brother. “I think he deserves it.”

    Tony Granato has people skills that make him an ideal candidate to rally former players spread across three coaching eras — Bob Johnson, Jeff Sauer and Eaves — and seal large cracks in a fractured fan base.

    Wisconsin football coach Paul Chryst was a year behind Granato at UW, but they bonded recently while Chryst coach at Pittsburgh and Granato was an assistant coach with the Penguins from 2012 to ’14.

    “When you hear people say he’s a really good guy, he’s better than that,” Chryst said of Granato. “He’s got that ability to make you feel like you’re the most special person in the room. He’s got a gift that way.”

    In a roundabout way, Chryst, who returned to coach his alma mater in 2015 and guided UW to a 10-3 overall record, helped lure Granato back to Madison.

    “When he got the position to be the Badger coach again, we’d been in touch a lot,” Granato said. “He told me how wonderful it is to be back, how great it is to be back on campus and be part of the university. So he’s got me pumped up and excited for how it’s been for him.”

    While in Pittsburgh, Granato said he sat in on team meetings and walked the sidelines during games and practices to see how Chryst operated.

    “I have great respect for him as a coach,” Granato said. “I think what he is as a football coach is what I want to be as a hockey coach. He’s class. He’s a great human being.”

    Alvarez said he spoke earlier this week with Granato’s soon-to-be-ex-boss, Detroit general manager Ken Holland, and learned that whenever the Red Wings have played in Pittsburgh, former Penguins players huddle outside the dressing room, all waiting to see Granato.

    “What a message that sends me,” Alvarez said.

    Osiecki, who played against Granato in the NHL, describes his friend as “sincere” and “intense” with a strong sense of family.

    “He’s one of the most respected people I’ve seen in the NHL in our business,” Osiecki said.

    Granato, from Downers Grove, Illinois, was a second-team All-American for the Badgers in 1985 and ’87 who finished his 152-game college career with 100 goals and 120 assists. The only other member of the 100-100 club at UW is Johnson (125-131).

    Granato played for Team USA in the 1988 Winter Olympics in Calgary and spent 13 seasons in the NHL despite being average-sized (5-foot-10 and 185 pounds) and a sixth-round draft pick. He accounted for 264 goals and 535 points while playing for the New York Rangers, Los Angeles Kings and San Jose Sharks.

    Known for his rambunctious instincts, Granato still holds the Rangers rookie record for most goals, with 36, and was such a prolific finisher in Los Angeles that he skated on a line with the legendary Wayne Gretzky, assisting on the 2,000th point of the Great One’s career.

    Along the way, Granato played with UW products at every stop, including goaltender Mike Richter in New York, center Gary Shuchuk in Los Angeles and defenseman Gary Suter in San Jose.

    Granato credits Suter, who grew up in Madison and played for the Badgers from 1983 to ’85, with easing him through his post-retirement transition.

    “He was my mentor, my best friend, a person who kind of kept me sane from the chaos of not knowing which direction your life is going,” Granato said. “He kind of got me refocused on staying involved with the game.”

    The road to this moment actually began during Granato’s final season with the Sharks in 2000-01. That’s when he found his on-ice role being downsized and him being cast a guide for younger players like Marco Strum and Patrick Marleau.

    “That was the transition into coaching,” Granato said. “That’s where I knew it would be something I’d like.”

    Granato worked as the radio color commentator for Sharks games in 2001-02 and did some freelance work as a TV analyst, including at least one Badgers game.

    Then came a call from Pierre Lacroix, the general manager of the Colorado Avalanche who offered Granato a spot on coach Bob Hartley’s coaching staff for 2002-03.

    “I was blessed to get that call because I think that’s what got me to stay part of the game,” Granato said.

    The best part of that assignment and two subsequent stints as head coach of the Avalanche — 2002 to ’04 and ’08 to ’09 — was the stability it provided Granato’s wife, Linda, and their now-grown children Nicholas, Dominic, Michael and Gabriella.

    “To generally get a coaching position, you start in the minors, you work in a small city somewhere and you ride buses and you’re never home to take care of the kids and be part of their lives,” Granato said. “I didn’t want to chase it. I wanted to find something where I could be a dad and be in a position where I could stay and have my responsibility to the family as my priority.”

    Back when Granato played for the Badgers, the NCAA tournament consisted of eight teams, the first round was determined by a two-game, total-goal series and the matches were played on campus sites. Now it’s a 16-slot field and a single-elimination format on neutral sites.

    Since Granato played at UW three new leagues have come to life — including the Big Ten Conference where the Badgers reside — 17 schools have added Division I programs and six of them have reached the Frozen Four.

    Back when Granato played, it was somewhat unusual to see underclassmen leave college and sign pro contracts. Now it happens all the time, especially at schools like UW.

    Of course, the sprawling Wisconsin campus has changed, as well as rules of compliance and academics.

    “The dynamics that go along with college hockey have changed,” Granato acknowledged. “The one thing that hasn’t changed is the game.

    “The game is played and you’re successful when you find kids, student-athletes, that are passionate, that understand the excitement part of playing college hockey. We want to get an enthusiastic, passionate group back.”

    Granato will remain in his capacity with the Red Wings until their season ends, whenever that may be. Upon taking over at UW his top priority is to learn about the personnel on his young roster, the one that compiled an 8-19-8 overall record in 2015-16, as well as those who have signed National Letters of Intent for 2016-17.

    “I know there are pieces in place there that are outstanding,” he said.

    A close second on the priority list is reaching out to former Badgers players and getting them involved with the program.

    “I want them to feel part of it,” Granato said.

    In recent days Granato has communicated with Eaves, via text, and Johnson, via phone, to make sure the lines of communications are open. Back in 2002, Eaves was hired to coach the men’s program over Johnson, a former UW men’s assistant.

    Granato, who was inducted in the UW Athletic Hall of Fame in 2000, said his respect for Johnson runs deep. Granato was in his first go-round as an NHL head coach in Colorado when he asked Johnson to come and be an assistant. Johnson declined citing a reluctance to leave his fledgling women’s program, which has gone on to win four NCAA titles since 2006 and wins 82 percent of its games.

    “It’s important that he understood why I wanted to be a part of this,” Granato said of Johnson.

    “I told him I want to develop and build a program like he has on the women’s side. That’s what I want the men’s side to look at.”

    Granato has a deep appreciation for the women’s game. His sister, Cammi, helped Team USA to the Olympic gold medal in 1998 and has since been inducted in the Hockey Hall of Fame. Meanwhile, their niece, Baylee Wellhausen, is a sophomore winger for the Badgers.

    Alvarez, the former UW football coach, has been criticized for his perceived lack of involvement with men’s hockey over the years. Granato addressed that notion.

    “He’s been unbelievable in this whole process,” Granato said. “He reached out to me and said how much it means to him to get the program to an elite level. That’s all of our goals and expectations. That’s what we expect.

    “We’d like it to be alongside what Mark’s done with the women’s program. We want to be at that level. We want people banging on our doors to come to Wisconsin. We want to be respected like the women’s program is, like the football program is, like the men’s basketball program is. We want to be right there with them.”

    It is hard to imagine UW doing better than this. Given how many high school and junior hockey players want to play in the NHL, having a successful (as in more wins than losses) NHL coach recruiting you cannot be anything but an overwhelming positive. The added benefit is, as with the hires of Chryst and Greg Gard, the Granatos and Osiecki (all of whom were UW students when I was) know the UW environment and students you can and cannot recruit. And, as schools that recruit one-and-dones find out, if you bring in NHL-caliber players, that requires you to increase your talent level every year because those players often don’t stay all four years.

    One interesting thing about this hire is this the Badgers’ first hire with no connection to Badger Bob. Jeff Sauer, who replaced Bob Johnson as coach, was an assistant for Johnson before becoming Colorado College coach, from where (like Johnson) he came to UW. Sauer’s second year at UW was Tony Granato’s first, and Sauer recruited Don Granato and Osiecki, who starred on Sauer’s 1990 national champion team. (I got to see that Frozen Four in Detroit.) Tony Granato was chosen over, among other possible candidates, former Badger George Gwozdecky, formerly the Denver coach.

    It is not that UW should never hire coaches without Wisconsin connections, but the Gary Andersen experience demonstrates the perils of hiring someone with no connection to UW (which, unlike the bad old days, is now one of college sports’ premier programs — the Badgers were recently named the fifth best football–men’s basketball combination in Division I) and, as appeared to have been the case with Andersen, more optimism than warranted about being able to get athletes with subpar (by UW’s standards) academic records into UW.

    Granato could be described as UW’s answer to another Big Ten coach, Red Berenson, who played hockey for Michigan, went to the NHL, coached in the NHL and then went to his alma mater to coach. Granato won’t coach as long as Berenson at UW, since Berenson just completed his 32nd season, but if UW can match Berenson’s two NCAA championships and 11 Frozen Four appearances, I think Badger fans will be fine with that.

    It’s unfortunate that things turned out as they did for Eaves, who won one national championship, finished second another season, and remains UW’s all-time leading scorer. He was criticized for bringing in too many players who left early for the NHL, but when that stopped, the Badger talent level dropped. He had two bad seasons, and average nightly attendance dropped below 10,000, which I think is what ultimately got Eaves fired. Eaves suffered from the same thing as Sauer — neither is named Bob Johnson, and neither reached the success levels of Badger Bob in a totally different college hockey environment compared with when Badger Bob coached in Madison. (For one thing, getting to the Frozen Four in most of Johnson’s seasons required just winning the Western Collegiate Hockey Association tournament; only in Johnson’s last two seasons were there more than four NCAA tournament teams.)

    I’m not surprised Mark Johnson took the job. Johnson has quite a women’s program, and at the same time would inevitably be compared to his father if he moved over to the men’s program. Johnson could certainly coach men’s hockey (and did as an assistant), but the women’s game is not precisely the same as the men’s game. (There is no legal checking in women’s hockey.)

    Given that Don Granato and Osiecki were UW head coach candidates, I don’t know how long they’ll stay at UW to assist Tony Granato. I’m guessing UW will have no problem selling tickets this coming season.

     

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on A shot and three goals
  • It’s a good day to announce …

    April 1, 2016
    US politics

    … that you should write me in as a Libertarian or Republican for president on Tuesday, because …

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    2 comments on It’s a good day to announce …
  • Essential Chicago

    April 1, 2016
    Music

    Cleveland.com reports on Chicago’s upcoming (and grossly tardy) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction:

    Every Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Inductee has a handful of songs (or more) you can play that kill any doubt about their candidacy.

    Chicago’s career has spanned more than 40 years, driven by two golden periods – one of experimentation and another of pop/soft rock supremacy.

    Within that time were unforgettable songs fans will find themselves revisiting leading up to Chicago’s induction in New York City next week:

    ‘Beginnings’ (1969)

    Robert Lamm’s lyrics are untouchable here. But it’s important to note you’ll come across a few versions of “Beginnings.” The single version is trimmed down and highlights the band’s ability to craft a hit. However, the full-length album version (from Chicago’s debut) will leave you in awe.

    ’25 or 6 to 4′ (1970)

    If there’s a song that proves how talented of a rock band Chicago was at its peak, “25 or 6 to 4” is it. Not surprisingly, the song, which features Chicago’s guitar work at its best, has become a highlight of the band’s live shows.

    ‘Make Me Smile’ (1970)

    The James Pankow-penned “Make Me Smile” began as a section in the seven-part “Ballet for a Girl in Buchannon” from “Chicago II.”

    However, it was an immediate standout. The group wisely recognized “Make Me Smile’s” radio friendly nature. It earned Chicago a top-10 hit. The song is also a worthy tribute to the life of guitarist (and lead singer on the song) Terry Kath.

    ‘Saturday in the Park’ (1972)

    Chicago’s late career soft-rock run would earn the band its fair share of critics. But during the 1970s, Chicago was able to effortless merge is jazz fusion sound with infectious hooks. The best example of that is “Saturday in the Park,” the band’s most inescapable hit thanks to the amazing horn section of Walter Parazaider, Pankow and Lee Loughnane.

    ‘A Hit By Varese’ (1972)

    Some would argue this is Chicago’s big song (maybe beside the massive hits). “A Hit by Varese” is the greatest opening track of Chicago’s career (from its fifth album) and showcased the band’s transition to more simplistic songwriting. The jazz rock is still there, but this is the sound of a band refining its music and recognizing how big it was becoming.

    ‘If You Leave Me Now’ (1976)

    Say what you want about Chicago’s super-soft 1976 chart-topper, but you’re kidding yourself if you don’t think it’s a key contributor to the band’s fame and, thus, it’s Rock Hall induction. And while we’re being honest, Peter Cetera delivers, hands down, the best vocal performance of any Chicago song. There, I said it.

    Hard to Say I’m Sorry’ (1982)

    Chicago’s career can be divided into two parts. There was the jazz-fusion and heavy experimentation phase, followed by a soft-rock centric that began with the success of “If You Leave Me Now.” Still, heading into the 1980s, many had written Chicago off as a band that lived and probably died in the 1970s. “Hard to Say I’m Sorry” proved that was not the case. Yes, it highlights an era many early Chicago fans want to forget. But it also showcases Cetera and company’s ability to craft standout pop hits in a decade that had a lot of them.

    It’s hard to say the writer is wrong. (If you stop reading this now … oh, never mind.) If you’re looking for an introduction to the group, there’s always, well, “Introduction”:

    For musical versatility, it’s hard to top “I’m a Man”:

    Want a ballad? Want the Beach Boys?

    Need a sports sounder?

    Want a non-violent political song?

    For live performance, there’s “Free,” which is expanded considerably live from its album version …

    … particularly when you can play with another group known for its horns:

    This shows what’s impressive about Chicago beyond its nearly five decades of existence. The group perfomed everything from hard rock to, well, radio-friendly ballads, and is still recording and touring today.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Essential Chicago
  • Presty the DJ for April 1

    April 1, 2016
    Music

    Today is April Fool’s Day. Which John Lennon and Yoko Ono celebrated in 1970 by announcing they were having sex-change operations. (Which may not even be news anymore in the era of Chaz Bono and Bruce — I mean Caitlin — Jenner.)

    Today in 1972, the Mar y Sol festival began in Puerto Rico. The concert’s location simplified security — it was on an island accessible only by those with tickets.

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for April 1
Previous Page
1 … 632 633 634 635 636 … 1,035
Next Page

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog

The thoughts of a journalist/libertarian–conservative/Christian husband, father, Eagle Scout and aficionado of obscure rock music. Thoughts herein are only the author’s and not necessarily the opinions of his family, friends, neighbors, church members or past, present or future employers.

  • Steve
    • About, or, Who is this man?
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Adventures in ruralu0026nbsp;inkBack in June 2009, I was driving somewhere through a rural area. And for some reason, I had a flashback to two experiences in my career about that time of year many years ago. In 1988, eight days after graduating from the University of Wisconsin, I started work at the Grant County Herald Independent in Lancaster as a — well, the — reporter. Four years after that, on my 27th birthday, I purchased, with a business partner, the Tri-County Press in Cuba City, my first business venture. Both were experiences about which Wisconsin author Michael Perry might write. I thought about all this after reading a novel, The Deadline, written by a former newspaper editor and publisher. (Now who would write a novel about a weekly newspaper?) As a former newspaper owner, I picked at some of it — why finance a newspaper purchase through the bank if the seller is willing to finance it? Because the mean bank lender is a plot point! — and it is much more interesting than reality, but it is very well written, with a nicely twisting plot, and quite entertaining, again more so than reality. There is something about that first job out of college that makes you remember it perhaps more…
    • Adventures in radioI’ve been in the full-time work world half my life. For that same amount of time I’ve been broadcasting sports as a side interest, something I had wanted to since I started listening to games on radio and watching on TV, and then actually attending games. If you ask someone who’s worked in radio for some time about the late ’70s TV series “WKRP in Cincinnati,” most of them will tell you that, if anything, the series understated how wacky working in radio can be. Perhaps the funniest episode in the history of TV is the “WKRP” episode, based on a true story, about the fictional radio station’s Thanksgiving promotion — throwing live turkeys out of a helicopter under the mistaken belief that, in the words of WKRP owner Arthur Carlson, “As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.” [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST01bZJPuE0] I’ve never been involved in anything like that. I have announced games from the roofs of press boxes (once on a nice day, and once in 50-mph winds), from a Mississippi River bluff (more on that later), and from the front row of the second balcony of the University of Wisconsin Fieldhouse (great view, but not a place to go if…
    • “Good morning/afternoon/evening, ________ fans …”
    • My biggest storyEarlier this week, while looking for something else, I came upon some of my own work. (I’m going to write a blog someday called “Things I Found While Looking for Something Else.” This is not that blog.) The Grant County Sheriff’s Department, in the county where I used to live, has a tribute page to the two officers in county history who died in the line of duty. One is William Loud, a deputy marshal in Cassville, shot to death by two bank robbers in 1912. The other is Tom Reuter, a Grant County deputy sheriff who was shot to death at the end of his 4 p.m.-to-midnight shift March 18, 1990. Gregory Coulthard, then a 19-year-old farmhand, was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide and is serving a life sentence, with his first eligibility for parole on March 18, 2015, just 3½ years from now. I’ve written a lot over the years. I think this, from my first two years in the full-time journalism world, will go down as the story I remember the most. For journalists, big stories contain a paradox, which was pointed out in CBS-TV’s interview of Andy Rooney on his last “60 Minutes” Sunday. Morley Safer said something along the line…
  • Food and drink
    • The Roesch/Prestegard familyu0026nbsp;cookbookFrom the family cookbook(s) All the families I’m associated with love to eat, so it’s a good thing we enjoy cooking. The first out-of-my-house food memory I have is of my grandmother’s cooking for Christmas or other family occasions. According to my mother, my grandmother had a baked beans recipe that she would make for my mother. Unfortunately, the recipe seems to have  disappeared. Also unfortunately, my early days as a picky, though voluminous, eater meant I missed a lot of those recipes made from such wholesome ingredients as lard and meat fat. I particularly remember a couple of meals that involve my family. The day of Super Bowl XXXI, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and a group of their friends got together to share lots of food and cheer on the Packers to their first NFL title in 29 years. (After which Jannan and I drove to Lambeau Field in the snow,  but that’s another story.) Then, on Dec. 31, 1999, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and Jannan and I (along with Michael in utero) had a one-course-per-hour meal to appropriately end years beginning with the number 1. Unfortunately I can’t remember what we…
    • SkålI was the editor of Marketplace Magazine for 10 years. If I had to point to one thing that demonstrates improved quality of life since I came to Northeast Wisconsin in 1994, it would be … … the growth of breweries and  wineries in Northeast Wisconsin. The former of those two facts makes sense, given our heritage as a brewing state. The latter is less self-evident, since no one thinks of Wisconsin as having a good grape-growing climate. Some snobs claim that apple or cherry wines aren’t really wines at all. But one of the great facets of free enterprise is the opportunity to make your own choice of what food and drink to drink. (At least for now, though some wish to restrict our food and drink choices.) Wisconsin’s historically predominant ethnic group (and our family’s) is German. Our German ancestors did unfortunately bring large government and high taxes with them, but they also brought beer. Europeans brought wine with them, since they came from countries with poor-quality drinking water. Within 50 years of a wave of mid-19th-century German immigration, brewing had become the fifth largest industry in the U.S., according to Maureen Ogle, author of Ambitious Brew: The Story of American Beer. Beer and wine have…
  • Wheels
    • America’s sports carMy birthday in June dawned without a Chevrolet Corvette in front of my house. (The Corvette at the top of the page was featured at the 2007 Greater Milwaukee Auto Show. The copilot is my oldest son, Michael.) Which isn’t surprising. I have three young children, and I have a house with a one-car garage. (Then again, this would be more practical, though a blatant pluck-your-eyes-out violation of the Corvette ethos. Of course, so was this.) The reality is that I’m likely to be able to own a Corvette only if I get a visit from the Corvette Fairy, whose office is next door to the Easter Bunny. (I hope this isn’t foreshadowing: When I interviewed Dave Richter of Valley Corvette for a car enthusiast story in the late great Marketplace Magazine, he said that the most popular Corvette in most fans’ minds was a Corvette built during their days in high school. This would be a problem for me in that I graduated from high school in 1983, when no Corvette was built.) The Corvette is one of those cars whose existence may be difficult to understand within General Motors Corp. The Corvette is what is known as a “halo car,” a car that drives people into showrooms, even if…
    • Barges on fouru0026nbsp;wheelsI originally wrote this in September 2008.  At the Fox Cities Business Expo Tuesday, a Smart car was displayed at the United Way Fox Cities booth. I reported that I once owned a car into which trunk, I believe, the Smart could be placed, with the trunk lid shut. This is said car — a 1975 Chevrolet Caprice coupe (ours was dark red), whose doors are, I believe, longer than the entire Smart. The Caprice, built down Interstate 90 from us Madisonians in Janesville (a neighbor of ours who worked at the plant probably helped put it together) was the flagship of Chevy’s full-size fleet (which included the stripper Bel Air and middle-of-the-road Impala), featuring popular-for-the-time vinyl roofs, better sound insulation, an upgraded cloth interior, rear fender skirts and fancy Caprice badges. The Caprice was 18 feet 1 inch long and weighed 4,300 pounds. For comparison: The midsize Chevrolet of the ear was the Malibu, which was the same approximate size as the Caprice after its 1977 downsizing. The compact Chevrolet of the era was the Nova, which was 200 inches long — four inches longer than a current Cadillac STS. Wikipedia’s entry on the Caprice has this amusing sentence: “As fuel economy became a bigger priority among Americans…
    • Behind the wheel
    • Collecting only dust or rust
    • Coooooooooooupe!
    • Corvettes on the screen
    • The garage of misfit cars
    • 100 years (and one day) of our Chevrolets
    • They built Excitement, sort of, once in a while
    • A wagon by any otheru0026nbsp;nameFirst written in 2008. You will see more don’t-call-them-station-wagons as you drive today. Readers around my age have probably had some experience with a vehicle increasingly rare on the road — the station wagon. If you were a Boy Scout or Girl Scout, or were a member of some kind of youth athletic team, or had a large dog, or had relatives approximately your age, or had friends who needed to be transported somewhere, or had parents who occasionally had to haul (either in the back or in a trailer) more than what could be fit inside a car trunk, you (or, actually, your parents) were the target demographic for the station wagon. “Station wagons came to be like covered wagons — so much family activity happened in those cars,” said Tim Cleary, president of the American Station Wagon Owners Association, in Country Living magazine. Wagons “were used for everything from daily runs to the grocery store to long summer driving trips, and while many men and women might have wanted a fancier or sportier car, a station wagon was something they knew they needed for the family.” The “station wagon” originally was a vehicle with a covered seating area to take people between train stations…
    • Wheels on theu0026nbsp;screenBetween my former and current blogs, I wrote a lot about automobiles and TV and movies. Think of this post as killing two birds (Thunderbirds? Firebirds? Skylarks?) with one stone. Most movies and TV series view cars the same way most people view cars — as A-to-B transportation. (That’s not counting the movies or series where the car is the plot, like the haunted “Christine” or “Knight Rider” or the “Back to the Future” movies.) The philosophy here, of course, is that cars are not merely A-to-B transportation. Which disqualifies most police shows from what you’re about to read, even though I’ve watched more police video than anything else, because police cars are plain Jane vehicles. The highlight in a sense is in the beginning: The car chase in my favorite movie, “Bullitt,” featuring Steve McQueen’s 1968 Ford Mustang against the bad guys’ 1968 Dodge Charger: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMc2RdFuOxIu0026amp;fmt=18] One year before that (but I didn’t see this until we got Telemundo on cable a couple of years ago) was a movie called “Operación 67,” featuring (I kid you not) a masked professional wrestler, his unmasked sidekick, and some sort of secret agent plot. (Since I don’t know Spanish and it’s not…
    • While riding in my Cadillac …
  • Entertainments
    • Brass rocksThose who read my former blog last year at this time, or have read this blog over the past months, know that I am a big fan of the rock group Chicago. (Back when they were a rock group and not a singer of sappy ballads, that is.) Since rock music began from elements of country music, jazz and the blues, brass rock would seem a natural subgenre of rock music. A lot of ’50s musical acts had saxophone players, and some played with full orchestras … [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CPS-WuUKUE] … but it wasn’t until the more-or-less simultaneous appearances of Chicago and Blood Sweat u0026amp; Tears on the musical scene (both groups formed in 1967, both had their first charting singles in 1969, and they had the same producer) that the usual guitar/bass/keyboard/drum grouping was augmented by one or more trumpets, a sax player and a trombone player. While Chicago is my favorite group (but you knew that already), the first brass rock song I remember hearing was BSu0026amp;T’s “Spinning Wheel” — not in its original form, but on “Sesame Street,” accompanied by, yes, a giant spinning wheel. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi9sLkyhhlE] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxWSOuNsN20] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9U34uPjz-g] I remember liking Chicago’s “Just You ‘n Me” when it was released as a single, and…
    • Drive and Eat au0026nbsp;RockThe first UW home football game of each season also is the opener for the University of Wisconsin Marching Band, the world’s finest college marching band. (How the UW Band has not gotten the Sudler Trophy, which is to honor the country’s premier college marching bands, is beyond my comprehension.) I know this because I am an alumnus of the UW Band. I played five years (in the last rank of the band, Rank 25, motto: “Where Men Are Tall and Run-On Is Short”), marching in 39 football games at Camp Randall Stadium, the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Memorial Stadium at the University of Illinois (worst artificial turf I had ever seen), the University of Nevada–Las Vegas’ Sam Boyd Silver Bowl, the former Dyche Stadium at Northwestern University, five high school fields and, in my one bowl game, Legion Field in Birmingham, Ala., site of the 1984 Hall of Fame Bowl. The UW Band was, without question, the most memorable experience of my college days, and one of the most meaningful experiences of my lifetime. It was the most physical experience of my lifetime, to be sure. Fifteen minutes into my first Registration…
    • Keep on rockin’ in the freeu0026nbsp;worldOne of my first ambitions in communications was to be a radio disc jockey, and to possibly reach the level of the greats I used to listen to from WLS radio in Chicago, which used to be one of the great 50,000-watt AM rock stations of the country, back when they still existed. (Those who are aficionados of that time in music and radio history enjoyed a trip to that wayback machine when WLS a Memorial Day Big 89 Rewind, excerpts of which can be found on their Web site.) My vision was to be WLS’ afternoon DJ, playing the best in rock music between 2 and 6, which meant I wouldn’t have to get up before the crack of dawn to do the morning show, yet have my nights free to do whatever glamorous things big-city DJs did. Then I learned about the realities of radio — low pay, long hours, zero job security — and though I have dabbled in radio sports, I’ve pretty much cured myself of the idea of working in radio, even if, to quote WAPL’s Len Nelson, “You come to work every day just like everybody else does, but we’re playing rock ’n’ roll songs, we’re cuttin’ up.…
    • Monday on the flight line, not Saturday in the park
    • Music to drive by
    • The rock ofu0026nbsp;WisconsinWikipedia begins its item “Music of Wisconsin” thusly: Wisconsin was settled largely by European immigrants in the late 19th century. This immigration led to the popularization of galops, schottisches, waltzes, and, especially, polkas. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl7wCczgNUc] So when I first sought to write a blog piece about rock musicians from Wisconsin, that seemed like a forlorn venture. Turned out it wasn’t, because when I first wrote about rock musicians from Wisconsin, so many of them that I hadn’t mentioned came up in the first few days that I had to write a second blog entry fixing the omissions of the first. This list is about rock music, so it will not include, for instance, Milwaukee native and Ripon College graduate Al Jarreau, who in addition to having recorded a boatload of music for the jazz and adult contemporary/easy listening fan, also recorded the theme music for the ’80s TV series “Moonlighting.” Nor will it include Milwaukee native Eric Benet, who was for a while known more for his former wife, Halle Berry, than for his music, which includes four number one singles on the Ru0026amp;B charts, “Spend My Life with You” with Tamia, “Hurricane,” “Pretty Baby” and “You’re the Only One.” Nor will it include Wisconsin’s sizable contributions to big…
    • Steve TV: All Steve, All the Time
    • “Super Steve, Man of Action!”
    • Too much TV
    • The worst music of allu0026nbsp;timeThe rock group Jefferson Airplane titled its first greatest-hits compilation “The Worst of Jefferson Airplane.” Rolling Stone magazine was not being ironic when it polled its readers to decide the 10 worst songs of the 1990s. I’m not sure I agree with all of Rolling Stone’s list, but that shouldn’t be surprising; such lists are meant for debate, after all. To determine the “worst,” songs appropriate for the “Vinyl from Hell” segment that used to be on a Madison FM rock station, requires some criteria, which does not include mere overexposure (for instance, “Macarena,” the video of which I find amusing since it looks like two bankers are singing it). Before we go on: Blog posts like this one require multimedia, so if you find a song you hate on this blog, I apologize. These are also songs that I almost never listen to because my sound system has a zero-tolerance policy — if I’m listening to the radio or a CD and I hear a song I don’t like, it’s, to quote Bad Company, gone gone gone. My blonde wife won’t be happy to read that one of her favorite ’90s songs, 4 Non Blondes’ “What’s Up,” starts the list. (However,…
    • “You have the right to remain silent …”
  • Madison
    • Blasts from the Madison media past
    • Blasts from my Madison past
    • Blasts from our Madison past
    • What’s the matter with Madison?
    • Wisconsin – Madison = ?
  • Sports
    • Athletic aesthetics, or “cardinal” vs. “Big Red”
    • Choose your own announcer
    • La Follette state 1982 (u0022It was 30 years ago todayu0022)
    • The North Dakota–Wisconsin Hockey Fight of 1982
    • Packers vs. Brewers
  • Hall of Fame
    • The case(s) against teacher unions
    • The Class of 1983
    • A hairy subject, or face the face
    • It’s worse than you think
    • It’s worse than you think, 2010–11 edition
    • My favorite interview subject of all time
    • Oh look! Rural people!
    • Prestegard for president!
    • Unions vs. the facts, or Hiding in plain sight
    • When rhetoric goes too far
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
    • Join 198 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d