• Presty the DJ for March 10

    March 10, 2012
    Music

    Today in 1956, RCA records purchased a half-page ad in that week’s Billboard magazine claiming that Elvis Presley was …

    Ordinarily, if you have to tell someone something like that, the ad probably doesn’t measure up to the standards of accuracy. In this case, the hype was accurate.

    Today in 1960, Britain’s Record Retailer printed the country’s first Extended Play and LP chart. Number one on the EP chart:

    The number one single today in 1962:

    Today in 1964, Paul Simon and Art Garfunkel recorded “The Sounds of Silence” with just acoustic guitars.

    More than a year later, the song was released after producers added electric guitar, bass and drums without telling Simon and Garfunkel.

    The number one album today in 1967 was “More of the Monkees”:

    Today in 1973, Pink Floyd released “Dark Side of the Moon” in the U.S.

    It was on the U.S. album charts for 740 weeks over 14 years.

    The number one single today in 1979:

    The number one single today in 1984:

    Today in 2000, Chrissie Hynde of the Pretenders was arrested for leading an animal rights protest in front of a Manhattan Gap store.

    Birthdays begin with Dean Torrence of Jan and Dean:

    Tom Scholz played guitar for Boston:

    Bunny Debarge of Debarge:

    Gary Clark sang for Danny Wilson:

    Two Pearl Jam birthdays — bass player Jeff Ament and drummer Dave Krusen:

     

    Edie Brickell of the New Bohemians, wife of the aforementioned Simon:

    John Charles LeCompt played guitar for Evanescence:

    One death of note today in 1988: Andy Gibb:

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for March 10
  • In defense of springing ahead

    March 9, 2012
    Culture, History, US business, US politics

    These are the weekend plans at our house for the second weekend in March:
    Saturday: Run around the house moving clocks ahead one hour, after we figure out how to move the various clocks ahead. Try to synchronize the clocks with my cellphone because cellphone clocks are synchronized with the big atomic clock in Colorado.
    Sunday: Wake up one hour early (according to our bodies) for church. Move through the rest of the day similarly sleep-deprived.

    You may think from those previous four sentences that I oppose Daylight Saving Time. I do not, although I think the term is a misnomer. It should really be called Daylight Shifting Time, because we’re not really saving daylight; we’re moving an hour of sunlight from the morning to the evening.

    DST is a concept that goes back to Ben “Early to Bed and Early to Rise” Franklin, who wrote An Economical Project to argue (possibly facetiously) that sunlight before you awaken is wasted. My favorite Founding Father was nonetheless a hypocrite, as demonstrated by his account of a visit to Paris:

    An accidental sudden noise waked me about six in the morning, when I was surprised to find my room filled with light; and I imagined at first, that a number of those lamps had been brought into it; but, rubbing my eyes, I perceived the light came in at the windows. I got up and looked out to see what might be the occasion of it, when I saw the sun just rising above the horizon, from whence he poured his rays plentifully into my chamber, my domestic having negligently omitted, the preceding evening, to close the shutters.

    I looked at my watch, which goes very well, and found that it was but six o’clock; and still thinking it something extraordinary that the sun should rise so early, I looked into the almanac, where I found it to be the hour given for his rising on that day. I looked forward, too, and found he was to rise still earlier every day till towards the end of June; and that at no time in the year he retarded his rising so long as till eight o’clock. Your readers, who with me have never seen any signs of sunshine before noon, and seldom regard the astronomical part of the almanac, will be as much astonished as I was, when they hear of his rising so early; and especially when I assure them, that he gives light as soon as he rises. …

    Franklin calculated that shifting the clocks one hour ahead in the spring and summer would save 64.05 million pounds of candles, with a monetary conversion that he called …

    An immense sum! that the city of Paris might save every year, by the economy of using sunshine instead of candles. If it should be said, that people are apt to be obstinately attached to old customs, and that it will be difficult to induce them to rise before noon, consequently my discovery can be of little use; I answer, Nil desperandum. I believe all who have common sense, as soon as they have learnt from this paper that it is daylight when the sun rises, will contrive to rise with him …

    Whether Franklin was being serious or not, Franklin’s proposal ended up being adopted in most of the world. In fact, France and Spain do DST one better and move clocks ahead another hour in the summer, an initiative first done in Britain during World War II.

    Wisconsin is affected by two pieces of geographic reality, being in the eastern part of the Central Time Zone and the far northern part of the continental U.S, The farther east you are within a time zone, the earlier sunrise and sunset are, and the farther west you are, the later sunrise and sunset are. The farther north you are, the bigger spread there is between sunrise and sunset, which is most noticeable on the first days of summer (which has 15 hours 28 minutes of daylight here) and winter (which has 8 hours 55 minutes of daylight).

    Few things are as depressing in the workplace as the days after DST ends, when you leave the office and notice you’re driving home in the dark. Even worse is what follows, driving to and from work in the dark. In contrast, when I was making early morning trips to WFRV-TV to appear on their early morning news in the 6 a.m. hour, I got to see the sunrise. Sunrises are overrated.

    DST was promoted as an energy conservation initiative in 1975 during the first energy crisis. Winter DST meant that workers could go home when it was at least sort of light out, but schoolchildren would be getting on school buses in the dark, or so went the NBC Nightly News story I remember watching.

    The energy conservation benefits of DST are probably illusory. Having more evening daylight may reduce use of electricity for lighting, but that will be offset, depending on where you are, by more use of electricity for air conditioning.

    The social benefits of shifting an hour of daylight, however, are inarguable. Those who work long daylight hours can at least have the opportunity to enjoy some of  our too-brief summer during the evening. That would be less possible without DST. As the Washington Post’s Marc Fisher put it in 2009:

    Such concerns pale in the face of all the wonderful things that come with more light. Not only does the extra hour of sunshine put a smile on folks’ faces, as Rep. Edward Markey, Congress’s Mr. Daylight Time, likes to say, but the additional light is credited with saving energy, cutting crime and making roads safer.

    I’m just happy to have the extra time to take a family walk, play hoops or linger over drinks at an outdoor cafe. Adding an hour of sunlight at the end of the day is primarily a “lifestyle benefit,” [Seize the Daylight author David] Prerau says, but it’s mainly the promise of energy savings that got this bill passed in 2005. …

    Similarly, while bad guys are usually asleep in the early morning, dusk brings about prime time for crime. The extra light late in the day suppresses crime rates. A federal study of expanding daylight time in the ’70s found a drop in crime in the District [of Columbia] of about 10 percent when daylight time is in effect.

    (Well, the District of Columbia has a lot of experience with crime, inside various federal buildings and on the streets.)

    DST is more family-friendly because it matches sunlight with the hours when the parents are done with work and their children are done with school. For those who argue otherwise — that shifting daylight only makes children unhappy about getting up and unhappy about going to bed — my 12 years of parenting experience suggests that parents could set wake-up at noon, or set bedtime at midnight, and the kids would still be reluctant to get up or go to bed.  (The purpose of government is neither to validate your lifestyle choices nor to make parenting easier.)

    You may read opinion pieces this weekend, usually written from latitudes south of this one, condemning the twice-yearly shifting of our clocks. (If you read Fisher’s piece,  you can read as much DST opposition as you like as well.)

    Some opposition to DST would fit under what I’d call the Tyranny of the Early Riser. As anyone who knew me as a teenager can attest, I am not a happy early riser, and even today and even fortified with coffee I can barely function in the early a.m. How I functioned in first-hour (as in 8:10 a.m.) high school classes, or went to 8:25 or even 8:50 a.m.  classes at UW is beyond me. I never scheduled a 7:45 a.m. UW class, although I did have a couple of 7:45 a.m. exams.

    (This blog is an example of my antipathy toward mornings. Most of the writing on this blog is done at night. I had planned for this blog be posted Friday morning, then changed my mind and set it for Saturday morning intending to finish it Friday, only to discover as I was writing that it went live at the originally scheduled time, when it wasn’t really finished. So Friday morning Presteblog readers have had the chance to watch me write, whatever that means.)

    It is one thing to get up early because you have to go to work, or if your customers are a time zone or even a continent to the east. I have, however, never understood those who tout their own virtue of getting up at 5 a.m. It’s dark and cold at 5 a.m. Those who claim they get uninterrupted work done at that hour could also get uninterrupted work done six hours earlier.

    I’ve noticed over the years society succumbing to the Tyranny of the Early Risers too. High school varsity basketball games started at 8 p.m. when I was in high school. Then when I entered the weekly newspaper world, they were played at 7:45, then 7:30 p.m. Now, games around here start at 7:15 p.m. High school football games are now played one-half hour earlier than when I was watching my high school lose. Indiana basketball coach Bobby Knight pitched a fit when ESPN scheduled Big Ten basketball games Mondays at 9:30 p.m. Eastern, 8:30 p.m. Central during the late 1980s, saying that his players got back from games too late. (Those Monday games are now played Tuesdays at 7 Eastern, 6 Central.)

    Knight’s complaint had something to do with Indiana’s peculiar role in the DST-or-not argument. Most of Indiana is in the Eastern time zone, while northwest (the parts considered to be in Chicagoland) and southwest Indiana are in the Central time zone. Indiana originally was in the Central time zone when time zones were legislated in 1918, but about two-thirds of Indiana (including around Indianapolis) moved to Eastern time in 1961. Most of the Central time zone parts of Indiana moved to Eastern time — some without asking the U.S. Department of Transportation, which, believe it or don’t, has federal time zone authority — between 1967 and 2006.

    More confusing in all this is the fact that after DST  became federal law in 1966, some of Indiana observed DST — the Central time parts and the parts of Indiana opposite Cincinnati and Louisville — but most of the state did not. So in the summers between 1967 and 2006, Indiana officially three time zones — Central Daylight Time, Eastern Standard Time and Eastern Daylight Time — though EST and CDT are the same time. Indiana adopted DST in 2006, with most of the state in Eastern time, although the Central Time Coalition wants to move go back to the time zone it would argue Indiana geographically belongs in.

    (If this confuses you, consider that 1978’s The American Atlas identified 345 different geographical areas of Indiana, each with a different time zone history. I went to Arizona late last March, and it wasn’t until I got there that I could figure out its time zone — Mountain Standard Time, the same as Pacific Daylight Time, one hour behind Wisconsin today but two hours behind on Sunday. Well, that is, except for the Navajo Reservation, which does observe DST because its borders include parts of New Mexico and Utah. My flight from Phoenix through Denver to Chicago took me from MST into MDT into CDT.)

    There are those who condemn changing “God’s time,” which is illogical if you take the concept very far. Getting up when the sun rises and going to bed when the sun sets, whenever that is, got shelved a couple hundred years ago. Today’s world of business and an international customer base arguably blows up the concept of time zones, period, but one should be careful how far you take that argument. The argument of the time costs of changing clocks ahead and back holds little water when computers, cellphones and other newer electronic devices are capable of changing their internal clocks on their own.

    Fisher liked the idea of double DST, or as an alternative permanently shifting time zones one hour ahead. I don’t know how likely that is (I’d be fine with the latter, and maybe the former too), but Congress must have been listening to its constituents about something given that DST started from late April to late October, then went from early April to late October, and now goes from the second weekend of March to the second weekend of November. There is some language irony in the fact that “standard” time is now half as long as non-standard time. People like their long(er) summer nights.

    The DST-vs.-Standard Time argument will continue because of the aforementioned geographic challenges of this continent, not to mention expanding international business. In a perfect world, we’d all work when we wanted to work, regardless of what the clock says. But as long as schools and retail stores exist, at a minimum, the early risers and the night owls will still be arguing over when they want their daylight.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    5 comments on In defense of springing ahead
  • The Big Ten bore

    March 9, 2012
    Sports

    The Big Ten and other major Division I conferences are holding their men’s basketball tournaments this weekend. (If you flip through your channels and you see something other than college basketball, something is wrong with your TV.)

    If you watch the Big Ten tournament in Indianapolis (quarterfinals today, including Wisconsin vs. Indiana at 1:25 p.m.) on the Big Ten Network, and semifinals Saturday and the final Sunday on CBS), you’ll discover what the Wall Street Journal’s Ben Cohen discovered:

    Of the 32 conferences that play Division I basketball, the Big Ten has either been the slowest or second-slowest in seven of the last eight years (in conference games) according to kenpom.com, a statistics website. For the entire regular season, the Big Ten is even slower than the Ivy League, which plays as if peach baskets were still in use. …
    Somewhere along the line, everything changed. The famed “Hurrying” Hoosiers of the 1940s and those outrageous scoring machines of the ’60s melted into the same kind of three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust mentality that has long defined the conference’s less-than-flashy football teams. “I wish I had some answer,” said Dan Dakich, a former Indiana player and interim coach who is now an ESPN analyst. “I don’t.”

    Cohen suggests it’s because of — or, depending on your perspective, the fault of — Dakich’s college coach, Bobby Knight, who focused on defense first. Cohen interviewed former Purdue coach Gene Keady, who said of his former archrival, “When certain coaching styles are winning, we emulate them. He changed the formula.”

    It’s probably better to blame Knight than Clintonville’s and Ripon College’s own Dick Bennett, who didn’t start coaching in the Big Ten until the mid-1990s. Before Bennett came to Madison, he coached at UW–Stevens Point and UW–Green Bay. Lacking access to great athletic talent, he recruited locally and focused on defense. (How much did Bennett focus on defense? He would tell his players on the floor that if they were gassed to rest on offense.) Bennett brought that style of basketball from Green Bay to Madison, which culminated in the Badgers’ 2000 Final Four team.

    Another example is Wisconsin coach Bo Ryan, whose first UW paychecks were for serving as an assistant coach for Bill Cofield in the late ’70s and Steve Yoder in the early ’80s. Ryan’s first UW–Platteville teams were known, believe it or not, for playing up-tempo basketball — his first UWP teams would bring in five players at a time. The term “up-tempo” describes nothing about UW basketball today.

    (Here’s a thought to make you wonder: UW fired Cofield after the 1981–82 season. Ridgeway native Tom Davis, who played at UW–Platteville and got his master’s degree at UW–Madison, was the basketball coach at Boston College. In five seasons, the Eagles won 100 games and earned two NCAA tournament berths and one National Invitational Tournament berth. He was known for pressure defense and necessarily playing a lot of players. But instead of hiring Davis, UW hired UW–Eau Claire coach Ken Anderson, then after Anderson quit three days after taking the job, hired Yoder, then the Ball State coach. Davis went to Stanford, then to Iowa, where his teams played in nine NCAA tournaments and two NITs in 13 seasons, usually beating UW like a drum in the process.)

    The problem is that other coaches in Wisconsin and farther turned Bennett’s necessity into a virtue, as if teams giving up fewer points showed them to be better coaches than teams scoring more points — as if losing 40–36 was preferable to losing 60–54, or 80–72. (The halftime score of Wisconsin’s last 2000 game, the Final Four semifinal against Michigan State: MSU 19, Wisconsin 17.)

    Why is this a problem? It’s not merely because I prefer watching a style of play closer to Grinnell’s Flying Circus than plod-and-pound. For the non-participants in the games, sports is entertainment. That means your favorite basketball team competes with every other potential entertainment or recreational activity for the disposable income dollar.

    Intercollegiate athletics at the Division I level has become an increasingly expensive operation. Since most college sports don’t make money for their colleges, the revenues generated by football and men’s basketball (along with women’s basketball in some schools and men’s hockey in others, including Wisconsin) have to fund all the colleges’ other sports. That’s why tickets cost as much as they cost (to which can be added the mandatory–voluntary contribution to keep said prime tickets), and sports stadiums have become two- or three-hour marketing opportunities as much as venues for the games. Fans who don’t go to games don’t spend money at the games.

    Fans prefer winning first and foremost, of course. Since two  teams play, each game features a winner and a loser. There are relatively speaking fewer sports purist who appreciate moving without the basketball, boxing out for rebounds, and free throw shooting as there are fans who want to be entertained, preferably with winning basketball. (The way to guarantee high attendance, I suppose, is for basketball officials to do everything they can to assure that the home team wins.) Teams that neither win nor play an entertaining style draw what Madison TV sports anchor Jay Wilson used to call the “Faithful 5,000” — the four-digit attendance numbers for UW basketball games in the 1980s.

    The National Football League figured this out when it changed rules to promote passing in 1978, and then several times thereafter. The Packers’ 2011 regular season was a microcosm of what the NFL wants to see, and apparently what fans want to see given NFL TV ratings. The more-points-are-better approach has filtered down into college football as well, as demonstrated by the past two UW seasons.

    As recently as the late 1970s, the three-point shot was a goofy idea from the late American Basketball Association. As recently as the early 1980s, shot clocks were something found only in the National Basketball Association. (For one season in the 1980s, the National Collegiate Athletic Association allowed conferences to set their own shot-clock and three-point-shot rules, which was bizarre to watch to say the least.)

    The 45-second shot clock and the 20-foot three-point-shot were instituted to promote more scoring, or so the NCAA thought. The irony is that the season with the highest per-game scoring average, 77.2 points per game per team, was in 1972, when college basketball had neither three-point shots nor shot clocks. In contrast, teams have not exceeded even 70 points per game in the past eight seasons. That shows that teams eventually adjust to the new set of rules.

    It also makes those who watch more than a few games a year wonder what has happened to basic basketball skills. The theory of the three is that a team that hits a third of its three-point shots will have the same offensive output as a team that hits half of its shots inside the arc. A team that did nothing but shoot threes and went for fast-break layups would theoretically combine the shot with the biggest bang for the buck with the highest-percentage shot. (Teams that drive to the basket go to the free throw line more often.) The irony of the three-point shot is that it has led to fewer mid-range shots — 10 to 15 feet or so. The bigger irony is that the three-point shot and the shot clock has not led to more offense.

    Cohen reports that the NCAA basketball rules committee is considering further tinkering with the rules: “Notre Dame coach Mike Brey, the committee’s chairman until this year, said there’s been discussion of experimenting with a wider lane and shorter shot clock.”

    One way to increase scoring would be for referees to actually call the game as its creators intended. All you need do is look at a tape from the 1980s or earlier to see the difference in what contact is now allowed. Michigan State is famous for using football pads to beat on its players during practice. Basketball isn’t supposed to be a contact sport, but watch what happens under the basket, and you’ll see that Big Ten games are more like football — or, in the case of the Spartans, muggings — than basketball.

    Calling the game as its creators intended would lead to sharply higher foul counts and much longer games, at least at first. It wouldn’t necessarily lead to much more scoring given the continuing free throw shooting slide. But eventually coaches and players would adjust, and the game would be played as it was intended to be played.

    The Big Ten’s slowness of pace  may help explain why the Big Ten hasn’t been successful in the NCAA tournament for several years. The Atlantic Coast Conference actually plays basketball. No one would consider Duke or North Carolina to be run-at-all-costs no-defense teams, and yet games involving the Blue Devils and Tar Heels actually approximate the way basketball is supposed to be played. Speed usually overcomes brute force.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    3 comments on The Big Ten bore
  • Presty the DJ for March 9

    March 9, 2012
    Music

    Today in 1963, the Beatles appeared in a concert at the East Ham Granada in London … as third billing after Tommy Roe and Chris Montez.

    Today in 1964, Capitol Records released the Four Preps’ “Letter to the Beatles.”

    The song started at number 85. And then Capitol withdrew the song to avoid a lawsuit because the song included a bit of “I Want to Hold Your Hand.”

    The number one British album today in 1968 was Bob Dylan’s “John Wesley Harding”:

    To prove that popularity does not always equal quality, I present the number one single today in 1975:

    The number one British single today in 1985:

    The number one  British single today in 1991 was recorded nine years earlier, but returned to popularity after its use in a Levi’s TV commercial:

    The number one British album today in 1991 was Chris Rea’s “Auberge”:

    Today in 2004, Tom Jones was banned from wearing tight leather pants by his son and manager, Mark, who said it was time for his 63-year-old father to dress his age.

    Birthdays begin with Lloyd Price:

    Mickey Gilley:

    Mark Lindsay of Paul Revere and the Raiders:

    Ron Wilson played drums for the Surfaris:

    Robin Trower played guitar for Procol Harum:

    Chris Thompson sang for Manfred Mann’s Earth Band:

    Jimmy Fadden of the Nitty Gritty Dirt Band:

    Frank Rodriguez of ? and the Mysterians:

    Martin Fry of ABC:

    Two deaths of note today: Danny Joe Brown, lead singer of Molly Hatchet, in 2005 …

    … and Brad Delp, lead singer of Boston, in 2007:

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for March 9
  • Not enough

    March 8, 2012
    Wisconsin business, Wisconsin politics

    According to IBWisconsin blogger David Blaska:

    Wisconsin politicos in both parties will be on red alert this Thursday when January’s job numbers for Wisconsin are announced. [Gov. Scott] Walker and the Republicans pray they’ll be big numbers and, more importantly, black numbers. Democrats and employee unions will be secretly hoping they’ll be red numbers. …

    Here’s my prediction: Thursday will bump Wisconsin UP another 18,000 jobs. Just an intuition. That’s one press release. If not, the second press release asks where is The Kathleen’s job-creation plan? Higher taxes across the board?

    Walker could rightly blame the continuous political turmoil. You’re a small- to medium-sized employer in Illinois thinking about expanding in Wisconsin. Who is going to be governor in six months: Scott Walker or Michael Moore?

    This is being posted before, I think, the job numbers are released. It was written before the job numbers are released.

    Whatever the January job numbers are, they won’t be enough. Not because of Walker’s 250,000 job numbers pledge. And not because of the previous months’ job numbers, although the previous months’ job numbers (some of which were inaccurate as originally reported) are symptomatic.

    The reason the job numbers won’t be enough is because the Legislature has not done nearly enough to promote business, which leads to private-sector jobs, the 34.9 percent of the population who pay for 100 percent of what government does.

    The most recent example of the Legislature’s failures on the job front is the failure to pass the mining bill, which would have led Gogebic Taconite to invest $1.5 billion in a new taconite mine, which would have created 800 union jobs and an estimated thousands of other jobs. Badger Blogger assesses the blame:

    Not only are Dale Schultz, and Sen. Bob Jauch, the representative for the district that would have directly benefited from the mine, but think of all of the Southeastern Wisconsin democratic senators that have constituents that work for the two largest mining equipment manufacturers in the world, Joy Global (P&H) and the former Bucyrus, now owned by Caterpillar. Their workers would have benefited greatly from a new Wisconsin mine. So a large part of the blame for this has to fall on people like Tim Carpenter, Lena Taylor & Chris Larson, who voted against their unionized constituents that work for these and many other companies. This vote proves that they are more concerned about delivering Scott Walker some sort of perceived loss, than they are about thousands of great paying jobs for Wisconsinites.

    The failure of the mining bill demonstrates the mindset that appears to be cemented among our elected officials — that no business that is not willing to jump through every government-created hoop is worthy of Wisconsin. (Given the fact that unions were supporting the mining bill, I guess that shows where Democrats are on the question of jobs.) I have yet to hear the ridiculous claim (currently being made by Obama misadministration officials) that overregulation creates jobs, but I assume that’s on the news release list from the Kathleen Falk campaign.

    Walker’s recall campaign commercials tout the government employee collective bargaining reforms that, he says, saved government jobs. (As if that’s a good thing.) Govzilla the regulatory monster will not be defanged until the government employee workforce is cut substantially — just to use a nice round number, let’s say 10,000 jobs, about one-fourth of the state workforce — in addition to changing much of state law. (For instance, open shop legislation.)

    How can I assert that the way to create jobs is to cut government jobs? The answer should be obvious. The only jobs that count are private-sector jobs. Let me repeat and emphasize: The only jobs that count are private-sector jobs. Private-sector jobs are the only jobs that inject money into the economy without taking money out of the economy. If all jobs were created equal, then the government could solve the unemployment problem by simply hiring every unemployed person and assign half to digging holes and the other half to filling in the holes.

    When government actually costs less, instead of just limiting the increases as the Walker administration has done, businesses will have more money to pay employees, invest in their business, or pay dividends to their owners. Any of those is a better use of business profits than paying taxes.

    The only thing that’s been done to improve the business climate is the dumping of the Department of Commerce in favor of the new Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. But the jury is out on whether WEDC is doing its job of promoting the state as a place to do business less than a year into its existence. Improving the state’s finances is a necessary but insufficient step by itself.

    That’s because one big negative remains our tax climate. The Tax Foundation reported that Wisconsin ranked fourth in business taxes for new businesses, but 35th for established businesses. Fourth is more like it, but the fact that Wisconsin’s startup and incorporation numbers remain bad, apparently that approach hasn’t been working for a long time. And there are many more business that are subject to the 35th-place ranking than the fourth-place ranking. The Tax Foundation also ranks Wisconsin 43rd in its 2012 State Business Tax Climate Index, which includes corporate taxes, personal income taxes (which affect not just executive salaries, but subchapter-S corporations), sales taxes, unemployment insurance taxes and property taxes. Since we know that businesses make location and expansion decisions based on how much they’ll pay in taxes, until Wisconsin ranks closer to the top than eighth from the bottom, we are unlikely to see improvements in the state’s economy.

    The state also needs to be honest for a change and admit two other things. First, we are not getting anywhere close to our money’s worth from the billions of dollars the state spends on education. Despite taxpayers’ paying for 13 four-year UW schools, 13 UW two-year schools, 16 technical colleges and more than 400 K–12 school districts, our state’s economy has been lagging for decades. (To be specific, per capita personal income growth has trailed the national average since I was in middle school.)

    Second, it should be obvious that the state’s quality of life (which is because of the state’s geography and people and has nothing to do with government) is of nearly no value in attracting business to come to this state. If our quality of life was as good as Wisconsinites claim, the resulting inmigration of population and resulting business and job creation to serve all those residents would place Wisconsin at the top of all those business climate comparisons, instead of sometimes in the middle and more often toward the bottom.

    Blaska asked the question of what Falk (and by extension any other Democrat) will come up with for their jobs plan. One can assume whatever Democrats come up with will parrot the approach of Gov. James Doyle, which was to promote exports and throw tax-break goodies only at favored businesses (for instance, green companies), and to hell with everyone else. Add up all of Walker’s job numbers since he took office in January 2011 (and if Blaska is right, they’ll be on the plus side), and they will dwarf Doyle’s 2009, when the state lost 90,000 jobs.

    If the Legislature was doing its job, it would pay attention to the state’s business climate rankings, which have gone from horrible under Doyle to between horrible and mediocre under Walker, and do something about them. Now.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Not enough
  • Presty the DJ for March 8

    March 8, 2012
    Music

    Today in 1965, Bob Dylan’s “Subterranean Homesick Blues” was released. Other than the run-on nature of the lyrics, the song was one of the first to have an accompanying “promo film,” now known as a “music video”:

    Today in 1971, Radio Hanoi played the Star Spangled Banner, presumably not as a compliment:

    Today in 1973, Paul McCartney was fined £100 for growing marijuana at his farm in Campbelltown, Scotland.

    McCartney’s excuse was that he didn’t know the seeds he claimed to have been given would actually grow.

    The number one single today in 1975:

    Today in  2003, Mark Knopfler, formerly of Dire Straits, discovered that in a conflict between his Honda motorcycle and a Fiat Punto, the bike loses — or, more accurately, the bike and its rider lose.

    Birthdays begin with Ralph Ellis of the Swinging Blue Jeans:

    Andrew Semple of the Fortunes:

    Michael “Mickey” Dolenz of the Monkees:

    Songwriter Carole Bayer Sager:

    Randy Meisner played guitar for the Eagles:

    Mike Allsup played guitar for Three Dog Night:

    Mel Galley played guitar for Whitesnake:

    Clive Burr played drums for Iron Maiden:

    Gary Numan:

    Richard Darbyshire of Living in a Box:

    Peter Gill played drums for Frankie Goes to Hollywood:

    Tom Chaplin of Keane:

    Today in 1973, Ron “Pigpen” McKernen, keyboard player for the Grateful Dead, really was dead.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for March 8
  • The radical concept of fiscal responsibility

    March 7, 2012
    Wisconsin politics

    The Wisconsin Policy Research Institute’s George Lightbourn thinks a new era may have dawned in Wisconsin politics:

    Over the past year in Madison, the psychology of government is changed.  No, it’s not because of changes to collective bargaining or recalls. The change is that for the first time in a long time, competence and fortitude have value.

    For years, the snide undercurrent running through the State Capitol was a belief that the citizens weren’t really up to the task of understanding the state budget.  Why else would our elected leaders so consistently approve budgets that they knew were unbalanced? The press conferences where governors of both parties signed the rivers of red ink into law were scenes where there was more winking going on than a Saturday night in Amsterdam. …

    Leading up to the last election for governor, our pollster asked if the public thought the elected leaders in Madison were, “capable of solving the state budget deficit.” Only 23% said they did. 59% of those same citizens told our pollster that they saw the state budget as a big problem.

    What a disconnect. It’s not often that you can actually measure public cynicism, but that is exactly what that poll did. It is ironic that the cause for the cynicism was the very political leaders who were counting on the public on being too dim to understand what was really going on in the budget?

    Now, after Governor Walker and the Legislature have rather famously – some would say infamously – balanced the state budget, how is the public feeling?  We asked about that last October when 41% of the public said that they actually thought the budget – a budget that included numerous cuts – would actually improve the future quality of life in Wisconsin.  This level of approval is surprising given that most people – even Republicans – tend to get weak in the knees when it comes to spending cuts.

    Even more telling was the most recent Marquette Law School poll. Charles Franklin, who runs the poll, took a different approach to testing public sentiment around Walker’s austere budget. Franklin found that fully 71% of Wisconsin adults feel that the middle class in the state, “won’t catch a break unless we get state spending under control.”  In that same February poll, 38% of the respondents said that Walker’s budget would reduce the chance that we have budget deficits in the future.  Only 25% disagreed with that sentiment.

    So have we entered a period where nerdy, wonkish budgeting is fashionable?  I think yes.

    I guess I’ll agree with Lightbourn when I see the results of Recallarama Part Deux and then the legitimate November elections. I’ll also be more convinced that Republicans have seen the fiscal responsibility light when they pass legislation to officially correctly measure state spending by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles instead of on a cash basis, as well as when spending and tax controls are added to the state Constitution.

    I’m not going to waste my time suggesting that state Democrats see the fiscal responsibility light, even though they should. Apparently the party is collectively too dense to figure out that while a significant number of voters may oppose the way that Walker balanced (on a cash basis) the 2011–13 state budget and fixed his predecessor’s deficit in the 2009–11 budget, going back to the way things were will be neither good for the state nor a winner with unattached voters. A Bill Clintonesque Third Way candidate might win a recall election, but if not, would be a frontrunner for the 2014 gubernatorial election.

    Proof of the ineffectiveness of the bend-over-for-the-government-unions-strategy is that, according to Rasmussen Reports, opponents of Walker’s recall now have an 11-point margin over supporters of his recall. Most distressing for Democrats is that according to Rasmussen, 58 percent of unaffiliated voters oppose Walker’s recall.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The radical concept of fiscal responsibility
  • A message for Wisconsin CEOs who want to count

    March 7, 2012
    Wisconsin business

    The Nicolet Bank Business Pulse has measured the opinions (the “pulse” if you will) of business owners for several years.

    The Business Pulse is now expanding statewide. In addition to the 498 participants in the regional Pulses, another 134 business owners and CEOs are participating in the statewide Business Pulse.

    Anyone who has read my opinions since 1994 (with the seven-year break from mid-2001 to early 2008) knows how I feel about the importance of Wisconsin business to Wisconsin. William F. Buckley Jr. once said if the choice was to be governed by the faculty of Harvard University or an equivalent number of names at the beginning of the Boston telephone book, he’d choose the latter. (I don’t think the fact he was a Yale graduate had anything to do with that.)

    My corollary is that I’d rather be governed by the members of any chamber of commerce in this state, even Madison’s, than any equivalent number of state legislators, regardless of party. Compare the net positive impacts of business people to politicians; business people win by such a large margin that you can’t count that high. Compare the net positive impacts of business to labor unions, and the margin is larger. All that business does is pay people in salaries and employee benefits, provide products and services for their customers, purchase products and services from other businesses, and contribute, financially and otherwise, to the communities in which they have facilities.

    Those who survey and poll as their livelihood will tell you that the larger the sample size, the better. So if you’re the ultimate decision-maker in a business, you can have your opinions counted (and find out the opinions of your peers) by signing up at http://stnorbert.us2.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_5q1oWxytxh7j55O. You can also pass on this item to your CEO/business owner/entrepreneur/person-who-makes-the-state’s-economy-go-and-contributes-positively-to-our-quality-of-life friends so they also can participate.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    1 comment on A message for Wisconsin CEOs who want to count
  • Presty the DJ for March 7

    March 7, 2012
    Music

    Today in 1962, the Beatles recorded their first radio appearance, on the BBC’s “Teenagers’ Turn — Here We Go”:

    Proving that there is no accounting for taste, I present Britain’s number one single today in 1970:

    The number one single over here today in 1970 was by an act that had already broken up:

    Today in 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Luther R. Campbell aka Luke Skyywalker, et al., Petitioners v. Acuff-Rose Music, Incorporated. Campbell and the rest of 2 Live Crew took Roy Orbison’s “Oh Pretty Woman” …

    … and turned it into 2 Live Crew’s “Pretty Woman”:

    Since 2 Live Crew hadn’t gotten Acuff–Rose’s permission (though they had asked), Acuff–Rose sued Campbell et al. The Supremes upheld the original U.S. District Court decision that parodies may be protected fair use under Chapter 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.

    Birthdays begin with Chris White, who played bass for the Zombies:

    Matthew Fisher played keyboards for Procol Harum:

    Peter Wolf sang for the J. Geils Band:

    Ernie Isley of the Isley Brothers:

    Matt Frenette played drums for Loverboy:

    One death of note today in 1988: Gordon Huntley, pedal steel guitarist of Matthews Southern Comfort:

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for March 7
  • Politically incorrect nuance

    March 6, 2012
    Culture, US politics

    Last week’s kerfuffle over Rush Limbaugh’s comments about the Georgetown University law school student who opposes the Roman Catholic Church’s position on birth control (got all that?) got me thinking a few slightly subversive thoughts.

    The controversy contains enough red herrings for hors d’oeuvres before a winter dinner. The student called out by Limbaugh (whose choice of language succeeded in obscuring Limbaugh’s larger point about whether an organization that believes birth control to be immoral should be forced to supply birth control to anyone) was no early-20s naif who spoke before thinking of the consequences, but a 30-year-old woman who has a long history of advocating for her definition of women’s rights. The stated $3,000 figure also suggests a level of, shall we say, social activity about which novels are written, or a failure to look for the lowest price.

    This tempest and the Obama administration’s current war on Catholic conscience are an inadvertent argument against employer-provided health insurance. Those who believe that life begins at conception (the official position of the Roman Catholic Church) should oppose forms of birth control that terminate a pregnancy after conception by, for instance, preventing implantation of the fetus in a woman’s uterine wall. (Which includes such birth control methods as the Pill, intrauterine devices, the Ortho-Evra patch, and Depo-Provera or Lunelle injections.) Why should an employer be forced to provide (which means pay for) coverage for medical procedures or treatments that the employer believes to be immoral?

    (If you are honest, you have to admit that any answer besides “the employer shouldn’t have to,” whether the medical procedure or treatment in question is birth control, Viagra, cosmetic surgery, hair-loss treatment or anything else indicates disrespect for morals different from yours. Here’s another example of disrespect for morals different from the writer’s.)

    It’s not clear that access to a woman’s preferred form of birth control paid for by someone else counts as a fundamental human right. (Nor the “right” to its precursor, consequence-free sexual activity.) On the other hand, policy decisions do have consequences, including unintended consequences. Answer this multiple choice question: If forced to choose one of these three choices, you would prefer:

    1. Paying for birth control for those who can’t afford to buy it.
    2. Paying for abortions for those who can’t afford to pay for their abortion.
    3. Paying for various welfare programs for single mothers who don’t have access to options 1 and 2.

    Viewed strictly fiscally, given the failure rates of various forms of birth control, option 2 probably would cost less than option 1, and either 1 or 2 would certainly cost less — not just fiscally, but in terms of the growth of various social pathologies — than option 3.

    (One of the more interesting side points of view in all this is the suggestion advanced by libertarian Virginia Postrel to make the Pill an over-the-counter medication as opposed to available only by prescription. The counterargument is that without medical advice, Pill use is likely to be less effective. The countercounterargument is that, based on comments about Postrel’s proposal, doctors may not be especially thorough telling their patients about what to do and not do on the Pill.)

    Do you think what you’ve read so far is heretical? Well, since we’ve gotten abortion into this, here’s more heresy: Neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party really want to change current abortion law, because the abortion issue is a useful tool to generate votes and campaign donations. My evidence is that, between 2001 and 2006 (except for part of 2002 when New Hampshire Sen. Jim Jeffords changed sides), a Republican was in the White House and Republicans controlled both houses of Congress. And no serious attempt was made to pass a law or a constitutional amendment that would have invalidated the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. Moreover, from 1977 to 1980, in 1993 and 1994, and in 2008 and 2009, a Democrat was in the White House and Democrats controlled both houses of Congress. And no serious attempt was made to write a law paralleling Roe v. Wade’s provisions to legalize abortion rights as permanently as possible in this republic.

    Since Roe v. Wade, opinion polls have consistently shown that a majority of Americans have, well, nuanced positions about abortion rights. (By Roe v. Wade, abortion was already legal in several states, including California, signed into law by Gov. Ronald Reagan.) Polls have shown consistent majority support for first-trimester abortion rights, as well as abortion rights in case of pregnancies caused by rape or incest, or pregnancies that threaten the life or health of the mother. A majority of Americans also have consistently supported parental notification and waiting period requirements, and oppose government funding of abortions.

    To suggest that this issue is going to cause lingering damage to the GOP in November requires you to believe that women voters have just one position on birth control (and for that matter abortion rights) and vote that issue before any other. This is a distraction, and a dumb distraction because it distracts from what should be the real issue this fall, Obama’s stunning incompetence on the economy. (For one thing, people with more money have more money to spend, including on birth control.)

    The most ridiculous statement I’ve read yet is that the Catholic Church in opposing the ObamaCare contraception mandate believes it’s above the law. It’s not ridiculous because it’s false; it’s ridiculous because only someone with complete ignorance of the Bible would say something like that intending to generate umbrage. Every Christian, Roman Catholic or not, is supposed to answer to God’s law before man’s law. To suggest otherwise makes that whole crucifixion business merely a story, as well as, more recently, religious opposition to Germany’s Nazi Party, communism in the late Soviet Union, the civil rights movement as led by the Rev. Dr.  Martin Luther King, and the post-King political activities of the Rev. Jesse Jackson, among others.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Politically incorrect nuance
Previous Page
1 … 959 960 961 962 963 … 1,031
Next Page

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog

The thoughts of a journalist/libertarian–conservative/Christian husband, father, Eagle Scout and aficionado of obscure rock music. Thoughts herein are only the author’s and not necessarily the opinions of his family, friends, neighbors, church members or past, present or future employers.

  • Steve
    • About, or, Who is this man?
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Adventures in ruralu0026nbsp;inkBack in June 2009, I was driving somewhere through a rural area. And for some reason, I had a flashback to two experiences in my career about that time of year many years ago. In 1988, eight days after graduating from the University of Wisconsin, I started work at the Grant County Herald Independent in Lancaster as a — well, the — reporter. Four years after that, on my 27th birthday, I purchased, with a business partner, the Tri-County Press in Cuba City, my first business venture. Both were experiences about which Wisconsin author Michael Perry might write. I thought about all this after reading a novel, The Deadline, written by a former newspaper editor and publisher. (Now who would write a novel about a weekly newspaper?) As a former newspaper owner, I picked at some of it — why finance a newspaper purchase through the bank if the seller is willing to finance it? Because the mean bank lender is a plot point! — and it is much more interesting than reality, but it is very well written, with a nicely twisting plot, and quite entertaining, again more so than reality. There is something about that first job out of college that makes you remember it perhaps more…
    • Adventures in radioI’ve been in the full-time work world half my life. For that same amount of time I’ve been broadcasting sports as a side interest, something I had wanted to since I started listening to games on radio and watching on TV, and then actually attending games. If you ask someone who’s worked in radio for some time about the late ’70s TV series “WKRP in Cincinnati,” most of them will tell you that, if anything, the series understated how wacky working in radio can be. Perhaps the funniest episode in the history of TV is the “WKRP” episode, based on a true story, about the fictional radio station’s Thanksgiving promotion — throwing live turkeys out of a helicopter under the mistaken belief that, in the words of WKRP owner Arthur Carlson, “As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.” [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST01bZJPuE0] I’ve never been involved in anything like that. I have announced games from the roofs of press boxes (once on a nice day, and once in 50-mph winds), from a Mississippi River bluff (more on that later), and from the front row of the second balcony of the University of Wisconsin Fieldhouse (great view, but not a place to go if…
    • “Good morning/afternoon/evening, ________ fans …”
    • My biggest storyEarlier this week, while looking for something else, I came upon some of my own work. (I’m going to write a blog someday called “Things I Found While Looking for Something Else.” This is not that blog.) The Grant County Sheriff’s Department, in the county where I used to live, has a tribute page to the two officers in county history who died in the line of duty. One is William Loud, a deputy marshal in Cassville, shot to death by two bank robbers in 1912. The other is Tom Reuter, a Grant County deputy sheriff who was shot to death at the end of his 4 p.m.-to-midnight shift March 18, 1990. Gregory Coulthard, then a 19-year-old farmhand, was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide and is serving a life sentence, with his first eligibility for parole on March 18, 2015, just 3½ years from now. I’ve written a lot over the years. I think this, from my first two years in the full-time journalism world, will go down as the story I remember the most. For journalists, big stories contain a paradox, which was pointed out in CBS-TV’s interview of Andy Rooney on his last “60 Minutes” Sunday. Morley Safer said something along the line…
  • Food and drink
    • The Roesch/Prestegard familyu0026nbsp;cookbookFrom the family cookbook(s) All the families I’m associated with love to eat, so it’s a good thing we enjoy cooking. The first out-of-my-house food memory I have is of my grandmother’s cooking for Christmas or other family occasions. According to my mother, my grandmother had a baked beans recipe that she would make for my mother. Unfortunately, the recipe seems to have  disappeared. Also unfortunately, my early days as a picky, though voluminous, eater meant I missed a lot of those recipes made from such wholesome ingredients as lard and meat fat. I particularly remember a couple of meals that involve my family. The day of Super Bowl XXXI, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and a group of their friends got together to share lots of food and cheer on the Packers to their first NFL title in 29 years. (After which Jannan and I drove to Lambeau Field in the snow,  but that’s another story.) Then, on Dec. 31, 1999, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and Jannan and I (along with Michael in utero) had a one-course-per-hour meal to appropriately end years beginning with the number 1. Unfortunately I can’t remember what we…
    • SkålI was the editor of Marketplace Magazine for 10 years. If I had to point to one thing that demonstrates improved quality of life since I came to Northeast Wisconsin in 1994, it would be … … the growth of breweries and  wineries in Northeast Wisconsin. The former of those two facts makes sense, given our heritage as a brewing state. The latter is less self-evident, since no one thinks of Wisconsin as having a good grape-growing climate. Some snobs claim that apple or cherry wines aren’t really wines at all. But one of the great facets of free enterprise is the opportunity to make your own choice of what food and drink to drink. (At least for now, though some wish to restrict our food and drink choices.) Wisconsin’s historically predominant ethnic group (and our family’s) is German. Our German ancestors did unfortunately bring large government and high taxes with them, but they also brought beer. Europeans brought wine with them, since they came from countries with poor-quality drinking water. Within 50 years of a wave of mid-19th-century German immigration, brewing had become the fifth largest industry in the U.S., according to Maureen Ogle, author of Ambitious Brew: The Story of American Beer. Beer and wine have…
  • Wheels
    • America’s sports carMy birthday in June dawned without a Chevrolet Corvette in front of my house. (The Corvette at the top of the page was featured at the 2007 Greater Milwaukee Auto Show. The copilot is my oldest son, Michael.) Which isn’t surprising. I have three young children, and I have a house with a one-car garage. (Then again, this would be more practical, though a blatant pluck-your-eyes-out violation of the Corvette ethos. Of course, so was this.) The reality is that I’m likely to be able to own a Corvette only if I get a visit from the Corvette Fairy, whose office is next door to the Easter Bunny. (I hope this isn’t foreshadowing: When I interviewed Dave Richter of Valley Corvette for a car enthusiast story in the late great Marketplace Magazine, he said that the most popular Corvette in most fans’ minds was a Corvette built during their days in high school. This would be a problem for me in that I graduated from high school in 1983, when no Corvette was built.) The Corvette is one of those cars whose existence may be difficult to understand within General Motors Corp. The Corvette is what is known as a “halo car,” a car that drives people into showrooms, even if…
    • Barges on fouru0026nbsp;wheelsI originally wrote this in September 2008.  At the Fox Cities Business Expo Tuesday, a Smart car was displayed at the United Way Fox Cities booth. I reported that I once owned a car into which trunk, I believe, the Smart could be placed, with the trunk lid shut. This is said car — a 1975 Chevrolet Caprice coupe (ours was dark red), whose doors are, I believe, longer than the entire Smart. The Caprice, built down Interstate 90 from us Madisonians in Janesville (a neighbor of ours who worked at the plant probably helped put it together) was the flagship of Chevy’s full-size fleet (which included the stripper Bel Air and middle-of-the-road Impala), featuring popular-for-the-time vinyl roofs, better sound insulation, an upgraded cloth interior, rear fender skirts and fancy Caprice badges. The Caprice was 18 feet 1 inch long and weighed 4,300 pounds. For comparison: The midsize Chevrolet of the ear was the Malibu, which was the same approximate size as the Caprice after its 1977 downsizing. The compact Chevrolet of the era was the Nova, which was 200 inches long — four inches longer than a current Cadillac STS. Wikipedia’s entry on the Caprice has this amusing sentence: “As fuel economy became a bigger priority among Americans…
    • Behind the wheel
    • Collecting only dust or rust
    • Coooooooooooupe!
    • Corvettes on the screen
    • The garage of misfit cars
    • 100 years (and one day) of our Chevrolets
    • They built Excitement, sort of, once in a while
    • A wagon by any otheru0026nbsp;nameFirst written in 2008. You will see more don’t-call-them-station-wagons as you drive today. Readers around my age have probably had some experience with a vehicle increasingly rare on the road — the station wagon. If you were a Boy Scout or Girl Scout, or were a member of some kind of youth athletic team, or had a large dog, or had relatives approximately your age, or had friends who needed to be transported somewhere, or had parents who occasionally had to haul (either in the back or in a trailer) more than what could be fit inside a car trunk, you (or, actually, your parents) were the target demographic for the station wagon. “Station wagons came to be like covered wagons — so much family activity happened in those cars,” said Tim Cleary, president of the American Station Wagon Owners Association, in Country Living magazine. Wagons “were used for everything from daily runs to the grocery store to long summer driving trips, and while many men and women might have wanted a fancier or sportier car, a station wagon was something they knew they needed for the family.” The “station wagon” originally was a vehicle with a covered seating area to take people between train stations…
    • Wheels on theu0026nbsp;screenBetween my former and current blogs, I wrote a lot about automobiles and TV and movies. Think of this post as killing two birds (Thunderbirds? Firebirds? Skylarks?) with one stone. Most movies and TV series view cars the same way most people view cars — as A-to-B transportation. (That’s not counting the movies or series where the car is the plot, like the haunted “Christine” or “Knight Rider” or the “Back to the Future” movies.) The philosophy here, of course, is that cars are not merely A-to-B transportation. Which disqualifies most police shows from what you’re about to read, even though I’ve watched more police video than anything else, because police cars are plain Jane vehicles. The highlight in a sense is in the beginning: The car chase in my favorite movie, “Bullitt,” featuring Steve McQueen’s 1968 Ford Mustang against the bad guys’ 1968 Dodge Charger: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMc2RdFuOxIu0026amp;fmt=18] One year before that (but I didn’t see this until we got Telemundo on cable a couple of years ago) was a movie called “Operación 67,” featuring (I kid you not) a masked professional wrestler, his unmasked sidekick, and some sort of secret agent plot. (Since I don’t know Spanish and it’s not…
    • While riding in my Cadillac …
  • Entertainments
    • Brass rocksThose who read my former blog last year at this time, or have read this blog over the past months, know that I am a big fan of the rock group Chicago. (Back when they were a rock group and not a singer of sappy ballads, that is.) Since rock music began from elements of country music, jazz and the blues, brass rock would seem a natural subgenre of rock music. A lot of ’50s musical acts had saxophone players, and some played with full orchestras … [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CPS-WuUKUE] … but it wasn’t until the more-or-less simultaneous appearances of Chicago and Blood Sweat u0026amp; Tears on the musical scene (both groups formed in 1967, both had their first charting singles in 1969, and they had the same producer) that the usual guitar/bass/keyboard/drum grouping was augmented by one or more trumpets, a sax player and a trombone player. While Chicago is my favorite group (but you knew that already), the first brass rock song I remember hearing was BSu0026amp;T’s “Spinning Wheel” — not in its original form, but on “Sesame Street,” accompanied by, yes, a giant spinning wheel. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi9sLkyhhlE] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxWSOuNsN20] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9U34uPjz-g] I remember liking Chicago’s “Just You ‘n Me” when it was released as a single, and…
    • Drive and Eat au0026nbsp;RockThe first UW home football game of each season also is the opener for the University of Wisconsin Marching Band, the world’s finest college marching band. (How the UW Band has not gotten the Sudler Trophy, which is to honor the country’s premier college marching bands, is beyond my comprehension.) I know this because I am an alumnus of the UW Band. I played five years (in the last rank of the band, Rank 25, motto: “Where Men Are Tall and Run-On Is Short”), marching in 39 football games at Camp Randall Stadium, the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Memorial Stadium at the University of Illinois (worst artificial turf I had ever seen), the University of Nevada–Las Vegas’ Sam Boyd Silver Bowl, the former Dyche Stadium at Northwestern University, five high school fields and, in my one bowl game, Legion Field in Birmingham, Ala., site of the 1984 Hall of Fame Bowl. The UW Band was, without question, the most memorable experience of my college days, and one of the most meaningful experiences of my lifetime. It was the most physical experience of my lifetime, to be sure. Fifteen minutes into my first Registration…
    • Keep on rockin’ in the freeu0026nbsp;worldOne of my first ambitions in communications was to be a radio disc jockey, and to possibly reach the level of the greats I used to listen to from WLS radio in Chicago, which used to be one of the great 50,000-watt AM rock stations of the country, back when they still existed. (Those who are aficionados of that time in music and radio history enjoyed a trip to that wayback machine when WLS a Memorial Day Big 89 Rewind, excerpts of which can be found on their Web site.) My vision was to be WLS’ afternoon DJ, playing the best in rock music between 2 and 6, which meant I wouldn’t have to get up before the crack of dawn to do the morning show, yet have my nights free to do whatever glamorous things big-city DJs did. Then I learned about the realities of radio — low pay, long hours, zero job security — and though I have dabbled in radio sports, I’ve pretty much cured myself of the idea of working in radio, even if, to quote WAPL’s Len Nelson, “You come to work every day just like everybody else does, but we’re playing rock ’n’ roll songs, we’re cuttin’ up.…
    • Monday on the flight line, not Saturday in the park
    • Music to drive by
    • The rock ofu0026nbsp;WisconsinWikipedia begins its item “Music of Wisconsin” thusly: Wisconsin was settled largely by European immigrants in the late 19th century. This immigration led to the popularization of galops, schottisches, waltzes, and, especially, polkas. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl7wCczgNUc] So when I first sought to write a blog piece about rock musicians from Wisconsin, that seemed like a forlorn venture. Turned out it wasn’t, because when I first wrote about rock musicians from Wisconsin, so many of them that I hadn’t mentioned came up in the first few days that I had to write a second blog entry fixing the omissions of the first. This list is about rock music, so it will not include, for instance, Milwaukee native and Ripon College graduate Al Jarreau, who in addition to having recorded a boatload of music for the jazz and adult contemporary/easy listening fan, also recorded the theme music for the ’80s TV series “Moonlighting.” Nor will it include Milwaukee native Eric Benet, who was for a while known more for his former wife, Halle Berry, than for his music, which includes four number one singles on the Ru0026amp;B charts, “Spend My Life with You” with Tamia, “Hurricane,” “Pretty Baby” and “You’re the Only One.” Nor will it include Wisconsin’s sizable contributions to big…
    • Steve TV: All Steve, All the Time
    • “Super Steve, Man of Action!”
    • Too much TV
    • The worst music of allu0026nbsp;timeThe rock group Jefferson Airplane titled its first greatest-hits compilation “The Worst of Jefferson Airplane.” Rolling Stone magazine was not being ironic when it polled its readers to decide the 10 worst songs of the 1990s. I’m not sure I agree with all of Rolling Stone’s list, but that shouldn’t be surprising; such lists are meant for debate, after all. To determine the “worst,” songs appropriate for the “Vinyl from Hell” segment that used to be on a Madison FM rock station, requires some criteria, which does not include mere overexposure (for instance, “Macarena,” the video of which I find amusing since it looks like two bankers are singing it). Before we go on: Blog posts like this one require multimedia, so if you find a song you hate on this blog, I apologize. These are also songs that I almost never listen to because my sound system has a zero-tolerance policy — if I’m listening to the radio or a CD and I hear a song I don’t like, it’s, to quote Bad Company, gone gone gone. My blonde wife won’t be happy to read that one of her favorite ’90s songs, 4 Non Blondes’ “What’s Up,” starts the list. (However,…
    • “You have the right to remain silent …”
  • Madison
    • Blasts from the Madison media past
    • Blasts from my Madison past
    • Blasts from our Madison past
    • What’s the matter with Madison?
    • Wisconsin – Madison = ?
  • Sports
    • Athletic aesthetics, or “cardinal” vs. “Big Red”
    • Choose your own announcer
    • La Follette state 1982 (u0022It was 30 years ago todayu0022)
    • The North Dakota–Wisconsin Hockey Fight of 1982
    • Packers vs. Brewers
  • Hall of Fame
    • The case(s) against teacher unions
    • The Class of 1983
    • A hairy subject, or face the face
    • It’s worse than you think
    • It’s worse than you think, 2010–11 edition
    • My favorite interview subject of all time
    • Oh look! Rural people!
    • Prestegard for president!
    • Unions vs. the facts, or Hiding in plain sight
    • When rhetoric goes too far
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
    • Join 198 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d