Today in 1964, the Supremes reached number one by wondering …
Today in 1968, the Beatles briefly broke up when Ringo Starr quit during recording of their “White Album.” Starr rejoined the group Sept. 3, but in the meantime the remaining trio recorded “Back in the USSR” with Paul McCartney on drums and John Lennon on bass:
Today in 1970, the number one album in the U.S. was Creedence Clearwater Revival’s “Cosmo’s Factory” …
… while across the pond number one was the Moody Blues’ “A Question of Balance”:
The number one album today in 1981 was Foreigner’s fourth album, called “4”:
The number one song today in 1987:
Birthdays today start with Dale Hawkins, who wrote a song CCR later recorded:
Ian Mitchell of the Bay City Rollers:
Debbie Peterson, who played drums for the Bangles …
… was born the same day as Roland Orazabal of Tears for Fears:
We begin with two forlorn non-music anniversaries. Today in 1897, Oldsmobile began operation, eventually to become a division of General Motors Corp. … but not anymore.
Imagine turning on your radio and finding out that the Soviet Union was invading your country. That’s what Radio Prague announced today in 1968.
Today in 1961, Patsy Cline, using crutches after exiting a car through the windshield head first in a car crash, recorded Willie Nelson’s “Crazy”:
The Beatles had a busy day today in 1966. They performed a concert at Crosley Field in Cincinnati, rescheduled due to rain and the lack of grandstand cover. Then they flew to St. Louis to perform the regularly scheduled concert at Busch Stadium … in the rain. This day made Paul McCartney determine that the Beatles should not perform live anymore.
The number one song across the pond today in 1968:
Today in 1973, the Doobie Brothers’ “Toulouse Street” was named a gold record …
… as was the Allman Brothers’ “Brothers and Sisters”:
Musicians recognize today’s first birthday, Count Basie:
Kenny Rogers:
Tom Coster of Santana:
Jackie DeShannon:
Joe Strummer of The Clash:
Steve Smith played drums for Journey:
Kim Sledge was one of Sister Sledge:
Finally, a death anniversary: Today in 2005, Dr. Robert Moog, inventor of the Moog Synthesizer, died. The Moog Synthesizer was the keyboard of choice throughout the 1970s and 1980s, perhaps to excess:
If you asked most Wisconsinites to identify their favorite sport, the answer probably would be the activity that in its high school iteration starts across the state tonight.
For more than 20 years, I have been announcing high school and college football, first on radio, and now on cable TV in Ripon. I’ve been watching football for far l0nger than that. My first sports memory is watching my father swear at our TV as the Green Bay Packers transitioned from the Glory Years to, well, the Gory Years, the 31-year-long desert between Super Bowl appearances. (My father insisted on putting a blanket over our south-facing living room window so he could clearly see the Packers’ descent from Super Bowl glory past mediocrity.)
The Packers were so bad in my early childhood, in fact, that I have this emblazoned memory: One day in third grade, I picked up a sports legends book from the grade school library. (I noticed two things: Milwaukee Bucks center Kareem Abdul-Jabbar wasn’t in it, but there was a basketball player named Lew Alcindor who looked exactly like Abdul-Jabbar, and although boxer Muhammad Ali wasn’t in it either, a boxer named Cassius Clay looked just like him too.) And I got to reading about the Packers’ winning the first two Super Bowls, which happened when I was 1½ and 2½ years old. And my eight-year-old mind could not process the fact that the same team my father swore at every fall Sunday had won the first two Super Bowls, even though the Glory Days were in their twilight.
Around that time, I started attending one UW football game a year, thanks to the fact that my parents and grandfather were season ticket holders. I know people who actually prefer watching football on TV because you get a better view from the multiple replays. To me, though, football is about the entire experience — the marching bands (such as, well, you know), the brisk (or worse) weather, the feeling of fan involvement by being there that is just not the same on TV.
I certainly did not get my affinity for football by playing the game. With apologies to my high school classmates who played on those teams, the fact is that La Follette won, in order, three, one, one and four games my four years there. I did not see La Follette win a football game until my senior year, despite the fact that I was at every home game, sitting in the La Follette Marching Band for the last three of those years. The football I played was of the touch or flag variety, where my lack of athletic skills were tolerated.
At the time I, a 6–2 160-pound stick, didn’t get the reason to get my brains beat out (or so I thought, until I got to the UW Marching Band practice field, where I learned that their practices were more strenuous than high school football’s) to sit on the bench during games. And once I started to understand the game more, I couldn’t think of a compelling reason to push around the guy in front of me — or, more likely, get pushed around by the guy in front of me — so that the guy with the ball might gain two or three yards. (Games with little passing and unsuccessful running are to me boring to watch, though running teams are easier to announce.) I didn’t get the positives of athletics (such as getting together in a group effort, the realization of the group as being more important than the individual, and the importance of doing well just because of the importance of doing well instead for recognition) from athletics; I got them from band.
And I didn’t get my affinity for football from the great successes of the Badgers and Packers either. The Badgers were not as bad as they would become in the Don Mor(t)on Veer from Victory Era of 1987–1989 (as in six wins in three seasons). But in the 1970s, the Badgers had exactly two winning seasons — 7–4 in 1974 and a 5–4–2 in 1978. The Packers also had two winning seasons — 10–4 in their NFC Central championship season in 1972, and 8–7–1 in 1978.
The Badgers finally started getting respectable in 1981, which began with a 21–14 win over number one ranked Michigan. The stunning nature of that win cannot be replicated in print here. The Badgers also beat, at home, archrivals Ohio State and Purdue on the way to a bowl berth. The next few years were pretty good too, including my one and only bowl trip, to the 1984 Hall of Fame Bowl as a member of the UW Marching Band. And then UW coach Dave McClain died of a heart attack two days after the annual spring game. McClain’s interim replacement was not retained after his one season, and then, well, six wins in three seasons (including a growing number of games where a growing number of fans dressed as empty bleachers) speaks for itself.
The Packers, meanwhile, hovered around .500 for the early ’80s, and then Forrest Gregg replaced Bart Starr as coach and decided to blow up Starr’s work (such as it was) and start over with players who were worse both on and off the field. The Packers had one playoff year (1982) and two near-playoff years (1983, when the team set a record for scoring offense and were still outscored on the season, and 1989, when 10 of their 16 games were decided by a touchdown or less), but that was it.
This was about the time that I started announcing games after graduating. The first game was on a beautiful Friday afternoon in 1988, Cuba City’s Homecoming against Lancaster. Announcing was a challenge because, independent of the fact that I had never announced football before that, the Cuba City press box faced the wrong direction, into the sun, and was closer to the goal line than the 50-yard line. Both facts proved a problem during the overtime, when, of course, the action was on the opposite end of the field.
You may have noticed by now a certain parallelism between Badger football and Packer football fortunes. The Packers started getting good when general manager Ron Wolf and head coach Mike Holmgren arrived in 1992. The Badgers, meanwhile, hired Barry Alvarez, and, wonder of wonders, not only got to the Rose Bowl, but won it on New Year’s Day 1994. Three years later, the Packers won Super Bowl XXXI.
I truly believe Badger and Packer fans of today do not realize how good they have it today. This past season, the Badgers got to the Rose Bowl (and losing the Rose Bowl is better than not getting there), and the Packers became the first NFC team to win a Super Bowl despite playing every playoff game on the road.
Meanwhile, back on Friday nights, I started announcing Ripon games in the fall of 2003. This was a good year to start announcing Ripon games, because if I announce games for another 46 years the 2003 Tigers will still be the most dominant offensive juggernaut I’ll probably ever see. The Tigers scored more than 40 points in 12 of their 14 games and more than 50 points in five of their games. They had a 2,000-yard rusher, and their quarterback rushed for more than 1,000 yards and passed for more than 1,000 yards. They won their second game of the season 56–36 with both their longest pass (82 yards) and longest run (92 yards) in program history. They won their second playoff game 56–42.
The game I remember the most from that year was their next-to-last regular season game against archrival Berlin. (Ripon vs. Berlin is the longest running rivalry in Wisconsin high school football.) Ripon was averaging more than 50 points per game, while Berlin was giving up just 5 points per game. Both teams were undefeated, and the winner was going to clinch a share of the conference title.
Besides the score — Ripon 49, Berlin 0 — one other fact stands out: Ripon got 567 yards of offense, all on the ground.
Gold trophy number two came two seasons later, with a much more defense-dominated team that also played closer games. (Well, except for their first playoff game, won 63–6.) The 2005 Tigers gutted out wins over their archrivals to win their third consecutive conference title, but fans accustomed to seeing the Tigers maul their opponents were a bit skeptical of what this team could do once the postseason started.
The highlight was their next to last game, their state semifinal against Lodi. Ripon scored the first two touchdowns, then Lodi scored the next two. Ripon held Lodi on a big fourth-down play, and then Lodi held Ripon on a big fourth-and-goal play. The Blue Devils had the ball deep in their own end with about 2 minutes left to play, which you would think would be a bad time to fumble.
And then the fun began. Lodi did indeed fumble and Ripon recovered, scoring the game-winning touchdown three plays later. The ensuing kickoff, into a 30-mph south wind, looked like a dying duck and spun out of bounds. Instead of taking the ball at the 35-yard line, the Lodi coach decided to make Ripon rekick. The next kick went up in the air, looked as if it hit something in the air, and came down behind a Ripon player, who decided that now would be a good time to fall on the ball. So Lodi’s comeback attempt turned out to consist of one play at the very end, and Ripon won on the way to its second state title in three years.
Ripon has made the playoffs for 10 consecutive seasons, which is difficult even in these days when most teams make the playoffs. (When I was in high school, only conference champions got in the playoffs, then two teams per conference, and now all teams with winning conference records and most teams with .500 conference records get in.) Besides their success, though, what makes covering Ripon football enjoyable is that the Tigers are a program their community can be proud of for reasons besides their record. The coaches have collected several letters over the years from game officials complimenting them for their on-field sportsmanship. Watch a Tiger game, and you’ll see Tigers picking up their opponents after plays. In a decade of watching them I have yet to see Ripon coaches publicly reaming out their players for something they did on the field, and I cannot say that about other programs I’ve witnessed.
So what is it about football? (“It” includes the fact that of all the sports played by men, football seems to have the most following among women, even though almost no women — almost — play football.) I think it has a lot to do with the fact that there is just one football game per week, and nine (high school), 11 or 12 (college) or 16 (NFL) games in the regular season. There is considerably less margin for error in a football season. Football also undoubtedly has parallels to ground wars in that one side is trying to take territory from the other by ground or air, and the most important battles are won or lost on the road. And in high school, players are not playing for money or for their athletic scholarship benefits (though they may be playing to try to get a college scholarship).
The breakdown sequence at the end of Ripon High School practices goes like this (each line except the last repeated twice):
We are … Ripon!
We are … the best!
We believe in … our team!
We believe in … each other!
We believe in … hard work!
WE WANT SOME MORE!
If a calamity occurred and I was installed as the head coach of a high school football team, other than adopting Ripon’s offense (since I’ve been around them, they have never failed to average at least 200 rushing yards per game), every week I would tell the players something probably similar to this: You get one chance to play this game today. Once tonight’s game is over, you can never play it again. And there are only nine chances to play high school football, every season. So make this one count.
Sometime either today or Saturday, I’m going to drive to Appleton to … drive cars.
This is the weekend for my favorite fundraiser, Bergstrom Automotive’s Drive for the Cure. Bergstrom’s Victory Lane dealership will have 100 cars for test-driving, and Bergstrom will donate $1 for every mile driven to Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
Bergstrom’s Drive for the Cure began when Enterprise Motorcars hosted BMW’s Susan G. Komen event back in the 1990s. (The nicest car I’ve ever driven was from that event, a BMW 540i six-speed that was both smooth and fast.) BMW dropped the event in the late 2000s, but Bergstrom picked it up.
Breast cancer research is a personal issue for me, but it should be a personal issue for any man. Every year, Marian University’s men’s hockey team does its own breast cancer fundraiser by wearing pink uniforms for a game.
The mother of the Marian men’s coach was treated for breast cancer. As the coach put it, it doesn’t take too much thought for a man to figure out how many women are in his life. Every man has, or had, a mother and grandmothers. Some have sisters, aunts and female cousins. Many have wives or female “significant others.” Many have daughters. Most have female neighbors or coworkers. Given that and the fact that 1 in 8 women are diagnosed with breast cancer, it’s not hard to see how breast cancer will affect any man’s life.
My mother was diagnosed in 1988. Her diagnosis was a shock because she had basically none of the risk factors — no family history anyone was aware of, she wasn’t overweight, she didn’t smoke or drink to excess, and she had no diet or exercise issues. With her lymph node involvement, a doctor later told her she had a 22 percent chance of surviving five years, and that was before she was unable to finish chemotherapy because it made her too ill.
Since 1988, my mother has gotten to see her sons graduate from college, her and my father’s retirements, one of her sons get married, her three grandchildren, and their 50th wedding anniversary. (There’s a message in there somewhere about odds.) She was also the third woman (that I know of) on the street where I grew up that had breast cancer.
I’ve taken part in the Bergstrom Drive for the Cure every year I’ve been able to. Last year’s was an interesting experience because of the darkening skies to the north (at 3:30 p.m.) as I took the last car out. I imagined trying to explain huge hail dimples on this brand new Volvo station wagon, but thankfully I didn’t have to. (However, the flooding in the Bergstrom parking lot from the torrential rain demonstrated why ground clearance is useful.)
The driving takes place today and Saturday from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. And free food is included.
How much money would you have paid for tickets for this concert at the Cow Palace in San Francisco today in 1964: The Beatles, the Righteous Brothers, the Bill Black Combo, the Exciters and Jackie DeShannon:
The number one song in the U.S. today in 1967 is because, according to the Beatles …
Five years later, Chicago had the number one album, “Chicago V”:
What a group of birthdays we have today, beginning with Ginger Baker of Cream:
Johnny Nash, who says he …
Ian Gillan of Deep Purple:
John Deacon of Queen:
Two deaths of note: Today in 2008, saxophonist LeRoi Moore, a founding member of the Dave Matthews Band, died after a vehicle crash at his farm:
One year ago today, Michael Been, lead singer for The Call, died of a heart attack at a concert where he was his son’s band’s sound man:
The legacy of several past presidential and gubernatorial administrations is on display today.
Today is Cost of Government Day in Wisconsin, the day on which we finally stop paying for federal, state and local spending for the year.
The Americans for Tax Reform Foundation describes Cost of Government Day “by adding the cost of government spending at all levels to a conservative estimate of all regulatory burdens—and then counting how many days of the year Americans work to pay the costs of government.”
You’ll notice that Cost of Government Day is four months and two days later than Tax Freedom Day, the day on which all federal, state and local taxes are finally paid for the year. That puts the spotlight on the federal budget deficit, doesn’t it? (And as far as I know the Tax Foundation doesn’t measure state finances correctly, by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles; if it did, the gap between taxes and spending would be even larger.)
But, says Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist:
Focusing national attention on the deficit rather than on the total cost of government—federal, state and local spending plus the cost of the federal and state regulatory burden—causes several problems. First, it deliberately understates the true cost of government. It also allows advocates of ever-larger government to misdirect our attention away from the bigger picture to just “the deficit.” And there are ways to dramatically increase the cost of government without adding to the deficit: new regulations and new spending programs matched with higher taxes. (Think ObamaCare and cap-and-trade rules from the Environmental Protection Agency.) …
Looking at the total cost of government rather than merely the annual deficit gives a more complete picture—and a more frightening understanding—of how much government costs each one of us. It also suggests how clever politicians can hide the cost of government, disguising increased spending by urging us to focus on the deficit and then “paying for” higher spending with higher taxes. Government grows but the deficit is unchanged.
The result of cumulative deficits, of course, is debt. The Tax Foundation reports that in 2009 4.96 percent of Wisconsin’s state government spending was interest on debt, sixth highest among the states.
Wisconsin has the sixth latest Cost of Government Day among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Americans for Tax Reform’s Center for Fiscal Accountability points out:
The calculation of the Cost of Government Day for each state is based on the varying government burdens suffered in each state. Federal tax and spending burdens are large contributing factors. These federal burdens vary because relatively higher burdens are borne by states with relatively higher incomes. State and local tax and spending burdens vary as well.
Here’s the thing: Wisconsin doesn’t have “relatively higher incomes.” In fact, Wisconsin’s per capita personal income growth has trailed the nation’s since Jimmy Carter was president. Which demonstrates the grotesque size of the “varying government burdens suffered” in Wisconsin, particularly the regulatory burden.
In Wisconsin’s case, to turn around the cliché, failure has a thousand fathers and mothers in Wisconsin. We have, for instance, 3,120 units of government in this state, a situation that occurred far before the Doyle Administration, and yet no one in Madison seems to think that isn’t a ridiculously high number.
Many of those units of government employ government employees of the mindset in this comment from my Monday blog:
My second issue with you is the whole figure of $71,000 that teachers make after benefits. Well that sounds just great on paper, but being the healthy individual that I am, I wasn’t in the hospital at all this year. The fact is this – my $33,000 salary is basically just that. … My marginally small home and used car are not flashy. I cut my cable bill, cell phone, stopped funding my 403b and the college fund set aside for my children just to offset the cost of my pay freeze and higher rates into pension and health insurance.
It would be talking to a wall to tell this WEAC member that the correct purpose of government is to perform government services, not to employ people with benefits far better than those taxpayers paying for those government-employee benefits. (Or to redistribute income or to effect trendy social change, but those are subjects for other blogs.) And those unemployed people who have neither cable nor cellphones nor retirement accounts nor college funds — or, for that matter, any kind of insurance — may not be impressed with this WEAC member’s personal sacrifices. And this state’s unemployment rates have a lot to do with this state’s poor business climate, which is, among other things, the result of giving employee benefits that taxpayers can’t afford, a major part of out-of-control government spending that taxpayers can’t afford.
Victor Davis Hanson more often than not writes about national security, but he notices something different about the Obama presidency:
Ever since he began campaigning for the presidency, Obama has hectored the private sector — talking nonstop of higher taxes, “spreading the wealth,” “fat cat” bankers, paying your “fair share,” “millionaires and billionaires,” “corporate jet owners,” and “unneeded” income.
Such share-the-wealth tirades were matched with redistributive vendettas. Vast new financial regulations and red tape followed. A new trillion-dollar health-care entitlement was imposed on employers. The National Labor Relations Board is attempting to shut down a new Boeing aircraft plant. The federal government took over private businesses — and on occasion reversed the order of payment to private creditors. New environmental regulations have curbed energy and agricultural production. Lifelong academics and government functionaries, not businesspeople, staff the Obama Cabinet and head the administration’s agencies.
But imagine if the president had instead promoted profit-making — by cutting red tape, praising entrepreneurs, promising no new taxes or burdens on businesses, and offering incentives to open new plants inside the United States. In other words, what if small businesses and large corporations believed Obama to be a friend and partner, a leader who wanted them to make big profits, hire millions of workers, and enrich the country in the process?
The United States should be in a renaissance. In a food- and fuel-short world, we have vast agricultural and energy resources. While there are riots, strikes, and unrest from Europe to the Middle East, America remains quiet. Foreign depositors even now still believe that the United States is the least likely nation to either confiscate their capital or renege on the interest owed on it. China, Russia, and India have enormous environmental, demographic, and social challenges ahead, of the samesort the United States dealt with decades ago. Our military is far superior to the competitors.
After nearly three years of blaming, apologizing, and explaining what America cannot and should not do, it is past time for a confident President Obama to remind the country that we can do almost anything we wish.
Instead of lecturing some Americans about why they owe their existing wealth to others, why not inspire them to create even bigger new profits to enrich everyone?
Obama’s reflexive anti-business beliefs are utterly predictable, however, and not just because of his own views or the views of his party and its apparatchiks. In fact, Robert Heinlein predicted them in 1973:
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.