The number one song today in 1962:
The number one song today in 1984 announced quite a comeback:
The number one song today in 1962:
The number one song today in 1984 announced quite a comeback:
ESPN has a weird relationship with football.
On the one hand, ESPN televises a lot of it — 10 tons of college games, high school games, and an NFL game every Monday night.
On the other hand, ESPN The Magazine and ESPN’s Grantland website seem to advocate for its elimination. Consider this from Chuck Klosterman:
To me, this is what’s so fascinating about the contemporary state of football: It’s dominated by two hugely meaningful, totally irrefutable paradigms that refuse to acknowledge the existence of the other. Imagine two vertical, parallel lines accelerating skyward — that’s what football is like now. On the one hand, there is no way that a cognizant world can continue adoring a game where the end result is dementia and death; on the other hand, there is no way you can feasibly eliminate a sport that generates so much revenue (for so many people) and is so deeply beloved by everyday citizens who will never have to absorb the punishment. Is it possible that — in the future — the only teenagers playing football will be working-class kids with limited economic resources? Maybe. But that’s not exactly a recipe for diminishing athletic returns. Is it possible that — in 10 years — researchers will prove that playing just one season of pro football has the same impact on life expectancy as smoking two packs of cigarettes every day for a decade? Perhaps. But we’ll probably learn about that study during the Super Bowl pregame show, communally watched by a worldwide audience of 180 million people. Will the government have to get involved? I suppose that’s possible — but what U.S. president is going to come out against football? Only one who thinks Florida and Texas aren’t essential to his reelection.
That’s not exactly a ringing vote for football, is it?
Then there’s ESPN The (Impossible to Read Because It’s Designed for a Generation That Supposedly Doesn’t Read) Magazine’s J.R. Moehringer and his 120 reasons why football will last forever. The reasons I like:
1. In a typical regulation football game, the two teams combine to run roughly 120 plays from scrimmage compared with nearly 300 pitches in a typical baseball game. There are no “waste pitches” in football. Every play is meaningful, consequential, suspenseful. Every play is part of a mighty struggle, a drive, and in the end all 120 plays combine to create a narrative, or metanarrative. Baseball, boxing, handball, sooner or later every game gets compared to narrative, but only in football are the plays perfectly linear, drawn up with letters, and only in football is the field itself lined like a sheet of notebook paper. The metanarrative of a single football game then fits within the larger saga of Football, which fits within — and helps explain — the masterplot of America. …
37. Football will survive because it’s weathered this crisis before. I don’t know that I believe the old chestnut History repeats itself. Life is various, ever changing, and though situations might have precedents, every situation is a snowflake. I agree with Chesterton: “Of all earthly studies, history is the only one that does not repeat itself.” And yet, it must be acknowledged, football has been here before. Right here. On this same moral hash mark. It was born in blood. It was weaned on death. It was invented in the late 1800s when some mad scientists got the idea to combine rugby with soccer, then slowly stirred in elements of wrestling, boxing, lacrosse, bullfighting, track and field and keep-away. Then they simmered it real slow, like a meat sauce, until it congealed into something that would make gladiators shudder.
38. It caught on right away, captured the public’s imagination, because its ruggedness was thought to cultivate masculinity, to instill vitality, just when American men feared they were losing touch with those things. (Has that ever not been true of American men?) Rules were added. The forward pass. The line of scrimmage. Gradually the game acquired a matrix of dos and don’ts, a rulebook more complex than the assembly instructions for an Ikea entertainment center.
39. Complexity made the fans feel like cognoscenti. With a little homework, the everyman could monitor the action knowingly, through field glasses, like a five-star general watching the battle from a distant hilltop. But the game never alienated the ignorati. Maybe while watching the Packers vs. Vikings you notice the D dropping a man into coverage, or sugaring a safety down into the box. Maybe you recognize that the O is in an 11-personnel set, or a 22. Maybe you don’t. Maybe you just like all the pretty colors. Doesn’t matter. The NFL is a capacious tent. Come one, come all, step right up.
40. Nothing else approaches football’s universal, transcultural, transgender, trans-generational appeal. Besides football, clean water and the Gap, nothing else in modern America can claim black fans and white fans, gay fans and straight fans, male fans and female fans, 9-year-old fans and 89-year-old fans.
41. Television, which tells us who we are by showing us when we gather, proves football’s cultural hegemony better than anything else. Nine of the 10 highest-rated single telecasts last year were football, including the Super Bowl, the most watched program of 2011, seen by 110 million people, or more than one-third of the populace. Four of the five most watched TV programs in American history have been Super Bowls. Thanksgiving Thursday and Super Bowl Sunday are the only two days when the entire American Family gathers in Rockwellian fashion around the dinner table, and let’s be honest, both days are all about football.
42. Michael MacCambridge, author of America’s Game, says we miss the point when we think of football as a man’s game. It is and it isn’t. “I think everybody knows that the TV show each year watched by the greatest number of men is the Super Bowl,” he says. “But the TV show every year watched by the greatest number of women is the Super Bowl. That’s true for African-Americans, Hispanics and so on — across the board.”
43. MacCambridge says football exploits something in our national DNA, something we have in common with the ancient Romans — a weakness for spectacle. “What I think American life is about now is big events that people can look forward to and gear up for.” Sometimes that means the Oscars, he says, sometimes it means the season finale of Breaking Bad. But come autumn it means the Big Game. “The presence of the game is everywhere,” MacCambridge says. “You feel it in coffee shops, you feel it in churches & There’s this quickening pace.” …
58. Yes, 2012 is an eon away from 1962. The Cold War has ended; we no longer use football as nuclear Kabuki theater. But Doomsday is still uppermost in our minds. You can’t sit in a church, or movie theater, and feel safe. Terrorism is neither gone nor forgotten, though we pretend both are true. Meanwhile, the national debt crests $16 trillion, the thermometer rises like a bloodred soufflé. Drug-resistant viruses, flesh-eating viruses, grid-eviscerating computer viruses, all lurk. A subcontinent of soda bottles and condoms and dental floss blobs around the Pacific. Mutant species. Solar flares. Seventeen-foot pythons. Nancy Grace. Wyoming lawmakers recently debated what their state should do when the United States collapses. Options they weighed: buy an aircraft carrier, raise an army, print special Wyoming currency. Q: How much is that loaf of bread? A: Ten and a half Cheyennes.(Half a dozen other states have had similar debates.) Football still comforts us, still braces us, because no matter what Armageddons we face, or imagine we face, the gridiron is a grassy stage on which we can watch something we need to watch, something we as a society can’t seem to watch enough — courage.
59. I don’t mean simply Hemingway’s pressurized grace. I mean order. Courage, among other things, is order. Simple order. Cool, clear order. One of the exquisite pleasures of a football game is seeing a group of men risk their bodies, their lives, their fortunes, figuratively, literally, to wrest order from entropy.
60. This is the meat and potatoes of all mythology. This is the primal drama. This is what the play-by-play guys are really talking about when they talk about third and long. …
62. Football is always about right now, this moment, because it’s always evolving. Part of creating order is adapting, and football is Darwinian, inside and out, whereas baseball fights off change like a 3-2 curveball. We live in an age of God Particles and nanorobots and live feeds from Mars, and Bud Selig is still Hamleting about instant replay? The mind reels.
63. Football will survive because, from its inception, it has reflected our image of an idealized manhood. “Modern American men,” MacCambridge writes, “found a truth and beauty in pro football that was more reliable, more sharply defined, than almost any other aspect of their lives.” Why? Because manhood isn’t something you possess, manhood is something you must prove, repeatedly, and a three-hour football game offers repeated proof. …
65. Manhood in America used to mean mastering a trade. Then it meant conquering frontiers. After industrialism killed craftsmanship, after the frontiers were paved under for a million Bed Bath & Beyonds, what was left? A few things. Football, chiefly, according to novelist Frederick Exley: “In football a man was asked to do a difficult and brutal job, and he either did it or got out. There was nothing rhetorical or vague about it; I chose to believe that it was not unlike the jobs which all men, in some sunnier past, had been called upon to do. It smacked of something old, something traditional, something unclouded by legerdemain and subterfuge. It had that kind of power over me.” …
67. I remember interviewing a female professor from the University of Texas at Austin. We were eating at a diner just off campus, discussing the all-powerful Longhorns. I asked her why Texans, why Floridians, why Americans are so enslaved to football. She forked her food, thinking. Finally she said something like: The male body. You can’t ever underestimate the awesome power and appeal of the male body. She then said more things about the male body. She talked about a particular football player in one of her classes, the rocked-up statuary Greekness of him, and I feared the girls around us were staring. It was like that moment in When Harry Met Sally … I’ll have what she’s having. …
70. Baseball always gets credit for the foundational part of masculinity — the father thing. The eternal game of backyard catch, Field of Dreams, the Ripkens, the Griffeys, the Bondses, so on. But football is the real paternal game, because it’s a conveyor belt of father figures, in the form of coaches. …
76. Football will survive because there will always be kids who need it even more than they love it. Marcel Reece, a fullback with the Raiders: “People ask me all the time, How’d you choose football? I tell them, I didn’t choose football. It chose me. It was the only time in my life I experienced love at first sight.”
77. Takeo Spikes, linebacker with the Chargers, ditto: “You can lock me up in solitary confinement for a couple of years, never tell me the date, never tell me the month, anything, and I could tell you what month it is, and I could tell you when it’s football season, that’s how much it’s been embedded in me.”
78. Delanie Walker, tight end with the 49ers, used football as a lead blocker in his escape from Pomona, 30 miles east of Los Angeles. Gangs, drugs, crime, poverty. “Football saved my life,” he says, sitting in the 49ers’ training facility at the start of camp. He has no trouble remembering the epiphanic moment. “I was about 8. My mom couldn’t afford to put me in Pop Warner, so I used to play this game with other kids called three flags up.” The rules were simple. There were no rules. Someone threw a ball in the air. The kids all jumped. Whoever came down with it then turned heel and ran for dear life, the mob in hot pursuit. Again and again, Walker snared the ball and ran, and no one could catch him or bring him down. “I just remember that day thinking, This is me. I don’t think I can do anything else.” …
84. Jameel McClain, a linebacker with the Ravens, says people make it complicated when it’s really quite simple. Football offers clarity in a world of doublespeak and lies. “Everything else in life, people can label you without getting the chance to understand you. In football, I tell you who I am. What I’m about. It’s the one thing to me where the definition of you … it’s all in your control.” …
90. Football will survive, but it may be narrower, lesser. In a future filled with scarcity, football may be yet another thing reduced and rationed. Red states, especially Southern states, already embrace football with religious intensity. (The past seven champions of college football have come from the Old Confederacy.) If football becomes redder, if it becomes regionalized, yet another thing we all disagree about, like Obamacare and gay marriage and guns, it might not be football, per se. …
94. Football will survive because its absence would create a cultural vacuum. Maybe not a vacuum, because nature abhors a vacuum and nature wouldn’t abhor the loss of football. Nature would be fine. The death of football would create a cultural DustBuster. “Institutions are embedded in it,” [former NFL lineman Michael] Oriard says. “It’s embedded in institutions. If it goes away, the question is, What replaces it? How will we satisfy whatever needs it served?” Offhand, Oriard can’t think of a way. …
118. I really don’t see it happening. But if it does, if it doesn’t, that’s tomorrow’s problem. We shouldn’t borrow trouble. We should do our jobs, ignore the clock, focus on this day, this season. Football isn’t baseball; it’s often over long before it’s over, but still.
The Wall Street Journal makes an interesting non-business observation:
Deep in the wilds of the Upper Midwest, Green Bay quietly has recruited a regiment of interchangeable players. The team’s novel idea is to find players—usually linebackers, tight ends or fullbacks—who can play in a variety of formations and situations because they’re virtually the exact same size and weight. The ideal specifications: 6 feet 2 and 250 pounds.
As Packers tight end D.J. Williams explained, only 46 players are allowed to dress for an NFL game. Every team has to cobble together its starters, reserves and special-teams players from those 46. “So if you can have one person doing what three people can do, it may only be 46 people dressed out there but it’s like having 60,” said Williams, who at 6 feet 2 and 245 pounds is roughly the magic size. “It’s a great advantage.” …
The Packers value versatility because it allows the team to save precious spots on the 53-man roster. When you watch Green Bay play, it feels like half the team is 6 feet 2 and 250 pounds, since those players fill so many roles.
Williams and Ryan Taylor, both listed as tight ends, said they have lined up at about six different positions so far in the preseason—including at tight end, in the backfield, in the slot and at wide receiver, as well as on special teams. Linebacker Robert Francois, 6-foot-2 and 255 pounds, calls his size “on the edge” of every linebacker position. Since most teams around the NFL might view a player this size as a “tweener”—a player either too big or too small for a specific position—these players often can be overlooked by other franchises and end up coming to Green Bay on the cheap.
Francois thinks this preferred Packers height and weight combination is perfect because players are lean enough to play inside or outside linebacker. Then, any of them can rush the passer because they’re big enough to go up against offensive tackles, yet quick enough to cover tight ends and receivers. …
Offensive coordinator Tom Clements said that the team’s 250-pound army allows it to use different personnel groups interchangeably. “Make [the defense] change with us and put different guys in different positions where they might not usually be,” Clements said.
Williams, the tight end, said the Packers can have a deeper playbook because they have more players who are familiar with many roles. Dom Capers, the Packers’ veteran defensive coordinator, said Green Bay employs four linebackers in its base defense instead of the typical three, to have the versatility to match up with any type of personnel the opposition uses.
This helps explain why, despite season-ending injuries to tight end Jermichael Finley and running back Ryan Grant, the Packers simply plugged in replacements and won Super Bowl XLV. Apparently Packers coach Mike McCarthy is smarter than your average bear, or Bear.
Today in 1955, a London judge fined a man for “creating an abominable noise” — playing this song loud enough to make the neighborhood shake, rattle and roll for 2½ hours:
Today in 1968, Private Eye magazine reported that the album to be released by John Lennon and Yoko Ono would save money by providing no wardrobe for Lennon or Ono:

Because the people who fought this fire do.
And because of the service of these people.
About both, I wrote this.
I have finally reached my fill of getting these U.S. Department of Agriculture news releases at work:
As the Obama Administration continues to support farmers and businesses impacted by the drought, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack today announced a two-month extension for emergency grazing on Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) acres, freeing up forage and feed for ranchers as they look to recover from this challenging time. …
“The Obama Administration is committed to helping the thousands of farm families and businesses who continue to struggle with this historic drought,” said Vilsack. “It is also important that our farmers, ranchers and agribusinesses have the tools they need to be successful in the long term. That’s why President Obama and I continue calling on Congress to pass a comprehensive, multi-year Food, Farm and Jobs Bill that will continue to strengthen American agriculture in the years to come, ensure comprehensive disaster assistance for livestock, dairy and specialty crop producers, and provide certainty for farmers and ranchers.”
At the direction of the President, Secretary Vilsack is helping coordinate an Administration-wide response that has included: the National Credit Union Administration’s increased capacity for lending to customers including farmers; the U.S. Department of Transportation’s emergency waivers for federal truck weight regulations and hours of service requirements to get help to drought-stricken communities; and the Small Business Administration’s issuance of 71 agency declarations in 32 states covering 1,636 counties, providing a pathway for small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives and non-farm small businesses that are economically affected by the drought in their community to apply for Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL). President Obama also stressed the need for the entire Administration to continue to look at further steps it can take to ease the pain of this historic drought. …
The Obama Administration, with Agriculture Secretary Vilsack’s leadership, has worked tirelessly to strengthen rural America, maintain a strong farm safety net, and create opportunities for America’s farmers and ranchers.
This is not a comment about the USDA. (If it was a comment about the USDA, it would include one of my favorite Ronald Reagan jokes, in which a family was touring the USDA headquarters, and walked past an office in which the occupant was sobbing. The family asked why the worker was crying, and their tour guide responded, “His farmer died.”) This is a comment about Vilsack’s USDA and how it apparently sees itself as an arm of the Obama 2012 campaign. (Not to mention, based on this news release, the DOT, the NCUA and the SBA.)
The USDA, and every other federal agency, is funded by our tax dollars. That means the tax dollars of Democrats, Republicans, independents and those who could not care less about politics. Whatever news value is in this news release is swamped by the blatant electioneering in this news release. (And before someone protests, this would be every bit as much inappropriate electioneering from a Republican administration.) And of course the release is missing the “Authorized and paid for” message found in political advertising.
Perhaps I missed something in the seven years I worked in public relations, but I do not recall the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Clinton or George W. Bush administrations sending out such politicized “news” releases. I do recall the Doyle administration sending out announcements that Gov. Jim Doyle approved some amount of money spent on a transportation project somewhere. Back in my business magazine days, I ran those releases, but with the self-aggrandizement replaced with “the state,” because Doyle could pay for his own political advertising. And if I get those now from the Walker administration, the same thing will happen. (For instance, this.)
The federal Hatch Act of 1939 prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity. Whoever wrote this news release touting “Agriculture Secretary Vilsack’s leadership” and the Obama administration’s working “tirelessly to strengthen rural America” is violating the Hatch Act, and should be prosecuted, or at least fired. The portion of your tax dollars that go to the USDA is being used to tout Obama among farmers, without your permission. And to Vilsack this must be OK since if Obama goes, so does Vilsack.
It makes me think I should count the number of electoral votes in states designated as disaster areas this summer. It also makes me happy I’m not involved in farming, since this news release makes me think that, as a publicly self-identified Obama opponent, the USDA would find some way to deny me the services I would otherwise entitled to. Is that unfair? Prove my belief incorrect.
(On Facebook last night I read a story of someone who lives in the Second Congressional District who doesn’t share the political viewpoints of its U.S. representative, or former U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold (D–Wisconsin), and wanted and got help on a constituent matter from neither. By that standard I expect no help from U.S. Rep. Ron Kind (D–La Crosse), ever.)
I’d like to say this sort of thing, partisan politics where it doesn’t belong, doesn’t happen in Wisconsin. That would be a lie. County law enforcement is politicized because those in county law enforcement — sheriffs, district attorneys, clerks of circuit court, even coroners — and the state attorney general are either Democrats or Republicans. County government is politicized because county government — clerks, registers of deeds, and even surveyors — are either Democrats or Republicans. The secretary of state is a Democrat, and the treasurer is a Republican, as if keeping the state seal (in the former case) or administering state trust funds (in the latter case) should be partisan tasks.
People wonder why our politics is so nasty, and why political disagreements have leaked out into the rest of life. Well, this is one reason. Politicians should never be mentioned, referenced or included in any other way in news releases from government agencies. (And one way to do that is to drastically reduce the number of political appointees in the federal and state government. In the state Capitol, for instance, that includes everyone in every agency from the title of “executive assistant” upward.)
Using government resources for political campaigns is wrong and should be illegal at every level of government. That particularly includes self-promoting news releases written by government employees at the behest of their bosses.
Today in 1959, Bertolt Brecht‘s “Threepenny Opera” reached the U.S. charts in a way Brecht could not have fathomed:
T0day in 1968, Apple Records released its first single by — surprise! — the Beatles:
Today in 1969, this spent three weeks on top of the British charts, on top of six weeks on top of the U.S. charts, making them perhaps the ultimate one-number-one-hit-wonder:
Proving again my maxim that change is inevitable, but positive change is not:
Putt, putt, putt: Sticking its noise yet again where it doesn’t belong, this is what the Obama (mis)Administration did Tuesday, as reported by Bloomberg.com and passed on by Automotive News:
President Barack Obama released a final version of a rule forcing automakers to more than double average fuel economy by 2025 that includes changes benefiting Honda Motor Co. and other makers of alternative-fuel vehicles. …
The Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration released the proposed rule for model years 2017 to 2025 in November after reaching an agreement with automakers on the outline in July 2011. Auto executives from companies including General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler Group LLC and Hyundai Motor Co. stood with Obama at the Washington Convention Center to tout the agreement, which was the basis for the final rule.
The proposed rule granted incentives to plug-in electric and plug-in electric-hybrid vehicles, with the final rule adding natural-gas-powered cars to that list. Honda sells vehicles powered by natural gas.
Obama blithely claims that “By the middle of the next decade, our cars will get nearly 55 miles per gallon, almost double what they get today. It’ll strengthen our nation’s energy security, it’s good for middle class families and it will help create an economy built to last.”
This is another Obama Administration lie. There will be no cars or light trucks built by 2025, because it is impossible to make a vehicle that is usable for an actual family to get 54.5 mpg in regular use. (As if Obama would know that, given that he has been chauffeured around with our tax dollars since the dumb voters to our south sent him to the U.S. Senate.)
No one asked car buyers or car owners if they wanted cars for which every repair bill has four digits in it. No one asked car buyers or car owners if they wanted cars that shut themselves off while in traffic, or shut off cylinders depending on when the car thinks it should. No one asked car buyers or car owners if they wanted cars that all they can do for them is fill them with gas or diesel.
The 54.5-mpg standard will pretty much destroy most of the recreational industry, including camping, boating, snowmobiling, ATV-riding (no vehicles will be able to pull a trailer carrying anything), hunting, fishing (unless you hunt and fish on your own land), and tourism that requires driving. Agriculture will be devastated because pickup trucks will be eliminated within a decade.
The savings the Obama administration claims from the impossible-to reach MPG standard are either (1) made up or (2) a ruse for the administration’s plan to substantially increase motor fuel taxes so that Americans pay upward of $10 per gallon for gas. (For one thing, the more fuel-efficient cars are, the less their owners buy gas and diesel, which means the less the federal and state governments get in gas and diesel taxes.)
But the 54.5-mpg standard is something else, says Michelle Malkin:
Yes, the same cast of fable-tellers who falsely accused Mitt Romney of murdering a steelworker’s cancer-stricken wife is now directly imposing a draconian environmental regulation that will cost untold American lives. …
Beyond the media-lapdog echo chamber, the economic and public-safety objections to these sweeping rules are deeply grounded and well founded.
For years, free-market analysts and government statisticians have warned of the deadly effect of increasing CAFE standards. Sam Kazman at the Competitive Enterprise Institute explained a decade ago: “The evidence on this issue comes from no less a body than the National Academy of Sciences, which issued a report last August finding that CAFE contributes to between 1,300 and 2,600 traffic deaths per year. Given that this program has been in effect for more than two decades, its cumulative toll is staggering.”
H. Sterling Burnett of the National Center for Policy Analysis adds that NHTSA data indicate that “322 additional deaths per year occur as a direct result of reducing just 100 pounds from already downsized small cars, with half of the deaths attributed to small car collisions with light trucks/sport utility vehicles.” USA Today further calculated that the “size and weight reductions of passenger vehicles undertaken to meet current CAFE standards had resulted in more than 46,000 deaths.”
These lethal regulations should be wrapped in yellow police CAUTION tape. The tradeoffs are stark and simple: CAFE fuel standards clamp down on the production of larger, more crashworthy cars. Analysts from Harvard to the Brookings Institution to the federal government itself have arrived at the same conclusion: CAFE kills. Welcome to the bloody intersection between the Obama jobs death toll and the Obama green death toll.
Obama’s a progressive? I fail to see what’s so progressive about making cars something only rich people can afford to buy or use, as was the case during the beginning of the Progressive Era.
Related to that is this from Eric Peters:
V-8s are on the way out — again. …
V-8s (and mass-market large cars) made a comeback in the ’90s and through to the present day as technology — especially fuel injection and overdrive transmissions — made it possible to make the 22.5 MPG CAFE cut. Or at least, come close enough so that any “gas guzzler” fines were economically manageable. Even something as stunningly, obstreperously powerful as a 2012 Cadillac CTS-V — packing a 6.2 liter, 556 hp V-8 — can manage 19 MPG on the highway, thanks to the efficiency improvements of the past 20-something years.
But no technology in existence today — or on the horizon — will get the CTS-V or anything else with a V-8 under its hood close to the new CAFE mandatory minimum of 35.5 MPG, which goes into effect come 2016. That means — in all likelihood — that V-8 powered cars are about to go away again, this time probably for good. …
Even sixes are in peril. BMW has shunted the formerly standard inline six in both the 3 and 5 Series, in favor of a new (twin-turbocharged) four.
It’s a clear trend — and the fact that we can see it developing on the luxury-performance end of the automotive spectrum is the proverbial canary in the coal mine as regards more modestly priced, large-engined cars such as the Chrysler 300 and — probably — much-anticipated but likely to be very short-lived models like the 2014 Chevy SS sedan. …
That includes trucks, incidentally.
The new CAFE standard — 35.5 MPG, average — doesn’t apply just to passenger cars, as the original 22.5 MPG CAFE standard did. Everything short of commercial vehicles is now lumped together in the same category. There is no more “light truck loophole” — the loophole that made it possible, back in the ’90s, for the car companies to do an end-run around CAFE for passenger cars by putting big engines into bigger vehicles that could be categorized aslight trucks — and which they called SUVs. …
From our perspective, as consumers, it’s not such a good deal. We pay more up front — and while that will be somewhat mitigated by reduced fuel consumption, those savings may — and probably will be — swept away by down-the-road maintenance and repair costs. Smaller, higher-stressed engines tend not to last as long as larger, less stressed engines. A force-fed (turbocharged or supercharged) engine is not likely to be a trouble-free 150,000 mile engine. Maybe these new-generation turbo’d and supercharged engines are built tougher — and will last longer. Or at least, as long as a similarly powerful, but less stressed, V-8. We’ll see. If they don’t, look out. Replacing a turbo on a late model car is typically a $2,000-plus job. Many of these CAFE-engineered new cars have two of them. …
This time, V-8s will become the exclusive playthings of the very affluent only — people who can afford to spend $70k-plus for a low-volume (and so, CAFE irrelevant) car. Jaguar, for example, will probably continue to offer a V-8 in the ultra-performance (and ultra-expensive) XF-R version of the XF luxury-sport sedan. Mercedes will still offer V-8s in the E and S Class… for those few who can handle the freight. …
Of course, Obama — and the next Dear Leader — will still get to drive around in cars powered by big V-8s that get far less than 35.5 MPG…with the gas bill paid by taxpayers.
And that’s just the way they want it.
Peters’ post is somewhat superfluous, because within 15 years you will not be able to buy a new car. The 54.5-mpg standard places GM, Ford and Chrysler in the position of brewers and distillers during Prohibition. (Which makes every cent of the GM and Chrysler bailouts wasted money.)
And if the upcoming death of automobiles isn’t bad enough, there’s another damnable trend, according to the American Spectator:
This morning, fat kids across America ran wind sprints until they vomited, drove sleds like beasts until muscle collapse, and alternated between jogging in place and hitting the deck so frequently that it jarred even the insides of onlookers. And they do it all again this afternoon.
This isn’t a federal anti-obesity initiative. It’s football.
Two-a-days are good for you. Video-game addiction, blasting ear buds to “11,” and treating Skittles as one of the four food groups are not. Madly, it’s the fitness-inducing pastime of teenage boys that public health crusaders inveigh against as though an end-around were as dangerous as a pack of Marlboro Reds. They’re not called health nuts for nothing. …
“Football’s in trouble for two reasons,” George Will explained in the wake of Seau’s suicide on ABC’s This Week. “First of all, the human body is not built for the violence that is inherent in football at the highest level. Second, people are going to watch football differently from now on, because they’re going to feel a little bit like the spectators in the Coliseum in Rome, watching people sacrificed for their entertainment, with a kind of violence that is unseemly — third suicide in 15 months.”
It may surprise the bow-tied baseball buff to learn that total suicides among Major League Baseball players greatly outnumber suicides among National Football League athletes. Should a numbskull baseball-hater have made a connection between Hideki Irabu’s recent self-inflicted death and, say, his 98 mph fastball, surely George Will would recognize the logical fallacy at work.
And certainly Will isn’t writing any columns about the dangers of baseball in the wake Wednesday’s $14.5 million settlement between defendants including Little League and a young pitcher left brain damaged after being struck in the heart by a batted ball. Like most intelligent people, the columnist recognizes that partaking in beneficial activities — travel, work, exercise, sex, eating — involves risk.
Why should football alone be judged by its risks but not its rewards? …
The pigskin is as out of place in risk-averse America as it was at books-intense University of Chicago. In a nation where children socialize with other children in adult-surveilled play dates, where walking to school shows bad parenting, and where lawyers jump in on schoolyard fights, kids crashing into other kids at full speed seems so 20th century.
The anachronistic nature of football that makes it so off-putting to our overprotected culture is also what makes the game, and its players, so incredibly popular. We don’t admire the ordinary. Football has never appeared as extraordinary as it does right now.
For now.
I will be on Wisconsin Public Radio’s Joy Cardin program this morning at 7 talking about last night’s Republican National Convention speech of Gov. Scott Walker. (Which means that, contrary to what I wrote Tuesday, I guess I do have to watch it.)
Wisconsin Public Radio’s Ideas Network can be heard on WHA (970 AM) in Madison, WLBL (930 AM) in Auburndale, WHID (88.1 FM) in Green Bay, WHWC (88.3 FM) in Menomonie, WRFW (88.7 FM) in River Falls, WEPS (88.9 FM) in Elgin, Ill., WHAA (89.1 FM) in Adams, WHBM (90.3 FM) in Park Falls, WHLA (90.3 FM) in La Crosse, WRST (90.3 FM) in Oshkosh, WHAD (90.7 FM) in Delafield, W215AQ (90.9 FM) in Middleton, KUWS (91.3 FM) in Superior, WHHI (91.3 FM) in Highland, WSHS (91.7 FM) in Sheboygan, WHDI (91.9 FM) in Sister Bay, WLBL (91.9 FM) in Wausau, W275AF (102.9 FM) in Ashland, W300BM (107.9 FM) in Madison, and of course online at www.wpr.org.
Unlike my Friday appearances, this one apparently is not repeated this evening, but I’m told it’ll be available on the WPR archives. You have been warned.
Today in 1966, the Beatles played their last concert for which tickets were charged, at Candlestick Park in San Francisco.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsnM4EmV8HI
Today in 1970, Edwin Starr was at number one on both sides of the Atlantic:
Britain’s number one album today in 1981:
The number one song today in 1982: