Two anniversaries today in 1965: The Beatles’ “Beatles VI” reached number I, where it stayed for VI weeks …
… while the Rolling Stones’ “Satisfaction” was their first number one single:
Two anniversaries today in 1965: The Beatles’ “Beatles VI” reached number I, where it stayed for VI weeks …
… while the Rolling Stones’ “Satisfaction” was their first number one single:
A staffer for retiring state Sen. Bob Jauch (D–Poplar) is sending this to state media:
Three state Senators and Wisconsin’s longest serving governor got together recently to share ideas on how to return civility to Wisconsin politics. The Civility Summit was held at the farm of former Governor Tommy G. Thompson (R-Elroy) who was joined by state Senators Tim Cullen (D-Janesville), Bob Jauch (D-Poplar), and Dale Schultz (R-Richland Center). The three senators are not seeking reelection this year.
The idea for the Civility Summit grew out of conversations Thompson had with each of the three senators.
“The three of us have each been around state government in some capacity for over 30 years,” said Cullen. “We’ve each had a working and personal relationship with Tommy, and we kind of said, ‘Gee, if we could find ways to work together despite being from different parties over the years there’s got to be a way to apply that to what’s happening today.’”
Cullen served two stints in the Senate, the first included being Senate Majority Leader from 1981-1986, and he was then tapped by Thompson to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services. First elected to the state Assembly in 1982, Jauch served as Senate Minority Leader during his over 28 years in the senate. Schultz also began his legislative career in the Assembly in 1982, moving to the Senate in 1991 where he also rose to Senate Majority Leader.
“Tim and I may be from a different party, but first and foremost we’re all residents of Wisconsin. We’ve always found ways to be pragmatic with guys like Tommy and Dale,” said Jauch. “Over the years we’ve had some arguments, but we all knew we had to put the people of Wisconsin ahead of party and personal interests, and it’s frustrating to see that attitude in short supply today.”
The four spent the day discussing how they were able to achieve results, how they differed with others while still being civil and how they can help renew those tactics in a seemingly fractured political environment.
“We’ve all served in leadership in the legislature, and I think that gives you a unique perspective because you have to work with a lot of different personalities,” Schultz said. “I don’t think there has been anyone better at doing that over the years than Tommy Thompson.”
The former governor began his political career in 1966 with his election to the state Assembly where he rose to Minority Leader before beating the odds and winning a contentious primary and then defeating an incumbent to become governor. Governor Thompson was elected an unprecedented four times before being chosen by President George W. Bush to serve as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services.
“It was an afternoon of beef, beer and bull – all home grown in Wisconsin,” said Thompson. “We all have a passion, an excitement, for the state we so deeply love, and I’ve always been a doer. To accomplish great things you have to work together. We’re at our very best when we unite for the people of Wisconsin.”
The three senators said they will continue to speak across the state to both encourage their colleagues to engage in a more civil debate and to remind voters during this campaign season to challenge candidates for office to explain how they have or will practice bipartisanship in office which would lead to real results for the people they represent.
Let’s put aside for the moment the millions of Democrats who don’t want you to eat meat and the millions of Republicans who don’t want you to drink, and examine this deeper. You would think the hypocrisy in this news release demonstrates that there was a whole lot more bull than beef and beer.
Let’s start with Cullen and Jauch, who demonstrated their love for Wisconsin, not to mention their putting people over party and personal interests by leaving the state to prevent the Act 10 vote. That vote, of course, was the direct result of the steaming pile of manure that was state government finances when Cullen’s and Jauch’s party had total control of state government. The government unions told Cullen and Jauch to prevent Act 10 from passage by any means necessary, and a trip across the state line was the result. (Cynical Steve is surprised that Schultz didn’t join them; of course he got his cake and to eat it too as he has done nearly all of his legislative career, since he voted against Act 10 and it passed anyway.) Maybe this civility thing can start with Cullen’s and Jauch’s apologizing for their conduct and for being completely, totally wrong about Act 10, but don’t hold your breath.
I’m also unclear where Jauch suddenly became the voice of moderation in the twilight of his career. (Somewhere there is a video clip of Jauch being neither moderate nor civil during Senate debate on Act 10.) I’m sure all those people in his Senate district who would like to work in well-paying mining jobs probably don’t look at Jauch so favorably. Jauch (and Cullen and Schultz) took the views of the latte-sipping Volvo-driving Birkenstock-wearing deodorant-eschewing environmentalists instead of the less fortunate, chronically unemployed blue collar workers from Jauch’s Senate district who would benefit from actual jobs.
The other thing I find hard to stomach is Cullen’s and Jauch’s talk about civility when their party showed none of it. I’m not talking about this decade. For most of the 1990s, the Senate was in Democratic hands, under the control of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Chvala (D–Madison). Over a decade Chvala morphed from being someone I not only voted for, but worked for in the grunt work that goes into a political campaign (for instance, painting a trailer and passing literature in parades), to being one of the nastiest bastards in the history of state politics. Maybe it was in reaction to Rep. Scott Jensen (R–Waukesha), the Assembly speaker most of that time; maybe it was in reaction to Thompson. But did Cullen and Jauch preach civility and moderation while they were in the Senate majority? There’s no evidence they did, and if Cullen and Jauch claim that politics is uniquely nasty now, they apparently weren’t paying attention in the 1990s.
I’ve written about Schultz in this space already. Thompson (for whom I voted five times, I point out, and we are Facebook Friends, at least until he reads this) could afford to be magnanimous because, like a parent, he always got the last word as the governor with the most veto authority of any governor in the nation. Because of that and his other political skills, I don’t think Thompson ever had to make a political deal he didn’t want to have to make. There was, for instance, the time when Thompson said he would sign a bill reinstituting the death penalty if it got to his desk. (Former Republican state Sen. Alan Lasee introduced a death penalty bill in every session of the Legislature.) No death penalty bill ever got to Thompson’s desk, even when Republicans controlled both houses of the Legislature, and I believe it’s because Thompson didn’t want it to get to his desk, and so it didn’t.
On the other hand, Thompson served during a period of growth in tax revenues (at one point, Wisconsin was number one in the nation not in football, but in taxes), and so he never had to make the kinds of difficult decisions for which Cullen, Jauch and Schultz castigated Gov. Scott Walker. The closest thing Thompson did to Act 10 was the Qualified Economic Offer, limiting growth in teacher salaries. The QEO went away after Thompson left for Washington.
I hope the Civility Summit included a mirror, but I’m betting it didn’t. Who is at fault for the decrease in civility in politics? I’ll give you a hint: Those at fault include men with the first names of Tommy, Dale, Bob and Tim.
Why is that? Because from the start of Thompson’s Assembly career to the end of Schultz’s, Jauch’s and Cullen’s Senate careers, state government (and local government too) has grown far beyond justified size given inflation and the state’s population growth. (Had we had limits on government spending tied to population growth and inflation since the late 1970s, according to the Tax Foundation, state and local government would be half the size it is today. However, Thompson never pushed for a Taxpayer Bill of Rights, either as state law or, more importantly, in the state Constitution.) During that time as well, state legislators became full-time legislators, and they are paid nearly twice what their average constituent makes. When the stakes go up in elections, the legislative process and campaigns get progressively more personal and nasty. (And therefore the more money gets spent on getting elected and reelected to office, which is a separate subject.)
Thompson, Schultz, Jauch and Cullen spent their entire adult careers in state politics. (I was 1½ years old when Thompson went to Madison, shortly before the Packers’ first Super Bowl win.) So maybe it’s natural for them to assume that every problem the state faces requires government to fix it. None of the four could ever have been accused as doing anything to promote, or even believing in, smaller government. (Thompson was a “compassionate conservative” before George W. Bush was.) Those four were in the same party — the Incumbent Party, which big government benefits most of all.
Out here in the real world, where people actually have to earn their salaries, government causes many more problems than it fixes. Unless you are a government employee, which means you’re paid for your work by taxpayers, no Wisconsinite has ever gotten his or her money’s worth from government.
The Civility Summit calls to mind an era of state politics that doesn’t exist anymore, if in fact it ever did. (Fighting Bob La Follette would have punched out anyone who called for civility in politics.) Politics, remember, is a zero-sum game. One side wins, which means the other side loses. If you don’t win, you have accomplished nothing for your constituents (at least those who voted for you) or your supporters.
Of course, I don’t elevate politicians like the state’s media does. I like politicians to the extent they do what I want them to do, and no more than that. (I particularly do not like politicians who refuse to place limits on their own power.) And I don’t love Wisconsin. You cannot love a thing, and Wisconsin is a thing — an overtaxed place with bad weather most of the year.
Today in 1955, “Rock Around the Clock” was played around the clock because it hit number one:
One year later, Dick Clark made his first appearance on ABC-TV’s “American Bandstand”:
Today in 1972, Paul McCartney and Wings began their first tour of France:
Geoffrey Norman delves into the world of Washington logic:
Washington needs more money and if it doesn’t get it, your morning commute will become:
a) more expensive
b) more unpleasant
c) both
The problem, you see, is that the Highway Trust Fund is “going broke,” by the Beltway’s curious definition of the phrase. It is sort of the way that after a round of painful “cuts,” spending somehow still goes up.
The Highway Trust Fund takes in more than 18 cents on every gallon of gasoline sold in this country, so there is plenty of revenue. Just not enough to meet Washington’s needs and desires. People are driving more fuel efficient cars and with gas already around $4 a gallon, not taking the trips they might otherwise take. So instead of having the $50 billion that Congress budgeted, the trust fund is looking at $34 billion.
So cuts are coming, possibly as soon as August, and, as Keith Laing of The Hill reports:
Those cuts could leave drivers facing congested or damaged roads, sparking anger ahead of November’s midterms.
Sort of like closing down the monuments during one of those government shutdowns. The idea being to inflict immediate pain. …
Gasoline is not a discretionary item in the budget of most Americans. Making it more expensive means there will be less to spend elsewhere. The people calling for urgent measures to keep the trust fund from going broke say they are concerned about jobs.” Theirs.
One wonders just how much pork a penny a gallon in new taxes would buy.
No talk, of course, of privatizing. Using the tolls mechanism.
Just more taxes. For jobs.
Tolls are controversial, to say the least. But if you’re not hearing about tolls, you’re also not hearing about the novel concept of actually spending transportation fund money on transportation-related expenses. Tom Gantert passes on this:
However, Jonathan Williams, director of the Tax and Fiscal Policy Task Force of the American Legislative Exchange Council, studied the Highway Trust Fund in 2007 and found that gas taxes have been spent on far more than just crumbling highways. This raises concerns over how Highway Trust Fund money would be spent if taxes are increased.
Williams found that Highway Trust fund dollars have been spent on things such as public education, museums, parking garages and graffiti removal. He said it is premature to increase gas taxes until Americans can be assured the money would be spent on legitimate road construction projects.
“There’s just so much diversion of funds,” Williams said.
Nothing has changed since Williams’s study. Chris Edwards, director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute, raised similar concerns in testimony in May to the Senate Finance Committee.
“There is no reason to raise the federal gas tax,” Edwards said. “You send the money to Washington, a lot of it gets lost in paper work and bureaucracy and pork-barrel politics.”
In his testimony, Edwards noted, since the 1970s, “fuel taxes have been siphoned off for non-highway purposes, particularly with the creation of the transit program in 1982. About one-quarter of HTF spending today is for non-highway purposes.”
O’Toole said in the last decade, Congress has diverted $55 billion of gas tax revenues to public transit.
“Congress has until the end of August to do something about the dwindling Trust Fund and until October 1 to reauthorize the gas tax,” O’Toole said. “Unless fiscal conservatives apply intense pressure, Congress is most likely to throw more General Funds at the Trust Fund and extend the current bad system another two years.”
Another way to spend less on road projects is to repeal the federal Davis–Bacon Act, which requires paying prevailing (that is, union-level) wages on road projects that receive federal funding, thus drastically increasing the cost of road projects. There is no reason for taxpayers to have to foot the bill for union wages.
The other thing that you won’t hear Obama parasites admit is that maybe gas tax revenues are down because people are taking fewer discretionary trips — for instance, vacations — in the Obama economy with gas prices heading back toward $4 a gallon. Of course, cutting back on vacations is a foreign concept to Barack and Michelle.
In the world of Barack Obama and his sycophants, nothing is ever Obama’s fault. Everything is the fault of the “do-nothing Congress,” George W. Bush, global warming, or even bad weather.
Think again, says John R. Lott Jr.:
The economy took a bad hit during the first quarter this year. It shrunk at an annual rate of 2.96 percent. Since the beginning of 1947, there are only 16 of the 268 quarters experienced worse growth.
The Obama administration blames the slow growth on the “historically severe winter weather, which temporarily lowered growth.” Jason Furman, the chair of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors, made this assertion again on July 3rd and President Obama has made this claim several times.
But that doesn’t square with the historic data. The five worst winter storms or winters with the coldest temperatures do not match economic downturns.
In a list of the worst United States winter storms since 1888, Epic Disasters, using National Weather Service data, lists five of the ten worst occurring since 1947. Four of the five saw economic growth. Only during the fifth worst storm did the economy shrink. The average annualized GDP growth during the quarters when those storms struck was 1.8 percent.
The Obama administration suggests measuring the severity of weather in terms of the U.S. temperature for the first quarter of the year. But, again the data doesn’t support their claim. There is absolutely no relationship between how cold it was and GDP growth. In fact, if there is anything, unusually warmer winters are associated with slightly less economic growth.
The Obama administration graphs out the “Deviation from Normal Temperatures, 1954-2014,” correctly show that this past winter was unusually cold. But what is missing is any evidence that GDP growth indeed gets slower when it is cold.
Economic growth has been abysmal during the Obama recovery, growing just 1.8 percent. The average growth since 1965 has been over 3.1 percent. Normally, during a recovery, economic growth is so fast for a while that lost economic growth during a recession is made up for quickly. But the opposite is true during the Obama recovery, where we are falling further and further behind the average growth rate.
As proof that the economy is growing strongly, the administration points to five months in a row above 200,000 job growth. But what they fail to mention is that since the beginning of the year, full-time jobs have actually declined. The added number of jobs has entirely been in part-time jobs and over 80 percent of them have been in the relatively low paying service sector. …
But the ultimate test for whether the Obama administration is right will come on July 30th, when the initial estimates for the second quarter’s GDP will be released. If the drop were just a temporary blip due to cold weather, we would need GDP growing at an annual rate of 3.1 percent just to dig ourselves out from the first quarter drop. But even that would mean effectively no growth for the first half of the year.
Second-quarter economic growth of 3.1 percent? You have to be seriously deluded to believe that will happen.
It is generally not considered a good career move to be indicted for drug trafficking, as Jonathan “Chico” and Robert DeBarge were today in 1988:
Birthdays begin with Jaimoe “Johnny” Johanson, drummer for the Allman Brothers:
Those who pay attention to the correct economic things know that our economic “recovery” is a recovery only by the loosest possible definition.
The jobs report the feds released Wednesday has even less bearing on reality. The most important number, the U6 — unemployed, underemployed and stopped looking — actually went up from May. Given the Obama administration’s proclivity to quietly revising downward economic news — the economy did not just shrink in the first quarter, it shrunk by 2.9 percent, halfway to an actual recession — you can assume whatever good news you read is not fact.
Some blind Obama-booster last week claimed more Americans are going on vacation. That assertion without facts is belied by, as I pointed out one three-day weekend ago, the visual evidence of adult toys — campers, boats, motorcycles and other non-essential transportation — for sale by owner. You don’t sell something like that after you bought a new toy; you sell them because you can’t afford to use them anymore.
The latest piece of evidence of our craptacular economy, which encompasses the entire Obama presidency (if that’s what you want to call what’s happened since Jan. 20, 2009) comes from Against Crony Capitalism:
For a family of 4 it takes roughly this much money per year to live the “American Dream” (Most families don’t come close.)
Answer: $130,000/year.
In places like Washington DC, New York, and San Francisco it costs a heck of a lot more than that. Life is not inexpensive. The median income per household in the USA by the way is about $51,000/year. So good news everyone, you’re almost halfway there!
Wages adjusted for inflation are actually in decline and have been since the beginning of the Great Recession. This is what happens in a crony economy. The connected get wealthier, and those on the outside have to hustle that much harder.
Are you a banker with access to Federal Reserve funds or a government employee who has a guaranteed COLA built into your taxpayer funded job (And ridiculous pension), or a government contractor which has ridden the wave of warfare over the last 10 years? Well, then things haven’t been so bad for you over the past few years. The productive part of the economy? Well, we live in reality.
And I sure am glad the Middle Income Healthcare Redistribution Act aka Obamacare went through. (And don’t forget the health insurance corporations wrote a bailout for themselves into the law.) Middle class folks have plenty to spare. Yeah, Obamcare is “fair.”
I am about done with the word “fair.”
The $130,000 figure comes from a USA Today story, which includes this conclusion from Marketwatch’s Howard R. Gold:
It sounds like a lot — and it is in a country where the median household income is about $51,000. Add one more child and another vehicle and you could easily reach $150,000
There are big regional variations, too. It costs a lot less to live the American dream in, say, Indianapolis or Tulsa than it does in metro areas like New York and San Francisco, where housing prices and taxes are sky high.
And many people achieve the dream on much less. Some immigrants, for example, have extended families and other support systems to help bear the burden.
Nonetheless, it’s clear that though the American dream is still alive, fewer and fewer of us can afford to live it.
There are those who believe the Great Depression was ended by the Franklin Roosevelt alphabet-soup agencies. They are wrong. The next believe is that the Great Depression was ended by World War II. They are also wrong. What ended the Great Depression was the end of World War II, and thus the end of rationing and forced saving, instead of consumer spending.
Our future will probably not include a world war. But then what will end the Great Recession? Anything? Nothing?
Today in 1967, the Beatles released “All You Need Is Love” …
… which proved insufficient for the Yardbirds, which disbanded one year later:
Can one wish a happy birthday to an entire band? If so, wish Jefferson Airplane a happy birthday:
Today is the anniversary of the Beatles’ first song to reach the U.S. charts, “From Me to You.” Except it wasn’t recorded by the Beatles, it was recorded by Del Shannon:
Five years later, John Lennon sold his Rolls–Royce:

Sharing my daughter’s birthday are Smiley Lewis, who first did …