• I always wanted to be a dot-com

    October 10, 2011
    Uncategorized

    Those who pay attention to such things may notice that this blog now has its own domain name, steveprestegard.com. I figured after six months of daily posting that my deep thoughts deserved something more than a Blogspot or WordPress domain name.

    Since the old address seems to flow into the new address, you will be able to find everything I’ve written since March 31 at either presteblog.wordpress.com or at steveprestegard.com. (I think.)

    Should I figure out how to do it (Google Apps is proving recalcitrant), I may even get my own email address.

    Meanwhile, in addition to Twitter (@presty1965) and Facebook (where I am the only Steve Prestegard), I am now on Google Plus (where I also am the only Steve Prestegard).

    You can run, but you can’t hide from me.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on I always wanted to be a dot-com
  • Presty the DJ for Oct. 10

    October 10, 2011
    Music

    Proving that there is no accounting for taste, I present the number one song today in 1960:

    The number two single today in 1970 was originally written for a bank commercial:

    Britain’s number one album today in 1970 was Black Sabbath’s “Paranoid”:

    The number one album today in 1981 was The Police’s “Ghost in the Machine”:

    The number one single today in 1987:

    The number one British album today in 1992 was REM’s “Automatic for the People”:

    Today in 2007, Blender magazine released a list of what it deemed the worst lyricists in rock music. Sting topped the list for name-dropping Russian author Vladimir Nobokov in “Don’t Stand So Close to Me” and for quoting a Volvo bumper sticker in “If You Love Somebody Set Them Free”:

    Birthdays start with Alan Cartwright, who played bass for Procol Harum:

    David Lee Roth:

    Michael Bivens of Bell Biv Devoe:

    Van Halen seems appropriate to end today’s entry:

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for Oct. 10
  • Suds Series II

    October 9, 2011
    Sports

    What could push the Packers off the front of the sports pages?

    This:

    Morgan a smash up the middle, base hit to center! Here comes Gomez! Around third! The throw and the Brewers win! … The Brewers are moving on, on a base hit by Nyjer Morgan! He’s being mobbed! Whoa, what a scene! Nyjer Morgan … who has delivered so many times this year, delivers a base hit to center field to score Carlos Gomez! And the Brewers have beaten Arizona! What a scene out here! Morgan mobbed at the mound! Whoa!

    You really have to hear Bob Uecker’s call of the first playoff series win for the Brewers since 1982, which means the Brewers will face St. Louis in the National League Championship Series starting this afternoon.

    The Cardinals did themselves and the Brewers a favor by defeating Philadelphia in the other National League Division Series. Thanks to the National League’s win in the All-Star Game earlier this year, the National League will have home-field advantage (hosting games 1 and 2 and, if necessary, 6 and 7) in the World Series. And because wild-card St. Louis won instead of number-one seed Philadelphia, number two seed Milwaukee, possessor of the best home record in baseball this season (and 3–0 at home but 0–2 on the road in the postseason so far), gets home field advantage in the NLCS.

    The Brewers and Cardinals have a history, of course. St. Louis defeated the Brewers 4 games to 3 in the 1982 World Series. And since the Brewers moved to the National League, Cardinals–Brewers games have been must-see occasions, particularly since the Cubs have reverted into their usual state of ineptitude.

    I’ve been to St. Louis twice to watch the Cardinals, first at the previous-plastic-iteration Busch Stadium, and at the current Busch.

    In 2008, my father, his high school buddy and I went on a four-game road trip that started in St. Louis (above, I'm with the bust of Cardinals announcer Jack Buck) …
    … included Cincinnati and Comiskey Park in Chicago …
    … and ended up at Miller Park with an extra-inning game that included two sausage races.

    St. Louis probably has the best atmosphere for baseball in the major leagues, both because of the Cardinals’ well-designed (but expensive-to-dine-in) stadium and because the Cardinals are subject number one of every day in St. Louis. The Cardinals are a well-run operation that fixed one of its errors when they moved their games back to where they always belong, 50,000-watt KMOX (1120 AM), a station you can probably get in your car in your driveway after sunset.

    More history: Milwaukee native Uecker was a Cardinal who was the backup catcher (to Fox Sports’ Tim McCarver) when the Cardinals won the 1964 World Series.

    Uecker’s World Series contribution to the Cardinals wasn’t during the seven games, however. Before Game 1 in St. Louis, probably because it seemed like a good idea at the time, he decided to try to catch fly balls with a tuba:

    Associated Press photo

    (Although I have not checked, I think it’s safe to say that when the UW Marching Band played before Game 3 of the 1982 World Series, no UW tuba player tried to emulate Uecker.)

    Doug Russell adds other reasons for the Brewers–Cardinals rivalry:

    And now, just as the Packers had to get past their chief rival to get to the Super Bowl; that is what is standing between the Brewers and the World Series. Remember, of course, that a true rival isn’t one that just beats up on the other; there has to be success at the same time. You actually have to be playing for something to make a rivalry all it can be.

    Along with mutual success, the other key element of what makes a hated rival is how much hatred can be spewed among their fans.

    Cardinals fans are a passionate lot. They have long supported their team through good times and bad. They are, without question, the most passionate and knowledgeable baseball fans in the game.

    Just ask them. …

    The Cardinals, led by manager Tony La Russa, also think that everyone should comport themselves with the dignity of attending the opera or ballet when on a baseball field. It is called a diamond after all.

    You see, though, that’s why they hate the Brewers. Because the Brewers are a fun, irreverent, boisterous group that have un-tucked their jerseys; gestured their “beast mode” to the crowd; and actually look like they are having a good time playing a child’s game.

    Russell quotes the unrelated Chris Russell of stltoday.com:

    “It’s okay to hate the Brewers. Really, it is. They have that familiar upstart swagger that the Cardinals are used to seeing in teams that catch a few breaks, go on a one-year run and suddenly feel invincible. Typically failing franchises like the Brewers, Reds and Cubs seem to feel like the world owes them something for being long-time losers. They bitch and moan and sulk when things don’t go their way, but then when they get their rare season that involves a playoff push they act like they are part of this juggernaut that can’t be messed with. Like they’ve been there before and other teams just can’t stack up. It always comes along with a brash, yet undeserved, cocky attitude and public outcries that involve choice words for the only team in the division that seems to be everyone’s rival. The Cardinals.

    Every wonder why that is? It’s because those teams haven’t been there. They retool every year with crops of washed up veterans and hopeful youngsters, and when that one magical season works for them they don’t know how to handle it. The proof is in their playoff success. Or lack thereof. The Cardinals, on the other hand, have been there, and have been the cream of the crop in the division – with few exceptions – since 2000. …

    [Brewers fans] boo everything. It’s almost as if they don’t know what’s going in the game at all. Someone makes a lineup change and you’d think Santa walked onto the field in Philadelphia. It’s okay to boo, but at least know what you’re doing. Idiot douche bags.

    (One wonders what St. Loo’s Russell thinks of Phillies and Yankees fans, who, contrary to his assertion, really do boo everything.)

    To those gross generalizations, Milwaukee’s Russell replies:

    This is why Brewers fans hate Cardinals fans. That column sums up what they think of the rest of the league, wrapped up in one spiteful, uppity, self-absorbed, hate filled, nonsensical, fantasyland fueled diatribe. This is how they all think. This is how Cardinals fans view themselves; the lone arbitrator of what is right and what is wrong with baseball. They get to decide because they are the only ones that respect the game. Again, just ask them. …

    So that brings us to today. Once again, it’s the Brewers and the Cardinals; two teams that cannot escape each other. In the two biggest series in franchise history, what are the odds of both being played against the same franchise?

    But, that’s what makes a rivalry great. Mutual success and mutual distaste.

    Not to mention rivalry-fueled overstatement.

    More pertinent than the rivalry between the teams’ fans is the rivalry between the teams. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Tom Haudricourt merely had to stick his recorder or notebook in the middle of this:

    When it was suggested to St. Louis rightfielder Lance Berkman that there is a general perception that the Cardinals and Brewers don’t like each other, he bluntly replied, “And that’s correct.”

    Right-hander Zack Greinke, who will start Game 1 for the Brewers on Sunday afternoon at Miller Park, certainly did nothing to quell the bitterness when asked if the clubs genuinely dislike each other.

    “Maybe now,” he said. “I think no one really likes (Chris) Carpenter. Besides that, I think (the Brewers) respect mostly everyone on their team.”

    Greinke referred to the Cardinals’ ace, whose 1-0 shutout of favored Philadelphia in Game 5 of the National League Division Series propelled wild-card St. Louis into the confrontation of NL Central rivals. That comment drew an immediate and expected response from St. Louis manager Tony La Russa.

    “Very disappointed that Greinke would say that,” said La Russa. “I don’t know him a lot, but I always thought he was a high-character, classy guy. That’s a bad comment to make unless you know Chris Carpenter.

    “Our attitude is we look at ourselves and we grade ourselves. And even if we don’t like what’s happening on the other side, it’s not our business unless somebody crosses the line.

    “So, I think the Brewers should take care of their players and their comments and not be concerned about other players and comments. But, like I said at the beginning, if they had Chris Carpenter they would be cheering for him and believing in him and they would not allow somebody that was a teammate to make a crack like that.”

    It’s certainly no secret that the Cardinals do not like Brewers centerfielder Nyjer Morgan, going back to past transgressions when Morgan played for Washington, including a forearm shiver he gave unsuspecting catcher Bryan Anderson in a game last season.

    Then, there was the confrontation between Carpenter and Morgan the last time the Brewers and Cardinals met Sept. 7 in St. Louis. Carpenter struck out Morgan in the ninth inning, cursing him after doing so and then turning his back.

    Morgan tossed a wad of chewing tobacco toward Carpenter, prompting Cardinals first baseman Albert Pujols to come across the infield to confront him. That action led to the benches and bullpens clearing, but it stopped there. …

    Brewers rightfielder Corey Hart had perhaps the best take on the feelings about Morgan and Carpenter.

    “With both of those guys, if they’re on your team you like them and if they’re on the other team you probably don’t like them,” said Hart. “Whether you like the guys or not, you respect them.”

    Yes, this should be fun.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Suds Series II
  • Presty the DJ for Oct. 9

    October 9, 2011
    Music

    My favorite Ray Charles song was number one today in 1961:

    Today in 1969, the BBC’s “Top of the Pops” refused for the first time to play that week’s number one song because of what singers Serge Gainsbourg and Jane Birkin were supposedly doing while recording “Je T’Aime … Moi Non Plus”:

    According to a classmate of mine, Madison radio stations play Britain’s number one single today in 1971 too often:

    The number one single today in 1976, which makes wonder if, to paraphrase Chuck Berry, Beethoven would have been rolling over at this:

    Birthdays begin with John Lennon:

    John Entwistle of the Who:

    Jackson Browne:

    Terry Balsamo played guitar for Limp Bizkit and Evanescence:

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for Oct. 9
  • Presty the DJ for Oct. 8

    October 8, 2011
    Music

    The number one song today in 1955:

    The number one British song (which is not from Britain) today in 1964:

    Today in 1971, John Lennon released his “Imagine” album:

    The number one British single today in 1977 got virtually no American airplay despite its singer:

    Birthdays start with Doc Green, the first deep voice of the Drifters:

    George Bellamy played guitar for the Tornadoes:

    Butch Rillera of Redbone …

    … was born the same day as guitarist Ray Royer of Procol Harum:

    Tony Wilson of Hot Chocolate:

    Who is John Cummings? You knew him as Joey Ramone:

    Hamish Stewart of the Average White Band:

    Robert Bell was the “Kool” of Kool and the Gang:

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for Oct. 8
  • My biggest story

    October 7, 2011
    media

    Earlier this week, while looking for something else, I came upon some of my own work.

    (I’m going to write a blog someday called “Things I Found While Looking for Something Else.” This is not that blog.)

    The Grant County Sheriff’s Department, in the county where I used to live, has a tribute page to the two officers in county history who died in the line of duty. One is William Loud, a deputy marshal in Cassville, shot to death by two bank robbers in 1912.

    The other is Tom Reuter, a Grant County deputy sheriff who was shot to death at the end of his 4 p.m.-to-midnight shift March 18, 1990. Gregory Coulthard, then a 19-year-old farmhand, was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide and is serving a life sentence, with his first eligibility for parole on March 18, 2015, just 3½ years from now.

    I’ve written a lot over the years. I think this, from my first two years in the full-time journalism world, will go down as the story I remember the most.

    For journalists, big stories contain a paradox, which was pointed out in CBS-TV’s interview of Andy Rooney on his last “60 Minutes” Sunday. Morley Safer said something along the line of wars being fun to cover, but really any big story is what a journalist wants to cover — human drama. On the other hand, human drama often involves tragedy, and this certainly was a tragedy for Reuter’s family, and also for Coulthard’s family.

    As it happened, I drove past the area a few hours before the shooting. I had been in Madison that weekend to watch the state basketball tournament and see my parents. It was a typical late winter night, with blowing snow making the two-lane roads a bit slick.

    The next morning, the first thing I heard was something along the lines of “A sheriff’s deputy was shot to death last night in Grant County.”  The radio station I was listening to had news every half-hour, and I wasn’t sure what I’d heard even though hearing the words “Grant County” woke me up better than a double espresso, so I waited another half-hour to hear the same thing, more awake this time.

    (Twenty-one years after I wrote the preceding story, I notice that two paragraphs are duplicated. I regret the error.)

    The criminal complaint and the trial revealed what had happened that evening.

    Coulthard, who worked and lived on a farm in eastern Grant County, decided to go to Platteville to drink that Sunday night. (Or drink some more; when Coulthard was arrested, his blood alcohol level was past the then-legal limit of 0.10.) The fact he didn’t have a valid driver’s license because of a previous drunk driving conviction posed a dilemma, which he solved by taking one of the farm’s tractors and heading down Wisconsin 80.

    About halfway to Platteville, Coulthard apparently concluded he wouldn’t get to Platteville by bar time, and was unhappy about that. Coulthard dealt with his anger by taking the shotgun that was in the tractor cab (intended to shoot varmints that didn’t belong on the farm) and firing at a billboard until he hit its light. He then turned around the tractor and went back to the farm.

    Reuter was working the 4-to-midnight shift, one of two deputies patrolling Grant County (which is larger in land area than the state of Rhode Island) that evening. Sheriff’s deputies are allowed to take their cars home with them, so Reuter probably was heading home when he encountered a tractor apparently disabled on the side of the road. It wasn’t made clear why Coulthard was parked on the side of the road; he may have been trying to sneak the tractor back into the farm by a side entrance.

    At any rate, when Reuter saw the tractor, which would have been an unexpected sight on a March night before anything was being planted or harvested, he turned on his red and blue lights, radioed in that he was stopped behind a disabled tractor, and got out to investigate. And when he got up to the tractor, he was greeted by a shotgun blast to the chest. He wasn’t wearing a bulletproof vest.

    I didn’t know Reuter personally, but I’d had a couple of interactions with him. One was when I ran out to get a photo of a downed power line caused by the remnants of a hurricane that had made the trip up the Mississippi River; he was at the scene where the power line crossed the state highway west of Lancaster. The other was when Reuter came over to pick up something tied to the felony theft trial of the newspaper’s former receptionist. (That is a story in itself, but not here.)

    As sometimes happens even at a small-town weekly newspaper, whatever I was intending to do the day after the shooting didn’t happen. My first stop after arriving at work was to go to the sheriff’s department to pick up the department’s news release. I had covered trials before, but never a murder.

    At first, the chief deputy was composed as I asked him details about what happened. And then from whatever I asked him, his eyes reddened and his voice choked up. And there is nothing in any journalism course that instructs you how to deal with something like that.

    The next afternoon, Coulthard made his first appearance in Grant County Circuit Court.

    That’s when I figured out why I thought the name sounded familiar. The previous year, I’d written a small item about Coulthard’s probation for criminal damage to property and theft charges. The probation term apparently included a short stay in the Grant County Jail, an experience so unpleasant that Coulthard supposedly vowed to never return to jail.

    Two days after that, I was at Reuter’s funeral, held in the Catholic church in Platteville because it was the largest church in the county. (A priest formerly at my family’s church was the pastor. We didn’t have a chance to reconnect.) The funeral was at a rural cemetery near the Reuter home. It was the first police funeral I’d ever witnessed, with a 14-mile-long procession of police cars.

    (My personal favorite detail of this case is the identity of the arresting officer. His name was Ivan. He was a Dane County Sheriff’s Department K–9 dog. Ivan went into a haymow, found Coulthard, and brought him out by his face. Coulthard’s first stop on the way to his life sentence was to Lancaster Memorial Hospital to have his facial wounds repaired.)

    In addition to this being the first murder trial I’d ever covered,  it was the first trial I’d covered that included numerous other members of the news media. Two TV stations and the Lancaster radio station were there for the trial, along with reporters from the Dubuque Telegraph Herald, La Crosse Tribune and Wisconsin State Journal in Madison, and some of our other Grant County weekly newspaper competition.

    I spent much of the spring attending various hearings tied to the trial, including the preliminary hearing (where a judge determines whether or not sufficient evidence exists to bring a case to trial) and the plea hearing. Coulthard first pleaded not guilty, then not guilty by mental disease or defect, then, just before the trial, back to not guilty.

    Coulthard’s public defenders’  strategy was to admit that Coulthard did shoot Reuter, but not intentionally — that he made a bad decision out of fear, not out of intent to shoot the cop who had stopped behind him.

    The trial began on a Friday, included a Saturday morning session, and wrapped up testimony on Monday, with the closing arguments and jury instructions Tuesday morning. Grant County District Attorney Emil Everix brought out a parade of witnesses to prove every event that had occurred that evening.

    When a reporter has reported enough to get that cynical sheen, the reporter realizes that most events are not as exciting as they are portrayed in fiction. There are no “Perry Mason” moments in trials.

    Coulthard took the stand in his own defense to reinforce his attorneys’ strategy of claiming a momentary breakdown of judgment. After one of his attorneys examined him, Everix cross-examined him, asking questions about the specific events.

    “When the officer came around, that’s when you shot him, is that correct?” asked Everix.

    “I shot him when I saw him,” said Coulthard.

    Everix immediately decided he had asked enough questions. Coulthard’s attorney tried to repair the damage, but it was like trying to unring a bell. Once a recess was declared, I went up to the court reporter to make sure I’d heard what I thought I had heard. So much for the claim that there are no Perry Mason moments in trials.

    The public defender called it a “slick lawyer’s trick” in his closing arguments. Everix countered by saying “That was not a a slip of the tongue, that was the truth finally coming out of his mouth.”

    The jury began deliberations around 11 a.m. I was in the clerk of court’s office doing my usual Tuesday dregs-of-mankind courthouse stop when the jury commissioner stuck his head in and said the jury had reached a verdict. That meant that in 90 minutes, the jury had selected a foreman, ate lunch, and decided the verdict.

    Coulthard will be eligible for parole on the 25th anniversary of Reuter’s death. Attorneys told me that hardly anyone gets parole on the first application. Coulthard is now 40 years old, which means he outlived Reuter.

    The aftermath included a few ironies. Coulthard’s sentencing hearing began with the jury, even though juries usually are not present at sentencings. The reason is that the judge did not poll the jury as apparently was requested, so they had to do that. Coulthard’s attorneys sought a mistrial based on the procedural error or omission. It was denied at all three levels of the state court system.

    Reuter’s squad car was later used by another sheriff’s deputy. But not for long — a couple years later, a deputy was driving the car north of Dubuque when the car got hung up on railroad tracks. The deputy radioed in that he was disabled, and then heard a train whistle. To make a long story short, the deputy survived, but the squad car did not.

    Coulthard is lucky in a sense. He’s lucky he wasn’t living one state to the south, where, had he done what he did, he would probably have been executed a few years ago. He has, however, spent more than half his life behind bars. That’s a grim thought for anyone who has even visited a prison. (I visited the Supermax prison in Boscobel before it opened.)

    Two years later, I was the owner of Coulthard’s hometown newspaper, the Tri-County Press. Although I don’t think I’ve ever met his parents, my office manager did tell me his mother was in one day to renew his subscription, to a post office box in Green Bay.

    The Tri-County Press’ previous owner reran a story from the La Crosse Tribune about Coulthard ‘s spending his birthday in the Richland County Jail, where he stayed from arrest until his sentencing. That struck me at the time as being incredibly bad judgment (the story included Coulthard’s jail address so readers could send him birthday cards), and the story struck me as glorifying a cop-killer. (There was no other possible perpetrator, and as previously noted the defense made no effort to deny that Coulthard had shot Reuter.)

    I’ve changed my mind slightly about that because I cannot imagine what horror was visited on Coulthard’s parents by the shooting. Everyone in the Tri-State region knew what the Coulthards’ oldest son did. And the Coulthards were active community members in Cuba City, including serving on the Cuba City Area Rescue Squad.

    But whatever horror was visited on Coulthard’s parents cannot match the horror visited on the Reuter family. Five children, who were ages 7 to 15 when Reuter was killed, grew up without a father. I don’t know if Diane Reuter has remarried or not, but she suddenly and unwillingly became a single parent. My extended family is proof that can happen to anyone (I have a grandfather who died at 47, a grandmother who died at 49, and an uncle who died at 44), but I doubt that’s the same.

    During the debate over public employee collective bargaining rights earlier this year, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett asked why police officers and firefighters were allowed to keep their collective bargaining rights while most other public employees weren’t. Independent of the political games being played (to coin a phrase, endorsements have consequences), there is one substantial difference between police officers and firefighters and other government employees — the first group’s job duties include the possibility that they could die in the performance of their job. We all got a reminder of that Sept. 11, 2001. Neither Tom Reuter nor the hundreds of New York police officers and firefighters thought when they went to work that day that that would be their last day on earth.

    I would think about the trial every time I drove past the Green Bay Correctional Institution, on Wisconsin 172. One thing that came to mind is that there seems to be absolutely no one to blame except Coulthard himself. I’m sure his parents blamed themselves for what he did, but no evidence came out about his having a bad childhood or any other excuse. Poor judgment under alcohol appears to have been a recurring theme despite his inability to legally drink (as in one drunk driving conviction and the charges for which he was on probation). Despite being legally drunk, Coulthard was sober enough to kill someone with one shot from a shotgun.

    Coulthard didn’t set out from his farm intending to shoot a cop that night. But when he picked up the shotgun and pointed it at Deputy Reuter, that was all the intent the law requires and the jury needed for a first-degree intentional homicide conviction and a life sentence. And because he didn’t want to go back to jail, he ended one life, irreparably damaged two families’ lives, and threw away his own life.

    The last irony is that I ended up knowing a lot of people who were principals in the case. The sheriff’s captain who executed the search warrant at Coulthard’s house became my brother-in-law, because her sister-in-law, having nothing else to do since her return from the Peace Corps, came to the trial with her mother. And there, she saw, for about the fourth time that week, the reporter who interviewed her upon her return from Guatemala. And he told her about the high school baseball playoff game later the day the verdict was reached. (Lancaster 20, Platteville 3.) Which led to another baseball playoff game (Gale–Ettrick–Trempealeau 8, Lancaster 7 in 12 innings). Which led to a date. Which leads to our 19th anniversary Oct. 24. And, other than justice being done, that may have been the best thing that came out of it all.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on My biggest story
  • 1957 vs. 1982 vs. 2011

    October 7, 2011
    Sports

    Last week, around the time the Brewers won the first two games of the National League Division Series, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Michael Hunt asked the question of which championship team was better, the 1982 American League champion Brewers, or the 2011 National League Central Division champion Brewers.

    Some posters chose option 3, the 1957 Milwaukee Braves, which defeated the (hated) New York Yankees 4 games to 3 to win the World Series.

    I bring up this comparison now because the 2011 Brewers’ season might end today with game 5 of the NLDS scheduled for late afternoon. The Brewers are one of the best home teams in baseball, but in a one-game playoff, to dust off my Greatest Sports Clichés book, anything can happen.

    If the Brewers fail to get to the World Series, they will of course drop to third in any comparison of these three teams. The Braves won the World Series in 1957, got to the World Series in 1958, and were contenders for the National League pennant in 1956 and 1959 (when they lost a playoff to the Dodgers). The early ’80s Brewers got to the 1982 World Series, won the American League East second-half title in the strike year of 1981, and were a contender every season from 1978 to 1983.

    Some of the choices are obvious. Ryan Braun (who batted .332 with 33 home runs, 111 RBI and an OPS of .994) is a Most Valuable Player candidate, Henry Aaron (.322, 44 HR, 132 RBI, .978 OPS in 1957) was the 1957 National League Most Valuable Player, and Robin Yount (.331, 29 HR, 114 RBI, .957 OPS) was the 1982 American League MVP.

    (Before we go on, for older baseball fans: OPS stands for On-Base (Average) Plus Slugging (Percentage), a statistic in which .700 to .767 is average and anyone better than .900 is one of the best offensive players in the league.)

    Other positions are fun to debate. Cecil Cooper (.313, 32 HR, 121 RBI, .870 OPS) was one of the most underrated players of his day. In 1980, Cooper batted .352, but the Royals’ George Brett batted .390. In 1982, Cooper batted .313, but Yount batted .331 and just missed the batting title. It seemed as though every season Cooper had the second or third best offensive stats on the Brewers. It’s hard to imagine the ’82 Brewers without Cooper, but it’s impossible to imagine the ’11 Brewers without Prince Fielder (.299, 38 HR, 120 RBI, .981 OPS in ’11).

    Third base gives you your pick of offensive style. Eddie Mathews (.292, 34 HR, 87 RBI, .927 OPS in ’57) was to Aaron what Fielder is to Braun — a feared left-handed power hitter backing up the best all-around hitter in the lineup. Paul Molitor (.302, 19 HR, 71 RBI, 41 stolen bases, .816 OPS), for whom third base was his fifth different position (he came up as a shortstop, played second when he came to the Brewers, was moved to center field and then right in 1981, then went to third in 1982) was known as “the Igniter” because he was as complete a leadoff hitter as baseball had in those days — ability to reach base, base-stealing ability, and a little power too.

    Some positions show how baseball has changed over the decades. Del Crandall was one of the best defensive catchers in baseball and at least an effective hitter. Ted Simmons was one of the best offensive catchers in baseball, although he was acquired as much for his ability to work with pitchers. Jonathan Lucroy has a lot of career ahead of him.

    There’s also the effect of the midseason addition to consider. Red Schoendienst (.309, 15 HR, 65 RBI, .795 OPS) was acquired in a trade midway through the ’57 season for, among others, Bobby Thomson of “The Giants win the pennant!” fame. (Thomson’s broken leg in 1954 paved the way for Aaron to come to Milwaukee.) Don Sutton came to Milwaukee in late August 1982 (after which he was 4–1 with a 3.29 ERA); had Sutton been with the Brewers longer, perhaps they would not have nearly collapsed in the last week of the season and needed the final-game win over Baltimore to win the division.

    Some players’ contributions are not quantified by statistics. Gorman Thomas was a below-average fielder and an all-or-nothing hitter (“all” meaning an average of 30 home runs per season, “nothing” meaning an average of 151 strikeouts per season) who was one of the Brewers’ clubhouse leaders. Similar things could be said of Jim Gantner (.295, 4 home runs, 43 RBI, .704).

    There is one huge what-if here, in the bullpen poll. Rollie Fingers was the AL MVP in 1981, and was pitching reasonably well (5–6, 29 saves, 2.60 ERA) until his arm injury in August 1982. One wonders how the Brewers would have finished with a healthy Fingers closing games instead of Pete Ladd, who was 1–3, though with three saves, and an ERA of 4.00 after Fingers’ injury. (For that matter, Ladd pitched perfectly, as in an ERA of 0.00, in the 1982 ALCS. However, he pitched only once in the World Series, giving up a hit and two walks to four batters.)

    But that’s not the only what-if. Billy Bruton played only half the season for the ’57 Braves due to injury. Rickie Weeks (.269, 20 HR, 49 RBI, .818 OPS) missed part of this season due to injury and could only pinch-hit in the 2008 playoffs due to injury.

    On the other hand, the injury-related what-ifs lead to opportunity for others. Ladd is an obvious example. An even better example is Bob “Hurricane” Hazle, who had the half-season of his life (he played just three years in the majors) when the Braves called him up in 1957. Hazle had what might have been a prorated All-Star season — .310, 7 HR, 27 RBI in 41 games, with an insane OPS of 1.126. He finished fourth in the Rookie of the Year balloting based on 41 games.

    Pitching probably best reflects the differences in eras, which makes comparing eras difficult. Certainly all three teams had name pitchers. It’s hard to top Warren Spahn (21–11, 2.69 ERA) and Lew Burdette (17–9, 3.72 ERA), even though Burdette had a higher ERA than his career ERA in 1957. (Two words: “Run support.”) The Braves’ third starter, Bob Buhl, picked a good time to have the best year of his career (18–7, 2.74 ERA). Gene Conley, Bob Trowbridge and Juan Pizarro shared the fourth starter spot. The bullpen was where failed starters or rookies went in the ’50s, but in any era, a 1.54 ERA is a 1.54 ERA, so Don McMahon certainly helped the Braves.

    The reputation of the 1982 “Harvey’s Wallbangers” Brewers was that they overcame mediocre pitching with their hitting. Pete Vuckovich was to the ’82 Brewers what Burdette was to the ’57 Braves — a relatively high era (3.34) overcome by run support (as shown by his 18–6 record). Mike Caldwell made up for a mediocre regular season (17–13, 3.91 ERA) with a tremendous World Series (2–0, 2.04 ERA). Vuke and Mr. Warmth (as Caldwell’s T-shirt worn under his jersey said, although there was another word on it that rhymes with “tucking”) were the only two Brewers’ starters (over the full season) with ERAs of less than 4.00.  The Brewers plainly would not have won the AL East without Sutton. But the pitcher who really saved the ’82 Brewers was Jim Slaton, who went 10–6 with a 3.29 ERA going between the rotation and the bullpen.

    The 2011 Brewers shouldn’t have enough pitching, by statistics, to have one more win than the ’82 Brewers and the ’57 Braves, but they do. As I noted last week, it’s a bit ironic that for all the wheeling and dealing general manager Doug Melvin did to put together a winning pitching staff, their best starter remains home-grown Yovani Gallardo (17–10, 3.52 ERA). Shawn Marcum pitched better statistically than Zack Greinke (3.83 vs. Marcum’s 3.54), but Greinke has the better record (16–6 in 28 starts vs. Marcum’s 13–7 in 33 starts). Interestingly, Randy Wolf (13–10, 3.69 ERA) pitched the most innings as a starter this year, and is sort of 2011’s answer to Caldwell.

    The reason the Brewers probably did as well as they did pitching-wise is their bullpen. The Brewers have been able to turn most games into six-inning games, thanks to seventh-inning pitcher LaTroy Hawkins (3–1, 2.42 ERA), eighth-inning pitcher Francisco Rodriguez (4–0, 1.86 ERA since coming to Milwaukee from the Mets) and closer John Axford (2–2, 46 saves, making them perhaps the 2011 equivalent of the 1990 Cincinnati Reds “Nasty Boys” bullpen.

    The best way to statistically compare teams is against their competition. This year’s Brewers had the second best record in the National League despite being seventh in ERA and fifth in runs scored (despite, in the latter case, leading the NL in home runs). The 1982 Brewers were first in runs scored and sixth in ERA, an unusual formula for the best record in baseball. The 1957 Braves were best in the NL with the second best ERA and the most runs scored.

    By the only measure that really counts, the 1957 Braves are the best baseball team Milwaukee ever produced, since they have a world championship. Where the 2011 Brewers finish depends on where they finish, beginning with today.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on 1957 vs. 1982 vs. 2011
  • Presty the DJ for Oct. 7

    October 7, 2011
    Music

    Today in 1975, one of the stranger episodes in rock music history ended when John Lennon got permanent resident status, his “green card.” The federal government, at the direction of Richard Nixon, tried to deport Lennon because of his 1968 British arrest for possession of marijuana. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that trying to deport Lennon on the basis of an arrest was “contrary to U.S. ideas of due process and was invalid as a means of banishing the former Beatle from America.”

    The number one British single today in 1978 came from that day’s number one album:

    The number one album today in 1989 was Tears for Fears’ “Seeds of Love”:

    The number one album today in 1995 was Alanis Morrisette’s “Jagged Little Pill” (which should have been difficult to fit into a CD player):

    Birthdays start with Colin Cooper of the Climax Blues Band, which …

    Tony Sylvester of the Main Ingredient, where …

    Dino Valenti of Quicksilver Messenger Service:

    Kevin Godley of 10cc and Godley and Creme:

    David Hope played bass for Kansas:

    Perhaps the biggest Indiana Hoosier football fan you’ll find, John Mellencamp:

    Tico Torres of Bon Jovi:

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for Oct. 7
  • A Job(s) well done

    October 6, 2011
    US business

    The tributes pouring in after the death of Apple Computer founder Steve Jobs Wednesday are effusive, even to the point of a bit overdone.

    Jobs’ Apple cofounder, Steve Wozniak, told the Associated Press, “We’ve lost something we won’t get back. The way I see it, though, the way people love products he put so much into creating means he brought a lot of life to the world.”

    I’ve used both Macs and PCs since I drove into the full-time work world in 1988. The Grant County Herald Independent in Lancaster used the second iteration of Macs to print stories, headlines, photo captions and parts of ads. The process by which newspapers used to do layout is too complicated to explain here (do a Web search for “Compugraphic” for details).

    I write the modern way of starting to write, going back into a story to insert something, moving paragraphs around, improving the lead, etc. All of that used to have to be done on a typewriter on which every insertion or change meant retyping the entire page. (Or in the alternative having several pages with just one or two paragraphs on them, often placed behind a page on which “INSERT HERE” is written in.) I have a hard time imagining being able to write more than one or two pages of copy in the old way.

    At the risk of sounding like a tech geek, I’ve always been more of a fan of Macintoshes than PCs. In fact, the only Mac we bought is still in our basement. Our kids occasionally play Tetris and Shanghai, and it still has a number of sound files I created on it.

    I’m guessing that Jobs and Michelle Malkin didn’t see eye to eye much politically. But Malkin may have written the best tribute to both Jobs and the economic system that allowed him to serve customers, hire and pay employees, and personally profit:

    There is perhaps no greater image of irony tonight than that of anti-capitalist, anti-corporate, anti-materialist extremists of the Occupy Wall Street movement payingtributetoSteve Jobs — the co-founder, chairman and former chief executive of Apple Inc., who passed away this evening.

    While the Kamp Alinsky Kids ditch school to moan about their massive student debt, parade around in zombie costumes, and whine about evil corporations while Tweeting, Facebook-ing, blogging, and Skype-ing their “revolution,” it’s the doers and producers and wealth creators like Jobs who change the world. They are the gifted 1 percent whom the #OWS “99 percent-ers” mob seeks to demonize, marginalize, and tax out of existence.

    Inherent in the American success story of the iPhone/iMac/iPad is a powerful lesson about the fundamentals of capitalism. The Kamp Alinsky Kids scream “People over profit.” They call for “caring” over “corporations.”

    But the pursuit of profits empowers people beyond the bounds of imagination.

    I am blogging on an iMac. When I travel, I use my MacBook Pro. I Tweet news links from my iPhone. My kids are learning Photoshop and GarageBand on our Macs. I use metronome, dictation, video, and camera apps. I use Apple products for business, pleasure, social networking, raising awareness of the missing, finding recipes, and even tuning a ukulele.

    None of the people involved in conceiving these products and bringing them to market “care” about me. They pursued their own self-interests. Through the spontaneous order of capitalism, they enriched themselves — and the world.

    In fact, after reading this from Arizona State University Prof. G. Pascal Zachary, I’m more a fan of Jobs than I was before:

    What does Apple’s Steve Jobs know about the politics of science and technology that other industrial tycoons don’t?

    The answer is not merely that Jobs sticks to his knitting, churning out new Apple products that strike a compelling engineering balance between emerging and stable technological elements. Jobs is not simply apolitical—he’s antipolitical.

    Instead of making hefty personal donations or having Apple mount Washington, D.C., lobbying efforts in the manner of a Google or a Microsoft, Jobs relies on his star power, his celebrity. When he met with President Obama in October, the White House pointedly announced that the president had sought the meeting, not Jobs. “He’s eager to talk to him about the economy, innovation and technology, education,” Robert Gibbs told the press. …

    Yet while cultivating friends in high places and capitalizing on his personal legend, Jobs doesn’t view political action as strategic to Apple’s business or to its capacity for innovation. All kinds of industrial giants routinely ask the federal government for assistance in supporting their innovation capacity, but not Apple.

    Jobs has studiously avoided explaining to the public why he doesn’t seek federal aid for Apple’s innovation capacity or competiveness strategy. People close to him over the years say he sees himself as a “progressive industrialist” who eschews moral gestures and views succeeding in the marketplace with innovative products as his central mission in life. His unwillingness to follow conventional approaches to handling government affairs stands in stark contrast to other high-tech leading companies, even some in the computing and Internet fields. …

    To be sure, the obvious point is worth making: When people supposedly in charge of innovating spend so much time and money seeking special favors from government, either their innovations aren’t very compelling, or maybe they know that innovating isn’t the way to succeed in business after all.

    As with many achievers, Jobs influenced even those he never met, such as Om Malik:

    Every generation has its heroes. I was too provincial to love the Beatles and cry over John Lennon. I was too Indian to care much about Elvis. And I read about President Kennedy in books. But for me, Steve Jobs was all of those people. I don’t know why, how and where that happened but Jobs was my icon.

    For many of us who live and die for technology and the change it represents, he was an example of what was possible, no matter how the chips were stacked against you. Jobs put life and soul into inanimate objects. Everyone saw steel, silicon and software; he saw an opportunity to paint his Mona Lisa. People saw a phone; Steve saw a transporter of love. People saw a tablet; he saw smiles and wide-eyed amazement. They made computers; he made time machines that brought us all together through a camera, screen and a connection.

    Mac, iPod and iPhone — they are like Silicon Valley’s Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker and E.T. — magical, memorable and life-changing. And perhaps that is why I didn’t want to meet him, interview him or even talk to him. I had the opportunity on numerous occasions when I was attending Apple’s events, but I decided not to. To me, just the idea of Steve was powerful enough.

    The idea of Steve led me to follow my heart, make tough choices, be brutally honest with myself (and sometimes annoying to people I love) and always remember that in the end, it is all about making your customers happy. There are simple ways to get along with everyone. There are easier ways to get things done. There are compromises. But to me Steve Jobs meant try harder, damn it, your customers (readers) expect better than that. Steve taught me to care about the little things, because in the end, little things matter.

    In September, Jeffrey A. Tucker added:

    Every time I slip on a pair of shoes, I think of the marvels of entrepreneurship and the division of labor that make my foot comfort possible. I have the same sense for those who make my refrigerator, provide lettuce for my salad, create alarm systems for my home and car, own and run chain stores that sell everything from pet food to paper clips, sell me insurance, build our homes and offices, and make it possible for me to buy a plane ticket with a few clicks on a computer — or finger swipes on a smartphone.

    Every entrepreneur in society deserves such praise, and it is also correct to single out Steve Jobs, because his company seemed to push civilization a bit further down the road to progress with mind-blowing consumer products that allow us to do everything from play musical instruments to video talk with people halfway across the world in real time. Apple has dramatically improved our lives — in the same way that all capitalistic ventures have but more conspicuously so. …

    What made Jobs’s tenure at Apple great is that he wedded profits with aesthetic loveliness. Not every businessperson can or should do this. Even the entrepreneurs who provided the masses with tacky things are just as deserving of our admiration and praise, for they too do their part to lift us all out of the poverty and squalor that is the state of nature.

    And aside from the prettiness of certain products or the elegance of the smartphone, there is another overarching beauty that we find in the market: a lovely, orderly, productive global matrix of cooperative exchange that leads to human flourishing for everyone, even in the absence of a global dictator. This is as beautiful a system as any product Steve Jobs ever made.

    The irony of the timing of Jobs’ death is that President Obama is trying to con Congress into passing his guaranteed-to-fail jobs bill. I had to repost this from  Twitter:  “Another Steve Jobs would create a whole lot more jobs than Obama’s ‘jobs bill.’”

    The additional irony is that those without enough to do are occupying Wall Street instead of, you know, working. The Anchoress notes:

    I confess, my geek husband and Elder Son appreciated his multi-layered genius much better than I ever could — I referred to him as “the guy who is making our lives look like Star Trek” — but even I am smart enough to know that Steve Jobs’ was a rare and exotic mind. I wonder if he is the last [publicly apolitical] capitalist we’re going to be permitted to admire for his creativity, his invention and his sheer genius?

    Jobs’ amazing accomplishments and, yes, failures should allow him his own last word:

    “Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.”

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    2 comments on A Job(s) well done
  • Risky business

    October 6, 2011
    US business, US politics

    Robert Samuelson writes for Investors Business Daily:

    Economist Robert Litan of the Kauffman Foundation likes to recall that half of today’s Fortune 500 companies began as startups in a recession or a bear stock market. And why not? During a recession, it’s cheaper to hire new workers, rent office space, buy supplies.

    But Litan suspects the same process may not be working now. In contrast to earlier slumps, when the number of startups barely fell, there’s been a steep decline. From 2006 to 2009, startups dropped 27%. …

    Americans see themselves as go-getters and risk-takers. Our optimism will ultimately rescue us. So it’s said.

    But the folklore increasingly collides with reality. The 2008-09 financial crisis traumatized millions. It swelled the ranks of risk-avoiders, worrywarts and victims. Of course, this was mainly a reaction to overborrowing, inflated home values and lost jobs. But now the fear factor is feeding on itself — and it’s smothering the recovery. …

    “Risk aversion” — understandable for individuals and firms— has become a collective curse. When everyone is supercautious, the result is stagnation or worse. Imagine an economy doing just slightly better: consumers work off some pent-up demand; stock prices are 10% higher; companies channel $200 billion of their cash to new products or plants; entrepreneurs nurture 10% more startups. A stronger recovery would be self-sustaining.

    One contributor to risk aversion that Samuelson doesn’t mention is business’ apparent belief that the Obama administration is going to swipe whatever profits businesses (99.9 percent of which are not on Wall Street) are able to earn in profits, by higher taxes, the upcoming ObamaCare, or whatever else the feds can think of to increase costs on business.

    Here’s an example: Last year Congress passed a bill that reduced banks’ ability to charge retailers credit- and debit-card swipe fees. Bank of America responded to the loss of revenue by charging its customers $5 per month for its debit cards. (Another example of the Law of Unintended Consequences.) Banking expert Barack Obama replied thusly:

    If you say to banks, ‘You don’t have some inherent right to get a certain amount of profit if your customers are being mistreated, that you have you have to treat them fairly and transparently,’ then some will hopefully get the message. … Banks can make money — they can succeed the old-fashioned way — by earning it by lending to small business and by lending to consumers, by making sure we are building the economy together.

    Let’s review: Congress passes a law that restricts a business’ ability to generate revenue. (A business’ fiduciary responsibility, of course, is to generate profits for its owners, a concept utterly foreign to the White House.) The business finds another way to generate revenue. Obama now looks for another way to interfere in this business’ business, instead of letting the business’ customers vote with their feet on whether they want to pay the charges.

    That is precisely what business is dealing with today — all businesses, not just the 0.1 percent of businesses that are publicly traded corporations. Because of the looming further threats of the Obama administration, businesses aren’t hiring, which means the unemployment rate is high, which means people aren’t buying things, which means businesses aren’t hiring … you get the picture. Risk aversion may indeed be a collective curse, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t rational.

    By the way: Banks are so inherently profitable that the collective profit of U.S. banks, $80 billion, is enough to run the federal government for 7 days and 12 hours.

    Share this on …

    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Risky business
Previous Page
1 … 990 991 992 993 994 … 1,029
Next Page

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog

The thoughts of a journalist/libertarian–conservative/Christian husband, father, Eagle Scout and aficionado of obscure rock music. Thoughts herein are only the author’s and not necessarily the opinions of his family, friends, neighbors, church members or past, present or future employers.

  • Steve
    • About, or, Who is this man?
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Adventures in ruralu0026nbsp;inkBack in June 2009, I was driving somewhere through a rural area. And for some reason, I had a flashback to two experiences in my career about that time of year many years ago. In 1988, eight days after graduating from the University of Wisconsin, I started work at the Grant County Herald Independent in Lancaster as a — well, the — reporter. Four years after that, on my 27th birthday, I purchased, with a business partner, the Tri-County Press in Cuba City, my first business venture. Both were experiences about which Wisconsin author Michael Perry might write. I thought about all this after reading a novel, The Deadline, written by a former newspaper editor and publisher. (Now who would write a novel about a weekly newspaper?) As a former newspaper owner, I picked at some of it — why finance a newspaper purchase through the bank if the seller is willing to finance it? Because the mean bank lender is a plot point! — and it is much more interesting than reality, but it is very well written, with a nicely twisting plot, and quite entertaining, again more so than reality. There is something about that first job out of college that makes you remember it perhaps more…
    • Adventures in radioI’ve been in the full-time work world half my life. For that same amount of time I’ve been broadcasting sports as a side interest, something I had wanted to since I started listening to games on radio and watching on TV, and then actually attending games. If you ask someone who’s worked in radio for some time about the late ’70s TV series “WKRP in Cincinnati,” most of them will tell you that, if anything, the series understated how wacky working in radio can be. Perhaps the funniest episode in the history of TV is the “WKRP” episode, based on a true story, about the fictional radio station’s Thanksgiving promotion — throwing live turkeys out of a helicopter under the mistaken belief that, in the words of WKRP owner Arthur Carlson, “As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.” [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST01bZJPuE0] I’ve never been involved in anything like that. I have announced games from the roofs of press boxes (once on a nice day, and once in 50-mph winds), from a Mississippi River bluff (more on that later), and from the front row of the second balcony of the University of Wisconsin Fieldhouse (great view, but not a place to go if…
    • “Good morning/afternoon/evening, ________ fans …”
    • My biggest storyEarlier this week, while looking for something else, I came upon some of my own work. (I’m going to write a blog someday called “Things I Found While Looking for Something Else.” This is not that blog.) The Grant County Sheriff’s Department, in the county where I used to live, has a tribute page to the two officers in county history who died in the line of duty. One is William Loud, a deputy marshal in Cassville, shot to death by two bank robbers in 1912. The other is Tom Reuter, a Grant County deputy sheriff who was shot to death at the end of his 4 p.m.-to-midnight shift March 18, 1990. Gregory Coulthard, then a 19-year-old farmhand, was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide and is serving a life sentence, with his first eligibility for parole on March 18, 2015, just 3½ years from now. I’ve written a lot over the years. I think this, from my first two years in the full-time journalism world, will go down as the story I remember the most. For journalists, big stories contain a paradox, which was pointed out in CBS-TV’s interview of Andy Rooney on his last “60 Minutes” Sunday. Morley Safer said something along the line…
  • Food and drink
    • The Roesch/Prestegard familyu0026nbsp;cookbookFrom the family cookbook(s) All the families I’m associated with love to eat, so it’s a good thing we enjoy cooking. The first out-of-my-house food memory I have is of my grandmother’s cooking for Christmas or other family occasions. According to my mother, my grandmother had a baked beans recipe that she would make for my mother. Unfortunately, the recipe seems to have  disappeared. Also unfortunately, my early days as a picky, though voluminous, eater meant I missed a lot of those recipes made from such wholesome ingredients as lard and meat fat. I particularly remember a couple of meals that involve my family. The day of Super Bowl XXXI, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and a group of their friends got together to share lots of food and cheer on the Packers to their first NFL title in 29 years. (After which Jannan and I drove to Lambeau Field in the snow,  but that’s another story.) Then, on Dec. 31, 1999, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and Jannan and I (along with Michael in utero) had a one-course-per-hour meal to appropriately end years beginning with the number 1. Unfortunately I can’t remember what we…
    • SkålI was the editor of Marketplace Magazine for 10 years. If I had to point to one thing that demonstrates improved quality of life since I came to Northeast Wisconsin in 1994, it would be … … the growth of breweries and  wineries in Northeast Wisconsin. The former of those two facts makes sense, given our heritage as a brewing state. The latter is less self-evident, since no one thinks of Wisconsin as having a good grape-growing climate. Some snobs claim that apple or cherry wines aren’t really wines at all. But one of the great facets of free enterprise is the opportunity to make your own choice of what food and drink to drink. (At least for now, though some wish to restrict our food and drink choices.) Wisconsin’s historically predominant ethnic group (and our family’s) is German. Our German ancestors did unfortunately bring large government and high taxes with them, but they also brought beer. Europeans brought wine with them, since they came from countries with poor-quality drinking water. Within 50 years of a wave of mid-19th-century German immigration, brewing had become the fifth largest industry in the U.S., according to Maureen Ogle, author of Ambitious Brew: The Story of American Beer. Beer and wine have…
  • Wheels
    • America’s sports carMy birthday in June dawned without a Chevrolet Corvette in front of my house. (The Corvette at the top of the page was featured at the 2007 Greater Milwaukee Auto Show. The copilot is my oldest son, Michael.) Which isn’t surprising. I have three young children, and I have a house with a one-car garage. (Then again, this would be more practical, though a blatant pluck-your-eyes-out violation of the Corvette ethos. Of course, so was this.) The reality is that I’m likely to be able to own a Corvette only if I get a visit from the Corvette Fairy, whose office is next door to the Easter Bunny. (I hope this isn’t foreshadowing: When I interviewed Dave Richter of Valley Corvette for a car enthusiast story in the late great Marketplace Magazine, he said that the most popular Corvette in most fans’ minds was a Corvette built during their days in high school. This would be a problem for me in that I graduated from high school in 1983, when no Corvette was built.) The Corvette is one of those cars whose existence may be difficult to understand within General Motors Corp. The Corvette is what is known as a “halo car,” a car that drives people into showrooms, even if…
    • Barges on fouru0026nbsp;wheelsI originally wrote this in September 2008.  At the Fox Cities Business Expo Tuesday, a Smart car was displayed at the United Way Fox Cities booth. I reported that I once owned a car into which trunk, I believe, the Smart could be placed, with the trunk lid shut. This is said car — a 1975 Chevrolet Caprice coupe (ours was dark red), whose doors are, I believe, longer than the entire Smart. The Caprice, built down Interstate 90 from us Madisonians in Janesville (a neighbor of ours who worked at the plant probably helped put it together) was the flagship of Chevy’s full-size fleet (which included the stripper Bel Air and middle-of-the-road Impala), featuring popular-for-the-time vinyl roofs, better sound insulation, an upgraded cloth interior, rear fender skirts and fancy Caprice badges. The Caprice was 18 feet 1 inch long and weighed 4,300 pounds. For comparison: The midsize Chevrolet of the ear was the Malibu, which was the same approximate size as the Caprice after its 1977 downsizing. The compact Chevrolet of the era was the Nova, which was 200 inches long — four inches longer than a current Cadillac STS. Wikipedia’s entry on the Caprice has this amusing sentence: “As fuel economy became a bigger priority among Americans…
    • Behind the wheel
    • Collecting only dust or rust
    • Coooooooooooupe!
    • Corvettes on the screen
    • The garage of misfit cars
    • 100 years (and one day) of our Chevrolets
    • They built Excitement, sort of, once in a while
    • A wagon by any otheru0026nbsp;nameFirst written in 2008. You will see more don’t-call-them-station-wagons as you drive today. Readers around my age have probably had some experience with a vehicle increasingly rare on the road — the station wagon. If you were a Boy Scout or Girl Scout, or were a member of some kind of youth athletic team, or had a large dog, or had relatives approximately your age, or had friends who needed to be transported somewhere, or had parents who occasionally had to haul (either in the back or in a trailer) more than what could be fit inside a car trunk, you (or, actually, your parents) were the target demographic for the station wagon. “Station wagons came to be like covered wagons — so much family activity happened in those cars,” said Tim Cleary, president of the American Station Wagon Owners Association, in Country Living magazine. Wagons “were used for everything from daily runs to the grocery store to long summer driving trips, and while many men and women might have wanted a fancier or sportier car, a station wagon was something they knew they needed for the family.” The “station wagon” originally was a vehicle with a covered seating area to take people between train stations…
    • Wheels on theu0026nbsp;screenBetween my former and current blogs, I wrote a lot about automobiles and TV and movies. Think of this post as killing two birds (Thunderbirds? Firebirds? Skylarks?) with one stone. Most movies and TV series view cars the same way most people view cars — as A-to-B transportation. (That’s not counting the movies or series where the car is the plot, like the haunted “Christine” or “Knight Rider” or the “Back to the Future” movies.) The philosophy here, of course, is that cars are not merely A-to-B transportation. Which disqualifies most police shows from what you’re about to read, even though I’ve watched more police video than anything else, because police cars are plain Jane vehicles. The highlight in a sense is in the beginning: The car chase in my favorite movie, “Bullitt,” featuring Steve McQueen’s 1968 Ford Mustang against the bad guys’ 1968 Dodge Charger: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMc2RdFuOxIu0026amp;fmt=18] One year before that (but I didn’t see this until we got Telemundo on cable a couple of years ago) was a movie called “Operación 67,” featuring (I kid you not) a masked professional wrestler, his unmasked sidekick, and some sort of secret agent plot. (Since I don’t know Spanish and it’s not…
    • While riding in my Cadillac …
  • Entertainments
    • Brass rocksThose who read my former blog last year at this time, or have read this blog over the past months, know that I am a big fan of the rock group Chicago. (Back when they were a rock group and not a singer of sappy ballads, that is.) Since rock music began from elements of country music, jazz and the blues, brass rock would seem a natural subgenre of rock music. A lot of ’50s musical acts had saxophone players, and some played with full orchestras … [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CPS-WuUKUE] … but it wasn’t until the more-or-less simultaneous appearances of Chicago and Blood Sweat u0026amp; Tears on the musical scene (both groups formed in 1967, both had their first charting singles in 1969, and they had the same producer) that the usual guitar/bass/keyboard/drum grouping was augmented by one or more trumpets, a sax player and a trombone player. While Chicago is my favorite group (but you knew that already), the first brass rock song I remember hearing was BSu0026amp;T’s “Spinning Wheel” — not in its original form, but on “Sesame Street,” accompanied by, yes, a giant spinning wheel. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi9sLkyhhlE] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxWSOuNsN20] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9U34uPjz-g] I remember liking Chicago’s “Just You ‘n Me” when it was released as a single, and…
    • Drive and Eat au0026nbsp;RockThe first UW home football game of each season also is the opener for the University of Wisconsin Marching Band, the world’s finest college marching band. (How the UW Band has not gotten the Sudler Trophy, which is to honor the country’s premier college marching bands, is beyond my comprehension.) I know this because I am an alumnus of the UW Band. I played five years (in the last rank of the band, Rank 25, motto: “Where Men Are Tall and Run-On Is Short”), marching in 39 football games at Camp Randall Stadium, the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Memorial Stadium at the University of Illinois (worst artificial turf I had ever seen), the University of Nevada–Las Vegas’ Sam Boyd Silver Bowl, the former Dyche Stadium at Northwestern University, five high school fields and, in my one bowl game, Legion Field in Birmingham, Ala., site of the 1984 Hall of Fame Bowl. The UW Band was, without question, the most memorable experience of my college days, and one of the most meaningful experiences of my lifetime. It was the most physical experience of my lifetime, to be sure. Fifteen minutes into my first Registration…
    • Keep on rockin’ in the freeu0026nbsp;worldOne of my first ambitions in communications was to be a radio disc jockey, and to possibly reach the level of the greats I used to listen to from WLS radio in Chicago, which used to be one of the great 50,000-watt AM rock stations of the country, back when they still existed. (Those who are aficionados of that time in music and radio history enjoyed a trip to that wayback machine when WLS a Memorial Day Big 89 Rewind, excerpts of which can be found on their Web site.) My vision was to be WLS’ afternoon DJ, playing the best in rock music between 2 and 6, which meant I wouldn’t have to get up before the crack of dawn to do the morning show, yet have my nights free to do whatever glamorous things big-city DJs did. Then I learned about the realities of radio — low pay, long hours, zero job security — and though I have dabbled in radio sports, I’ve pretty much cured myself of the idea of working in radio, even if, to quote WAPL’s Len Nelson, “You come to work every day just like everybody else does, but we’re playing rock ’n’ roll songs, we’re cuttin’ up.…
    • Monday on the flight line, not Saturday in the park
    • Music to drive by
    • The rock ofu0026nbsp;WisconsinWikipedia begins its item “Music of Wisconsin” thusly: Wisconsin was settled largely by European immigrants in the late 19th century. This immigration led to the popularization of galops, schottisches, waltzes, and, especially, polkas. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl7wCczgNUc] So when I first sought to write a blog piece about rock musicians from Wisconsin, that seemed like a forlorn venture. Turned out it wasn’t, because when I first wrote about rock musicians from Wisconsin, so many of them that I hadn’t mentioned came up in the first few days that I had to write a second blog entry fixing the omissions of the first. This list is about rock music, so it will not include, for instance, Milwaukee native and Ripon College graduate Al Jarreau, who in addition to having recorded a boatload of music for the jazz and adult contemporary/easy listening fan, also recorded the theme music for the ’80s TV series “Moonlighting.” Nor will it include Milwaukee native Eric Benet, who was for a while known more for his former wife, Halle Berry, than for his music, which includes four number one singles on the Ru0026amp;B charts, “Spend My Life with You” with Tamia, “Hurricane,” “Pretty Baby” and “You’re the Only One.” Nor will it include Wisconsin’s sizable contributions to big…
    • Steve TV: All Steve, All the Time
    • “Super Steve, Man of Action!”
    • Too much TV
    • The worst music of allu0026nbsp;timeThe rock group Jefferson Airplane titled its first greatest-hits compilation “The Worst of Jefferson Airplane.” Rolling Stone magazine was not being ironic when it polled its readers to decide the 10 worst songs of the 1990s. I’m not sure I agree with all of Rolling Stone’s list, but that shouldn’t be surprising; such lists are meant for debate, after all. To determine the “worst,” songs appropriate for the “Vinyl from Hell” segment that used to be on a Madison FM rock station, requires some criteria, which does not include mere overexposure (for instance, “Macarena,” the video of which I find amusing since it looks like two bankers are singing it). Before we go on: Blog posts like this one require multimedia, so if you find a song you hate on this blog, I apologize. These are also songs that I almost never listen to because my sound system has a zero-tolerance policy — if I’m listening to the radio or a CD and I hear a song I don’t like, it’s, to quote Bad Company, gone gone gone. My blonde wife won’t be happy to read that one of her favorite ’90s songs, 4 Non Blondes’ “What’s Up,” starts the list. (However,…
    • “You have the right to remain silent …”
  • Madison
    • Blasts from the Madison media past
    • Blasts from my Madison past
    • Blasts from our Madison past
    • What’s the matter with Madison?
    • Wisconsin – Madison = ?
  • Sports
    • Athletic aesthetics, or “cardinal” vs. “Big Red”
    • Choose your own announcer
    • La Follette state 1982 (u0022It was 30 years ago todayu0022)
    • The North Dakota–Wisconsin Hockey Fight of 1982
    • Packers vs. Brewers
  • Hall of Fame
    • The case(s) against teacher unions
    • The Class of 1983
    • A hairy subject, or face the face
    • It’s worse than you think
    • It’s worse than you think, 2010–11 edition
    • My favorite interview subject of all time
    • Oh look! Rural people!
    • Prestegard for president!
    • Unions vs. the facts, or Hiding in plain sight
    • When rhetoric goes too far
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
      • Join 198 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar
    %d