Today in 1963, Ed Sullivan was at Heathrow Airport in London just as the Beatles deplaned to a crowd of screaming fans and a mob of journalists and photographers.
Intrigued, Sullivan decided to investigate getting the Beatles onto his show.
Today in 1964, Ray Charles was arrested at Logan Airport in Boston and charged with heroin. Charles was sentenced to one year probation after he kicked the horse.
Another CEO has dared to explain to his employees that, yes, votes have consequences, reports the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
Mike White, the chairman and owner of Rite-Hite, a major Milwaukee manufacturer of industrial equipment,told employees in an email this week that all employees “should understand the personal consequences to them of having our tax rates increase dramatically if President Obama is re-elected, forcing taxpayers to fund President Obama’s future deficits and social programs (including Obamacare), which require bigger government.” …
In his email, White said neither he nor the company wanted to “prejudice any employee for their political views and totally respect your right to vote as you choose. I am simply trying to present the facts as I know them and to protect the business you have helped build! Please think carefully about your vote on Nov. 6.”
Rite-Hite is a Subchapter S corporation for taxes, meaning that our corporate tax rate is the highest personal tax rate. So what? Well, our RSP contributions are based on AFTER TAX profits. The tax rate we pay is not 17%, as Warren Buffet would have you believe; with state taxes it is roughly 45%. President Obama has announced that our planned tax rate would increase to roughly 65%, reducing our after tax income by 36% and dramatically reducing, if not eliminating, your and my RSP contributions.
Of equal importance, instead of the these profits being re-invested into Rite-Hite for future growth and profitability, the money will be sent into the abyss that is Washington D.C. So, on top of the burden of having your personal taxes increase dramatically, which they will, your RSP contributions and healthy retirement are also at risk all for the sake of maintaining an over-sized government that borrows 42% of every dollar it spends.
The other big impact on Rite-Hite employees, if President Obama is re-elected, is the good chance of losing Rite-Hite insurance and being put into Obamacare. Employers have the choice (though competition in the marketplace will dictate), to continue their existing plans or to pay a penalty and have employees go into the Government Plan. Our plan costs much more per family than the penalty and hence the possible competitive need to drop the Rite-Hite Health Plan. Every opportunity to make up for lost profits to taxes will have to be evaluated.
Someone who fancies himself an expert on election law began the comments on the Journal Sentinel page thusly:
Wisconsin statute 12.09(3):
No person may personally or through an agent, by any act compel, induce, or prevail upon an elector either to vote or refrain from voting at any election for or against a particular candidate or referendum.
Wisconsin statute 12.11(1M):
Any person who does any of the following violates this chapter:
(a) Offers, gives, lends or promises to give or lend, or endeavors to procure, anything of value, or any office or employment or any privilege or immunity to, or for, any elector, or to or for any other person, in order to induce any elector to:
3. Vote or refrain from voting for or against a particular person.
To which came this followup:
Please point out in that letter where he told his people how to vote or how to vote for. I guess in your world being honest and providing a forecast of events likely to happen should be illegal.
I commented about previous examples of this on WTDY in Madison two weeks ago. As far as I’m concerned, businesses have not merely the right, but the obligation to tell their employees about the consequences of what the politicians do to their business. Moreover, as long as government taxes and regulates business, business has the right to fully participate in the political process.
What is the Obama response to all this? A new Cabinet department, reports Investors Business Daily:
After assuring the public “the private sector is doing fine,” yet facing a strong challenger who’s championing the embattled private sector for real, what should our president come up with to bolster his flailing campaign but a hastily cobbled together new plan to create yet another government agency, this time for business.
Seems that with this president all it takes to revive the enfeebled U.S. economy and win votes is yet another new government department to layer on top of all the others. It won’t work.
“I’ve said that I want to consolidate a whole bunch of government agencies. We should have one Secretary of Business, instead of nine different departments that are dealing with things like giving loans to SBA (Small Business Administration) or helping companies with exports,” he told MSNBC. …
He’s already got a Secretary of Business in the Department of Commerce. And, say, isn’t “commerce” a near-synonym for business?
Whatever that agency does — and its missions are so sprawled out, no one knows for sure — it’s no match for the real problems burdening business in the Obama era: tax hikes, political blasts at outsourcing, demonizing individual companies for political purposes, new environmental regulations, uncertainty over health care mandates, a failure to open new markets abroad and government czars who say they’d like to “crucify” oil companies.
Because the reality is the problems troubling U.S. businesses and harming confidence and competitiveness aren’t the lack of such agencies, but the fact that government just keeps getting bigger.
National Review comments about Obama’s “economic patriotism,” an oxymoron as applied to Obama:
The president of the United States is charged with looking after the national interest, not the interest of specific persons who happen to live in a state that is politically important to him and who are useful as pawns in an embarrassingly low-rent political campaign.
President Obama speaks as though he believes, or does not mind appearing to believe, that there is wealth to be had from preserving underperformance, thus his pride in propping up such moribund corporations as General Motors rather than letting the firms go through a proper restructuring and emerge on the other side more competitive and profitable. This is of a piece with his eagerness to use taxpayer money to enrich unviable enterprises such as Solyndra, on the theory that he knows the power-equipment market better than the people who buy and sell in that market do. As investors go, Mitt Romney was a considerably more adept manager of his shareholders’ money than President Obama has been of the taxpayers’ precious capital.
The theory that we can somehow make ourselves better off by propping up uncompetitive corporations and industries is sometimes known as “economic nationalism,” and is very much in vogue on the left at the moment. …
Economic nationalism is a deeply anti-humanistic tendency. The division of labor is what makes human life possible at a level of civilization higher than that enjoyed by Robinson Crusoe, and trade is how labor is divided across communities and across countries. Mitt Romney is too busy engaging in China-hawkery to say so, but trade makes us better off even when the trading partner on the other side of the exchange maintains restrictive economic practices such as manipulating its currency or maintaining an oppressive police state, both of which are true of China. (And trade makes poor Chinese people better off, too, something decent people would be celebrating rather than despairing over.) Comparative advantage and gains from trade are facts of economic life; those who would deny them are the economic equivalent of flat-earthers. …
Calling a political rival a “traitor” marks a new low in an election season that has been full of them. The ironic thing is that all of this irresponsible and corrosive talk of “patriotism” and “traitors” suggests only that the Democrats love power more than country. “New Economic Patriotism”? We’ll take the old-fashioned kind of patriotism.
I’ll take a president who does not shoot off his mouth and denigrate success by saying “If you’ve got a business you didn’t build that. Somebody made that happen.”
The weather world is all atwitter about Stormageddon, or Frankenstorm, or what Jalopnik calls “Snor’eastercane,” Hurricane Sandy and the contrasting storm coming from the west to apparently meet somewhere in the Northeast.
The storm doesn’t all have to do with the storm. It’s over the National Weather Service:
The league of extraordinary meteorologists are extraordinarily pissed off at the National Hurricane Center for their pedantic warnings for Frankenstorm Sandy. Specifically, they feel that the NHC’s wonkiness led them to not issue Hurricane and Tropical Storm Warnings when the conditions will be hurricane-like.
Instead, they’re issuing a High Wind Watch, which means nothing to anyone.
Sandy’s called the “Frankenstorm” because it’s currently transitioning from a warm core tropical system to a cold core, hybrid storm. Therefore, issuing a Tropical Storm Warning/Watch or Hurricane Warning/Watch will eventually be technically incorrect since it won’t be a tropical system, but rather a sub-tropical system.
The NHC says they’re worried that people will be confused when, after the storm goes inland, they switch all the later warnings and watchings to High Wind and Coastal Flooding alerts so, with the exception of points offshore, they’re issuing High Wind Watches/Warnings.
The weather warning second-guessers include such names as The Weather Channel’s Bryan Norcross and Jim Cantore, and my favorite severe weather meteorologist, Mike Smith, who posted this early Sunday morning:
The latest barometric pressure associated with Sandy is 960 mb. It is forecast to drop to 937 mb when it is south of NYC. … With a pressure that low the winds and surge could be very comparable to a hurricane. It would be an all-time record low for the region, hurricane or not.
At the wedding I attended earlier this evening, two residents of D.C. told me they heard the storm was weakening. “I heard it wasn’t going to be a hurricane,” one of them said.
This was a very poor decision by the NWS. I hope it doesn’t end up costing lives due to the perceived lessening of the threat because it “isn’t” a hurricane in bureaucrat-speak.
The irony for us Wisconsinites is that, as of Monday, the word “rain” is nowhere in the forecast until Sunday.
Any second now you may hear some liberal bleating that Stormageddon is the result of global warming. Joe Bastardi has anticipated this in a tweet …
Warmingistas propaganda on Sandy just more lies
… proven with the news that global warming stopped, uh, 16 years ago.
How will this affect the presidential race? (As if that’s a meaningful question.) The Romney campaign bus won’t be available to the campaign, because it’s being used to deliver relief supplies.
Smith passes on quite a message from a meteorologist at the NWS’ Philadelphia office:
Today in 1983, Pink Floyd’s “Dark Side of the Moon” spent its 491st week on the charts, surpassing the previous record set by Johnny Mathis’ “Johnny’s Greatest Hits.” “Dark Side of the Moon” finally departed the charts in October 1988, after 741 weeks on the charts.
Today in 1956, Elvis Presley made his second appearance on CBS-TV’s Ed Sullivan Show, with Sullivan presenting Presley a gold record for …
One year later, Presley’s appearance at the Pan Pacific Auditorium in Los Angeles prompted police to tell Presley he was not allowed to wiggle his hips onstage. The next night’s performance was filmed by the LAPD vice squad.
One year later, Buddy Holly filmed ABC-TV’s “American Bandstand”:
I return to the airwaves Saturday night to call the Iowa–Grant football playoff game against Kickapoo/La Farge at 7 p.m. on WPVL (1590 AM) in Platteville, WGLR (1280 AM) in Lancaster, and www.wglr.com.
The first game I covered at Kickapoo High School was a 1988 playoff game. (One of the coaches later became a grade school principal in, yes, Ripon.) At the time, Kickapoo’s press box was a row of lunch tables at the top of the bleachers. It was not warm that night.
I’ve had several instances where I’ve announced more than one game in one day. (This started on a warm March day in 1987, when I covered, in chronological order, the state boys gymnastics meet in Madison, a girls basketball sectional final in Reedsburg, and a boys basketball regional final in Madison.) The Midwest Conference has women’s/men’s basketball doubleheaders, so nearly every one of those totaled four hours of announcing. I’ve had a few instances when I did a girls basketball playoff game in one place and then a boys playoff game in another. I’ve also done one football doubleheader — a Ripon College game in the afternoon and a Ripon High School playoff game that night. And I’ve had one tripleheader, a college basketball doubleheader followed by a high school game.
I’ve had one multiple-sport doubleheader, a boys basketball game followed by a college hockey game. So that places me in the company of Fox’s Joe Buck, who on Sunday called the Giants–49ers NFL game, followed by the Cardinals–Giants National League Championship Series game. Sports Illustrated’s Richard Deitsch reports:
Buck had previously called doubleheaders as a Cardinals broadcaster, but he’d never experienced the kind of Sunday he had in San Francisco. After Giants quarterback Eli Manning took a knee to close out the Niners, Buck darted out of Candlestick Park at 4:32 p.m. local time and arrived at AT&T Park at 5:04 p.m., about 10 minutes before the scheduled first pitch of Game 1 of the National League Championship Series. He compared his seven mile, police-escorted trolley trip — Fox rented the wheels from the Cable Car Charter Company — to another famous ride in the Golden State. “I’m in the White Bronco being driven by Al Cowlings,” Buck said from his cable car earlier in the afternoon. “This whole street car thing is a diversionary tactic. We’ll be in Mexico by midnight.” …
After the game, Buck’s voice remained strong, and he announced that he was off to grab some pizza and a seltzer. “I’m fine; it’s not like I was in the pentathlon,” he said. “I just sat there and talked. It’s cute for Fox, but beyond that, people just want to watch the game.”
In a broadcasting variation on Tony Stewart’s “double duty” drives in the Indy 500 and Coca-Cola 600, ESPN’s NBA announcers Mike Breen and Jeff Van Gundy last year called a Christmas doubleheader in two cities, beginning with an afternoon Miami Heat vs. Mavericks game in Dallas before taking a charter flight to Oakland where the Golden State Warriors were hosting the Los Angeles Clippers. Breen also called a doubleheader in 2010 at L.A.’s Staples Center, an afternoon Lakers game for ABC followed by a Knicks-Clippers tilt for MSG Network.
Keith Jackson of ABC-TV did that twice, calling the Oklahoma–Texas football game from Dallas, then game 4 of the 1978 American League Championship Series (in New York!) and game 4 of the 1980 National League Championship Series (in Houston).
This is much more common in non-national markets. One Wisconsin example is the late Jim Irwin, who announced Badger and Packer football, and Badger and Bucks basketball, many times on the same days. (Usually they were the Packers at noon and the Bucks that evening.) I suspect Marv Albert, who simultaneously announced the New York Knicks and Rangers while working for NBC, did the same.
SI has a long story about Buck, a second-generation sportscaster:
Twenty million people are about to hear Buck and Aikman call the Buccaneers’ game against the Giants. As Fox’s lead NFL and major league baseball announcer, Buck has one of the most familiar voices in America-it’s the sound track to many of the biggest football games and the World Series. To a generation of sports fans he is the voice of fall. It’s odd, then, that so many fans think he doesn’t love the games. Truth is, he loves them as much as you do-just not in the same way, because…. Well, we will explain. …
Jack Buck just wanted his son around. That’s why he brought Joe to Cardinals’ spring training in Florida before the boy turned one. Jack was the Cardinals’ radio voice. Joe was the first child of his second marriage. Jack had six kids with his first wife, and he missed too much of their childhoods because he was working. He could not believe what he just didn’t see. He told Joe’s mom, Carole, that he wouldn’t let that happen with Joe.
Almost from the beginning they seemed more like friends than father and son. Jack didn’t even call his kid Joe. He called him “Buck.” When Jack recorded radio shows in his home office, he told young Joe he could sit in as long as he was quiet. Joe would seat himself in an antique chair and wordlessly study his dad. He revered his father. When Joe greeted Jack at Busch Stadium after games, he offered to hold his coat or his drink so everybody would know he was Jack Buck’s boy.
But the real fun came when he joined his dad on the road. He sat in the booth during games. He rode on the team plane, hung out in the clubhouse. He knew that Stan Musial was a Cardinals legend, but he thought of Stan the Man as his father’s pal. …
Buck does not watch as many games as diehard fans, preferring reality shows in the company of his teenage daughters, but he enjoys broadcasting them as much as anybody alive. Joe Buck, you see, did not really grow up on sports. He grew up on sportscasting.
Julie, his sister, babysat the Cardinals’ kids and got to know their wives. She saw the team as family, and she became a passionate fan. Joe knew the players as professionals. He saw that the best jobs in the world are still jobs. …
His high school friend Preston Clarke says, “He just seems born to do this.” Was he? Or was he trained? Who knows? The voice, the discipline, the disposition, the passion, the ability to react-they are all so tightly interwoven that Joe will never really know which of his gifts are genetic and which are environmental.
How do you know that sportscasting is a good line of work? (Yes, it is work, even if it doesn’t seem so to listeners and viewers.) You can tell from the number of second- and third-generation announcers, the most prominent of whom would be Jack and Joe Buck; Harry, Skip and Chip Caray; Marv (and brothers Steve and Al) and Kenny Albert; Marty and Thom Brennaman; and Harry and Todd Kalas.
This took place 20 years apart, with interestingly the same analyst, Tim McCarver:
The younger Buck has a somewhat different style from his father, though not as different as Harry and Skip Caray were. (Jack Buck worked with Harry Caray, and I’ve concluded that Skip Caray sounded more like Buck than his father.) Jack did a lot of TV in its early days, but he did 162 or so games a year on the radio, so his style came from radio. Joe has done radio (I remember listening to him driving into St. Louis in August 1992; at 11:30 p.m. I had to turn the air conditioning in the car back on as we crossed the Mississippi River), but the vast majority of his work has been on TV.
Joe Buck gets a lot of criticism largely for his somewhat laid-back style. Part of it also is the result of his being on nearly week on Fox, from the start of the baseball season to the end of the NFL season, for the past decade. (He has been Fox’s lead baseball announcer since Fox started covering baseball in 1996, and he’s done NFL games since 1994, and Fox’s lead NFL announcer since 2002). Something similar happened to Curt Gowdy, who between 1966 and 1975 was NBC’s lead announcer for baseball, the American Football League and then NFL, and college basketball. Gowdy’s NFL successor, Dick Enberg, decided to limit his work to 50 events so he wouldn’t be criticized for, or through, overexposure.
The thing that Joe Buck will miss — unless he decides to go back to broadcasting for a team — is that connection between a team’s announcer and its fans, as shown in the posthumous tributes to his father and Harry and Skip Caray. Whenever the Brewers’ Bob Uecker heads to the press box in the sky, the tribute to Uke will be unlike anything this state has seen.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Bob McGinn wrote this before a couple of weeks ago NFL games:
All those individual and team records on offense mean nothing to me, at least when compared to marks established a decade or more ago.
Surely, you can see it.
For more than 30 years, owners and executives in the National Football League have been chipping away so defenses, the ugly stepchildren of pro football, cannot hold sway.
The result has been a rewritten rules book that makes it so much easier for players to throw a football, to catch a football and to pass block.
It’s a vastly different game now than it was 10 years ago, let alone 20, 30 or 40. The game isn’t as good, either.
From my vantage point last Sunday, I gazed upon another sellout, excited crowd at Lambeau Field. In my game story, I referred to Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees as giants of the gridiron, and called it an afternoon to remember.
Let me clarify something. I was referring to the way the game is played in 2012. For younger fans, it represented a perfect illustration of what has made the NFL the envy of all forms of entertainment in America.
That is, lots of scoring, lots of yards, practically no defense and few, if any, crushing hits.
When it comes to overall revenue, television ratings, newspaper and digital online coverage, gambling and the proliferation of fantasy football, interest in pro football has never been higher.
But the product on the field, at least to the football purist, continues to lose appeal. …
Rodgers and Brees moved their teams up and down the field. Together, their passing yardage was 765, their completion percentage was .695 and their passing rating was 113.7.
Despite dropping back 56 times, Brees was knocked down just three times, two by sacking. In his 43 dropbacks, Rodgers suffered no sacks.
On the other hand, the two offenses rushed for just 147 yards. …
Forty years ago, offensive linemen tried to pass block by chattering their feet and using mostly their elbows and shoulders. Passing began to take off in 1978 when rules permitted linemen to extend their arms and use open hands.
Today, according to former Packers center and media analyst Larry McCarren, linemen are OK if their hands are inside or outside the chest of the pass rusher as long as they remain frontal. It becomes the judgment call of an official when the rusher gets to the side of the blocker.
If, as a pass rusher, you’re able to extricate yourself and head for the passer, your split-second assignment becomes mental, not physical. Do you hit him, or pull up?
“Guy has the ball,” McCarren said. “I commit to the tackle. Guy throws the ball. How do I decommit to the tackle?” …
The league can talk all it wants about player safety but that falls on deaf ears. The league moved on concussions largely because of media and medical pressure, and most of the new protections are designed for quarterbacks, the men that drive revenue.
The league’s continued push for an 18-game season, the addition of 13 games on Thursday nights and televised on its network, and its stubborn use of unfit replacement officials tell me the league’s actions don’t mesh with its words.
Now the league must be very careful not to legislate out too much violence. This is a society that wants to sit in on Sunday violence, and football is a game of injuries, anyway.
As you watch, if not dote on the NFL, just remember that it has been and could be a better game.
It should be obvious what’s happening here. The NFL is trying to grow its audience. The casual fan likes offense and scoring. The passionate fan may appreciate defense more than non-fans, but the NFL assumes those fans will follow the NFL regardless of how games are, even if, as McGinn does here, they complain about how real football (however they define that) isn’t being played. (Some of those “real football” fans should view games of the ’60s … that is, the American Football League.)
Last season is a perfect example. Thanks, I think, to the lack of preseason minicamps, the amount of scoring in the regular season a year ago was insane. But once the playoffs start, the teams with the best defenses go the farthest. By then, of course, you’ve already hooked the casual fans because of the crazily entertaining regular-season games.
Britishers with taste bought this single when it hit the charts today in 1961:
Today in 1965, the four Beatles were named Members of the Order of the British Empire by Queen Elizabeth. The Beatles’ visit reportedly began when they smoked marijuana in a Buckingham Palace bathroom to calm their nerves.
The Beatles’ receiving their MBEs prompted a number of MBE recipients to return theirs. “Lots of people who complained about us receiving the MBE received theirs for heroism in the war — for killing people,” said John Lennon, previewing the public relations skills he’d show a year later when he would compare the Beatles to Jesus Christ. “We received ours for entertaining other people. I’d say we deserve ours more.”
Lennon returned his MBE in 1969 as part of his peace protests.