• Blue Brewing

    August 1, 2014
    Sports

    The Thursday trade-without-waivers deadline came and went with the Brewers making one acquisition — outfielder Gerardo Parra.

    At least Parra is a left-handed hitter. He has six home runs, which is six more than outfielder Logan Schaefer, and two fewer than occasional lead-off hitter Scooter Gennett. But Parra (which must mean “left-handed” in Spanish, since former Brewer pitcher Manny Parra was also left-handed) is not a power hitter. He has never hit more than 10 home runs in a season, and to expect him to hit 10 to 15 home runs the rest of this season is unrealistic.

    The Brewers did not improve themselves in their two biggest liabilities — left-handed power hitting and pitching. Nearly all of the Brewers’ notable hitters — center fielder Carlos Gomez, catcher Jonathan Lucroy, right fielder Ryan Braun, and third baseman Aramis Ramirez — are right-handed hitters. The Brewers platoon at first base, but the right-handed first baseman, Mark Reynolds (today’s answer to Dave Kingman) has 16 of the 20 home runs at first base. The leading left-handed power hitter is Gennett, with eight, eight more than outfielder Logan Schaefer, who was platooning in left field for a while. The Brewers also platoon at second base, which means Gennett gets the majority of the at-bats (most pitchers are right-handed, of course), but Gennett is probably not a power hitter in this or any future season.

    The Brewers do not have en0ugh pitching. The Brewers have literally never had enough pitching. They do not have a number-one or even number-two starter on their staff. That includes supposed number-one starter Yovani Gallardo, who has not pitched any better than a number-three starter all season. The bigger pitching issue is late-inning relief, before closer Francisco Rodriguez (though Rodriguez has a few spectacular flameouts this season), and, again, the Brewers didn’t improve themselves there either.

    My contention throughout this season is that the Brewers have been playing over their heads, and that rarely lasts for even an entire season. The Brewers’ worst stretch of the season was just before the All-Star break, when they shed their entire division lead, only to win the final game of the season and thus take a lead into the break. They still have that lead, but I think it’s highly likely that lead will disappear after their weekend in St. Louis, which starts tonight. The Cardinals picked up two pitchers this week, though neither, thankfully, was superstar lefty David Price, who went from Tampa Bay to Detroit.

    Parra is a Gold Glove winner, but left field is probably the least important defensive position in the outfield. Parra isn’t going to replace Braun in right or Gomez in center, and left fielder Khris Davis has been hitting home runs in left, so it’s not clear why the Brewers got Parra at all. They needed bench help (one other player they never replaced after he left was utility player Jerry Hairston Jr., who they got during the 2011 season), but I’m not sure Parra’s that bench help either.

    There were a couple of rumors, or more speculation than rumor, that the Brewers might be going after two supposedly available left-handed first basemen, Philadelphia’s Ryan Howard and Boston’s David Ortiz. (Ortiz started his professional career in Wisconsin, when the Timber Rattlers were a Mariners affiliate.) Neither is playing to their traditional standards. Both are up their in years. Both are on teams that apparently are shedding their older and more expensive players. Howard is due $70 million the next two seasons, but supposedly the Phillies were willing to pay “most” of that to a new team. Neither deal happened, and the waiver period’s end makes deals more difficult, though not impossible.

    This should not necessarily be read as a call to replace general manager Doug Melvin. Given the Brewers’ limited resources, maybe this team is the best he can do this year. This year demonstrates, though, the downsides of building from within, in that it takes longer and the penalties for failure to develop players (for instance, left-handed power hitters) or injuries (relievers Tyler Thornburg and Jim Henderson) are harsher.

    Brewers fans remember the playoff seasons — 1981, 1982, 2008 and 2011. They less remember the almost-seasons — 1979, 1983, 1987 (the Brewers managed to miss the playoffs despite their 13-0 start) and 1992. And this looks now like one of those seasons, not a playoff season.

     

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Blue Brewing
  • Presty the DJ for Aug. 1

    August 1, 2014
    Music

    Today in 1964, the Beatles’ “A Hard Day’s Night” went to number one and stayed there for longer than a hard day’s night — two weeks:

    If you are of my age, this was a big moment in 1981:

    Today in 1994, while the Beatles were long gone, the Rolling Stones started their Voodoo Lounge tour:

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for Aug. 1
  • The end of Journal

    July 31, 2014
    media, US business, Wisconsin business

    As the broadcast types would put it, this was BREAKING NEWS! the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported 12 hours ago:

    Two storied media firms, Journal Communications Inc. of Milwaukee and E.W. Scripps Co. of Cincinnati, announced Wednesday evening an agreement to merge their broadcast operations while spinning off their newspapers into a separate company.

    Under the deal, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel will serve as the flagship of a new public company, Journal Media Group, which will be headquartered in Milwaukee.

    Meanwhile, Journal Communications’ broadcast assets, including WTMJ radio and television, will be folded into Scripps, with the headquarters in Cincinnati. The E.W. Scripps Co. name will be retained and the firm will remain controlled by the Scripps family.

    The deal follows a growing trend among media players to divide newspaper and broadcast assets into separate companies.

    “Everyone wins,” said Steven J. Smith, chairman and chief executive officer of Journal Communications, who will serve as the non-executive chairman of Journal Media.

    In addition to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Journal Media will consist of all of Scripps’ newspapers, including the Memphis Commercial Appeal, community publications and digital offerings. In all, the new company will operate daily newspapers in 14 markets.

    The new company will have around 3,600 employees with expected annual revenue of some $500 million.

    Journal Media will get a fresh financial start in an uncertain media world. The company’s balance sheet will have $10 million in cash and no debt, while Scripps keeps substantially all of the qualified pension obligations.

    Timothy E. Stautberg, who oversees Scripps’ newspapers, will become CEO of Journal Media. …

    “It’s going to be a larger company than we have today with more employees than we have today,” Smith said.

    He added that he was also excited for the broadcast employees who currently work at Journal Communications.

    “They are going to be part of a larger enterprise with even more resources to continue to serve their markets, and they’ll have our people grow professionally,” he said. “On both sides of this transaction we feel there is great value, great logic and a great cultural fit.”

    Scripps will emerge from the deal as the nation’s fifth-largest independent TV group, with 34 stations. For the first time in years, it will re-enter the radio market, picking up Journal Communications’ 35 stations.

    All told, the company will serve 27 TV markets and reach 18% of the nation’s households. Moreover, Scripps may become a key platform for political advertising with TV stations in eight battleground states: Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio and Wisconsin. …

    “I can’t think of two station groups that fit together more easily with more clear upside than when you put these two together,” said Richard A. Boehne, who will remain as board chairman, president and CEO of Scripps. …

    In addition to the papers and their websites in Milwaukee and Memphis, the Journal Media Group will include the Knoxville (Tenn.) News Sentinel; Naples (Fla.) Daily News; Corpus Christi (Texas) Caller-Times; Ventura (Calif.) County Star; Scripps Treasure Coast (Fla.) Newspapers; Independent Mail of Anderson County, S.C.; the Redding (Calif.) Record Searchlight; Wichita Falls (Tex.) Times Record News; San Angelo (Tex.) Standard-Times; Kitsap (Wash.) Sun; the Evansville (Ind.) Courier & Press and Henderson (Ky.) Gleaner; and the Abilene (Tex.) Reporter-News.

    As you know, I am a twice-former Journal Communications employee, the first time voluntarily, the last time involuntarily. The first time I left an employee-owned company as a stockholder, though very small. Employee ownership is not the same thing as employee management, but it is a good thing for employees to have skin in the game, to be able to reap financial awards beyond a paycheck and occasional bonus for their work, and, because they have skin in the game, have interest in how the company is doing beyond their own corner of it.

    (The craziest thing I ever did the first time I was at Marketplace was to fill out a Suggest and Share suggestion that the company buy the Milwaukee Brewers. This was at a time when Tribune owned the Cubs, Turner Broadcasting owned the Braves, and I believe the Texas Rangers were owned by a broadcaster too. I was told politely by corporate that Journal was not interested in buying the Brewers, but they were certainly interested in partnerships with the Brewers, and WTMJ has been their radio flagship all but two years of their existence.)

    Journal Communications has always been the state’s biggest media company. The Milwaukee Sentinel was the state’s oldest daily newspaper (though not the oldest newspaper; I worked there). The Milwaukee Journal started after the Sentinel. WTMJ radio is one of the oldest commercial radio stations in the state, and WTMJ-TV was the state’s first commercial TV station.

    The Milwaukee Journal and Milwaukee Sentinel were separate newspapers until 1995. The Journal was the afternoon and more politically liberal newspaper; the Sentinel was the morning and more politically conservative newspaper (its most prominent early editor, Rufus King, was prominent in the Republican Party, which as you know started in Ripon in 1854) of the two. (The Sentinel opposed slavery, but the Sentinel also opposed Fighting Bob La Follette.) Hearst Newspapers (started by, yes, William Randolph Hearst) purchased the Sentinel in 1924, as well as what became WISN radio. So Journal owned WTMJ, and Hearst owned WISN.

    In 1962, Sentinel employees went on strike, and Hearst closed the Sentinel. Journal then purchased the Sentinel, and for 33 years Journal Communications operated them separately, as two editorial staffs, but one advertising, printing and delivery system. That was until 1995, when Journal combined the two newspapers as the Journal Sentinel.

    So there is a little bit of wistful nostalgia in seeing the old company split up. Except that, when I went back to Marketplace in 2008, it wasn’t the same company. The print subsidiary, Add Inc, started as a shopper printer by former Waupaca-area radio station employees (one of whose sons started Marketplace and hired me, which I’m sure he doesn’t consider a career highlight), became Journal Community Publishing Group. The first time I was at Marketplace, there were, technically speaking, just three levels of management above me, and we were all employee-owners.

    Journal went public between my departure and my return. Before I had left, Journal had purchased a couple of weekly newspapers and decided to expand them greatly to form what was called Fox Cities Newspapers — basically one newspaper per high school area (hence three in Appleton), with some common content, to compete against The Post~Crescent. I thought it was a good idea with too much front-end spending (a much bigger building that required substantial renovation and a cube farm, possibly too many employees, and somewhere I may still have Fox Cities Newspapers notebooks and pens). When 9/11 and the subsequent recession happened, Journal pulled the plug on Fox Cities Newspapers — too soon, in my opinion, though no one asked me.

    The best thing I can say about my three-year return, other than that we did good work but obviously didn’t have enough advertising, was that it gave me the opportunity to be a publisher, and in fact the company’s first and last publisher/editor. (After having had four publishers, two of whom I loathed, in two years, I finally decided I wanted a shot at the job.) I was told when Marketplace closed that it wasn’t my fault or anything I had done wrong (I inherited a mess, about which my new bosses weren’t entirely forthcoming), and at least I could say that I outlasted the two antagonists above me, one of whom left with the magazine she had started, the other of whom was fired. It also gave me the chance to appear on WTMJ-TV’s “Sunday Insight with Charlie Sykes,” which is the most watched political pundit show in the state.

    SundayInsight110724MPM

    Being the biggest makes you the biggest target. Some people don’t like the Journal Sentinel because of its animus toward conservatives, both on the news side and on the opinion pages. (The latter has gone back and forth based on opinion page editor. What drives me nuts about the Journal Sentinel, and the Wisconsin State Journal and many other daily newspapers, is opinion by committee, where a group of people decides opinions. That gets you inconsistent opinions or, if consensus is required, mush. I haven’t done unsigned opinions for 20 years; my views are my own, and stated as such.) Some people don’t like WTMJ radio because of conservative hosts Sykes and Jeff Wagner, and its Right Wisconsin. Some people don’t like WTMJ-TV because of its veer toward tabloid news, mirrored at WGBA-TV in Green Bay.

    Still, until this deal closes, Journal is a Wisconsin company. Lee Newspapers, publisher of the State Journal, the La Crosse Tribune and the Kenosha News, is not. Nor is Gannett, publisher of 10 daily newspapers. Nor is the owner of the NBC, ABC and Fox affiliates in Madison, the owners of the other Green Bay stations, the owners of the La Crosse ABC station, and the stations in Eau Claire and Wausau. Besides Journal’s WTMJ and WGBA, the only Wisconsin-owned TV stations are now WISC-TV in Madison and WKBT-TV in La Crosse.

    The Journal/WTMJ operation was one of the last of its kind in the U.S. Every major city used to have a newspaper/radio/TV combination, usually the dominant media company in their market for obvious reasons. (You can tell who they are, or were, sometimes by the radio or TV station’s call letters; WGN stood for World’s Greatest Newspaper — in their opinion the Chicago Tribune. Not many Madisonians know that The Capital Times started WIBA radio, which is hugely ironic given WIBA’s conservative talk programming today, or that what now is Magic 98 and what used to be WISM radio in Madison started WISC-TV, or that WKOW-TV and WTSO radio, formerly WKOW radio, were owned by the same company.) The feds decided that was a bad thing in 1975, though Journal was grandfathered in.

    While only 0.1 percent of U.S. companies are publicly traded, those are the biggest U.S. companies and employers, and public company stock — either purchased directly or in a mutual fund — is the number one place where investors put their money. So clearly publicly traded companies have an important role in the U.S. economy. (And as with all companies consumers have the ability to choose, or not, to buy something from a particular company, including, of course, newspaper subscriptions.)

    My experience and observation, though, is that publicly traded companies are not necessarily where you want to work. Profit is the number one concern for a company of any size, but it sometimes appears as though profit is the only concern of some public companies. Decisions are therefore made based on quarterly earnings, which doesn’t really promote long-term thinking or planning. Big companies have, strange though this may sound, the worst qualities of unions, where everybody is treated the same, regardless of their actual contribution to the company, and it’s difficult to get rid of poor performers.

    The splitting of print from broadcast strikes me as a mistake, though something other media companies are doing. The reason I think it’s a mistake is that I see print and broadcast in the process of merging into one single information source, with different delivery vehicles, thanks to the Internet — print if you want it, audio if you want it, video if you want it, available 24/7. Scripps and Journal’s merging and splitting off those delivery vehicles is the opposite direction of that trend, and you can guess whether print or broadcast was considered more important, particularly in these post-Citizens United days of political campaign spending.

    The final bad thing that comes to mind is that this is yet another example of a Wisconsin company leaving the state by acquisition. (I guarantee you without researching the subject that Ohio’s corporate taxes and legal structure are better than Wisconsin’s.) As an employee it is good to work as far away from corporate headquarters as possible, but a company’s interest in corporate contributions to their community drops like a rock the farther you get away from the corporate offices. Journal was a huge presence as a corporate citizen in the Milwaukee area in its employee-ownership days; it probably dropped after the company went public, and it will drop even more with broadcast management in Cincinnati and not Milwaukee.

    A Facebook Friend pointed this out:

    “When completed, Scripps shareholders will own 69% of the broadcasting company and 59% of Journal Media Group. Journal Communications shareholders will emerge with 31% of the broadcasting company and 41% of the newspaper company.” <<< So bottom line, Journal Communications is being taken over by Scripps.

    Readers know one of my favorite phrases is “change is inevitable; positive change is not.” The question is whether Journal Sentinel readers, WTMJ (and whatever 94.5 now is) listeners, and WTMJ and WGBA viewers will think this change is positive. From readers, listeners and viewers come advertising dollars, and from ad dollars come revenues.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The end of Journal
  • The first post about the spring 2016 elections

    July 31, 2014
    Wisconsin politics

    The vagaries of elections are such that this post is about five or six elections (depending on how many candidates show up) from now, as the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports:

    With the 2016 mayoral election nearly two long years away, south side Ald. Bob Donovan told several hundred cheering friends and supporters Tuesday night that he will challenge Mayor Tom Barrett.

    Donovan, a four-term alderman and a frequent critic of the mayor on such hot-button issues as public safety and the streetcar project, made his announcement official Tuesday night at a rally at American Serb Hall, 5101 W. Oklahoma Ave.

    Donovan said Milwaukee’s greatest challenge was “timidity of leadership” and emphasized the point later, referring to the “muck and mire of indecision and timidity.”

    Earlier in the day, he filed papers with the Milwaukee Election Commission. …

    Donovan … said the city’s major issues are public safety, MPS and the city’s infrastructure. Tuesday night, he said the city was in “serious, serious trouble.” He said as mayor he would take Milwaukee off “autopilot” and “make waves.”

    Earlier, Donovan acknowledged that Barrett has hired more officers — a total of 120 are scheduled to be added to the force by the end of the year. But he said the new hirings do not take into account police retirements and unfilled positions.

    “Where we fall short in my estimation is not getting enough boots on the street,” Donovan said. …

    In addition to Donovan, Ald. Joe Davis, another frequent Barrett critic, especially on the issue of economic development, has said he will form an exploratory committee for mayor. And Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. has indicated he will make a decision this year whether to challenge Barrett. Clarke is seeking re-election against challenger Chris Moews.

    Donovan is not necessarily correct about needing more “cops on the street.” Facebook Friend Glenn Frankovis (who is more qualified to be police chief of Milwaukee than the current police chief of Milwaukee) points out that at $75,000 per officer, increasing the number of police officers beyond what Barrett apparently is doing would cost tens of millions of dollars and make police protection the number one budget area in the city. (Which wouldn’t necessarily be the worst thing.)

    Frankovis is a supporter of Donovan. Frankovis’ point is that police need to be deployed better, saturating high-crime areas, and not just for a few weeks. Frankovis did that as a police captain, and why current chief Ed Flynn refuses to do that is impossible to understand.

    In fact, all Flynn does is parrot Barrett, engage in the usual gun-control claptrap, and complain about the state Legislature. Media Trackers reports on a leader of the latter:

    In a fiery press release Wisconsin Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R) punched back at Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn regarding claims that the state legislature had a role to play in this summer’s rash of violent crimes in Milwaukee.

    Citing laws passed by the Republican controlled legislature, and signed by Gov. Scott Walker, Fitzgerald noted, “Even with targeted state dollars being funneled directly to Milwaukee, the city continues to see disturbing rates of violent crime far out of line with the rest of the state.” Fitzgerald pointed to funding heroin treatment programs, expanding the state’s Treatment and Diversion programs to target alcohol addiction, developing ‘swift and certain sanctions’ for parole and probation violations and increased protections for victims of domestic violence as specific cases where the state directly helped the city.

    Fitzgerald also noted that the state even spent $175,000 of state taxpayer funds to expand the Milwaukee’s ShotSpotter crime detection technology.

    Citing data from a Media Trackers report, Fitzgerald blamed Milwaukee’s violent crime problem on the Milwaukee criminal justice system’s “overreliance on plea bargaining” and weak sentencing, which he says creates a “revolving door of criminals who serve short stints behind bars only to wind up back in court for new – often more serious – crimes.”

    In June, Media Trackers ran a report showing that between June and August of last summer 33 individuals were charged with first-degree intentional homicide, first-degree reckless homicide or felony murder in Milwaukee. The 33 individuals had a combined criminal history of 76 prior felony charges and 35 prior felony convictions.

    Last week Flynn called into Midday with Charlie Sykes on AM620 and blamed the Wisconsin legislature for making Milwaukee judges and police “prisoners of the laws as written.” But as Media Trackers showed in our report, 10 of the 16 individuals that used a gun to commit a homicide/murder were previous felons and committing a felony simply by having the gun they used in their crimes.

    Media Trackers also reported that 15 of the 33 individuals whose cases had concluded received a combined 220 years in prison and 128 years of extended supervision of the 952 years of imprisonment they were eligible for. Thirteen of the 15 cases had also been plea bargained.

     

    Conservative Consigliere picks apart Flynn:

    And so we have come to the end with Milwaukee Police Ed Flynn.  No, Chief Flynn has not officially tendered his resignation.   However, if you listened closely in hisradio interview with Charlie Sykes late last week the Chief unmistakably and irrevocably waved the white flag in his war on crime in Milwaukee.

    His surrender didn’t come in the inevitable and predictable finger pointing at Madison or his clichéd calls for more gun laws.   No, Chief Flynn officially cried “uncle” to the bad guys when he argued that Milwaukee could not be held to the same standards of safety as the suburbs because the suburbs don’t have the same levels of poverty as Milwaukee.   When a Police Chief who rode into town with a law and order, broken windows philosophy and a strong message of “Poverty doesn’t cause crime, crime causes poverty,” devolves into, ‘When the suburbs have the same poverty levels as Milwaukee then suburban lawmakers can criticize our public safety situation,’ he is beaten – utterly and thoroughly beaten.   He has unconditionally surrendered.
    It is sad. In his early years in Milwaukee Chief Flynn showed great promise. He was a no-excuses leader. He refused to parrot the fatalistic liberal platitudes about race, poverty and crime. His hallmark was visible
    presence, community engagement, and zero tolerance. He looked to modernize the police department’s thinking and attitudes at the same time he was dragging it technologically into the 21st Century. He viewed public safety as a necessary condition for economic growth and job creation in the city, not vice versa.

    All this started to change, however, with his highly-publicized sexual indiscretions and the subsequent controversy that suggested his department might have been cooking the books internally to make the city’s violent crime statistics look rosier than they actually were. These twin scandals gave his political masters in City Hall all the public relations cover they needed to get rid of him. To keep his job, Chief Flynn has had to toady up to the Mayor and the rest of Milwaukee’s liberal political establishment and be their trained parrot, squawking back whatever they say in his shiny police plumage.
    He poses with them while they blame the state’s concealed carry law for Milwaukee shootings – despite the fact that none of our recent shootings have involved anyone holding a concealed carry permit.

    He points fingers with them at Republicans in Madison and demands stronger sentences for gun crimes, but refuses to say a peep about the Milwaukee liberal political establishment in the District Attorney’s office and the Circuit Court that plays catch and release with the criminals his officer arrest under the state’s existing laws.

    He suggests the needs for higher mandatory minimum sentences for certain crimes, but he is unwilling to push back on or to point out the absurdity to the large-scale community movement here in Milwaukee decrying high incarceration rates for urban youth – exactly the kind of individuals who would be most dramatically impacted by the sort of mandatory minimum sentences he is proposing. …
    Flynn’s recent p.r. stunt to make one section of the city “as safe as the suburbs for a day” was a humiliating admission that his police force is impotent to make all of Milwaukee safe on any sort of consistent basis.   With that admission, he has officially relegated his department’s role to one of a disaster cleanup crew controlled by the whimsy of demography and current events rather than a public safety organization in control of its own turf.

    Crime is really the number one problem in Milwaukee. Barrett excuses it away with the usual poverty-as-cause liberal claptrap. There are poor places (by the traditional income-based definitions of poverty) elsewhere in Wisconsin, but with nowhere remotely near Milwaukee’s crime rates. And in its vast array of social ills, Milwaukee is dragging down the rest of Wisconsin.

    But you’ll never hear Trolley Tom admit that. Frankovis said on Facebook:

    Bob talks about things Barrett has failed miserably at – reducing crime in Milwaukee. How does Barrett figure to attract businesses and create job opportunities when violent crime is out of control and good people are discouraged from even calling to report crime because of Ed Flynn’s slow/no Dispatch policy, which Barrett obviously approves of.

    The issue that should be in the mayoral race isn’t something the mayor controls — education, specifically the state of Milwaukee Public Schools, the state’s biggest spending,  yet worst by far, school district. Barrett has done nothing about MPS, and has not even tried to get the Legislature to give the mayor control over MPS. (That would be the fastest bill the Legislature ever passed if Barrett just asked for it.) Donovan should campaign on getting mayoral control and the ability to hire and fire MPS employees.

    Donovan, by the way, is so suddenly popular that he has his own Facebook meme:

    (For those who don’t know, Flynn and Barrett are standing behind Donovan.)

    I don’t know if Donovan is a Republican, or if he is even a conservative. (The bet is that he’s not a Democrat given that the head of the Democratic Party of Milwaukee County apparently said several nasty things about Donovan.) I know nothing about Davis. I know a fair amount about Clarke, but electoral politics says there needs to be one non-Barrett, whether that’s Donovan or Clarke, to get Mayor Milquetoast out of office.

     

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The first post about the spring 2016 elections
  • On the air with not-Joy Cardin

    July 31, 2014
    media, US politics, Wisconsin politics

    I will be on Wisconsin Public Radio’s Joy Cardin show Friday at 7 a.m., even though Joy Cardin will not be on her own show.

    I came up with the headline from an old story about Dan Ingram, one of the legendary disc jockeys of the top 40 era. The story goes that Ingram was supposed to start July 3, 1961, but did shows two nights before he was supposed to start on afternoons, and, because his employer didn’t want him to use his name on-air before his scheduled start date, introduced himself by saying, “This is the Chuck Dunaway Show — but this isn’t Chuck!”, and then later identified himself by saying, “I’m not Chuck Dunaway.”)

    Wisconsin Public Radio’s Ideas Network can be heard on WHA (970 AM) in Madison, WLBL (930 AM) in Auburndale, WHID (88.1 FM) in Green Bay, WHWC (88.3 FM) in Menomonie, WRFW (88.7 FM) in River Falls, WEPS (88.9 FM) in Elgin, Ill., WHAA (89.1 FM) in Adams, WHBM (90.3 FM) in Park Falls, WHLA (90.3 FM) in La Crosse, WRST (90.3 FM) in Oshkosh, WHAD (90.7 FM) in Delafield, W215AQ (90.9 FM) in Middleton, KUWS (91.3 FM) in Superior, WHHI (91.3 FM) in Highland, WSHS (91.7 FM) in Sheboygan, WHDI (91.9 FM) in Sister Bay, WLBL (91.9 FM) in Wausau, W275AF (102.9 FM) in Ashland, W300BM (107.9 FM) in Madison, and of course online at www.wpr.org.

    The other side is represented by Ed Fallone, a former state Supreme Court candidate. We’ll probably be talking about the trifecta of state Supreme Court decisions due out today.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on On the air with not-Joy Cardin
  • Presty the DJ for July 31

    July 31, 2014
    Music

    Today in 1964, a Rolling Stones concert in Ireland was stopped due to a riot, 12 minutes after the concert began.

    Today in 1966, Alabamans burned Beatles products in protest of John Lennon’s remark that the Beatles were “bigger than Jesus.” The irony was that several years earlier, Lennon met Paul McCartney at a church dinner.

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    1 comment on Presty the DJ for July 31
  • The green socialists

    July 30, 2014
    US politics

    No one should be surprised by what the Daily Caller reports:

    Environmentalists have declared that global warming can’t be stopped without ending the “hegemonic capitalist system,” saying that cap-and-trade systems and conservation efforts are “false solutions.”

    “The structural causes of climate change are linked to the current capitalist hegemonic system,” reads the final draft of the Margarita Declaration, presented at a conference including about 130 environmental groups.

    “To combat climate change it is necessary to change the system,” the declaration adds.

    Environmental activists met in the oil producing, socialist country of Venezuela as part of a United Nations-backed event to increase civil engagement in the lead up to a major climate conference.

    But environmentalists surprised U.N. officials by offering up a declaration that not only seeks to end capitalism, but one that also opposes U.N.-backed efforts to fight global warming — namely, cap-and-trade and forest conservation programs.

    Climate-change news analysis site RTCC reports that it’s unclear which groups signed onto the declaration, adding that it runs in the face of the “green economy” solutions to global warming backed by rich nations.

    But many poor countries, like Venezuela, do not support a “green economy” solution to global warming, instead, arguing that rich countries should give poor nations cash payments and technology transfers.

    Rejection of cap-and-trade and forest conservation programs also fly in the face of U.S. and European environmental groups, which back programs to limit and price carbon dioxide emissions.

    In the U.S., environmentalists rallied behind the Environmental Protection Agency proposals to cut carbon dioxide emissions from new and existing power plants — a plan that would force the shutdown of coal-fired power plants. …

    “EPA is setting up our states to fail – our local economies to fail – to deliver on the president’s promise that electricity prices will skyrocket – all for immeasurable so-called climate benefits,” Louisiana Republican Sen. David Vitter said in a Thursday hearing on the EPA’s new rule. ”This rule is all pain and no gain.”

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The green socialists
  • The right culture

    July 30, 2014
    Culture, media

    Jonah Goldberg followed up this …

    Dinesh D’Souza had a similar motivation in making “America: Imagine the World Without Her,” a new documentary love letter to his adopted country. He’s often described as the Right’s Michael Moore, but he’s aiming higher, hoping to contend one day with Steven Spielberg and Oliver Stone in the feature-film business. He tells National Review that “the Left knows the power of telling a story.” Stone and Spielberg are “much bigger than Michael Moore. They don’t make liberal films — they just make films, and they have a point of view. I want to make films with a different point of view.”

    D’Souza’s absolutely right about Spielberg (though too kind to Stone). One of my biggest complaints about contemporary conservatism — in and out of politics — is that it has lost sight of the importance of storytelling.

    My late friend Andrew Breitbart liked to say that politics is downstream of culture, meaning that any truly successful political turnaround needs to start by changing popular attitudes. Adam Bellow, a storied editor of conservative books, has a similar conviction and is trying to launch a conservative revolt in the world of fiction.

    I wish them great success. Still, I think there’s something missing in this ancient conversation on the right (conservatives have been making such arguments since the 1950s — if not the 1450s, with the publication of the Gutenberg Bible). Conservatives refuse to celebrate, or even notice, how much of the popular culture is on their side.

    Sure, Hollywood is generally very liberal, but America isn’t. Judging by their campaign donations, Hollywood liberals are very supportive of abortion rights. But there’s a reason why sitcoms since Maude haven’t had a lot of storylines about abortion. Indeed, nearly every pregnant TV character treats her unborn child as if it’s already a human being.

    The Left may be anti-military, but such movies tend to do poorly, which is why we see more pro-military films. Similarly, it’s a safe bet that Hollywood liberals loathe guns. But you wouldn’t know that by what they produce. Not many action stars save the day by quoting a poem. Most Hollywood liberals probably oppose the death penalty, yet they make lots of movies where the bad guy meets a grisly death to the cheers of the audience. The Left rolls its eyes at “family values,” but family values are at the heart of most successful sitcoms and dramas.

    One explanation is that while it is true that culture is upstream from politics, reality and, I would argue, morality are upstream from culture. Good stories must align with reality and a sense of justice. They can be set in space or Middle Earth, but if they don’t tap into something real about the human condition, they will fail. As Margaret Thatcher used to say, “The facts of life are conservative.”

    Confirmation of that, I think, can be found in liberal Hollywood’s failure to be as liberal as it wants to be. And that’s definitely funny because it’s true.

    … with this:

    If you took great offense of the recent episode of HBO’s “True Blood” in which two vampires crashed a Ted Cruz fundraiser — at the Bush Library no less — and said some bad words about Republicans, I have some advice: Lighten up.

    The other week I wrote about how the standard conservative critique of the popular culture is just a bit too tightly wound. This minor kerfuffle strikes me as a good illustration of my point. For those who don’t watch the show — i.e. somewhat more than 300 million out of America’s 314 million residents — True Blood is about a world in which vampires finally “come out of the coffin” thanks largely to the invention of a synthetic blood substitute “True Blood.”

    Most of the series takes place in the Louisiana town of Bon Temps, a town infested not only with improbably important vampires and mystical deities, but a small army of nasty southern caricatures living alongside sexually liberated Bohemians that would make Brooklyn hipsters blush. The utterly ridiculous plot lines aren’t important for the purposes of this discussion — or pretty much for any other purpose. But suffice it to say pretty much every episode involves lots of sex — often including the homosexual variety — drugs, profanity, tedious and logically inconsistent speeches about the evils of bigotry, and a hodgepodge of mossy clichés about, again, sex, politics, culture, history, and religion wrapped in the candy coating of pretty naked people. “Gilligan’s Island” was vastly more plausible than True Blood (even accounting for the fact the Howell’s had an extensive wardrobe for a three-hour tour, yet the people who lived on the boat had only one set of clothes apiece).

    For instance, in the offending Ted Cruz episode, the people who shot up the Bush library weren’t the vampires, but Yakuza gangsters with submachine guns (last seen beheading a post-coital yoga swami). My biggest complaint is that none of the vampires have decamped for New York to slaughter the cast of “Girls” (“I can’t die! I just landed an internship at the Utne Reader!”).

    I find the show moderately (probably not the right word) entertaining, but then again I have a soft spot for the vampire genre, not to mention gratuitous sex and violence. That’s just me. I’m not proud of it. But I certainly don’t take the show too seriously, and anyone who does probably isn’t worth taking seriously.

    And that goes far more for its fans than its foes. The show was intended from the outset to provide running commentary on gay issues. It was never subtle about this. The opening credit sequence shows a sign like you might see outside a small town church or fire station that reads “God Hates Fangs.”

    Now the problem with analogizing homosexuals to vampires is really quite simple: It’s a terribly bigoted analogy! Whenever the show dives into extended comparisons of vampires and gays — which is often — I always wonder if the writers realize what they’re saying. If you made the show from an even remotely right-of-center perspective, it would be boycotted by LBGT groups immediately.

    According to True Blood‘s own storyline, vampires have been evil, bigoted, cruel, and murderous for millennia. They have their own secret, manipulative agenda. They control events from dark corners. They quite literally have the power to brainwash people. Not surprisingly, the comparison to vampires is a classic staple of anti-Semitism. Indeed, some argue that Bram Stoker’s Dracula was one extended anti-Semitic caricature (a rich, manipulative, blood-sucking rootless cosmopolitan from Eastern Europe with a “hooked” nose at a time of high Jewish immigration? Pure coincidence!). A fan of the show might say, “Only some vampires are evil, bigoted, cruel and murderous. There are nice vampires too.”

    Okay, well. First the whole original storyline is about how Bill Compton is different than other vampires because he’s noble and decent, suggesting the other vamps aren’t. Second, try to make that kind of “it’s not all gays” or “it’s not all blacks” or (outside of the Middle East, U.N. or, increasingly, MSNBC) “it’s not all Jews” argument without sounding bigoted. Hey, I can’t be anti-vampire, some of my best friends are vampires! And, third, let me explain something else: Shut up.

    It reminds me of when “28 Weeks Later” came out and everyone went gaga about how it was an extended anti-war metaphor of the Iraq invasion and the “green zone.” Few dwelled on the fact that in that metaphor the enemy — the zombies — must be shown no mercy and ruthlessly exterminated. They just thought it was cool that a zombie movie was making such an obvious reference to the war, or something.

    And that I think is the source of the real problem here. By any objective or commonsense measure, the uptight Republicans slaughtered at the Ted Cruz fundraiser are happier and more productive members of society than virtually every other character in the show. From the sympathetic white-trash werewolves to the corrupt human rabble-rousers, from the vampire aristocrats to the endless string of slatternly young women and men who come and go with regularity, the show focuses on creatures who are, variously, decent-but-doomed, evil, stupid, or morally, spiritually, or intellectually lost.

    The one thing these people have going for them? They are cool — at least by the glandular, knee-jerk liberal, fashion-forward, standards of the show’s producers and its niche pay-cable audience. In other words, to the extent the show is politically appealing, it is an irrational hot mess (much like the goo vampires turn into when struck with a wooden stake). It’s like it was written for Bill Maher’s studio audience, a group that doesn’t care about real facts or arguments — they just want to hear how they’re awesome and the people they hate aren’t.

    To them, rich Republican men in bolo ties and rich Republican women in prim pantsuits aren’t cool. And you know what? That’s fine. Indeed, in real life, those Republicans would look at most of the motley characters inhabiting “True Blood” and see a gaggle of losers. And for the most part, they’d be right.

    Conservatives need to get over their insecurities about not being cool in the eyes of liberals (and American adults generally could stand to worry about this sort of thing a lot less than they do). Once you start looking for it, it’s amazing how much liberal commentary — particularly about sex and religion — boils down to a kind of sneering self-satisfaction that liberals are hip and conservatives are squares (just think about how much “analysis” of Obama has been rooted in the assumption he’s cool). …

    Moreover, the simple fact is that the popular culture has lots of archetypes that are essentially conservative and cool. Very few male action stars fit the model of how Salon thinks men should behave, what with all the gunplay, mansplaining, and refusal to get the required signatures on the necessary sexual-consent forms. The men of “Lone Survivor” are certainly cool. Even better, they are cool and have a code of honor. The same goes for the female protagonist of “Zero Dark Thirty.”

    The point is that cool isn’t monolithic in a diverse and rich culture. For some, Southern Gothic sybaritic crapulence is cool; for others, self-sacrifice and patriotism are cool. And for lots of us, both have their places.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The right culture
  • Presty the DJ for July 30

    July 30, 2014
    Music

    The Beatles were busy at work today in 1963:

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for July 30
  • If only you could do over 2012

    July 29, 2014
    US politics, Wisconsin politics

    The New York Times reports …

    The Republicans appear to hold a slight advantage in the fight for the Senate and remain in a dominant position in the House. They need to pick up six seats to gain Senate control, and they hold a clear advantage in races in three states: South Dakota, Montana and West Virginia. The data from YouGov, an opinion-research firm that enjoyed success in 2012, finds the G.O.P. with a nominal lead in five additional states.

    The five states where the Republicans hold a slight lead in the YouGov panel include three Southern ones — Arkansas, Louisiana and North Carolina — where Democratic incumbents face tough re-election contests and where Mitt Romney won in 2012. Republicans also have a slight edge in Iowa and Michigan, two open seats in states that usually vote for Democrats in presidential elections.

    … and Jim Geraghty comments:

    A couple reasons to find these results plausible:

    It’s not all roses and sunshine for Republicans. In Colorado, Cory Gardner, one of the stronger GOP challengers, trails Sen. Mark Udall, 47 percent to 51 percent. In Alaska, Begich leads both challengers listed. In the two GOP-held seats that the party needs to keep, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky is up 4 and in Georgia, Purdue is up 6 on Michelle Nunn — neither margin is particularly overwhelming in states that are deep red in presidential elections.

    There aren’t a lot of results that look wacky. In four of the Senate races where the GOP candidate leads, the margins are 2 percentage points or less — Thom Tillis in North Carolina, Joni Ernst in Iowa, Bill Cassidy in Louisiana, and Terri Lynn Land in Michigan. Flip those, and Republicans only gain four seats, a sum most on the right would find disappointing.

    If there’s a thumb on the scale, it’s the wrong one. If you think of the New York Times and CBS News as liberal news organizations, these results are an argument against interest.

    Now throw in this poll result:

    Americans are so down on President Obama at the moment that, if they could do the 2012 election all over again, they’d overwhelmingly back the former Massachusetts governor’s bid. That’s just one finding in a brutal CNN poll, released Sunday, which shows Romney topping Obama in a re-election rematch by a whopping nine-point margin, 53 percent to 44 percent. That’s an even larger spread than CNN found in November, when a survey had Romney winning a redo 49 percent to 45 percent.

    Two years ago, Obama won re-election with about 51 percent of the vote.

    An electorate that’s disappointed and frustrated with Obama is not going to turn out to vote for Democrats. They’ll either vote for Republicans or stay home.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on If only you could do over 2012
Previous Page
1 … 772 773 774 775 776 … 1,038
Next Page

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog

The thoughts of a journalist/libertarian–conservative/Christian husband, father, Eagle Scout and aficionado of obscure rock music. Thoughts herein are only the author’s and not necessarily the opinions of his family, friends, neighbors, church members or past, present or future employers.

  • Steve
    • About, or, Who is this man?
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Adventures in ruralu0026nbsp;inkBack in June 2009, I was driving somewhere through a rural area. And for some reason, I had a flashback to two experiences in my career about that time of year many years ago. In 1988, eight days after graduating from the University of Wisconsin, I started work at the Grant County Herald Independent in Lancaster as a — well, the — reporter. Four years after that, on my 27th birthday, I purchased, with a business partner, the Tri-County Press in Cuba City, my first business venture. Both were experiences about which Wisconsin author Michael Perry might write. I thought about all this after reading a novel, The Deadline, written by a former newspaper editor and publisher. (Now who would write a novel about a weekly newspaper?) As a former newspaper owner, I picked at some of it — why finance a newspaper purchase through the bank if the seller is willing to finance it? Because the mean bank lender is a plot point! — and it is much more interesting than reality, but it is very well written, with a nicely twisting plot, and quite entertaining, again more so than reality. There is something about that first job out of college that makes you remember it perhaps more…
    • Adventures in radioI’ve been in the full-time work world half my life. For that same amount of time I’ve been broadcasting sports as a side interest, something I had wanted to since I started listening to games on radio and watching on TV, and then actually attending games. If you ask someone who’s worked in radio for some time about the late ’70s TV series “WKRP in Cincinnati,” most of them will tell you that, if anything, the series understated how wacky working in radio can be. Perhaps the funniest episode in the history of TV is the “WKRP” episode, based on a true story, about the fictional radio station’s Thanksgiving promotion — throwing live turkeys out of a helicopter under the mistaken belief that, in the words of WKRP owner Arthur Carlson, “As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.” [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST01bZJPuE0] I’ve never been involved in anything like that. I have announced games from the roofs of press boxes (once on a nice day, and once in 50-mph winds), from a Mississippi River bluff (more on that later), and from the front row of the second balcony of the University of Wisconsin Fieldhouse (great view, but not a place to go if…
    • “Good morning/afternoon/evening, ________ fans …”
    • My biggest storyEarlier this week, while looking for something else, I came upon some of my own work. (I’m going to write a blog someday called “Things I Found While Looking for Something Else.” This is not that blog.) The Grant County Sheriff’s Department, in the county where I used to live, has a tribute page to the two officers in county history who died in the line of duty. One is William Loud, a deputy marshal in Cassville, shot to death by two bank robbers in 1912. The other is Tom Reuter, a Grant County deputy sheriff who was shot to death at the end of his 4 p.m.-to-midnight shift March 18, 1990. Gregory Coulthard, then a 19-year-old farmhand, was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide and is serving a life sentence, with his first eligibility for parole on March 18, 2015, just 3½ years from now. I’ve written a lot over the years. I think this, from my first two years in the full-time journalism world, will go down as the story I remember the most. For journalists, big stories contain a paradox, which was pointed out in CBS-TV’s interview of Andy Rooney on his last “60 Minutes” Sunday. Morley Safer said something along the line…
  • Food and drink
    • The Roesch/Prestegard familyu0026nbsp;cookbookFrom the family cookbook(s) All the families I’m associated with love to eat, so it’s a good thing we enjoy cooking. The first out-of-my-house food memory I have is of my grandmother’s cooking for Christmas or other family occasions. According to my mother, my grandmother had a baked beans recipe that she would make for my mother. Unfortunately, the recipe seems to have  disappeared. Also unfortunately, my early days as a picky, though voluminous, eater meant I missed a lot of those recipes made from such wholesome ingredients as lard and meat fat. I particularly remember a couple of meals that involve my family. The day of Super Bowl XXXI, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and a group of their friends got together to share lots of food and cheer on the Packers to their first NFL title in 29 years. (After which Jannan and I drove to Lambeau Field in the snow,  but that’s another story.) Then, on Dec. 31, 1999, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and Jannan and I (along with Michael in utero) had a one-course-per-hour meal to appropriately end years beginning with the number 1. Unfortunately I can’t remember what we…
    • SkålI was the editor of Marketplace Magazine for 10 years. If I had to point to one thing that demonstrates improved quality of life since I came to Northeast Wisconsin in 1994, it would be … … the growth of breweries and  wineries in Northeast Wisconsin. The former of those two facts makes sense, given our heritage as a brewing state. The latter is less self-evident, since no one thinks of Wisconsin as having a good grape-growing climate. Some snobs claim that apple or cherry wines aren’t really wines at all. But one of the great facets of free enterprise is the opportunity to make your own choice of what food and drink to drink. (At least for now, though some wish to restrict our food and drink choices.) Wisconsin’s historically predominant ethnic group (and our family’s) is German. Our German ancestors did unfortunately bring large government and high taxes with them, but they also brought beer. Europeans brought wine with them, since they came from countries with poor-quality drinking water. Within 50 years of a wave of mid-19th-century German immigration, brewing had become the fifth largest industry in the U.S., according to Maureen Ogle, author of Ambitious Brew: The Story of American Beer. Beer and wine have…
  • Wheels
    • America’s sports carMy birthday in June dawned without a Chevrolet Corvette in front of my house. (The Corvette at the top of the page was featured at the 2007 Greater Milwaukee Auto Show. The copilot is my oldest son, Michael.) Which isn’t surprising. I have three young children, and I have a house with a one-car garage. (Then again, this would be more practical, though a blatant pluck-your-eyes-out violation of the Corvette ethos. Of course, so was this.) The reality is that I’m likely to be able to own a Corvette only if I get a visit from the Corvette Fairy, whose office is next door to the Easter Bunny. (I hope this isn’t foreshadowing: When I interviewed Dave Richter of Valley Corvette for a car enthusiast story in the late great Marketplace Magazine, he said that the most popular Corvette in most fans’ minds was a Corvette built during their days in high school. This would be a problem for me in that I graduated from high school in 1983, when no Corvette was built.) The Corvette is one of those cars whose existence may be difficult to understand within General Motors Corp. The Corvette is what is known as a “halo car,” a car that drives people into showrooms, even if…
    • Barges on fouru0026nbsp;wheelsI originally wrote this in September 2008.  At the Fox Cities Business Expo Tuesday, a Smart car was displayed at the United Way Fox Cities booth. I reported that I once owned a car into which trunk, I believe, the Smart could be placed, with the trunk lid shut. This is said car — a 1975 Chevrolet Caprice coupe (ours was dark red), whose doors are, I believe, longer than the entire Smart. The Caprice, built down Interstate 90 from us Madisonians in Janesville (a neighbor of ours who worked at the plant probably helped put it together) was the flagship of Chevy’s full-size fleet (which included the stripper Bel Air and middle-of-the-road Impala), featuring popular-for-the-time vinyl roofs, better sound insulation, an upgraded cloth interior, rear fender skirts and fancy Caprice badges. The Caprice was 18 feet 1 inch long and weighed 4,300 pounds. For comparison: The midsize Chevrolet of the ear was the Malibu, which was the same approximate size as the Caprice after its 1977 downsizing. The compact Chevrolet of the era was the Nova, which was 200 inches long — four inches longer than a current Cadillac STS. Wikipedia’s entry on the Caprice has this amusing sentence: “As fuel economy became a bigger priority among Americans…
    • Behind the wheel
    • Collecting only dust or rust
    • Coooooooooooupe!
    • Corvettes on the screen
    • The garage of misfit cars
    • 100 years (and one day) of our Chevrolets
    • They built Excitement, sort of, once in a while
    • A wagon by any otheru0026nbsp;nameFirst written in 2008. You will see more don’t-call-them-station-wagons as you drive today. Readers around my age have probably had some experience with a vehicle increasingly rare on the road — the station wagon. If you were a Boy Scout or Girl Scout, or were a member of some kind of youth athletic team, or had a large dog, or had relatives approximately your age, or had friends who needed to be transported somewhere, or had parents who occasionally had to haul (either in the back or in a trailer) more than what could be fit inside a car trunk, you (or, actually, your parents) were the target demographic for the station wagon. “Station wagons came to be like covered wagons — so much family activity happened in those cars,” said Tim Cleary, president of the American Station Wagon Owners Association, in Country Living magazine. Wagons “were used for everything from daily runs to the grocery store to long summer driving trips, and while many men and women might have wanted a fancier or sportier car, a station wagon was something they knew they needed for the family.” The “station wagon” originally was a vehicle with a covered seating area to take people between train stations…
    • Wheels on theu0026nbsp;screenBetween my former and current blogs, I wrote a lot about automobiles and TV and movies. Think of this post as killing two birds (Thunderbirds? Firebirds? Skylarks?) with one stone. Most movies and TV series view cars the same way most people view cars — as A-to-B transportation. (That’s not counting the movies or series where the car is the plot, like the haunted “Christine” or “Knight Rider” or the “Back to the Future” movies.) The philosophy here, of course, is that cars are not merely A-to-B transportation. Which disqualifies most police shows from what you’re about to read, even though I’ve watched more police video than anything else, because police cars are plain Jane vehicles. The highlight in a sense is in the beginning: The car chase in my favorite movie, “Bullitt,” featuring Steve McQueen’s 1968 Ford Mustang against the bad guys’ 1968 Dodge Charger: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMc2RdFuOxIu0026amp;fmt=18] One year before that (but I didn’t see this until we got Telemundo on cable a couple of years ago) was a movie called “Operación 67,” featuring (I kid you not) a masked professional wrestler, his unmasked sidekick, and some sort of secret agent plot. (Since I don’t know Spanish and it’s not…
    • While riding in my Cadillac …
  • Entertainments
    • Brass rocksThose who read my former blog last year at this time, or have read this blog over the past months, know that I am a big fan of the rock group Chicago. (Back when they were a rock group and not a singer of sappy ballads, that is.) Since rock music began from elements of country music, jazz and the blues, brass rock would seem a natural subgenre of rock music. A lot of ’50s musical acts had saxophone players, and some played with full orchestras … [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CPS-WuUKUE] … but it wasn’t until the more-or-less simultaneous appearances of Chicago and Blood Sweat u0026amp; Tears on the musical scene (both groups formed in 1967, both had their first charting singles in 1969, and they had the same producer) that the usual guitar/bass/keyboard/drum grouping was augmented by one or more trumpets, a sax player and a trombone player. While Chicago is my favorite group (but you knew that already), the first brass rock song I remember hearing was BSu0026amp;T’s “Spinning Wheel” — not in its original form, but on “Sesame Street,” accompanied by, yes, a giant spinning wheel. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi9sLkyhhlE] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxWSOuNsN20] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9U34uPjz-g] I remember liking Chicago’s “Just You ‘n Me” when it was released as a single, and…
    • Drive and Eat au0026nbsp;RockThe first UW home football game of each season also is the opener for the University of Wisconsin Marching Band, the world’s finest college marching band. (How the UW Band has not gotten the Sudler Trophy, which is to honor the country’s premier college marching bands, is beyond my comprehension.) I know this because I am an alumnus of the UW Band. I played five years (in the last rank of the band, Rank 25, motto: “Where Men Are Tall and Run-On Is Short”), marching in 39 football games at Camp Randall Stadium, the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Memorial Stadium at the University of Illinois (worst artificial turf I had ever seen), the University of Nevada–Las Vegas’ Sam Boyd Silver Bowl, the former Dyche Stadium at Northwestern University, five high school fields and, in my one bowl game, Legion Field in Birmingham, Ala., site of the 1984 Hall of Fame Bowl. The UW Band was, without question, the most memorable experience of my college days, and one of the most meaningful experiences of my lifetime. It was the most physical experience of my lifetime, to be sure. Fifteen minutes into my first Registration…
    • Keep on rockin’ in the freeu0026nbsp;worldOne of my first ambitions in communications was to be a radio disc jockey, and to possibly reach the level of the greats I used to listen to from WLS radio in Chicago, which used to be one of the great 50,000-watt AM rock stations of the country, back when they still existed. (Those who are aficionados of that time in music and radio history enjoyed a trip to that wayback machine when WLS a Memorial Day Big 89 Rewind, excerpts of which can be found on their Web site.) My vision was to be WLS’ afternoon DJ, playing the best in rock music between 2 and 6, which meant I wouldn’t have to get up before the crack of dawn to do the morning show, yet have my nights free to do whatever glamorous things big-city DJs did. Then I learned about the realities of radio — low pay, long hours, zero job security — and though I have dabbled in radio sports, I’ve pretty much cured myself of the idea of working in radio, even if, to quote WAPL’s Len Nelson, “You come to work every day just like everybody else does, but we’re playing rock ’n’ roll songs, we’re cuttin’ up.…
    • Monday on the flight line, not Saturday in the park
    • Music to drive by
    • The rock ofu0026nbsp;WisconsinWikipedia begins its item “Music of Wisconsin” thusly: Wisconsin was settled largely by European immigrants in the late 19th century. This immigration led to the popularization of galops, schottisches, waltzes, and, especially, polkas. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl7wCczgNUc] So when I first sought to write a blog piece about rock musicians from Wisconsin, that seemed like a forlorn venture. Turned out it wasn’t, because when I first wrote about rock musicians from Wisconsin, so many of them that I hadn’t mentioned came up in the first few days that I had to write a second blog entry fixing the omissions of the first. This list is about rock music, so it will not include, for instance, Milwaukee native and Ripon College graduate Al Jarreau, who in addition to having recorded a boatload of music for the jazz and adult contemporary/easy listening fan, also recorded the theme music for the ’80s TV series “Moonlighting.” Nor will it include Milwaukee native Eric Benet, who was for a while known more for his former wife, Halle Berry, than for his music, which includes four number one singles on the Ru0026amp;B charts, “Spend My Life with You” with Tamia, “Hurricane,” “Pretty Baby” and “You’re the Only One.” Nor will it include Wisconsin’s sizable contributions to big…
    • Steve TV: All Steve, All the Time
    • “Super Steve, Man of Action!”
    • Too much TV
    • The worst music of allu0026nbsp;timeThe rock group Jefferson Airplane titled its first greatest-hits compilation “The Worst of Jefferson Airplane.” Rolling Stone magazine was not being ironic when it polled its readers to decide the 10 worst songs of the 1990s. I’m not sure I agree with all of Rolling Stone’s list, but that shouldn’t be surprising; such lists are meant for debate, after all. To determine the “worst,” songs appropriate for the “Vinyl from Hell” segment that used to be on a Madison FM rock station, requires some criteria, which does not include mere overexposure (for instance, “Macarena,” the video of which I find amusing since it looks like two bankers are singing it). Before we go on: Blog posts like this one require multimedia, so if you find a song you hate on this blog, I apologize. These are also songs that I almost never listen to because my sound system has a zero-tolerance policy — if I’m listening to the radio or a CD and I hear a song I don’t like, it’s, to quote Bad Company, gone gone gone. My blonde wife won’t be happy to read that one of her favorite ’90s songs, 4 Non Blondes’ “What’s Up,” starts the list. (However,…
    • “You have the right to remain silent …”
  • Madison
    • Blasts from the Madison media past
    • Blasts from my Madison past
    • Blasts from our Madison past
    • What’s the matter with Madison?
    • Wisconsin – Madison = ?
  • Sports
    • Athletic aesthetics, or “cardinal” vs. “Big Red”
    • Choose your own announcer
    • La Follette state 1982 (u0022It was 30 years ago todayu0022)
    • The North Dakota–Wisconsin Hockey Fight of 1982
    • Packers vs. Brewers
  • Hall of Fame
    • The case(s) against teacher unions
    • The Class of 1983
    • A hairy subject, or face the face
    • It’s worse than you think
    • It’s worse than you think, 2010–11 edition
    • My favorite interview subject of all time
    • Oh look! Rural people!
    • Prestegard for president!
    • Unions vs. the facts, or Hiding in plain sight
    • When rhetoric goes too far
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
      • Join 197 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar
    %d