The number one single today in 1960:
The number one single today in 1970:
The number one album today in 1987 was U2’s “The Joshua Tree”:
The number one single today in 1960:
The number one single today in 1970:
The number one album today in 1987 was U2’s “The Joshua Tree”:
I am a subscriber to The Rap Sheet, a collection of current and past crime fiction in print and electronic media.
It’s an excellent read when the author is not injecting his politics where readers may think it doesn’t belong. (Hypocritical? I am well aware it’s his blog and he can include whatever he likes, just like I can. I do not, however, market this blog as a politics-free zone.)
I was reading it last night and saw …
In February, I mentioned on this page that I’d been asked by a Wall Street Journal writer about my interest in collecting the main title sequences for older TV crime dramas–the basis for The Rap Sheet’s YouTube page. At the time I told him there were a few such introductions I had still not found, including one for the 1973-1974 NBC cop drama Chase, starring Mitchell Ryan. Well, thanks to author Lee Goldberg, who shares my obsession with these classic small-screen openings, I’ve finally added the Chase intro to my collection.
As you know, I sort of beat Goldberg and the author to it, though mine is not the original:
This isn’t the greatest copy around, but at least it actually made the air, unlike my slideshow:
I had not remembered that “Chase” was initially on opposite of “Hawaii Five-O,” which would have posed a hideous choice on the part of the eight-year-old edition of your humble blog writer. (It was bad enough when the last half-hour of “The Mod Squad” overlapped with the first half-hour of “Hawaii Five-O.”
As you know, titles are critical for catching the viewer’s attention. This series met my criteria for TV-watching when I watched far more TV than I do now — cool vehicles plus cool theme music. Can you see why an eight-year-old would be temporarily mesmerized by …
… a TV series that included a souped-up car and a helicopter and a motorcycle and a police dog? Not only that, but, according to the always-accurate Wikipedia, the series’ characters …
… specialized in solving unusually difficult or violent cases, and indicative of the show’s emphasis on the determined pursuit and undercover surveillance of hardened criminals. The unit, headquartered in an old firehouse, relied mainly on alternate means of transportation such as Helicopters, Motorcycles, Custom vans, Taxis, four-wheel-drive vehicles, Sports and muscle cars, work trucks (vehicles from the Public Works Department, the Telephone company, and/or the Postal Service and civilian delivery services) and high-speed driving to apprehend its suspects.
Well, who wouldn’t watch that? The added bonuses were that it was a Jack Webb production …
… which implied a certain level of quality. It was also created at Webb’s behest by Stephen J. Cannell, who turned out to be one of the greatest TV writers and series creators in television history. (Cannell got his start on Webb’s “Adam-12.” And it had the requisite theme music, written by jazz saxophonist Oliver Nelson, who did a lot of TV work, including the theme of “The Six Million Dollar Man.” (Webb was a huge jazz fan and considered his best film to be “Pete Kelly’s Blues.”)
The series supposedly was based on the Los Angeles Police Department’s Special Investigation Section. Given that (if I remember the episodes correctly) a lot of the episodes occurred well outside L.A., perhaps it should have been set within the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department (assuming it had an SIS counterpart). I suspect, however, that there were some issues between Webb and the L.A. sheriff, based on “Emergency!”, where the sheriff’s deputy character the first couple of seasons suddenly became a generic police officer.
It turns out that apparently for $21 you can own the entire six-DVD set, such as it is. The series had a pilot and 16 episodes, and the DVDs supposedly have 12 episodes, so I have no idea what is not included, and whether the episodes include Michael Richardson (the car driver), Norm Hamilton (the helicopter pilot) and Brian Fong (the motorcycle guy), or their midseason replacements Gary Crosby (a frequent member of the Jack Webb Players) and Craig Gardner.
I was pondering getting this, but as it turned out to my surprise, YouTube has two episodes …
… apparently posted by a fan of Maunder, though they are labeled as being from his Western series “Lancer.”
This, by the way, also should not be confused with another NBC series called “Chase” …
… nor with the brass rock group Chase:
Legendary Speed Shop passes on Nitto Tire’s video:
As you know, one of my weird interests is car starter sounds. A car’s starter motor (assuming it successfully starts the car) is a promise of a trip to a destination, the expression of transportation freedom found in no other mode of transportation.
The ultimate starter sound still is probably Brutus …
… powered by a BMW 48-liter V-12 engine which perfectly embodies the phrase “exploded into life.” Although Rolls–Royce might have a contrary argument:
The number one British single today in 1955:
The number one British single today in 1959:
The number one single today in 1961:
Chicks on the Right reports:
Don’t be fooled by her whole “listening” tour. She’s not actually listening, but prescreening. She doesn’t want to say anything that will add further damage to her campaign. Don’t believe me? At a roundtable discussion with furniture employees in New Hampshire, she just nodded her headed and said “mmm hmm” approximately 88 times.
And let’s face it. That’s probably her best strategy, because when she actually opens her mouth, she only screws herself over.
On Monday, Hillary Clinton said that she’s actually shocked that small businesses aren’t prospering. And I don’t know if she’s really that ignorant or if she simply wants to distance herself from Obama’s crappy economic policies. Even though hers are basically the same. …
“From my perspective, I want to be sure that we get small businesses starting and growing in America again,” Hillary said. “We have stalled out. I was very surprised to see that when I began to dig into it because people were telling me this, as I traveled around the country the last two years, but I didn’t know what they were saying, and it turns out that we’re not producing as many small businesses as we used to. And a recent world study said that we are 46th in the world in the difficulty to start a small business. There’s lots of issues…”
What to do? OH I KNOW I KNOW PICK ME! Let’s push through another stimulus package! Or we could raise taxes! More regulations! That’ll do the trick!
Let’s go back to what she said. Basically, “dead broke” Hillionaire was flying around the country, being super down-to-earth and people were like, “Hey Hillz, the economy sucks monkey balls.” And she was all, “What? I don’t know what you’re saying.”
Seriously. That’s her excuse. She didn’t know what they were saying. But now that she’s officially running for president, she has TOTALLY seen the light. She gets it.
The truth is, she only now chooses to recognize small business struggles because it benefits her. She doesn’t actually care about small businesses. No Democrats do. It’s all about her. It’s always about her. It’s her turn to be president, so she’ll say whatever she needs to say and sympathize with whoever needs sympathy to get there.
You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to see that liberal policies hurt small businesses. My dad’s a small business owner, and I’ve witnessed the struggle. He has put so much sweat into keeping his business alive in Obama’s economy. That’s why I get worked up when Democrats talk about how great the economy is. It’s obvious. It’s not. And everyone with an Actual Brain recognizes that. Businesses have no confidence in the economy.
At the end of the day, Hillary’s going to say whatever needs to be said. Her answer to helping small businesses will be just like Obama’s strategy. More big government top-down policies. Squash all incentives to invest and innovate, then sit around and wonder why the economy sucks.
I’m not sure the Chicks are correct. Remember this statement back during the Hillarycare days? Ralph R. Reiland did:
As first lady, she produced a 1,400-page health plan, primarily in secret, that was overloaded with central controls, punishments for disobedience and costly mandates for employers. …
Similarly, the attitude from Hillary’s central-planning squad was that small-business owners could toss in the towel if they couldn’t pay the price of providing the government’s newly mandated benefits for 100 percent of their employees.
“I can’t be responsible for every undercapitalized entrepreneur in America,” Mrs. Clinton said in 1993, responding to charges that her plan would bankrupt businesses and cut employment. Destroy a job through excessive health mandates, she was told, and employees will go from having no health insurance to having no health insurance and no jobs.
No one, of course, was asking Hillary Clinton to be “responsible for every undercapitalized entrepreneur in America.” Just the opposite: It was her plan that would cause the undercapitalization.
The anti-business message was clear. Go out of business if you can’t jump through Hillary’s hoops. A business is a throwaway if it can’t come up with the money to pay for the latest mandate.
Then there was last October, as Godfather Politics noted:
Multi-millionaire Hillary Clinton told a crowd gathered at the Park Plaza Hotel that corporations and businesses” don’t “create jobs.” I wonder if the workers and owners of the Park Plaza Hotel know that.
I also wonder how the $100 million that Bill and Hillary have earned since they left the White House account for their windfall? Did it fall heaven in baskets, or did it grow on their backyard money trees. …
If corporations and businesses don’t create jobs, then who or what does? Government? Governments don’t create jobs. All government jobs are “created” by taking money from businesses, corporations, and workers through taxes. If businesses and corporations didn’t exist, government wouldn’t have any money to tax, thus, there wouldn’t be any government jobs.
Microsoft was founded in 1975. Prior to this date, Microsoft did not employ anybody. Today, Microsoft employs 126,000 people worldwide. Microsoft does not stand alone as a corporation. Millions of other people are employed indirectly from a company like Microsoft.
The same is true of Apple, General Electric, Wal-Mart, and every other big company that liberals seem to hate for their “greed.”
Hillary’s “corporations and businesses” don’t “create jobs” comments is reminiscent of President Obama’s “you didn’t build that” claim. Remember?
Liberals tied to make excuses for Obama’s comment like they will try to do for Hillary. Hillary is their man for 2016. …
There is no money for government without people who make money. Government is the great inhibitor of economic growth.
It’s amazing that someone who has been infesting Washington for 22 years doesn’t grasp business. But not surprising.
The number one British single today in 1964 was written by John Lennon and Paul McCartney, but not performed by the Beatles:
The number one British single today in 1969:
The number one single today in 1977:
The Score has bad news for Bucks fans:
The clock is ticking on the Milwaukee Bucks’ plan to unveil a new $500 million downtown facility.
The arena financing plan must be completed in 10 days in time for the Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee’s consideration.
“This has to be wrapped up in the next 10 days,” urged Bucks president Peter Feigin on Tuesday. Feigin admitted to challenges within the politics associated with finalizing a plan, but expressed cautious optimism, reports Don Walker of the Journal Sentinel.
A meeting is expected to convene on Wednesday between representatives from the Bucks, the city councilors and legislative leaders. The Bucks’ current timeline calls for groundbreaking in the fall of 2015 but there would need to be agreements with the city and county as well as a go-ahead on the financing plan.
The Bucks have billed the plan as a 50-50 public-private partnership on the $500 million facility. However that plan has faced some opposition and uncertainty.
The original plan headed by Wisconsin governor Scott Walker called for the state of Wisconsin to provide $220 million in bonding. But that proposal has failed to generate sufficient political backing. Instead, an alternative for $150 million in backing has been put forth by Senate Majority leader Scott Fitzgerald.
Should the $150-million proposal go through, the Bucks would be short $100 million of their goal of $500 million.
The Bucks are facing an NBA-imposed deadline by the fall of 2017 to have a new arena in place. Should the Bucks fail to meet the deadline, the league reserves the right to buy back the team for $575 million.
Charlie Sykes gives the reasons why this is bad news for Bucks fans:
1. Public opinion.
The numbers in last week’s Marquette University law poll were brutal, with 79 percent of registered voters statewide opposing public financing. That was bad enough, but the numbers out state were even worse: 87 percent of out state voters opposed the plan. That’s a huge problem because any package has to have out state GOP backing to make it into the budget. Milwaukee Democrats won’t lift a finger.2. Tom Barrett.
Not a new story, but it is getting worse with every passing week. Barrett’s lack of engagement on a major project in his own city has both puzzled and annoyed legislators and his apparent refusal to increase the local share — by, for example, creating a TIF for the new private-sector ancillary development — may be a deal killer. This would be bad enough, but legislators contrast his hands-off approach to the arena project to his fervent backing of the $124 million streetcar. Behind the scenes, Milwaukee County Executive Chris Abele is floating some ideas, but his ability to get anything through a hostile county board is problematic at best.
3. Tom Barrett’s mouth.
If possible Barrett made things even worse last week, when he lashed out at Governor Scott Walker and the GOP legislators, suggesting that they had passed gun laws that contributed to the city’s explosion of violent crime. Barrett’s comments were cited by both co-chairs of the legislature’s Joint Finance Committee. “Politics is about relationships,” [State Rep. John] Nygren said Friday. “You poke a finger in our eyes, it makes it a little harder.”
Senator Alberta Darling was even more direct:
Darling accused Barrett of “appalling leadership,” saying he was shifting the blame for crime without taking responsibility for what’s happening in the city. Last week, Barrett called on Gov. Scott Walker and the Republican-dominated Legislature to devote more resources to public safety in Milwaukee, saying the state’s gun laws have resulted in more guns on the street.
“He never is at fault for anything,” Darling said. “He’s never the key player.”
4. Marc Lasry.
Some insiders think that Lasy’s public commitment to raise $270,000 in a week for Hillary Clinton could leave a bigger mark than the polling numbers. Lasry has every right to support the candidate of his choice, of course, and he has made no secret of his fealty to the Clintons. But the timing of his all-in-for-Hillary announcement raised eyebrows, given that in order to he has to get his financing package approved, he needs to support of a GOP legislature and a GOP governor… who also happens to be running for president.
Lasry is evidently either tone-deaf, or simply has decided that he wants to be ambassador to France more than he wants a new arena in Downtown Milwaukee.
5. Scott Walker.
In case you hadn’t noticed, the governor has a lot on his plate lately and he is trying to appeal to different constituencies. How much political capital is Walker going to devote to a project that could easily be cast as corporate welfare for billionaires? How will that play in Iowa, or New Hampshire? As we saw in the fight over Miller Park, a political lift this heavy needs an engaged, aggressive, high profile push from the governor. Don’t expect Walker to use the Tommy Thompson playbook here.
Nygren asks:
Currently, the city and county of Milwaukee have committed $50 million, a mere 5% of total costs related to this project. To put that into perspective, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett committed $64 million of city funds to build a 2.5 mile streetcar route, which is 50% of all streetcar costs. If Mayor Barrett is willing to front 50% of the costs for a streetcar, but only 5% for an arena in his city, it begs the question: how serious is the Mayor about keeping the Bucks in Milwaukee?In comparison to what other cities have contributed, Milwaukee’s contribution is considerably less. Most recently, in Sacramento, the city is giving $255 million, nearly 53% of all costs to build a new NBA stadium. The city of Brooklyn is also planning a $1 billion arena; however, the city has committed $205 million, 20.5% of costs. In fact, going back to 2001, no city has committed less to build an arena than Milwaukee. If we want to seriously move forward with keeping the Bucks in Milwaukee, we need the city and county to get serious about funding.
Clearly, Milwaukee and Milwaukee County are not serious about funding a Bradley Center replacement. The Bucks’ owners need not sell the team back to the NBA; they need only ask the Washington state Democrats to come up with taxpayer goodies for Seattle Sonics 2.0.
What legislator interested in reelection would go against 87 percent of his or her constituents? As stated here before, the statewide following for the Bucks is nowhere near the statewide following of the Brewers, and Miller Park was far from uncontroversial. (For that matter, 47 percent of Brown County voters voted against the 0.5-percent Brown County sales tax for the early-2000s Lambeau ield improvements. It’s one thing to buck 47 percent of your constituents, but 87 percent?)
Enjoy the NBA playoffs (game three of Bucks vs. Bulls is Thursday night), Bucks fans. You don’t have long to watch the NBA in Milwaukee.
The American Enterprise Institute chronicles 18 incorrect predictions dating back to the first U.S. observance of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin’s birthday …

… I mean, Earth Day, in 1970:
1. Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation,” wrote Washington University biologist Barry Commoner in the Earth Day issue of the scholarly journal Environment.
3. The day after the first Earth Day, the New York Times editorial page warned, “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”
4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born,” wrote Paul Ehrlich in a 1969 essay titled “Eco-Catastrophe! “By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”
6. Ehrlich sketched out his most alarmist scenario for the 1970 Earth Day issue of The Progressive, assuring readers that between 1980 and 1989, some 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would perish in the “Great Die-Off.”
7. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” declared Denis Hayes, the chief organizer for Earth Day, in the Spring 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.
8. Peter Gunter, a North Texas State University professor, wrote in 1970, “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”
9. In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
10. Ecologist Kenneth Watt told Time that, “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”
11. Barry Commoner predicted that decaying organic pollutants would use up all of the oxygen in America’s rivers, causing freshwater fish to suffocate.
12. Paul Ehrlich chimed in, predicting in his 1970 that “air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” Ehrlich sketched a scenario in which 200,000 Americans would die in 1973 during “smog disasters” in New York and Los Angeles.
13. Paul Ehrlich warned in the May 1970 issue of Audubon that DDT and other chlorinated hydrocarbons “may have substantially reduced the life expectancy of people born since 1945.” Ehrlich warned that Americans born since 1946…now had a life expectancy of only 49 years, and he predicted that if current patterns continued this expectancy would reach 42 years by 1980, when it might level out.
14. Ecologist Kenneth Watt declared, “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’”
15. Harrison Brown, a scientist at the National Academy of Sciences, published a chart in Scientific American that looked at metal reserves and estimated the humanity would totally run out of copper shortly after 2000. Lead, zinc, tin, gold, and silver would be gone before 1990.
16. Sen. Gaylord Nelson wrote in Look that, “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
17. In 1975, Paul Ehrlich predicted that “since more than nine-tenths of the original tropical rainforests will be removed in most areas within the next 30 years or so, it is expected that half of the organisms in these areas will vanish with it.”
18. Kenneth Watt warned about a pending Ice Age in a speech. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years,” he declared. “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”
Henceforth I am going to repeat, every time another environmental cataclysm is predicted by the likes of Al Gore, the observation of Glenn Harlan Reynolds: Global climate change is not a crisis. The reason you know it’s not a crisis is because the people who claim global climate change is a crisis are not acting as if it’s a crisis. I will be more convinced that global climate change is a crisis when the people who claim it’s a crisis start acting like it’s a crisis.
For instance, Breitbart reports:
President Obama is earning criticism for Earth Day plans that include taking Air Force One to the Everglades in Florida to serve as a backdrop for his latest speech about his fears of global warming.
In his speech Obama will claim that global warming is damaging tourism and people’s health. The President has also said that climate change is a national security risk.
“The Everglades is one of the most special places in our country,” Obama said during his Saturday weekly address. “But it’s also one of the most fragile. Rising sea levels are putting a national treasure–and an economic engine for the South Florida tourism industry–at risk.”
Obama went on saying, “there’s no greater threat to our planet than climate change,” and added that it “can no longer be denied–or ignored.”
The President then pledged to push harder at his global warming goals. “We’ve committed to doubling the pace at which we cut carbon pollution, and China has committed, for the first time, to limiting their emissions,” Obama said during his Saturday address. “And because the world’s two largest economies came together, there’s new hope that, with American leadership, this year, the world will finally reach an agreement to prevent the worst impacts of climate change before it’s too late.”
But the President taking Air Force One to Florida to talk of global warming strikes some as hypocritical, or at least that it defeats claims that we need to make severe cutbacks in our lives to “fix” global warming.
On Earth day last year, for instance, Obama burned more than 35,000 gallons of fuel and emitted 375 tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in his trips around the world.
Air Force One burns five gallons of fuel every single mile it flies and costs the American people $179,750 an hour. But that is just for the plane itself as the personnel also include 75 people who travel with the president each of whom often get paid overtime during the trips.
Today in 1964, the president of Britain’s National Federation of Hairdressers offered free haircuts to members of the next number one act in the British charts, adding, “The Rolling Stones are the worst; one of them looks as if he’s got a feather duster on his head.”
One assumes he was referring to Keith Richards, who is still working (and, to some surprise, still alive) 51 years later.
The number one British single today in 1965:
The number one British album today in 1972 was Deep Purple’s “Machine Head”: