• First, the song of the day:

    The number one song today in 1959 was a one-hit wonder …

    … as was the number one song today in 1968 …

    … as was the number one British song today in 1974 …

    … but not over here:

    The number one song today in 1985:

    Today in 2001, ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC and 31 cable channels all carried “America: A Tribute to Heroes,” a 9/11 tribute and telethon:

    The first of the three birthdays today is not from rock and roll, but it is familiar to high school bands across the U.S. and beyond:

    Don Felder of the Eagles:

    Tyler Stewart, drummer of the Barenaked Ladies:

    No comments on Presty the DJ for Sept. 21
  • Erick Erickson is a fan of Donald Trump’s United Nations speech Monday:

    Quibble all you want with what he said or how he said it, I was only a kid when Ronald Reagan uttered the phrase “Evil Empire” and I still remember the press reaction. I was an adult when George W. Bush uttered the phrase “axis of evil” and I remember the press reaction. And I suspect that Donald Trump, like those two, will be vindicated against his critics for his tough stance at the United Nations.

    What a politician says and what he really does or does not do are different things. But what President Trump said yesterday at the United Nations really restores a realistic approach to American foreign policy and a key, core sentiment that Ronald Reagan understood and the left decried: better our a**hole than their a**hole.

    The fact is we cannot convert every country to our form of constitutional republic. And the fact is that there are always going to be third world hell holes from which terrorists might stage attacks or do bad things. It is far better for us to admit this and make sure those third world hell holes are controlled by allies who will help us destroy our enemies than by our enemies allies who will wage war against us.

    The President’s bluntness may be off putting to some on this, but it was really telling yesterday when former Obama staffers were unable to reconcile how the President could say he will not impose our way of life on another country while also saying he would take action against Venezuela.

    In the real world, the Venezuelan regime is destabilizing an entire region, sparking a humanitarian crisis, and ceding ground to nefarious groups including drug lords and terrorists. If the Venezuelan President could run his country without it collapsing into anarchy that will be taken advantage of by interests opposed to ours, President Trump would leave him alone. But because the Venezuelan President cannot do that, our President will act to keep us safe and his team is smart enough to know that acting today will prevent disaster tomorrow.

    The same holds true with North Korea where this President is having to clean up the idealized vomit fest of three prior administrations and their “diplomatic” efforts that did nothing except buy North Korea time to make a nuke while learning the fine art of shake down saber rattling.

    Whether this President lives up to his vision is another matter and will largely be for history to judge. But his stated foreign policy is mature, stable, and needed. It is grounded in historic American leadership around the world, not isolationism, and not multinational interventionism.

    President Trump’s immediate predecessor took the world stage and often made it seem he though no nation was better or worse, but all were equal. Every nation said the same thing about how great their nation was and their nation was the best. We did it too as team sport, in Obama’s mind, but his policies were premised on us not being the best nation.

    Yesterday at the United Nations, President Trump all but declared the United States actually really is the best damn nation that ever was, but is humble enough not to try to force everyone to our level.

    I’ll take it!

    If media reports that the Trump administration is trying to not back out of the horrible Paris economic-destruction — I mean climate change — treaty, I’ll be back to criticizing Trump again. Trump deserves credit for this speech to the relativist organization that believes that all countries are equal, including serial human rights abusers.

     

    1 comment on An UN-settling speech
  • Jerry Bader brings up modern Democratic racism:

    Here is how the Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines “xenophobe:”

    one unduly fearful of what is foreign and especially of people of foreign origin.

    Merriam-Webster may want to consider including the Democratic Party of Wisconsin logo with that definition. In response to Governor Scott Walker’s Monday signing of the Foxconn incentive package, a quartet of democratic legislative leadership issued a news release criticizing the deal. It appears the group didn’t want anyone to miss the fact that Foxconn is a “foreign corporation.” the phrase is used seven times in the release:

    • giveaway to a foreign corporation (par. 1)
    • $3 billion in cash payments to a foreign corporation (par. 2)
    • special loopholes for a foreign corporation (par. 2)
    • second fiddle to a foreign corporation (par. 3)
    • Giving $3 billion to a foreign corporation (par.4)
    • a foreign corporation ties the hands (par. 5)
    • offered to a foreign corporation (par. 6)

    That’s one mention for each paragraph with a bonus second mention in paragraph two. You can read the release here: Senate Dem Leadership release – Statement on Foxconn Signing 9.18.17

    Meanwhile, the liberal group One Wisconsin Now joined in on the fear of foreigners fest. While OWN’s statement includes a mere three uses of the word “foreign,” they also exhibit a fear of people from a strange and mysterious land to Wisconsin’s south:

    There is nothing in the proposal that guarantees that workers in the new plant come from Wisconsin, meaning taxpayers will be subsidizing jobs for workers from Illinois and other states.

    Of course, it’s entirely possible and indeed likely that out of state residents would relocate to Wisconsin to take Foxconn jobs; especially if they come from a state that doesn’t border Wisconsin. While an influx of residents to Wisconsin is and of itself a good thing, there is evidence that the Foxconn development will benefit the entire state. The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported that business leaders upstate, including the La Crosse and Wausau areas expect the ripple effect of Foxconn on the state economy to benefit residents in their region.

    Perhaps Wisconsin Democrats will next take aim at restaurants that serve French wine and Russian caviar.

    The left has used the “foreign corporation” “Taiwanese company” and “Chinese economics” narratives to argue against the state doing business with Foxconn. Democrats have argued the deal is a bad one for the state. But they also plan on running against Governor Scott Walker’s jobs record in 2018, which gives them an ulterior motive to oppose Foxconn.

    Walker signed the $3 billion incentive package into law a Gateway Technical College in Racine County Monday, where the $10 billion Foxconn facility is expected to be located.

    James Wigderson adds:

    Since the deal with Foxconn was announced by Governor Scott Walker, Democrats have been running around complaining about a Chinese company getting a subsidy from the state of Wisconsin. (Actually, the company is Taiwanese.) They’re complaining about China more than President Donald Trump did during the 2016 campaign. …

    We’ve already commented on the odd opposition to Asians by Democratic gubernatorial candidate Tony Evers, the state Superintendent of Public Instruction. If the Democrats have a problem with foreigners, specifically Asians, perhaps they should just say so. Asian American voters would probably like to know if the Democrats are still the party of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his internment camps.

    Because judging from the anti-foreigner rhetoric, Wisconsin Democrats would be thrilled to give $3 billion in incentives away to a corporation as long as it’s incorporated within the United States. It’s just the color of the skin of the executives at Foxconn that has the Democrats upset.

    Oh wait, Democrats don’t like workers in Illinois, either. They’re suddenly concerned that large manufacturing facilities too close to the Illinois border might attract the wrong element. We’re not sure what that wrong element from Illinois might be, Cubs fans?

    Have the Democrats been to Janesville lately, or Lake Geneva? There are Cubs fans wearing team jerseys everywhere. If we were going to build a wall on the state line, apparently something the Democrats now favor, it’s too late. Chicago-style hot dogs are now regular fare in most Wisconsin cities.

    Perhaps would be happy if we created a 100-mile economic exclusion zone along the border with Illinois preventing any economic activity in the region so people from Illinois couldn’t get jobs in Wisconsin. Presumably 100 miles should be enough to deter all but the most die-hard commuters. While we’re at it, we can tear up the Amtrak tracks coming north from Chicago, too.

    Of course, Democrats weren’t worried about those annoying people from Illinois invading our state when General Motors in Janesville was temporarily bailed out under President George Bush and President Barack Obama (the plant closed anyway). Nor did Democrats object to Illinois workers possibly benefitting when former Governor Jim Doyle, also a Democrat, offered General Motors $200 million in incentives to build a new factory in Janesville in 2009 (it didn’t work).

    And when Amazon built in Kenosha, keeping out fans of the Chicago Bears wasn’t an issue then, either. But then, General Motors and Amazon are American companies. If Toyota or Hyundai wants to build another auto plant in Janesville or Kenosha, then the Democrats are ready to keep the foreigners out.

    I also wonder how many Democrats opposed Gov. James Doyle’s incentive package for Marinette Marine, owned by an Italian company.

    No comments on Xenophobic Democrats
  • James Wigderson:

    Wisconsin’s Assembly Democrats chose a new leader Monday, and unfortunately the choice was not a surprise. State Rep. Gordon Hintz, D-Oshkosh, is now the Assembly Minority Leader, replacing state Rep. Perter Barca, D-Kenosha. Hintz was unopposed.

    Barca recently came under fire from his fellow Democrats after supporting the legislation to bring a $10 billion Foxconn manufacturing campus to the Racine-Kenosha area, but Democrats are claiming there are other factors as well. Barca presided over election loss after election loss resulting in the Republicans holding 64 seats in the 99 seat branch of the legislature.

    Democrats were probably justified in kicking Barca to the curb, especially since every Democratic candidate for governor is opposed to Foxconn (until Andy Gronik changes his mind again). However, by picking Hintz by letting him run unopposed, Democrats are reminding voters that the party really does not believe good character is a prerequisite for public officials.

    Hintz’s first round of trouble began when he was cited for solicitation in a prostitution sting in an Appleton massage parlor. Hintz later gained statewide notoriety after yelling, “You’re f—–g dead!” at former state Rep. Michelle Litjens, R-Oshkosh, following the completion of the Act 10 vote. Hintz did not apologize to Litjens until after the news of the threat went public.

    Hintz had a chance to explain his ill behavior towards women on UpFront with Mike Gousha on Sunday. Gousha mentioned the massage parlor incident but did not ask Hintz about it, preferring instead to only ask Hintz about the incident with Litjens.

    “The question is, is it about temperament?” Gousha asked. “For a leadership post, do you have the right temperament for that post?”

    “Well, that’s the challenge that’s out there,” Hintz said. “It’s something that I’m self aware of. When I’m upset it’s usually because I’m upset. There’s good ways it comes out and bad ways it comes out. I’m self-aware enough to know what my strengths and weakness are. And I certainly had to make that assessment as I take something like this on.”

    Hintz said there’s a positive side of his being upset because he’s upset. “I think the positive side of having energy and believing in what you do, is that I think I’m going to be able to do that,” Hintz said.

    (Gousha, of course, didn’t ask if the massage parlor incident was a one-time occurrence. Nor did Gousha ask if Hintz will lack credibility as Wisconsin deals with a serious human trafficking problem. And Gousha didn’t ask Hintz what his female colleagues think of his public behavior towards women.)

    Amazingly, no women candidates in the Assembly stepped up to challenge Hintz just to provide a more ethical contrast. Perhaps they would have been emboldened in their approach when Republican Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke, R-Kaukauna, asked that his Republican colleagues drop the criticisms of Hintz.

    It’s doubtful Democrats will ever return the favor.

    This is not the first time Assembly Democrats have been willing to overlook ethical lapses for political reasons. In 2010, Democrats refused to expel former state Rep. Jeff Woods, a former Republican who became an independent voting with the Democrats, after his third, fourth and fifth arrests for driving under the influence, the three arrests occurring within a matter of months. After the election during the lame duck session, Democrats attempted to push through contracts with the state employees, getting Woods out of rehab because they needed his vote.

    Now they’re being led by someone who explains his behavior by saying he gets upset because he’s upset, so Hintz acts out. That’s not the character of a leader, but the impulse control and temperament of a child. Perhaps, then, he’s the Democrats’ best representative after all.

    What do you expect from a party that thinks nothing of having an impeached, disbarred, serial sex offender give speeches at their national convention.
    State Sen. Chuck Chvala (D–Madison) was the Senate Democratic leader when Democrats were mostly in the majority of the Senate in the 1990s. At the time it was said he had the job because no one else wanted it. That may be why Hintz has the job. It may also be that Democrats think an obscenity-firing morals-challenged “leader” will convince voters to vote for them. It worked for Slick Willie.
    No comments on Hintz about Democratic character