Today in 1962, the BBC banned playing the newly released “Monster Mash” by Bobby “Boris” Pickett on the grounds that it was offensive. To use today’s vernacular, really?
Eleven years later, the BBC banned the Rolling Stones’ “Star Star,” but if you play the clip you can hear why:
The Kinks had the number one song today in 1964:
The Supremes had the number one song today in 1966 …
… while the number one album was the Beatles’ “Revolver”:
The number nine song today in 1994 is a strange-sounding song about a strange incident in the somewhat professionally strange career of Dan Rather:
Birthdays start with Jose Feliciano …
… who was born one year before Danny Hutton of Three Dog Night:
Barriemore Barlow of Jethro Tull …
… was born one year before Joe Perry of Aerosmith …
… who was born the same day as drummer Don Powell of Slade:
Mr. Mister drummer Pat Mastelotto …
… was born one year before Johnny Fingers of the Boomtown Rats …
… who was born one year before Siobhan Fahey of Bananarama:
The rock group Jefferson Airplane titled its first greatest-hits compilation “The Worst of Jefferson Airplane.”
Rolling Stone magazine was not being ironic when it polled its readers to decide the 10 worst songs of the 1990s.
I’m not sure I agree with all of Rolling Stone’s list, but that shouldn’t be surprising; such lists are meant for debate, after all. To determine the “worst,” songs appropriate for the “Vinyl from Hell” segment that used to be on a Madison FM rock station, requires some criteria, which does not include mere overexposure (for instance, “Macarena,” the video of which I find amusing since it looks like two bankers are singing it).
Before we go on: Blog posts like this one require multimedia, so if you find a song you hate on this blog, I apologize. These are also songs that I almost never listen to because my sound system has a zero-tolerance policy — if I’m listening to the radio or a CD and I hear a song I don’t like, it’s, to quote Bad Company, gone gone gone.
My blonde wife won’t be happy to read that one of her favorite ’90s songs, 4 Non Blondes’ “What’s Up,” starts the list. (However, the techno version clearly should be on the list.)
To demonstrate that rock musicians are not like you and me, here is the lead Non-Blonde, Linda Clifford:
“I wasn’t really a big fan of my band,” she said. “I didn’t like the record at all. ‘Drifting’ was the only song I loved. I did love ‘What’s Up?’ but I hated the production. When I heard our record for the first time I cried. It didn’t sound like me. It made me belligerent and a real asshole. I wanted to say, ‘We’re a fucking, bad-ass cool band. We’re not that fluffy polished bullshit that you’re listening to.’ It was really difficult.”
My definition of “worst” includes such criteria as poor performance (William Hung’s “She Bangs” occupies its own level of musical hell), poor-quality production (Dave Edmunds’ “I Hear You Knocking,” which, apparently deliberately, sounds as if it was recorded on a pre-World War II wire recorder or was phoned in on land line from the middle of Africa), a substantial annoyance factor (for instance, the singer’s voice), general stupidity (two words: “Disco Duck“) and a concept that fits the category of “Just Because You Can Doesn’t Mean You Should” (for instance, most actors’ records, about which more momentarily).
Next on the Rolling Stone list is a song that MTV’s Kurt Loder described perfectly as “dopey but irresistible,” Right Said Fred’s “I’m Too Sexy,” which shouldn’t be on the list either because it’s actually cleverly written:
Dion has made an entire career of sappy ballads. Rock groups that make the strategic decision of recording their own sappy ballads in the interest of increasing record sales deserve inclusion on any worst list, including the entire post-Chicago career of Peter Cetera.
Other examples from this hall of shame include Kiss …
… and Alice Cooper …
… and Styx …
… and Starship …
… and Aerosmith …
… and Bryan Adams (who recorded a contemporary song for a movie set in the 13th century):
Being from the ’80s, I’m more likely to include songs like this on my list, and if you disagree, well, shaddupa you face:
I’ve written before that I’m a fan more of songs than of groups, which probably shows itself in my daily “Presty the DJ” posts. (Here’s a hint: If you notice that a song of a performer on a particular day isn’t there, either that’s because (1) the post is already hellishly long or (2) the blogger doesn’t like the song.) I confess to judging songs on how they sound — music and lyrics — rather than just lyrics. (Which is fortunate for Bo Donaldson and the Heywoods, because the words of “Billy Don’t Be a Hero” depict an unrecognizable war.) I hate Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the USA” not merely because of its blatantly anti-American lyrics, but because Springsteen’s singing on this song sounds like someone running a cheese grater across his teeth, accompanied by bizarre Chinese-sounding keyboards. (“Born in the USA” is not evidence of one of Springsteen’s strange musical obsessions, bells, heard prominently on “Born to Run.”)
Since I’m a fan more of songs than of groups, in the same way I don’t like every song of every act (such as the dreck, starting with “If You Leave Me Now,” of Chicago, my favorite rock group), I don’t hate every song of every act, except for Air Supply, one of whose singers, to paraphrase Aerosmith, sounds like a lady. Guns N Roses comes close, however, because singer Axl Rose is the singing equivalent of the broadcasting term known as “puking.” And why the local radio station’s morning host chooses to play “Sweet Child O Mine” at 6:40 a.m. every Monday remains a mystery, other than its function of motivating me to get out of bed so I don’t have to hear it. (Their Friday counterpart is the Scissor Sisters’ “I Don’t Feel Like Dancing,” which is merely an earworm co-written by Elton John, who plays the piano on the song.)
Michael Bolton deserves numerous inclusions on the hated-it list for not just the sappy nature of most of his work (with one exception), but also his voice, which sounds like he’s trying to tear his retinas. (Or yours.) Barry Manilow lacks Bolton’s hemorrhoid-shredding voice but (withthreeexceptions) has the same diabetes-inducing discography. Opposite Manilow is Frankie Valli, who has done somegreatmusic, but whose voice has occasionally been the musicalequivalent of a godawful annoying TV commercial. (Some might say if it’s annoying but you remember it, the commercial has done its job, but not if you refuse to buy the product being sold because of the commercial.)
You may have concluded by now that I am not a fan of, to use Paul McCartney’s phrase, silly love songs, whether upbeat or downbeat. (Replace “silly” with “stupid” in the lyrics, and that song makes perfect sense.) Dan Hill and I share the same birthday; that does not change my opinion of the vomit-inducing “Sometimes When We Touch,” which I will not dignify by linking to it.
Songs can be annoyances as well because they are non sequiturs. I don’t know about you, but when I think of hanging tough, I do not think of New Kids on the Block. Why the Beach Boys would sing of an Indiana town in a movie about a bartender on a tropical island … well, a lot of the ’80s don’t make sense. (Another example is Led Zeppelin’s “Fool in the Rain,” a musical self-ripoff of their superior “D’Yer Maker,” on their final album, “In Through the Out Door,” which includes the suicide-inducing “All of My Love.”) And can anyone say what this song is about? (Not to mention: What music genre is this? Techno-country?)
Country music is stereotyped as a variation on the theme of my-dog-died my-wife-left-me my-truck-blew-up my-roof-caved-in let’s-go-get-drunk. So why singers and songwriters decided on their own to create the teen tragedy genre of pop songs (also known as “death rock” or a “splatter platter”) is beyond my comprehension.
The most famous of this genre is probably “Teen Angel,” in which boyfriend stalls car on railroad tracks and pulls girlfriend to safety, only to watch in horror as girlfriend goes back to car and gets smucked by a train. (She was going after his class ring.) Or perhaps it’s “Tell Laura I Love Her,” in which a love-smitten young lad enters a car race intending to win enough money to buy a wedding ring for Laura. Laura’s boyfriend doesn’t get smucked by a train, he gets smucked by another (or perhaps his own) race car, and his racing career and wedding plans go up in flames.
Or perhaps it’s “Last Kiss,” another fatal car drive song first sung by J. Frank Wilson and banshee-sounding backup singers, and then covered by Pearl Jam (which makes one think Eddie Vedder lost a bet):
Many bad songs are covers, songs that were re-performed whether or not they should have been. If the song isn’t very good (for instance, Peter Frampton’s “Baby I Love Your Way”), you are usually guaranteed the remake will be even worse, particularly if it mangles a rock classic along the way:
Even if the song is a classic, it can be ruined by a bad performance:
Curiously (or maybe not), the aforementioned songs-performed-by-actors category mostly seem to include covers. (For whatever reason(s), singers seem to be able to act better than actors can sing.) John Lennon and George Harrison surely are rolling in their graves every time someone plays this:
And if the world wasn’t interested in hearing Captain Kirk sing, then why did Mr. Spock (who sounds like a cross between B.J. Thomas and Bruce Springsteen) feel the need to sing too?
On the other hand, this was the best version of Morris Alpert’s intolerable “Feelings”:
Actor David Soul, the latter of “Starsky & Hutch,” lacked the paint-peeling voice of the captain and first officer of the U.S.S. Enterprise. His one chart-reaching recording was merely another drop in a sea of sap:
The ’80s have, unfortunately, several examples of the actor-as-singer oeuvre:
Europhiles and those who look down at the U.S. claim that the Old World has much more sophistication, class and taste than the New World. I reply to that assertion with the observation that David Hasselhoff has released 17 albums and 16 singles. None charted in the U.S.
Speaking of actors singing, I’m not sure where to put “MacArthur Park,” which was written by one of the great American pop song writers, Jimmy Webb. Actor Richard Harris’ version of “MacArthur Park” proves that, had Harris been required to sing for his supper, he would have starved to death:
What rescues this odd song (which was inspired by Webb’s relationship with a cousin of Linda Ronstadt) is its arrangement, particularly the orchestral break (from 4:52 to 6:20), for which the song won a Grammy in 1969. (The Grammy surely was not for Harris’ singing.) The orchestral break led to this SCTV sketch:
Dave Barry’s Book of Bad Songs gives Harris’ version the honor (if that’s what you want to call it) of being Barry’s worst song of all time. (I would have chosen, from Barry’s list, Paul Anka’s “You’re Having My Baby” or Bobby Goldsboro’s “Honey” myself.) To prove that the bad reviews are the result of the performance, “MacArthur Park” has been covered more than 50 times, including Donna Summer’s number-one disco version …
… and Maynard Ferguson’s horn version …
… and Weird Al Yankovic’s own interpretation:
Obviously the definition of “worst song” is a matter of personal taste. Here’s a rule of thumb: A song should make your worst-music list if the song makes you want to (1) shoot any music device on which it’s playing, (2) shoot the performer(s), or (3) shoot yourself so you never have to hear it again.
Today in 1926, Radio Corporation of America created the National Broadcasting Co.
The number one single in Britain today in 1965:
Today in 1971, five years to the day after John Lennon met Yoko Ono, Lennon released his “Imagine” album:
The number one album today in 1976 was the second time Fleetwood Mac released an album named “Fleetwood Mac”:
The winner of the best video award at today’s 1992 MTV Video Music Awards (made memorable because Nirvana’s Krist Novoselic threw his guitar up in the air, and his guitar knocked him unconscious on the way back down):
Birthdays begin with Otis Redding …
… born one year before Luther Simmons of the Main Ingredient:
Doug Ingle of Iron Butterfly …
… was born one year before Bruce Palmer of Buffalo Springfield:
I looked into my backyard upon getting up this morning, and it was colored green and gold.
The season opener for the Super Bowl XLV champion Green Bay Packers is tonight against Super Bowl XLIV champion New Orleans. The Packers won Super Bowl XLV over Super Bowl XLIII champion Pittsburgh, 31–25.
(As I write this, by the way, I am planning no additional post today on President Obama’s much vaunted jobs speech tonight. Obama will say nothing he hasn’t already said, and nothing that in its proposed form will pass Congress. Those who watch the speech will be wasting your time.)
Before we move on to whether the Packers will be the NFC representative at Super Bowl XLVI, right down Interstate LXV from Chicago (which will not be visiting Super XLVI unless they buy tickets), we should pause to recall how truly amazing winning Super XLV was. Just getting to Super Bowl XLV required winning five consecutive games — the last two regular-season games and three road playoff games, two against teams that had beaten the Packers earlier that season.
The Packers limped into the playoffs with the sixth NFC seed, and no NFC sixth seed (I’m glad I’m writing this and not saying this) had ever gotten to the Super Bowl. Teams fight to win games so that they can host playoff games, not play them on the road, and the Packers had not won a single road playoff game since the 1997-season NFC Championship.
And this was after a regular season in which the Packers had (seemingly inexplicably) lost to NFC North doormat Detroit, lost a home game, and lost their best running back and tight end. To think the Packers, one of the youngest teams in the NFL, were a Super Bowl team in early January seemed like the little boy presented with a barn full of horse manure who digs in excitedly under the rationale that there has to be a pony in there somewhere.
Dallas defensive lineman Larry Cole once described a rookie quarterback’s taking the Cowboys to an improbable win as a “triumph of the uncluttered mind.” Maybe one of the youngest rosters in the NFL didn’t know they weren’t supposed to be able to get to the Super Bowl. Maybe this is the football gods’ payback to Packer fans for the 2007 season, when the Packers should have gone to the Super Bowl but did not after the unspeakable home NFC Championship overtime loss to the New York/Jersey Giants; they shouldn’t have even gotten to Super Bowl XLV, but now there is a fourth Lombardi Trophy at Lambeau Field.
Several things are now certain. Quarterback Aaron Rodgers’ 2009 season proved that he could play quarterback as well as any quarterback in the NFL. (He now has as many Super Bowl rings as Brett Favre.) Coach Mike McCarthy may look like a second-generation bar owner, but has not merely the technical expertise (including adaptability, given that without running back Ryan Grant the Packers may have had the worst running attack of the previous 28 Super Bowl champions) but the motivational art to win under difficult circumstances. (One of the greatest motivational moves in the history of the NFL came the night before Super Bowl XLV, when McCarthy had his players sized for their Super Bowl rings.) And after more than half a season of utter confusion, the Packers now know how to play the 3–4 defense (or coordinator Dom Capers’ diabolical variations thereof).
The reason no one has repeated as a Super Bowl champion since Denver won Super Bowls XXXII (which we won’t discuss here) and XXXIII is that, to quote a longtime sportswriter, winning one Super Bowl means you play 16 Super Bowls the next season. Inevitably some of the Super Bowl ring-wearers decide they had a bigger role in the team’s success than they actually did and head to (financially) greener passages. Add to the fact the kind of luck that follows around champions usually lasts just a season.
On the other hand, short of a Rodgers injury beyond one probably-going-to-lose-anyway game, could the Packers have had a more calamitous season injury-wise than 2010? The Packers’ leading rusher in 2010, Brandon Jackson, had all of 703 yards. The team averaged 100 yards rushing per game, 24th in the NFL, and was outgained on the season. (Somewhere Vince Lombardi is demanding “What the hell is going on out there?!”) The Packers’ offense ranked just ninth in yardage and 10th in scoring.
No Packer coach has gotten much of a reputation as being a defensive genius. (Lombardi, Mike Holmgren, Mike Sherman and McCarthy were all offensive coordinators before going to Green Bay.) But remember the axiom that offense wins games but defense wins championships, and consider that Capers’ 3–4 defense was fifth best in yardage and second best in points, and that the Packers were second best in turnover ratio. And, by the way, they played the second half of Super Bowl XLV without their defensive leader, cornerback Charles Woodson, and did not fall apart.
Go back two paragraphs to the paragraph about the offense, and consider that injured running back Ryan Grant and tight end Jermichael Finley are itching to contribute to a Super Bowl team. The Packers won a Super Bowl with a far-from-great offense that is likely to get better. The team appears to be reaching that promised land where the upward sloping graph of experience and the downward sloping graph of skill meet.
My crystal ball (which correctly predicted 6–10 in 2008 but refused to bow to the Super Bowl hype and predicted, uh, 8–8 last year) sees a 12–4 season, with losses at Chicago, Atlanta, Detroit and the New York/Jersey Giants. That should be enough to win the NFC North, even with rapidly improving Detroit and always-difficult Chicago. (Although the Bears could have a 2011 crash like the Vikings had a 2010 crash — literally in the case of the deflating Metrodome.)
Atlanta is probably the most skilled team in the NFC, and Philadelphia spent big on the free agent market to improve. They appear to be the Packers’ biggest roadblocks on the way to Super Bowl XLVI, along with possibly tonight’s opponent, the Saints. The conventional wisdom says one of them will get to Indianapolis and not the Packers. Then again, I didn’t get around to predicting a Super Bowl until the NFC Championship game, so call me a pigskin pessimist.
Todd Lohenry logically passed on these 15 fun Trek facts:
In keeping with the aforementioned statistic comparing crew apparel and sudden death (does the Federation’s counterpart to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration know this?), the apparel industry has picked up on this trend:
Today in 1956, Harry Belafonte’s “Calypso” went to number one for the next 31 weeks:
Today in 1965, Daily Variety included this ad:
Madness! Running parts for four Insane Boys age 17-21.
The ad drew 437 would-be Insane Boys, including Stephen Stills (who ended up working with David Crosby, Graham Nash and Neil Young instead), Paul Williams (who wrote a lot of songs and acted a bit, including as Little Enos Burdette), Danny Hutton (who went on to form Three Dog Night) and Charles Manson (and you know what he ended up doing). The four winners were Micky Dolenz, Davy Jones, Peter Tork and Michael Nesmith:
The number one single …
… and album today in 1973:
Today in 1977, Jimmy McCullough took wing, leaving Wings for the Small Faces band:
Birthdays begin with actor Peter Sellers, who also recorded two records:
Patsy Cline:
Kelly Groucutt of Electric Light Orchestra …
… was born the same day as Ron “Pigpen” McKernen of the Grateful Dead:
Dean Daughtry played keyboards for the Atlanta Rhythm Section:
David Steele was a Fine Young Cannibal:
As for the other momentous event of Sept. 8, beam back here in one hour. To not do so will be … illogical.
It is with great disappointment that we have learned of the efforts of some conservatives on the national level to try to dictate to Wisconsin conservatives their choice for the United States Senate seat being vacated by Democratic Senator Herb Kohl. This is a tremendous opportunity for Wisconsinites to elect a second conservative senator worthy of holding the office, and one that Wisconsin conservatives will take very seriously. This is not only a choice of ideology but of character, and it is our responsibility to bring Mark Neumann’s lack of character to your attention. While we do not question Neumann’s past contributions to conservatism while he was a Congressman, his actions during last year’s campaign are completely unbecoming of a conservative candidate.
We respectfully request the national conservative groups and individuals to take a second look at their endorsement of Neumann. We ask that since many of them missed the opportunity to come to Wisconsin during the recent battles over collective bargaining for state employees and the recall elections, they come to Wisconsin now to talk to true Wisconsin conservatives to find out what they think of Neumann before attempting to foist their choice upon Wisconsin. …
If the past election in Wisconsin has shown national conservatives anything, it is to trust in the faith of Badger State conservative activists. We had the foresight to supply the movement with current leaders and rock stars like Janesville Congressman Paul Ryan, Ashland Congressman Sean Duffy, Green Bay Congressman Reid Ribble, Governor Scott Walker, U.S. Senator Ron Johnson, and even Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus.
That is just in the past two years, and we assure you, there are plenty more where they came from.
Yes, I know, he’s really conservative. Neumann is not just Tea Party conservative; he’s Mark Neumann conservative. …
Now when it comes to the final round, I’d have to say Mark Neumann is as right of center as Tammy Baldwin is left. There’s no need for a middle-of-the-road candidate. If you put those two up to the voters, Neumann wins. This state is still reeling from the damage the left created over the last few years. It’s a chance to get another genuine Tea Party conservative into the U.S. Senate.
Several things are going on here, beginning with a demonstration that national conservatives and a state’s Republican Party are not the same thing, for those who assume that the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is a giant monolith. Neumann made few new friends and made some enemies in the state GOP for the way his gubernatorial campaign broke Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment, “Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican,” erasing much of the goodwill generated by his two terms in Congress and his record therein.
The Club for Growth has the right to endorse, or not, whomever it wants. And as a self-described economic conservative and social libertarian, I am quite sympathetic to the Club for Growth’s goals, “getting more and more pro-growth, pro-market policies enacted by our government by truly supporting pro-growth candidates.” (Of course, one would have to look hard to find an anti-growth conservative; that cannot be said about liberals.)
There is, however, a delicate balance between ideological purity and electability. The Club for Growth has been criticizing Thompson for his John Kerry-like zigzag on ObamaCare. As secretary of Health and Human Services, Thompson helped lead the way for the vast expansion of the “homeland security” (a term I despise, by the way) federal apparatus in the days and years after 9/11. Thompson’s record as governor does not particularly fit the definition of “fiscal conservative,” even though few people cared around election time.
Elected officials in legislative bodies have the luxury of being able to vote with consequences only to their own reelection. (See Obama, Barack, “present” votes.) Elected officials who have executive roles have to make decisions and deals to get things accomplished, realizing the axiom that the perfect is the enemy of the good. When Thompson took office in 1987, Democrats controlled both houses of the Legislature; all he had was the nation’s most powerful gubernatorial veto, a recovering economy, and the legislator’s traditional fear of becoming an ex-legislator. Thompson wasn’t the governor for 14 years by accident.
Neumann, meanwhile, is 0 for 2 in statewide races, having lost the 1998 U.S. Senate race to Sen. Russ Feingold the same year Thompson was elected to his fourth term in office. (Which means that the same charges that Thompson is yesterday’s political news could be applied to Neumann too.) Neumann lost two 1st Congressional District races before squeaking in in 1994 and narrowly getting reelected in 1996, which suggests at least likability concerns if not electability concerns. Neumann had plenty of opportunity to run for Senate or governor in the intervening 12 years; he had the right to not run, but it does make one wonder why he didn’t try to take on Feingold or Kohl before now.
The Democratic alternative appears to be either socialist U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D–Madison) or former U.S. Rep. Steve Kagen (D–Appleton), which for non-Democrats may be like the Iran–Iraq War or a Bears–Vikings game in that one wishes both could lose. It is possible that the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate may not be entirely to the liking of conservatives generally or the Club for Growth specifically. It is guaranteed that Baldwin or Kagen or any other Democrat won’t be to their liking. In order to accomplish what you want to accomplish, you must first win.
Thompson isn’t my first choice for the Senate nomination (and truth be told, I don’t have a first choice at the moment). If Thompson gets the nomination, however, I would probably vote for him. I’m not sure I can say the same thing about Neumann. Neumann might turn what should be a sure thing — against either as left-wing a politician as exists in this state, or the doctor with the two-digit IQ and an allergy to the truth — into an upset loss, which would negatively affect the Republicans’ ability to capture the U.S. Senate. And the Democratic leadership of the Senate is a good reason to vote Republican next November.
Today in 1963, ABC-TV’s “American Bandstand” moved from every weekday afternoon in Philadelphia to Saturdays in California:
The number one album today in 1968 was the Doors’ “Waiting for the Sun,” their only number one album:
Today in 2007, on the 11th anniversary of the Las Vegas shooting of rap stars Marion “Suge” Knight and Tupac Shakur (who died six days later), a study revealed that rock stars were twice as likely to die early as non-rock stars. Researchers said premature rock star deaths were so prevalent (for proof, read on) that the industry should be labeled a “high-risk” profession.
Birthdays begin with Al Caiola, who recorded two famous TV theme songs:
Buddy Holly:
Alfa Anderson of Chic:
Gloria Gaynor:
Chrissie Hynde of the Pretenders:
Jermaine Stewart, who claimed …
Two death anniversaries, first from The Who, who famously sang that they hoped to die before they get old. Keith Moon, drummer for The Who, died today in 1978 at 31, before he got old:
Today in 2003, Warren Zevon died. Zevon was known most for “Werewolves of London,” but he was also was the piano player and band leader for the Everly Brothers, recorded a song for the movie “Midnight Cowboy,” and had Jackson Browne, The Eagles and Linda Ronstadt play on his albums.
The Washington Post’s George Will writes about Colorado, its governor, and its beer (all of which are related):
[John] Hickenlooper is a double rarity, the first brewer to become a governor (well, if you don’t count Sam Adams and Thomas Jefferson, the amateur), and, in this time of political dyspepsia, he is a happy man whose constituents seem reasonably happy with him.
Hickenlooper, who says, “I was 50 times better at running a brew pub than I was as a geologist,” seems to be pretty good at running this state. This is probably because, having been in business, he appreciates the spontaneous order of a market economy, which does not need to be run by politicians.
For much of the political class, the private sector, with job creation through risk-taking, is as foreign as Mongolia. Hickenlooper says of politicians: “Everyone should spend two years running a big, popular restaurant.” Doing so, you learn about placating people: Not all customers are going to be happy, but the proverb has it right (“A soft answer turneth away wrath”) and, he says, “there is no advantage in having enemies.” Besides, in the restaurant business, even if you have a bad night, tomorrow night is another chance.
Hickenlooper has not endorsed the attempt to get a court to overturn what voters did in limiting, with a Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, the legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
He says, “We are such a purple state” — Colorado is about one-third Republican, one-third Democrat and one-third unaffiliated — “we can avoid the big fights.” In spite of all the homogenizing forces of American life, from the population’s mobility to mass media, regional differences remain remarkably durable. …
The United States is the only nation founded on a good idea — the pursuit of happiness — and, not coincidentally, it also was founded on beer. Within two years of the founding of Jamestown in 1607, the colony wrote to London asking that a brewer be sent to Virginia. The Mayflower, which was looking for a haven farther south, landed at Plymouth Rock instead because, according to William Bradford’s journals, “our victuals being much spent, especially our beer.” Jefferson brewed beer at Monticello, and his boon companion, James Madison, diluted his limited-government convictions enough to consider a national brewery to provide an alternative to whiskey.
Colorado is fortunate to have someone with an actual business background as governor. (As of this moment, Richard Leinenkugel seems a more attractive candidate for U.S. Senate than former Gov. Tommy Thompson or former U.S. Rep. Mark Neumann, even though as far as I know Leinenkugel has no plans to run.) If more elected officials had business backgrounds instead of government backgrounds, perhaps responsible budgeting would not be such a foreign concept in this state. On the other hand, former state Rep. and Milwaukee County executive Scott Walker was electable in the eyes of non-Republicans, as opposed to businessman Neumann, who is about to find out the same thing in his U.S. Senate campaign. When someone with deep business experience runs for statewide office, Democrats and their apparatchiks dig up that business person’s disgruntled customers or former employees in a general election campaign. (See Johnson, Ron.)
Wisconsin and Colorado have similar political cultures. (In fact, Colorado Gov. Richard Lamm was born in Madison.) The big difference, however, is that Colorado politicians are prevented from willy-nilly spending and taxing by their state’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights, which was enacted by voter referendum. Wisconsin voters have never been able to vote on a Taxpayer Bill of Rights because Republicans haven’t pushed hard enough for one. One result is that Colorado’s business climate is better than Wisconsin’s. Another is that who gets elected becomes less important because the most wasteful spending ideas and the most economy-killing tax increases are prevented from being enacted into law.
President Obama is scheduled to give his 11,319th speech of his (too long) presidency Thursday as the pregame show for the first NFL game of the season.
Obama ignores advice that doesn’t fit into his worldview. Which is why his speech will include nothing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce would suggest would actually create jobs:
At Wednesday’s Labor Day briefing, Chamber Senior Vice President and Chief Economist Dr. Martin Regalia explained that businesses will hire when the economy grows fast enough to make it profitable to hire more workers.
Watch this video from Regalia’s presentation. Also, read his recent post where he explains the critical connection between economic growth and job creation.
Persistently high unemployment requires the focused attention of our leaders and a plan of action not hatched in fantasy land. That’s why the Chamber will be sending a detailed jobs plan to the president and Congress next week.