About this weekend

I’m announcing football tonight — a must-win for Platteville at Dodgeville (the first meeting: Dodgeville 48, Platteville 45) — and Saturday afternoon — UW–Platteville against UW–Eau Claire from the sidelines at http://www.theespndoubleteam.com. (But you knew that.)

The Badgers don’t play Saturday, but most other college teams do. And the Packers host Detroit (and the personal foul-accumulating Boy Named Suh) Sunday.

Which makes this from Daniel J. Flynn appropriate:

Amazon’s one-time chief financial officer, Joy Covey, who joined the $60 billion company in 1996 when its annual sales reached $16 million, tragically left us last week. Covey, like about 700 other Americans this past year, died in a bicycling accident. …

More Americans died from cycling accidents last week than died from football hits during the last three seasons combined. The tragedies led no one to call for a ban on bikes. Everybody seems to comprehend that the positives in health and transportation outweigh the considerable negatives of the pedal-powered vehicles. This measured perspective doesn’t extend to our collective view of tackle football, a far less deadly activity that, like biking, provides myriad social and health benefits. …

One thousand times more Americans die from swimming than from football hits. Last year, skateboarding collisions killed 15 times as many Americans as football collisions did. About twelve times as many people die annually from crashes on the ski slopes than die from crashes on the gridiron.

If you’re wearing a Riddell or Schutt helmet when you die, the Drudge Report surely will highlight your passing. If you’re not wearing a helmet in a fatal riding or skiing crash, Matt Drudge probably won’t notice. The war on football is as much a clash between perception and reality as anything else.

When journalists do notice serious injuries in sports not named football, calls for abolition do not usually follow. After Michael Ybarra, a Wall Street Journal“extreme sports correspondent,” died from a climbing fall in the Sierra Nevada Mountains near Yosemite National Park last year, no national debate emerged over the wisdom of mountaineering. The celebrity skiing deaths of Michael Kennedy, Representative Sonny Bono, and actress Natasha Richardson thankfully led to an uptick in helmets on the slopes but not in calls to abandon the sport. Caleb Moore’s death while snowmobiling at the Winter X Games earlier this year hasn’t led to a lawsuit against the event or equipment manufacturers. Football plays by a separate set of rules.

If the debate over football were about safety, then the scolds seeking to prohibit the game would table their ambition until after doing away with skiing, skateboarding, cycling, and dozens of other deadlier sports.

Safety works as a false front for what’s really motivating the attacks on America’s game. Rough and muddy football clashes with our increasingly risk-averse, passive-aggressive, unsoiled society. It doesn’t fit in a world of parentally monitored play dates, Xbox babysitters, and trophies for everyone. The war on football is a cultural tic calling itself a public-health crusade.

Football competes on a rigged playing field vis-à-vis other sports. Our standards for it, partly because of its popularity, are more stringent than our standards for other sports. If a fatality occurs in cycling, it doesn’t register unless it happened to Amazon’s CFO or someone similarly famous. When such an injury claims the life of an anonymous football player, every journalistic outlet runs with the story in part because it plays into an existing storyline.

This creepy exploitation of tragedy reinforces an impression about football that is at variance with the facts. Football is safer than it ever has been — and safer than many uncontroversial pastimes ever will be.

(Before you ask: No, I didn’t play football other than in my yard or at the park. The combination of lack of athletic talent and height but not weight would have gotten me broken in half.)

Commenters on Flynn’s post castigating him for not including the effects of concussions. Concussions are a problem in all sports, not just football. To say that concussions are a reason to ban football requires you to agree that concussions are a reason to ban women’s sports, since some studies claim girls get more concussions than boys.


One thought on “About this weekend

  1. Daniel Flynn’s article is silly. His examples are poor and his reason is questionable.
    He opines the death of a young executive who died, tragically, in a bike accident. This was a result of a traffic accident, and then compares it to fatalities in football? Wah? A little context Mr. Flynn!
    If the 700 or so deaths Flynn cited are numbers from the National Transportation Safety Administration (http://www.bicyclinginfo.org/facts/crash-facts.cfm) , you’ll find that it is mostly adults, and further, male adults over 41, that wind up injured or killed. The numbers are smaller for similar-aged kids that would be participating in football. But the bigger point, he is comparing a traffic safety problem to a sport injury issue. If high schools had competing bicycle teams, that would be the comparison. It is the same for the skiing, swimming and other activities. He conjures up statistics that involve adults doing independent activities and not in the context of organized sport.
    When football is compared to their competitive counterparts, they are on even footing when it comes to injuries. Online searches give different results for which sport causes the most or least, so the stats could be argued many ways, depending on what you are looking for. But it does look at all sports and doesn’t look at “football only” as Mr. Flynn sensationalizes.
    The article then becomes borderline Onion-esque with a pandering line or two about how making football safer is really somebody’s agenda to turn us into a passive society. Yawn. That argument is so old, I thought it was shelved with the leather helmets. What a false and inane accusation.
    I thought Righties were all about local control and no ‘Big Brother’?” So if a local district decides it doesn’t want a football program, be it safety or economic reasons, then why do they have to put up with critics like Flynn? Why somebody like Flynn wants to keep it from gaining safety is beyond me. Why do they need extra safety? I don’t know. Ask Junior Seau.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s