The 34.9 percent

,

Occupy _______ has been throwing around “the 1 percent” and “the 99 percent.”

I have been writing about the battle between government and Wisconsin taxpayers as “the 15 percent” (the former) and “the 85 percent” (those not part of the 15 percent whose taxes pay the salaries and benefits of the 15 percent).

Tim Nerenz introduces another percentage:

Here is our America according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

312 million people live here
154 million of us want to work.
141 million of us do work.
109 million of us work in the private sector.
18 million of produce goods.
2 million of us produce food.

Most people are stunned to learn that only 20 million Americans (6.4%) make, mine, build, or grow things. And even that is a bit inflated, as many of the jobs in those companies that make things are administrative positions which exist only to provide information to government agencies and assure compliance with regulations. …

While the unemployment rate can be, and is, manipulated by adjustments and assumptions, the better ratio that really matters in assessing the health of our economy is private sector (wealth producing) employment as a percentage of total population. As we begin 2012, only 34.9% of Americans create the wealth that sustains us all. And not just us, but a goodly part of the rest of the world, too. …

In John F. Kennedy’s Camelot of 1962, government spending on dependency programs – i.e. the safety net – was 28% of the federal budget; last year, it was 70.5%, according to Congressional Budget Office.  And he did not have two wars pushing up on the denominator back then.  …

How much is enough?  In constant dollars (adjusted for inflation), government spending per household has risen 162% since 1964. Federal spending per household is now $29,401 according to Heritage Foundation, and is projected to rise to over $35,000 in less than 10 years.  With a median income of $49,000, that level of federal spending is simply unsustainable. It is not a political problem; it is math.

We can’t tax that much, and we can’t borrow that much; the only option left is to inflate the currency and then to hyper-inflate it when inflating it doesn’t work.  Our median income will still be $49,000 but the cost of everything will double and triple and our savings will be eaten up.  …

The International Monetary Fund lists the United States as the second-worst country in terms of fiscal trajectory – i.e. the amount of current debt plus the rate at which future debt will be accumulated under current fiscal policies. The world has no blueprint for the implosion of an economy too-big-to-fail. When the Roman Empire cratered it ushered in a millennium known as the Dark Ages. A millennium is incomprehensible to a society who can’t make it a half-hour without checking Facebook.  This is not going to be pretty. It is not too late to fix it, but you can see too-late from here.

I’m on the side of Wisconsin’s 85 percent. I’m also on the side of the 34.9 percent.

7 responses to “The 34.9 percent”

  1. What Those Who Are Working Are Really Doing Today | Wis U.P. North

    […] 34.9 percent — those who work for private-sector employers, those who, in Tim Nerenz‘s words, […]

  2. The 34.9% and their government enemies « The Presteblog Avatar
    The 34.9% and their government enemies « The Presteblog

    […] 34.9 percent — those who work for private-sector employers, those who, in Tim Nerenz‘s words, […]

  3. Baharak Avatar
    Baharak

    Raising taxes on The Rich to pre Bush era lveles, would reduce the deficit by .04%, yet cripple any chance for an economic recovery PB, admit it, you’re afraid they are going to cut the size of one of your checks I have a better solution for Social Security and medicare Dump all the money from all the PERS accounts in the Country, into Social Security and Medicare.. This goes for all the special retirements State and Federal members of Congress recieve.. Let Public employees retire off the same system us Regular people, are expected too . This also fixes the Government pension crisis .

  4. Ale Avatar
    Ale

    Raising taxes on the Wealthy would not solve our pobrlems but it would help a little financially and help a lot to sooth the Class warfare that exists now. Same with cutting out the loopholes and making all income taxable, which would help financially more over teh long term. Raising the RATE is not as effective as eliminating the loopholes.I don;t agree with the separate retirement’ some have set up that exempt them from Social Security but that was the deal and we have to live with it for those who were hired under that contract. New hires should go into SS. The best way to help SS is to eliminate the cap on how much income is taxed. If you make $250,000 you pay SS tax on all of it, not just the $109,000 that is the current cap. DO that and there is no problem with SS far into the future. UM I’d include our Congress Critters in that too, they ahve a separate retirement system that is VERY NICE for them they retire at full pay after ten years in congress and have full paid medical for life. That is not fair at all.

  5. When a tax cut is a tax hike « The Presteblog Avatar
    When a tax cut is a tax hike « The Presteblog

    […] mistake of having the second highest corporate income tax rates in the developed world on those paying for everything government does. Share this on …TwitterFacebookLinkedInEmailPrintLike this:LikeBe […]

  6. Not enough « The Presteblog Avatar
    Not enough « The Presteblog

    […] Legislature has not done nearly enough to promote business, which leads to private-sector jobs, the 34.9 percent of the population who pay for 100 percent of what government […]

  7. The 0.0018 percent « The Presteblog Avatar
    The 0.0018 percent « The Presteblog

    […] 500 means you’re complaining about 0.0018 percent of American businesses, which employ the 34.9 percent of people who, despite government’s best efforts, as Nerenz put it, “create the wealth […]

Leave a comment