Skip to content
  • The game of Walker’s thrones

    July 16, 2015
    US politics, Wisconsin politics

    Politico‘s story about Gov. Scott Walker’s election wins for state Assembly, Milwaukee County executive and governor is called “Tales from Scott Walker’s Graveyard”:

    Scott Walker’s path to the 2016 presidential race is littered with the bones of vanquished opponents.

    Since 1990, the Wisconsin governor’s name has appeared on a ballot 14 times, and he’s failed just twice — a winning record that’s central to his pitch to Republican primary voters. Along the way, he’s left a trail of defeated challengers, many of them gripped by resentment toward a foe they recall as crassly opportunistic, loose with facts or blindly ambitious.

    Yet for all the lingering enmity, as Walker prepares to announce his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, his rivals also grudgingly respect him as a rare and exceptionally canny politician who’s constantly underestimated and always outperforms expectations.

    He’s a sneaky-smart campaigner, they say, a polished and level-headed tactician, a master at reading crowds. He learned the value of ignoring uncomfortable questions, rather than answering them. In hindsight, the many politicians he pancaked on the road to the national stage — in races for the state Assembly, county executive and governor — almost invariably see his career as an elaborate practice run for the White House.

    To David Riemer, who fell to Walker in a 2004 bid for Milwaukee County executive — a nonpartisan race — Walker’s wiles can be summed up by a single moment during one of their debates. Riemer, sensing Walker’s desire to run for higher office, recalled placing a sheet of paper on Walker’s lectern that included a pledge to fulfill an entire four-year term. Sign it, Riemer demanded.

    Walker sensed the trap right away.

    “He just let it sit in front of him. He didn’t get it back to me. He didn’t rip it up. He didn’t turn it into a paper airplane … he ignored it,” Riemer said. “He understood very well, one of the key lessons in political life is they can’t print what you don’t say.”

    Walker dispatched Riemer, mocked his rival’s pledge in a press release and less than two years later ran in the 2006 Republican primary for governor.

    The 47-year-old Republican often points to the fact that he’s been on the ballot just about every two years since 1990 — including three victorious races for governor — as proof that he’s battle-tested and prepared to grind out yet another long campaign. He’ll launch his presidential candidacy as the front-runner in Iowa, which holds the first contest of the 2016 GOP primary season in February. He’s led the pack there since delivering a well-received speech at a January GOP gathering. Since then, though, he’s muddled through some tougher months, stumbling during his early forays into foreign policy and maintaining a lower profile than other top competitors, like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio.

    Walker’s two most recent and prominent opponents — Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and businesswoman Mary Burke — declined to comment for this story. But a former senior aide to Burke, Walker’s Democratic challenger for reelection in 2014, suggested Walker’s struggles this year have been “bigger and more noticeable” than any he faced during the gubernatorial campaign. At the same time, Democrats shouldn’t be complacent. “I think there is a risk in underestimating him,” said the aide, who requested anonymity to speak candidly about Walker’s skills.

    The danger of underestimating Walker is a common theme among the candidates and operatives on the losing side. Another senior Democratic adviser in one of Walker’s statewide races warned that his foes shouldn’t be lulled by Walker’s uneven start in presidential politics.“He’s got antennas,” said the adviser, who also requested anonymity. “He’s the real deal. As time goes on, you’ll get more of that vibe as you cover him. He can come across as a little arrogant, obviously. But with real people out there, he’s really, really good. He’s just in touch with what they’re looking for.”

    Walker’s opponents remember him as so unflappable and message-disciplined that he rarely created a stir. He was always polite behind the scenes at debates, said Lena Taylor, who said she appeared jointly with Walker 24 times when she tried to oust him as county executive in 2008, only to lose by close to 20 percentage points. Others recalled their off-camera interactions with Walker similarly. He’d always talk about his family, chitchat about the Packers or the Brewers sports teams, never say anything antagonizing.

    “He’s personable,” said Taylor, now a Democratic state senator. “He’s comfortable with the person on the farm. He’s comfortable with the person in the boardroom.”

    Taylor has no love for Walker — she refers to him as “polarizing” and “an extremist” who often touts the fact that he’s the son of a Baptist preacher to wriggle out of uncomfortable spots. Her advice to Democrats if he ends up as the nominee? Don’t expect him to commit unforced errors.

    “He is used to speaking and speaking publicly, so don’t expect him to be someone, who even when it’s not going well, to get off-kilter,” she said. “He stumbles, we all do. But he’s a guy who’s going to be more even-toned. Use that to your advantage, Mrs. Clinton.”

    While a handful of his challengers from the past two decades have passed away, the first and only Democrat to ever get the best of Walker is still around and promises to be a vocal Walker critic: Rep. Gwen Moore.

    Moore beat Walker handily in a 1990 state Assembly race, the governor’s first-ever bid for elected office. He later moved to a more conservative district to relaunch his political career. Moore’s distaste for Walker runs deep: She describes him as smooth and talented, but also considers him ruthless and slippery.

    “As a matter of fact, before I met him, some of the Republicans that I had made friends as a freshman shared with me that this man stands in front of a mirror for hours and practices,” she said.

    Looking ahead to November 2016 with Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee, Moore urged Democrats to goad Walker into making insensitive comments — even if those same tactics failed to unsettle him last year against Burke. “He’s been very successful, but he’s going to have a hard time beating a woman that’s tough,” Moore said. “She needs to be prepared for someone who doesn’t care who he maims, cripples or kills for his ambition.”

    Walker’s first national test will be in a race more crowded and fractious than any he has faced before — he’s faced relatively few truly close elections, and fewer still within his own party. In the only statewide race he’s ever lost, he dropped out of a 2006 primary for governor. Aside from that, his toughest intraparty fight came in 1993 — his first political victory — in a special election to fill a vacant Wisconsin Assembly seat. Walker won a five-way Republican primary that year, a victory that reports at the time credited to his support from anti-abortion troops.

    Mary Jo Baas, who finished fourth in that race with about 600 votes, told POLITICO that she and two of the other Republican competitors discussed joining forces to beat Walker, who was the clear front-runner. But they couldn’t agree on which two of them should drop out, leaving Walker atop a splintered field, winning with less than 2,600 votes.

    Today, Baas — whose surname was Paque at the time of the special election — says she’s glad she didn’t block Walker’s path. “I think when he ran for Legislature and county executive and governor and now president, people have continually underestimated him,” she said. “If I had known how good he was, I wouldn’t have run. When he talked to a group of people, people felt like he was one of them. He knew what connected, what resonated.”

    Now, as she watches her onetime rival vie for the nation’s highest office, Paque sees vestiges of the same energetic campaigner he was in 1993, a sign, she said, of trouble for his Republican competitors.

    “I could summarize my advice for people running against him,” she said with a laugh.

    “Don’t.”

    People underestimate Walker like they underestimated Assembly Minority Leader Tommy Thompson when he ran for governor; his Republican rival called him “a two-bit hack from Elroy.” People misunderestimated George W. Bush as a baseball-team owner. And, of course, Ronald Reagan was just an actor. The four people in this paragraph total 10 election wins for governor and four presidential election wins.

    Walker’s message discipline is remarkable, as is his unflappability in public. I’ve seen reporters try to bait him and fail. He’s participated in debates and never once, as far as I’m aware, stumbled significantly. He is going to say what he plans to say, and no more than that. He’s not known for off-the-cuff remarks, which the media prefers but which get candidates into trouble.

    Aaron Goldstein predicts that you will have to replace the title “governor” with “president” because …

    1. He’s Part of the Middle Class (or He Actually Shops at Kohl’s and Sears)

    It was after Walker spoke at the Iowa Freedom Summit in January that his popularity began to soar outside of Wisconsin. As much as anything else, I think what resonated with the crowd and those who watched the speech on C-SPAN or online is when he spoke about shopping at Kohl’s:

    But years ago as newlyweds I made a critical mistake. I went to a Kohl’s Department Store and I bought something for the price it was marked at. Right? My wife said to me, “You can never go back there again until you learn how to shop at Kohl’s.” So now if I’m going to pick up a new shirt I go to the rack that says it was $29.99 & I see it’s marked down to $19.99. And then because I’m well trained I got that insert from the Sunday newspaper and I took it up to the clerk with my Kohl’s credit card and get another 10 or 15% off. And then I watch that mailer because, man, Tonette shops there a lot so I know I’m going to get another 10 to 15% off. And if I’m really lucky I get that flyer with 30% off.

    Somehow I don’t think Ann Romney ever told her husband that he had to learn to shop at Kohl’s. Not that there’s anything wrong with being wealthy. But when money is no object it can be difficult to understand that most of us are subject to the mercy of money. The fact is, the lives of most Americans are centered around the fact we don’t have enough money. Mitt Romney couldn’t grasp this in 2012 and I don’t believe most of the current Republican field gets it either by virtue of their prosperity.

    In late April, the New York Daily News tried to make an issue of Walker’s credit card debt with Sears. William Jacobson of Legal Insurrection responded to the report in the Daily News in this manner:

    The latest attack on Walker is that he has “up to” $50,000 in credit card debt to — wait for it — Sears.

    We don’t know exactly how much because financial disclosures only are made in broad ranges, so it could be as little as $10,000.

    Regardless, it’s SEARS!

    As the only presidential candidate with a negative net worth, Scott Walker is in that boat with the rest of us. Nearly all presidential candidates speak of the middle class, but in Scott Walker we actually have a candidate who is a part of the middle-class.

    2. He Didn’t Graduate from College

    Remember when the media tried to make an issue of Walker not graduating from college? As Susan Milligan argued in U.S. News & World Report:

    But should we not demand this basic credential from the person we empower to run the country, start wars and negotiate with foreign leaders? If employers demand college degrees — and for no other reason than that they can, not because the job itself requires a college education — then why not impose this minimum requirement on the leader of the nation?

    Last I checked some fellow from Missouri named Harry S Truman didn’t graduate college, much less attend. Yet he did a fine job when it came to running the country, in his case ending a war and negotiating with foreign leaders, and is considered among the best to have held the office of President of the United States.

    Granted, Truman left office more than six decades ago and times have changed considerably since. But what hasn’t changed is that most Americans don’t have college degrees. In fact, it’s 60% of Americans. Another 22% attend college, but don’t graduate for a variety of reasons as was the case with Walker. So when the media tried to make an issue of the fact that Walker didn’t finish college they effectively insulted the intelligence of 8 out of every 10 Americans.

    This isn’t to say that higher education is without virtue. Should Walker be elected President he will need the advice of people who are learned in economics, the military, health care and other matters. But a higher education doesn’t guarantee common sense. President Obama might have once edited the Harvard Law Review, but in more than six years in office he has proved the late William F. Buckley’s adage that he would “sooner live in a society governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand faculty members of Harvard University.” I am sure if WFB were still alive that he would firmly place the Wisconsin governor among the first 2,000 names in the Boston telephone directory even if his last name begins with W.

    3. He Talks to People Not at Them Nor Does He Need to Shout to Make His Point

    Some politicians, be they Democrats or Republicans, love to hear themselves talk. In so doing, they end up talking at people instead of to them. That isn’t Scott Walker. As demonstrated in the first point about shopping at Kohl’s, when Walker talks about public policy he does so in a manner to which nearly everyone in the audience can relate.

    There are some issues that are difficult to talk about in a rational way because of the deep emotions they arouse. We have seen this over the past couple of weeks on the subject of immigration, particularly with Donald Trump’s comments about Mexico sending criminals to the United States.

    For his part, Walker has spoken candidly about reducing immigration levels. But he has done so without characterizing illegal immigrants as drug dealers and rapists. It is debatable whether reducing immigration levels is our best policy approach. But if the invective can be kept out of it, then it is a discussion worth having and if anyone can keep the discussion civil it is Scott Walker. …

    4. He Chooses His Battles Wisely

    Although the President of the United States wields enormous power, he or she cannot use their power on every matter. At a practical level, some matters are best left to local and state governments while other matters are best left out of the hands of government altogether. Do we really want another President who while openly admitting he doesn’t have all the facts nevertheless accuses a local police department of “acting stupidly”?

    A mark of a wise and effective elected leader is the ability is to govern when necessary and with the support of the majority of the people. When Scott Walker reformed collective bargaining in Wisconsin’s public sector, he did so because it was necessary and he did so with the majority of his state’s people behind him. The result is controlled costs, more money in the hands of state workers, and greater local control. When President Obama overhauled the U.S. healthcare system he did so unnecessarily, without the support of the majority of Americans and he couldn’t have cared less. The result is higher premiums, less insurance coverage and less access to medical care.

    Which would you choose?

    5. He Can Appeal to Conservatives and Non-Conservatives Alike

    Scott Walker appeals to conservatives not only for his stand on collective bargaining reform, but for signing into law right to work legislation, concealed carry measures, and his efforts to increase vouchers for school choice.

    But the conservative vote alone won’t be enough to elect a Republican President. Would Ronald Reagan have been twice elected President without the help of Reagan Democrats? Walker certainly isn’t the only Republican with conservative bona fides, but he is arguably the only Republican who can also appeal to non-conservatives. In order for a Republican to win the White House he is going to have to convince enough people who voted for Barack Obama twice to take a leap of faith.

    Now I’m not talking about hardcore left-wing activists here. Rather I am talking about the majority of people who do not think about politics on a day-to-day basis but care enough to show up on Election Day. They will vote Democrat by default, but can be persuaded to vote Republican by the right candidate. Can anyone imagine Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, or Ben Carson carrying a blue state like Wisconsin? After all, Walker has been thrice elected Governor in a state that twice voted for Barack Obama and hasn’t gone Republican since, well, Ronald Reagan.

    This isn’t to say that Walker is the new Reagan. Such a thing does not exist. There is only one Ronald Reagan. But what Walker does possess is a calm demeanor and an ability to communicate directly with people, which enables him to come across as a reasonable person who will carry out his duties in a competent manner. Scott Walker is the kind of Republican who can resonate with people who might not ordinarily vote Republican.

    6. He Can Withstand the Liberal Hate Machine

    Whoever wins the GOP nomination can expect the liberal hate machine, a coalition of the Democratic Party and the mainstream media, to vilify the Republican standard bearer as a racist, sexist, homophobe who cares only for the rich and wants to throw elderly grandmothers off cliffs. …

    I don’t know if Walker has skin made of Teflon, but it is certainly thicker than that of the present occupant in the White House. What has toughened him is the fact that liberals from all over the country have made a concerted effort to unseat Walker and undo his reforms and he has found a way to beat them at every turn. It is no small accomplishment that Walker is the first governor in American history to survive a recall vote.

    The reason liberals have failed to oust Walker from office is that liberals portray Walker as a monster, but Walker simply doesn’t come off that way to most people. If anything it is the liberals who have been far more monstrous in their behavior towards Walker and his family, effectively making him a more sympathetic figure. When the Boston band the Dropkick Murphys objected to Walker using their version of the Woody Guthrie penned song “I’m Shipping Up to Boston” at the Iowa Freedom Summit, they tweeted, “we literally hate you.” This says a great deal more about the Dropkick Murphys than it does about Scott Walker. I suspect we will see a lot more of this and, to paraphrase Nietzsche, what does not kill Walker will make him stronger. If Walker can carry himself with more decency than his opponents, then he will go far.

    I haven’t decided whether I’m supporting Walker, or anyone else, in the Republican primary. (One would think the number of GOP candidates will be culled somewhat by next April.) I think it’s unlikely Walker will become president. But that may be another underestimation.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The game of Walker’s thrones
  • Presty the DJ for July 16

    July 16, 2015
    Music

    This is a slow day in rock music, save for one particular birthday and one death.

    It’s not Tony Jackson of the Searchers …

    … or Tom Boggs, drummer for the Box Tops …

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for July 16
  • From the bowels of the State Capitol

    July 15, 2015
    Wisconsin politics

    This news arrived dramatically in my email yesterday:

    “Today we are filing a lawsuit and a request for a restraining order to halt the implementation of the harmful impacts of the Governor’s budget on the people who use the services of the Office of the Secretary of State,” Doug La Follette said.

    The 2015/2017 Biennial Budget slashes the Office staff to just one and moves historic records to a remote location in the basement of the capitol; this would have a devastating impact on service and to the public wanting to find these important historical records that have been maintained by Wisconsin Secretaries of State since 1848.

    The office processes 15,000 apostilles each year and if clients who want to adopt a child, transact international business, study abroad or ship a body overseas cannot receive the documents in a timely fashion they will be harmed. This is hardly a business friendly move to make as Wisconsin’s economy is already in poor shape.

    La Follette stated that with only one staff person remaining it would be impossible to provide the needed service to these clients and would create unsustainable stress to the one remaining staff member. The staff person will get sick and has a right to vacation resulting in the office being closed with harmful impacts to many people.

    The Office is the custodian of thousands of current and historical documents including: Statutes, laws of Wisconsin, Blue Books, and gubernatorial filings requiring application of the Great Seal (executive orders, proclamations, and pardons), boundary agreement filings, and charter ordinance filings, oaths of office, political action committee filings, special counsel contracts and state bond filings.

    The Constitution and statutes require these records be maintained by the Secretary of State and must be secure and available for public inspection.

    And relocating of the Office of the Secretary of State into a space that is not easily accessible to the public would be a great inconvenience and create confusion to the dozens who come to the office each day and would violate state laws requiring accessibility to the public.

    Further if the current staff are terminated, it would take months to recruit and train new employees [one current staff person speaks Spanish fluently which is not easy to replace].

    In brief, allowing the provisions of the budget impacting the Sec of State’s office to go into effect will do great harm to many people for many years.

    Therefore, we are asking for an injunction to prevent this immediate and long term harm to the public.

    This, for those who forgot, is the same secretary of state who illegally delayed publication (one of the few duties he is assigned) of Act 10 in order to facilitate a lawsuit against Act 10. For that, La Follette was not recalled from office, and he continues to get nearly $70,000 a year from us sucker taxpayers. I am also told, though I cannot confirm this, that La Follette once lost the state seal; keeping the state seal is one of his few duties.

    State Treasurer Matt Adamczyk had a response, reported by WisPolitics:

    I am quite shocked that La Follette took the extreme action of filing a lawsuit because he does not like the location of his office. …

    Until now, the taxpayers paid annual rent of $80,000 for La Follette’s unnecessarily oversized office overlooking the State Capitol building.

    It makes no sense for taxpayers to be paying rent when free office space is available across the street in the State Capitol building. In fact, the office he is being moved into is the office that I am currently occupying. In an effort to save taxpayer money, I’ve agreed to give La Follette my office.

    To put this into perspective, La Follette’s office is being moved less than 400 feet. His new office previously housed four full-time employees in the former treasurer’s office. On the other hand, La Follette will have only 2.75 employees in the same amount of space.

    Additionally, La Follette complained that the office will not be accessible to the public, which is simply not true. The office will have full public access when the Capitol building is open and will be handicap accessible.

    It is clear that after being in office over 35 years, La Follette has become out of touch with middle class Wisconsinites. La Follette should be looking for ways to save taxpayer money instead of wasting it with frivolous lawsuits.

    I’ve advocated here before that the few duties of the offices of treasurer and secretary of state should be assigned to the lieutenant governor, after which those two offices should be abolished and the lieutenant governor office should be placed separately on the state ballot from the governor. That would require changes to the state Constitution, which the Legislature should begin immediately.

    By the way: A Facebook comment on the page of state Sen. Leah Vukmir (R-Wauwatosa) claims La Follette is a state treasure because he’s the grandson of Fighting Bob La Follette. That is false. The Fighting Bob grandson who was involved in politics was Bronson La Follette, the state’s attorney general until 1986. Douglas La Follette is approximately a fifth cousin.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on From the bowels of the State Capitol
  • Presty the DJ for July 15

    July 15, 2015
    Music

    Today in 1963, Paul McCartney was fined 17 pounds for speeding. I’d suggest that that may have been the inspiration for his Wings song “Hell on Wheels,” except that the correct title is actually “Helen Wheels,” supposedly a song about his Land Rover:

    Imagine having tickets to this concert at the Anaheim Civic Center today in 1967:

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for July 15
  • Walker Derangement Syndrome, UW–Madison edition

    July 14, 2015
    US politics, Wisconsin politics

    Why, you ask, do Republicans want to cut the UW System? Why do most Republican-leaning voters support something like that?

    Well, it might have something to do with what happens with those taxpayer-funded salaries at the state’s only world-class university, as reported by The College Fix:

    University of Wisconsin sociology Professor Sara Goldrick-Rab claims there are “terrifying” psychological similarities between Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and Nazi leader and mass murderer Adolf Hitler.

    In a July 1 tweet, Goldrick-Rab said: “My grandfather, a psychologist, just walked me through similarities between Walker and Hitler. There are so many-it’s terrifying.”

    The extreme comparisons didn’t stop there.

    A day later, Professor Goldrick-Rap tweeted: “No doubt about it-Walker and many Wisconsin Legislators are fascists. Period. They proved it today. #SHAME.”

    Walker, a Republican, announced on Monday that he is running for president.

    The College Fix reached out to Professor Goldrick-Rab on Monday to seek clarification about her strongly worded tweets. Goldrick-Rab released the following statement to The College Fix:

    Thank you for your question. Please note that I have taken time out of my unpaid vacation to respond, as a courtesy to the timeliness of your request.

    If you reread the tweet, you will see that I stated that an expert in the field – a psychoanalyst with decades of experience – compared the ‘psychological characteristics’ of the two individuals, and that I was struck by his analysis. There do appear to be commonalities.

    I’m confident you are capable of seeing the difference between such an assessment and equating the whole of two different people.

    I’m also confident you will note that the tweet was not a “reaction” to any particular event, and thus it may not fit with your narrative.

    Recently Goldrick-Rab also targeted the Wisconsin budget as an attack on education and tenure, tweeting she “spent more than 20 years working for & honoring the tenure I earned. Walker just robbed me of it. He robbed Wisconsin. It’s unforgivable.”

    She went on to suggest Walker would “make an example” out of her and fire her to advance his campaign.

    “You should hear my kids, trying to figure out what moving means. Walker is driving them out of their home state. He took mom’s job.” Goldrick-Rab tweeted July 12.

    In a statement issued to the Wisconsin State Journal, Goldrick-Rab said that her colleagues around the UW system are talking privately about leaving, and that “(legislators) had literally shattered their employees and students and they stand up and say ‘thank you.’ It’s cowardly. We’re the laughingstock of the nation.”

    Professor Goldrick-Rab also joined the chorus of those lamenting the fact that Walker doesn’t have a college degree, tweeting: “My 5 year old just busted out with ‘Scott Walker needs to go to college to get some more knowledge!’  Whoa. She’s way ahead…”

    Yes, readers, these are the kind of people who have succeeded in making Walker a national political star. Among other inconvenient facts, Walker is approximately 12 million short of Hitler in deaths caused by evil ideas. This, we are supposed to believe, is what academic freedom and tenure are for.

     

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Walker Derangement Syndrome, UW–Madison edition
  • The O in AFL-CIO stands for …

    July 14, 2015
    US politics, Wisconsin politics

    The Washington Post’s Chris Cilizza wrote this before yesterday’s big news:

    Scott Walker’s message in his soon-to-be-announced presidential bid is simple: I’m a conservative who has won and won (and won) in a blue state. I’ve talked the talk and walked the walk.

    “We fought and we won,” Walker says in the video his campaign released in advance of Monday night’s formal announcement. “Without sacrificing our principles we won three elections in four years in a blue state.”

    That’s a very powerful message for Republicans desperate to win the White House back. And, it’s one that Walker has Democrats to thank for.

    Remember that Walker’s initial win in 2010 occasioned no great attention among national politicos.  He was a little-known county executive who was known, primarily, for being the “brown bag” guy. No one expected to hear from him again, nationally speaking.

    Then Walker made his move on public employee unions. Suddenly, he became enemy number one of the organized labor movement nationally and the Republican every Democrat in Wisconsin loved to hate. That emotion led to the push to recall Walker in a June 2012 election; there was a widespread belief in the anti-Walker crowd that it was a virtual guarantee that voters would get rid of the governor.

    Except that didn’t happen. In fact, Walker won by a larger margin over Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett in the 2012 recall than he did in the regularly scheduled 2010 election. In the wake of that loss — and, in truth, in the months leading up to the vote — there was considerable disagreement between labor/Wisconsin Democrats and national party strategists about whether the recall was a smart political move.

    Following Walker’s win, I wrote this:

    There was considerable internal discussion and disagreement between Washington and Wisconsin Democrats (and organized labor) about whether to push for a recall election this summer or wait until 2014 for a chance to unseat Walker. (Washington Democrats broadly favored the latter option, Wisconsin Democrats and labor the former).

    As the recall played out, two things became clear: 1) There were almost no one undecided in the race and 2) those few souls who were undecided tended to resist the recall effort on the grounds that Walker had just been elected in 2010.

    The sentiment among those undecided voters, according to several Democrats closely monitoring the data, was that while they didn’t love Walker they thought he deserved a full term before passing final judgment on how he was performing.

    That Democrats nominated Barrett — the same man who Walker had defeated in the 2010 general election — added to the sense among independents and undecided voters that this was primarily a partisan push to re-do a race in which they didn’t like the final result.

    Looking back, it’s clear that without the recall, there is no Scott Walker presidential announcement today. What the recall did was turn Walker into a conservative hero/martyr — the symbol of everything base GOPers hate about unions and, more broadly, the Democratic party.  He went from someone no one knew to someone every conservative talk radio host (and their massive audiences) viewed as the tip of the spear in the fight against the creep of misguided Democratic priorities. He became someone who had the phone numbers of every major conservative donor at his fingertips. He became what he is today: The political David who threw a pebble and slew the mighty liberal Goliath.

    It’s hard for me to imagine that if Democrats had never tried to recall Walker that he would be a) running for president in 2016 or b) solidly established as one of the three candidates regarded as most likely to be the nominee.  Even if Walker had, as he did, won a second term as governor in Wisconsin in 2014, it’s much more likely he’d be grouped in with fellow governors like John Kasich and Chris Christie rather than, as he is now, with Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio.

    The recall was a major — and long-tailed — strategic mistake by Democrats. It elevated Walker from a low-profile governor into a conservative superstar.  If Walker winds up as the Republican nominee in 2016 — and he has a real chance to be just that —  Democrats have only themselves to blame for his rise. They made Walker into the kind of politician who could beat Hillary Clinton next November.

    Conventional wisdom claimed that Walker won the 2012 recall election …

    … because of a significant number of non-fans of Walker who nonetheless voted for him because they believed Walker shouldn’t have been recalled over Act 10. That foreshadowed Walker’s loss in 2014 … until, of course, he won again.

    Democrats and liberals (but I repeat myself) could blame the 2014 loss on the inept campaign of Mary Burke, but Democrats were all atwitter of having a female candidate who ran a successful family business, until it became obvious that Burke didn’t have as large a role as was claimed at said successful family business, and as a candidate she reminded no one of, say, former Texas Gov. Ann Richards. One wonders when Democrats will stop underestimating Walker for having a low intellect (due to his sin of a lack of college degree, the same as with a majority of Wisconsinites), because obviously he’s smarter than the Democrats and their political experts.

    So what does the O in AFL-CIO stand for? That’s the number of elections (yes, using an O for a zero — the new version of Hawaii Five-0 does it) Big Labor has won against Scott Walker. That also represents the number of times Big Labor has succeeded in wresting control of either house of the Legislature away from Republicans in the regularly scheduled 2010, 2012 and 2014 elections. When AFL-CIO chief thug Richard Trumka calls Walker a “national disgrace,” Trumka should look in the mirror; that’s called “projection.”

    Alternatively, I love this tweet:

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The O in AFL-CIO stands for …
  • Presty the DJ for July 14

    July 14, 2015
    Music

    This being Bastille Day, I should probably post some French rock acts, even though you probably have never heard of any French rock act.

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for July 14
  • The ideological diversity of the state GOP

    July 13, 2015
    Wisconsin politics

    Kevin Binversie looks at the 11 Assembly Republicans who voted against the 2015-17 state budget:

    While it’s easy to group all 11 as some of the most potentially-vulnerable members of the Republican caucus, the reality is there are three groups here.

    The Truly Vulnerable

    • Ed Brooks, R-Reedsburg, 50th Assembly District
    • Todd Novak, R-Dodgeville, 51st Assembly District
    • Kathy Bernier, R-Chippewa Falls, 68th Assembly District
    • Nancy VanderMeer, R-Tomah, 70th Assembly District
    • Dave Heaton, R-Wausau, 85th Assembly District
    • Warren Petryk, R-Eleva, 93rd Assembly District

    With an eye on 2016, and the likelihood of higher Democratic turnout, there’s little doubt the majority of these representatives voted against the budget with concerns over their re-election at the top of their minds. Given recent teeter-tottering between the parties in these swing districts, even a “No” vote might not be enough to ensure a return to the Madison in 2017.

    Of the six seats listed above, since redistricting, results have ranged from 48 percent to 52 percent for the Republican candidate in either 2012 or 2014. Three of these six seats (Novak, VanderMeer, and Heaton) had margins of victory (or defeat in the case of VanderMeer in 2012) which triggered a recount.

    The others, while sitting on respectable margins of victory in 2014, had squeakers in 2012.

    The Prevailing Wage Trio

    • Keith Ripp, R-Lodi, 42nd Assembly District
    • Scott Krug, R-Nekoosa, 72nd Assembly District
    • James “Jimmy Boy” Edming, R-Glen Flora, 87th Assembly District

    This set of state representatives each issueda press releaseagainst the state budget saying essentially the same thing, “I’m disappointed that prevailing wage language was included in the final budget.”

    On an electoral level, nearly all three inhabit relatively safe seats. With each winning re-election (or initial election) to the assembly in 2014 with margins between 56 percent to 66 percent. Only Scott Krug, who won a squeaker in 2012, can claim true political worry.

    Of course, how the Stevens Point-area Republican can claim he’s looking out for taxpayers by opposing prevailing wage reform while leaning towards support for a Bucks arena from his out-state district will be something to watch next year on the campaign trail.

    The Big-Government, College Town Republicans

    • Travis Tranel, R-Cuba City, 49th Assembly District
    • Lee Nerison, R-Westby, 96th Assembly District

    Both opposed Act 10 in 2011, both opposed prevailing wage perform now, both are from western Wisconsin and concerned about the vote from their college-aged voters. (Tranel from UW-Platteville, Nerison from UW-La Crosse)

    Sense the pattern.

    Electorally, both Tranel and Nerison are fairly safe. In 2014, Tranel won re-election with 61 percent, and won in 2012 with 54 percent. Nerison carried his district in both 2012 and 2014 with 59 percent of the vote.

    Both essentially are longshots to be beaten in 2016, but they’ll be on the radar anyway. Tranel, elected in 2010 and one time was seen as a rising conservative star, has quickly developed a reputation as “the next Dale Schultz” in the sense he talks a solid conservative game in district, but is rarely there when the votes are counted.

    Well, until Tranel casts a vote that actually kills a GOP wish-list item (for instance, mining reform, in which Schultz’s vote and all the Democratic votes killed northwest Wisconsin mining), Tranel is not a shorter, thinner Dale Schultz. Nerison may represent a district near La Crosse, but he does not represent La Crosse.

    I assume the list of the Vulnerables is more or less accurate, though Brooks’ district hasn’t gone Democratic in my memory. Novak is a first-termer, but has qualities that will be hard for Democrats to oppose. I disagree with the stance those opposed to prevailing-wage reform took, but notice that it passed.

    In fact, notice that the state budget passed even without these 11 votes, or the vote of Sen. Robert Cowles (R-Green Bay). That seems like good political maneuvering to me. The 11 can say that they opposed whatever about the budget they opposed, and yet, like Act 10, it passed anyway.

    This is something Gov. Scott Walker can spin to his advantage in this politically divided state within this politically divided nation. If I were Walker I would say that the 11 No votes demonstrate that the Republican Party does differ on some subjects, that the GOP has actual political diversity, unlike the other side. Know any anti-abortion Democrats? How about any Democrats who favor the Second Amendment? (My definition does not include gun control that only affects the ability of law-abiding Americans to purchase guns.) How about any Democrats who favor general tax cuts, instead of cutting taxes for a few by raising taxes on everyone else?

    With all due to respect to Charlie Sykes and the Right Wisconsin people, whose work I enjoy reading and who have worked hard to influence the Wisconsin political debate: I’m not sure labeling and appearing to shun Republicans who don’t vote your way is helpful to the conservative cause. (For that matter, the state GOP could be labeled into suburban-Milwaukee, Fox River Valley and outstate elements, with most of the aforementioned 11 in the latter group, and Walker, Assembly Speaker Robin Vos and Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald in the former group.)

    The GOP has a 13-seat majority in the Assembly and a two-seat majority in the Senate. Obviously conservative legislation still is getting passed without every single GOP vote. In fact, the larger a majority is, the more likely there is to be wavering from the supposedly true line. That’s not much of an issue until your one-vote majority includes Dale Schultz, which is no longer the case.

    The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel claimed that Walker wanted a big budget victory heading into his presidential campaign. Well, state government should not be negatively affected by presidential politics. The Republican Party needs to be bigger than Scott Walker, who may or may not become president and will not be governor forever, or, for that matter, any single Republican.

     

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on The ideological diversity of the state GOP
  • Trump vs. Trump

    July 13, 2015
    US politics

    Back in 1980, U.S. Rep. John Anderson (R–Illinois) decided to run for president as an independent. The motto of his campaign was “The Anderson Difference.”

    One night that year, NBC-TV ran a story on its Nightly News, “The Anderson Differences,” comparing his positions as a congressman — for instance, favoring a measure to make the U.S. officially a Christian nation — with his positions as a presidential candidate. The comparison was not favorable, not because NBC agreed or disagreed with his past or present positions, but because the difference between past and present was essentially 180 degrees.

    That came to mind reading Jim Geraghty:

    You may have gathered that I remain a skeptic about Donald Trump. Trump fans look at us skeptics with incredulity that we could possibly object to their man, and his ability to “change the debate” and force the media to discuss topics like sanctuary cities. Those of us not so enamored with Trump pause at how that quality suddenly outranks all other qualities in a potential Republican presidential candidate — including consistent conservatism.

    Permit me to remind you about Donald Trump’s assessment of President Bush back in 2008:

    Bush has been so bad, maybe the worst president in the history of this country. He has been so incompetent, so bad, so evil, that I don’t think any Republican could have won.

    Evil? Evil? Of course, in the same interview, Trump endorsed … diplomatic outreach with Iran.

    You know, you can be enemies with people, whether it’s Iran, Iraq, anyplace else and you can still have dialogue. These people won’t even talk to him. It’s terrible.

    Wait, there’s more! Check out his assessment of Obama!

    VAN SUSTEREN: The new president-elect, what are your thoughts? Pretty exciting, it’s always exciting when we have a change of power, a transition, but what are your thoughts.

    TRUMP: It’s very exciting we have a new president. It would have been nice if he ended with a 500 point up instead of down. It’s certainly very exciting.

    His speech was great last night. I thought it was inspiring in every way. And, hopefully he’s going to do a great job. But the way I look at it, he cannot do worse than Bush. [Emphasis added.]

    VAN SUSTEREN: We know how you feel about this.

    TRUMP: It’s not me, it’s everybody. It’s been a total catastrophe. That’s what happened to Republicans. They got run are [sic] out of office because we have a president that’s been so bad.

    And he’s been a catastrophe, there’s no question about it. He got us into a war we didn’t need. You look at the money, we’re spending hundreds of billions of dollars on a war, and then people wonder why the economy isn’t doing well.

    OPEC is ripping us off left and right, the oil countries are just ripping us off left and right.

    So you have wars, you have OPEC, all of this stuff. He didn’t do anything about it. He sends Condoleezza Rice. She gets off a plane and waves to everybody and then leaves. It’s ridiculous. …

    And then here’s his thoughts on health care back in 1999 …

    TRUMP: I think you have to have it, and, again, I said I’m conservative, generally speaking, I’m conservative, and even very conservative. But I’m quite liberal and getting much more liberal on health care and other things. I really say: What’s the purpose of a country if you’re not going to have defensive [sic] and health care?

    If you can’t take care of your sick in the country, forget it, it’s all over. I mean, it’s no good. So I’m very liberal when it comes to health care. I believe in universal health care. I believe in whatever it takes to make people well and better.

    KING: So you believe, then, it’s an entitlement of birth?

    TRUMP: I think it is. It’s an entitlement to this country, and too bad the world can’t be, you know, in this country. But the fact is, it’s an entitlement to this country if we’re going to have a great country.

    And then, as you probably saw, Trump’s post-2012 comments on illegal immigration:

    “Republicans didn’t have anything going for them with respect to Latinos and with respect to Asians,” the billionaire developer says.

    “The Democrats didn’t have a policy for dealing with illegal immigrants, but what they did have going for them is they weren’t mean-spirited about it,” Trump says. “They didn’t know what the policy was, but what they were is they were kind.”

    Romney’s solution of “self deportation” for illegal aliens made no sense and suggested that Republicans do not care about Hispanics in general, Trump says.

    “He had a crazy policy of self deportation which was maniacal,” Trump says. “It sounded as bad as it was, and he lost all of the Latino vote,” Trump notes. “He lost the Asian vote. He lost everybody who is inspired to come into this country.”

    The GOP has to develop a comprehensive policy “to take care of this incredible problem that we have with respect to immigration, with respect to people wanting to be wonderful productive citizens of this country,” Trump says.

    Yet I see people comparing Trump to Reagan. Donald Trump has been a conservative for about ten minutes.

    You have read (because I’m sure I quoted it previously) Ralph Waldo Emerson’s observation that “Foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.” (The rest of which is: “… adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.”) California Gov. Ronald Reagan raised taxes and signed the nation’s most liberal, for the day, abortion rights legislation, both of which President Ronald Reagan opposed.

    But calling a previous president of your own party “evil” seems unlikely to generate much support among your own party, even among those who didn’t like said president. Favoring universal health care, whether ObamaCare or single-payer, is not a position the Republican Party is likely to adopt at any point. At some point he’s going to have to explain the gulf between his previous positions and his current positions.

    Trump blamed his first bankruptcy on Reagan’s 1987 tax reform, because it eliminated some obscure real estate tax break. Reagan’s 1987 tax cut helped propel the longest peacetime economic expansion in this nation’s history, which not even Bill Clinton’s 1993 tax increase could stall for long.

    Trump cannot credibly repeat Reagan’s line that he didn’t leave the Democratic Party; the Democratic Party left him, because all of the aforementioned positions remain Democratic positions today as they were in 2008. Either Trump changed all of those positions, which means he needs to explain what changed his mind, or he doesn’t actually have any long-standing firm tenets of what’s right and wrong in politics, other than his own fortunes.

    Of course, there’s an easy way to do that if you have enough money, as Trump certainly does. Like Ross Perot in 1992, Trump certainly has enough money to run for president without the support of the GOP, or his apparent former party, the Democratic Party. Run for president as an independent, and you can skip the silliness of the primary parade and go right to the general campaign. You can take whichever positions you want on whichever issues you like, and you can ignore issues you don’t care about or don’t want to touch with a 39 1/2 foot pole. (For instance: Abortion rights.)

    To quote 1992 “Reform” Party candidate H. Ross Perot, see? It’s that simple.

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Trump vs. Trump
  • Presty the DJ for July 13

    July 13, 2015
    Music

    We start with the first recorded instance of Buddy Holly in Wisconsin: Today in 1958, Holly nearly drowned while swimming across a lake near Rhinelander while on tour.

    Holly’s swimming problems may have occurred because he didn’t realize how cold Wisconsin (specifically our bodies of water) can get. He got another lesson in that seven months later.

    Today in 1960, Elvis Presley released a song based on the Italian “O Sole Mio”:

    Today in 1970, Anne Murray released her first song during an inappropriate time of year:

    The number one single today in 1974:

    Today in 1999, the New Radicals (which were really just one, uh, Radical) split up after one album, from which came one single:

    (more…)

    Share this on …

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print
    Like Loading…
    No comments on Presty the DJ for July 13
Previous Page
1 … 700 701 702 703 704 … 1,042
Next Page

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog

The thoughts of a journalist/libertarian–conservative/Christian husband, father, Eagle Scout and aficionado of obscure rock music. Thoughts herein are only the author’s and not necessarily the opinions of his family, friends, neighbors, church members or past, present or future employers.

  • Steve
    • About, or, Who is this man?
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Adventures in ruralu0026nbsp;inkBack in June 2009, I was driving somewhere through a rural area. And for some reason, I had a flashback to two experiences in my career about that time of year many years ago. In 1988, eight days after graduating from the University of Wisconsin, I started work at the Grant County Herald Independent in Lancaster as a — well, the — reporter. Four years after that, on my 27th birthday, I purchased, with a business partner, the Tri-County Press in Cuba City, my first business venture. Both were experiences about which Wisconsin author Michael Perry might write. I thought about all this after reading a novel, The Deadline, written by a former newspaper editor and publisher. (Now who would write a novel about a weekly newspaper?) As a former newspaper owner, I picked at some of it — why finance a newspaper purchase through the bank if the seller is willing to finance it? Because the mean bank lender is a plot point! — and it is much more interesting than reality, but it is very well written, with a nicely twisting plot, and quite entertaining, again more so than reality. There is something about that first job out of college that makes you remember it perhaps more…
    • Adventures in radioI’ve been in the full-time work world half my life. For that same amount of time I’ve been broadcasting sports as a side interest, something I had wanted to since I started listening to games on radio and watching on TV, and then actually attending games. If you ask someone who’s worked in radio for some time about the late ’70s TV series “WKRP in Cincinnati,” most of them will tell you that, if anything, the series understated how wacky working in radio can be. Perhaps the funniest episode in the history of TV is the “WKRP” episode, based on a true story, about the fictional radio station’s Thanksgiving promotion — throwing live turkeys out of a helicopter under the mistaken belief that, in the words of WKRP owner Arthur Carlson, “As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.” [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ST01bZJPuE0] I’ve never been involved in anything like that. I have announced games from the roofs of press boxes (once on a nice day, and once in 50-mph winds), from a Mississippi River bluff (more on that later), and from the front row of the second balcony of the University of Wisconsin Fieldhouse (great view, but not a place to go if…
    • “Good morning/afternoon/evening, ________ fans …”
    • My biggest storyEarlier this week, while looking for something else, I came upon some of my own work. (I’m going to write a blog someday called “Things I Found While Looking for Something Else.” This is not that blog.) The Grant County Sheriff’s Department, in the county where I used to live, has a tribute page to the two officers in county history who died in the line of duty. One is William Loud, a deputy marshal in Cassville, shot to death by two bank robbers in 1912. The other is Tom Reuter, a Grant County deputy sheriff who was shot to death at the end of his 4 p.m.-to-midnight shift March 18, 1990. Gregory Coulthard, then a 19-year-old farmhand, was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide and is serving a life sentence, with his first eligibility for parole on March 18, 2015, just 3½ years from now. I’ve written a lot over the years. I think this, from my first two years in the full-time journalism world, will go down as the story I remember the most. For journalists, big stories contain a paradox, which was pointed out in CBS-TV’s interview of Andy Rooney on his last “60 Minutes” Sunday. Morley Safer said something along the line…
  • Food and drink
    • The Roesch/Prestegard familyu0026nbsp;cookbookFrom the family cookbook(s) All the families I’m associated with love to eat, so it’s a good thing we enjoy cooking. The first out-of-my-house food memory I have is of my grandmother’s cooking for Christmas or other family occasions. According to my mother, my grandmother had a baked beans recipe that she would make for my mother. Unfortunately, the recipe seems to have  disappeared. Also unfortunately, my early days as a picky, though voluminous, eater meant I missed a lot of those recipes made from such wholesome ingredients as lard and meat fat. I particularly remember a couple of meals that involve my family. The day of Super Bowl XXXI, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and a group of their friends got together to share lots of food and cheer on the Packers to their first NFL title in 29 years. (After which Jannan and I drove to Lambeau Field in the snow,  but that’s another story.) Then, on Dec. 31, 1999, my parents, my brother, my aunt and uncle and Jannan and I (along with Michael in utero) had a one-course-per-hour meal to appropriately end years beginning with the number 1. Unfortunately I can’t remember what we…
    • SkålI was the editor of Marketplace Magazine for 10 years. If I had to point to one thing that demonstrates improved quality of life since I came to Northeast Wisconsin in 1994, it would be … … the growth of breweries and  wineries in Northeast Wisconsin. The former of those two facts makes sense, given our heritage as a brewing state. The latter is less self-evident, since no one thinks of Wisconsin as having a good grape-growing climate. Some snobs claim that apple or cherry wines aren’t really wines at all. But one of the great facets of free enterprise is the opportunity to make your own choice of what food and drink to drink. (At least for now, though some wish to restrict our food and drink choices.) Wisconsin’s historically predominant ethnic group (and our family’s) is German. Our German ancestors did unfortunately bring large government and high taxes with them, but they also brought beer. Europeans brought wine with them, since they came from countries with poor-quality drinking water. Within 50 years of a wave of mid-19th-century German immigration, brewing had become the fifth largest industry in the U.S., according to Maureen Ogle, author of Ambitious Brew: The Story of American Beer. Beer and wine have…
  • Wheels
    • America’s sports carMy birthday in June dawned without a Chevrolet Corvette in front of my house. (The Corvette at the top of the page was featured at the 2007 Greater Milwaukee Auto Show. The copilot is my oldest son, Michael.) Which isn’t surprising. I have three young children, and I have a house with a one-car garage. (Then again, this would be more practical, though a blatant pluck-your-eyes-out violation of the Corvette ethos. Of course, so was this.) The reality is that I’m likely to be able to own a Corvette only if I get a visit from the Corvette Fairy, whose office is next door to the Easter Bunny. (I hope this isn’t foreshadowing: When I interviewed Dave Richter of Valley Corvette for a car enthusiast story in the late great Marketplace Magazine, he said that the most popular Corvette in most fans’ minds was a Corvette built during their days in high school. This would be a problem for me in that I graduated from high school in 1983, when no Corvette was built.) The Corvette is one of those cars whose existence may be difficult to understand within General Motors Corp. The Corvette is what is known as a “halo car,” a car that drives people into showrooms, even if…
    • Barges on fouru0026nbsp;wheelsI originally wrote this in September 2008.  At the Fox Cities Business Expo Tuesday, a Smart car was displayed at the United Way Fox Cities booth. I reported that I once owned a car into which trunk, I believe, the Smart could be placed, with the trunk lid shut. This is said car — a 1975 Chevrolet Caprice coupe (ours was dark red), whose doors are, I believe, longer than the entire Smart. The Caprice, built down Interstate 90 from us Madisonians in Janesville (a neighbor of ours who worked at the plant probably helped put it together) was the flagship of Chevy’s full-size fleet (which included the stripper Bel Air and middle-of-the-road Impala), featuring popular-for-the-time vinyl roofs, better sound insulation, an upgraded cloth interior, rear fender skirts and fancy Caprice badges. The Caprice was 18 feet 1 inch long and weighed 4,300 pounds. For comparison: The midsize Chevrolet of the ear was the Malibu, which was the same approximate size as the Caprice after its 1977 downsizing. The compact Chevrolet of the era was the Nova, which was 200 inches long — four inches longer than a current Cadillac STS. Wikipedia’s entry on the Caprice has this amusing sentence: “As fuel economy became a bigger priority among Americans…
    • Behind the wheel
    • Collecting only dust or rust
    • Coooooooooooupe!
    • Corvettes on the screen
    • The garage of misfit cars
    • 100 years (and one day) of our Chevrolets
    • They built Excitement, sort of, once in a while
    • A wagon by any otheru0026nbsp;nameFirst written in 2008. You will see more don’t-call-them-station-wagons as you drive today. Readers around my age have probably had some experience with a vehicle increasingly rare on the road — the station wagon. If you were a Boy Scout or Girl Scout, or were a member of some kind of youth athletic team, or had a large dog, or had relatives approximately your age, or had friends who needed to be transported somewhere, or had parents who occasionally had to haul (either in the back or in a trailer) more than what could be fit inside a car trunk, you (or, actually, your parents) were the target demographic for the station wagon. “Station wagons came to be like covered wagons — so much family activity happened in those cars,” said Tim Cleary, president of the American Station Wagon Owners Association, in Country Living magazine. Wagons “were used for everything from daily runs to the grocery store to long summer driving trips, and while many men and women might have wanted a fancier or sportier car, a station wagon was something they knew they needed for the family.” The “station wagon” originally was a vehicle with a covered seating area to take people between train stations…
    • Wheels on theu0026nbsp;screenBetween my former and current blogs, I wrote a lot about automobiles and TV and movies. Think of this post as killing two birds (Thunderbirds? Firebirds? Skylarks?) with one stone. Most movies and TV series view cars the same way most people view cars — as A-to-B transportation. (That’s not counting the movies or series where the car is the plot, like the haunted “Christine” or “Knight Rider” or the “Back to the Future” movies.) The philosophy here, of course, is that cars are not merely A-to-B transportation. Which disqualifies most police shows from what you’re about to read, even though I’ve watched more police video than anything else, because police cars are plain Jane vehicles. The highlight in a sense is in the beginning: The car chase in my favorite movie, “Bullitt,” featuring Steve McQueen’s 1968 Ford Mustang against the bad guys’ 1968 Dodge Charger: [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMc2RdFuOxIu0026amp;fmt=18] One year before that (but I didn’t see this until we got Telemundo on cable a couple of years ago) was a movie called “Operación 67,” featuring (I kid you not) a masked professional wrestler, his unmasked sidekick, and some sort of secret agent plot. (Since I don’t know Spanish and it’s not…
    • While riding in my Cadillac …
  • Entertainments
    • Brass rocksThose who read my former blog last year at this time, or have read this blog over the past months, know that I am a big fan of the rock group Chicago. (Back when they were a rock group and not a singer of sappy ballads, that is.) Since rock music began from elements of country music, jazz and the blues, brass rock would seem a natural subgenre of rock music. A lot of ’50s musical acts had saxophone players, and some played with full orchestras … [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CPS-WuUKUE] … but it wasn’t until the more-or-less simultaneous appearances of Chicago and Blood Sweat u0026amp; Tears on the musical scene (both groups formed in 1967, both had their first charting singles in 1969, and they had the same producer) that the usual guitar/bass/keyboard/drum grouping was augmented by one or more trumpets, a sax player and a trombone player. While Chicago is my favorite group (but you knew that already), the first brass rock song I remember hearing was BSu0026amp;T’s “Spinning Wheel” — not in its original form, but on “Sesame Street,” accompanied by, yes, a giant spinning wheel. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi9sLkyhhlE] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxWSOuNsN20] [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9U34uPjz-g] I remember liking Chicago’s “Just You ‘n Me” when it was released as a single, and…
    • Drive and Eat au0026nbsp;RockThe first UW home football game of each season also is the opener for the University of Wisconsin Marching Band, the world’s finest college marching band. (How the UW Band has not gotten the Sudler Trophy, which is to honor the country’s premier college marching bands, is beyond my comprehension.) I know this because I am an alumnus of the UW Band. I played five years (in the last rank of the band, Rank 25, motto: “Where Men Are Tall and Run-On Is Short”), marching in 39 football games at Camp Randall Stadium, the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome in Minneapolis, Michigan Stadium in Ann Arbor, Memorial Stadium at the University of Illinois (worst artificial turf I had ever seen), the University of Nevada–Las Vegas’ Sam Boyd Silver Bowl, the former Dyche Stadium at Northwestern University, five high school fields and, in my one bowl game, Legion Field in Birmingham, Ala., site of the 1984 Hall of Fame Bowl. The UW Band was, without question, the most memorable experience of my college days, and one of the most meaningful experiences of my lifetime. It was the most physical experience of my lifetime, to be sure. Fifteen minutes into my first Registration…
    • Keep on rockin’ in the freeu0026nbsp;worldOne of my first ambitions in communications was to be a radio disc jockey, and to possibly reach the level of the greats I used to listen to from WLS radio in Chicago, which used to be one of the great 50,000-watt AM rock stations of the country, back when they still existed. (Those who are aficionados of that time in music and radio history enjoyed a trip to that wayback machine when WLS a Memorial Day Big 89 Rewind, excerpts of which can be found on their Web site.) My vision was to be WLS’ afternoon DJ, playing the best in rock music between 2 and 6, which meant I wouldn’t have to get up before the crack of dawn to do the morning show, yet have my nights free to do whatever glamorous things big-city DJs did. Then I learned about the realities of radio — low pay, long hours, zero job security — and though I have dabbled in radio sports, I’ve pretty much cured myself of the idea of working in radio, even if, to quote WAPL’s Len Nelson, “You come to work every day just like everybody else does, but we’re playing rock ’n’ roll songs, we’re cuttin’ up.…
    • Monday on the flight line, not Saturday in the park
    • Music to drive by
    • The rock ofu0026nbsp;WisconsinWikipedia begins its item “Music of Wisconsin” thusly: Wisconsin was settled largely by European immigrants in the late 19th century. This immigration led to the popularization of galops, schottisches, waltzes, and, especially, polkas. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl7wCczgNUc] So when I first sought to write a blog piece about rock musicians from Wisconsin, that seemed like a forlorn venture. Turned out it wasn’t, because when I first wrote about rock musicians from Wisconsin, so many of them that I hadn’t mentioned came up in the first few days that I had to write a second blog entry fixing the omissions of the first. This list is about rock music, so it will not include, for instance, Milwaukee native and Ripon College graduate Al Jarreau, who in addition to having recorded a boatload of music for the jazz and adult contemporary/easy listening fan, also recorded the theme music for the ’80s TV series “Moonlighting.” Nor will it include Milwaukee native Eric Benet, who was for a while known more for his former wife, Halle Berry, than for his music, which includes four number one singles on the Ru0026amp;B charts, “Spend My Life with You” with Tamia, “Hurricane,” “Pretty Baby” and “You’re the Only One.” Nor will it include Wisconsin’s sizable contributions to big…
    • Steve TV: All Steve, All the Time
    • “Super Steve, Man of Action!”
    • Too much TV
    • The worst music of allu0026nbsp;timeThe rock group Jefferson Airplane titled its first greatest-hits compilation “The Worst of Jefferson Airplane.” Rolling Stone magazine was not being ironic when it polled its readers to decide the 10 worst songs of the 1990s. I’m not sure I agree with all of Rolling Stone’s list, but that shouldn’t be surprising; such lists are meant for debate, after all. To determine the “worst,” songs appropriate for the “Vinyl from Hell” segment that used to be on a Madison FM rock station, requires some criteria, which does not include mere overexposure (for instance, “Macarena,” the video of which I find amusing since it looks like two bankers are singing it). Before we go on: Blog posts like this one require multimedia, so if you find a song you hate on this blog, I apologize. These are also songs that I almost never listen to because my sound system has a zero-tolerance policy — if I’m listening to the radio or a CD and I hear a song I don’t like, it’s, to quote Bad Company, gone gone gone. My blonde wife won’t be happy to read that one of her favorite ’90s songs, 4 Non Blondes’ “What’s Up,” starts the list. (However,…
    • “You have the right to remain silent …”
  • Madison
    • Blasts from the Madison media past
    • Blasts from my Madison past
    • Blasts from our Madison past
    • What’s the matter with Madison?
    • Wisconsin – Madison = ?
  • Sports
    • Athletic aesthetics, or “cardinal” vs. “Big Red”
    • Choose your own announcer
    • La Follette state 1982 (u0022It was 30 years ago todayu0022)
    • The North Dakota–Wisconsin Hockey Fight of 1982
    • Packers vs. Brewers
  • Hall of Fame
    • The case(s) against teacher unions
    • The Class of 1983
    • A hairy subject, or face the face
    • It’s worse than you think
    • It’s worse than you think, 2010–11 edition
    • My favorite interview subject of all time
    • Oh look! Rural people!
    • Prestegard for president!
    • Unions vs. the facts, or Hiding in plain sight
    • When rhetoric goes too far
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
    • Join 197 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d