The Packers turned in another up-and-down, ultimately disappointing performance at Minnesota Sunday night, which only intensifies Mike McCarthy’s already hot seat. The 13th-year head coach has become a receptacle for criticism, much of it adhering to the same theme: that his offensive system is stale.
The first problem is this analysis is a few years too late (more on that in a moment). The second—and much bigger—problem is it gives Aaron Rodgers a pass for the highly inconsistent way he executes this offense.
Please understand, you’re not reading an Aaron Rodgers Hot Take. At least, not according to discussions that occur within the NFL. Around the league, Rodgers is regarded as an incredible but imperfect quarterback. Outside the NFL, Rodgers is basically viewed as a god. It has somehow become heretical to say anything critical of him.
Rodgers is the most physically talented quarterback of all-time; 32 NFL GMs would be happy to build their team around him. When he’s clicking, he’s magnificent. But Rodgers does not click with the regularity of a Drew Brees, Tom Brady or even a resurgent Andrew Luck. There is no stat that captures throws that should be made but aren’t, or throws that could have been made on-schedule but were made off-schedule. If these categories existed, Rodgers would have as many as any quarterback, every year. He’s a scintillating sandlot player who goes into sandlot mode way too often.
Sandlot mode? Who does he think he is, Brett Favre?
Yes, Rodgers’s unique style, which few QBs have enough talent to call upon, has led to some of his most spectacular plays. But in the aggregate, it also creates the illusion of dysfunction around him. To television viewers, Rodgers runs around because his O-line breaks down. Or because, presumably, receivers aren’t getting open. And they’re not getting open because the scheme isn’t helping them. Sometimes this is the case. But just as often, the glitches aren’t coming from everyone around the quarterback, but from the quarterback himself.
What’s most befuddling: Right when you start to think Rodgers will forever read the field with the choppiness of a rookie, he starts slinging the ball with perfectly disciplined timing and rhythm. When that switch is flipped, Rodgers borders on unstoppable. His greatness reaches such a level that, when the switch is flipped back, you understand why outside observers can’t help but assume the problem is everyone else.
This is where McCarthy is getting victimized. A great illustration of Rodgers’s unevenness came two weeks ago in Green Bay’s win over Miami. The Packers faced a 4th-and-2 near midfield. The Dolphins are a zone D that almost always plays nickel. Knowing their nickel would keep two linebackers on the field, McCarthy put in a fourth receiver and aligned Davante Adams in the backfield, so their top weapon could run his route against those overmatched linebackers. Adams did, breaking open on a short-angle route right in Rodgers’s immediate line of vision. The play worked perfectly. And Rodgers, for reasons not even Sigmund Freud could figure out, tried to break down and extend the play. A quick-strike play like this can’t be extended, though, and naturally, the protection cracked and Rodgers was sacked.
Imagine if it had been Sean McVay putting Brandin Cooks at running back. Or Andy Reid putting Tyreek Hill there. Their genius would have been heralded once again. On a big fourth down gamble the offensive mastermind puts his best wide receiver at running back and catches the defense off balance! Boy, you never know what this coach will do next!
Of course, McVay’s QB or Reid’s QB (or almost any team’s QB) would have thrown the ball on that play. McCarthy’s QB didn’t, and so, to outside observers, McCarthy’s creativity here never existed.
That creativity lately has shown up on other plays, too. In fact, this season, McCarthy’s offensive scheme has evolved dramatically. Early in the year, it was mostly just the simple spread formations that propagate isolation routes—that’s the unimaginativeness McCarthy has been dogged for over the years. Most likely he played this way because it accommodated Rodgers’s sandlot tendencies. It worked when the Packers had the right veteran receivers. But with an aging Jordy Nelson gone, James Jones longgone, and Randall Cobb either out injured or not looking like himself, the Packers this season have had to rely on callow, rookie receivers who are not yet capable of getting open on their own or finding the defense’s soft spots when Rodgers extends plays.
So, McCarthy has scrapped some of the iso-spread passing concepts for newer-age designs. He has used spread formations this November about half as often as he did in September. More importantly, he’s used condensed formations, with receivers aligned tight to the formation, about three times as often. Those condensed sets are the same thing McVay uses in L.A. It gives receivers more field to work with, which propagates more schematic variables in the passing game and a more natural intertwinement of routes. It also creates congestion for a defense, rendering coverages more predictable. This makes it easier for a QB to anticipate open throws. And, receivers who align tight to the formation are in better position to block safeties in the running game, which makes play-action off of that even more believable. On a related note, the Packers have also employed more snaps of two-tight end personnel, which diversifies a scheme, particularly on the ground.
The results of McCarthy’s updated approach have been mixed, in part because Rodgers’s execution has been mixed. Still, it’s reasonable to keep McCarthy on the hot seat; even with his improved approach, he’s far from flawless. But when evaluating McCarthy, we must admit that his quarterback is far from flawless, too.
Kalyn Kahler asks:
Is he going to say it?
Twice a week, every week, for the past month, Aaron Rodgers has stood in front of a sea of recorders, cameras and phones, all patiently waiting to capture the speech. In 2014, it was “R-E-L-A-X.” In 2016, “run the table.” But now it’s getting late. Rodgers and the Packers have just lost aSunday Night Football game in Minnesota, falling to 4-6-1 on the season. Those reporters, like the rest of the football-watching world, are still waiting for the quarterback to say something—anything—that will ensure the Green Bay Packers’ 2018 season will turn out O.K. Instead, Rodgers stands at the podium, left foot casually crossed in front of his right, and stoically repeats a variation of this phrase: “We’re going to need some help.”
It doesn’t feel like 2016, when they fell to 4-6 then ran the table, making it to the NFC championship. It doesn’t feel like 2014, when they were blown out in two of their first three games before flipping the switch, finishing 12-4 and coming within an onside kick recovery of the Super Bowl. As November turns into December, the Packers face the prospect of missing the playoffs with a healthy Rodgers for the first time since 2008—his first year as the starter. Observers can’t help but wonder: What is wrong with the Packers?
It’s been nearly a year since Ted Thompson stepped down as general manager. But to understand what is happening in 2018, you must look back a few years. Many interviewed for this story say the Packers’ struggles can be traced back to Thompson’s final years as GM; others who won’t say it still suggest it with their actions.
Thompson, of course, had a wildly successful overall run in Green Bay. He began his career as a front-office executive in Green Bay in 1992. After leaving for a five-year stint in Seattle, he returned to the Packers as general manager in 2005. The first selection of his first draft was Aaron Rodgers, and the team went to the postseason nine times in 13 seasons of Thompson’s GM tenure, including a Super Bowl XLV title. He will deservedly be inducted into the Packers Hall of Fame in May.
Thompson was devoted to a strict draft-and-develop model, rarely signing free agents or making trades; it drove Green Bay’s success during the most of his tenure. But the draft-and-develop model falls apart quickly if the team doesn’t draft well. For instance, of the Packers’ eight draft picks in 2015, just one remains on the roster, linebacker Jake Ryan (who is currently on injured reserve). Only wideout Davante Adams and center Corey Linsley remain from 2014’s nine-man class. But even as holes in the roster began to show the past few years, the Packers remained conservative in free agency.
Some in the organization felt the reduced talent on the roster put a strain on the coaching staff. And many in the front office were frustrated as well. Sources familiar with the inner workings of the organization said that lower level personnel employees explored trades and initiated conversations with other teams, around three or four times each year, but they could never get far without the ability to counter offer, which would require Thompson’s cooperation and approval. Scouts on the pro side were often frustrated because they felt like their hard work went to waste. They would spend weeks putting together reports on all the available free agents, and Thompson would rarely sign any. At various points during Thompson’s tenure, the Packers had chances to land Randy Moss, Marshawn Lynch (a collegiate teammate of Rodgers’s) and Tony Gonzalez, but did not move on any of them. (A team spokesperson declined an interview request for Thompson.)
Multiple sources noted the Packers’ low tolerance for “loud guys,” a general term for players who are outspoken with the media or even those who complain privately about the organization. Thompson was fiercely and famously private—if he had it his way, the team wouldn’t have put out press releases at all, even for good news like a player signing a contract extension. The term “bad guy” was thrown around amongst team decision makers, a descriptor that could range from a guy with a sordid past, or just a player who talks too much. (Example of the latter: Martellus Bennett, last season. “Yeah, that was never going to work,” says one person familiar with the inner workings of the front office.)
Thompson had full autonomy over football operations. Team president Mark Murphy, who arrived in 2007, says he met with his GM regularly, but that he doesn’t involve himself in any football decisions. Some in the organization believed that because Green Bay has no actual owner (Murphy serves as a de facto owner), Thompson’s power went unchecked. The front office as a whole got too comfortable. And the conservative, traditional culture being created became stifling for some.
Ron Wolf, the Hall of Fame GM who ran the Packers from 1991-2001, had a saying: Football is the most important thing. If we do the football part right, the result will be wins. It was a message about seeing the bigger picture, not sweating the small stuff, and taking care of the things that really mattered. Some in the organization felt like that message had been lost.
Some of the team rules became byzantine. No backwards hats on the sidelines. No undershirts showing from underneath practice jerseys. All players must coordinate and wear the same color shoes, as determined by the team. When players leave the locker room for practice, the equipment staff tidies each locker, clearing it of any unsightly hangers or extra gear.
Thompson set the rules, and it was up to Russ Ball, the VP of football administration/player finance who was seen as the only person in the building with Thompson’s full trust, to enforce them. One former Packer said that over time, these small rules add up and wear players down, causing some to question why certain things are the way they are.
“It’s an insane level of control,” says one person close to the organization. “No fun, it’s all about the Packer brand and being a vice president. The most important people in the organization are the VPs. The players and all that, that comes later.”
After Thompson stepped down, Murphy reorganized Green Bay’s power structure. During the interview process for a new general manager, Murphy decided Thompson’s job would be best be split into two separate roles. In January, director of player personnel Brian Gutekunst was promoted to general manager, and Ball was promoted to a new role, executive vice president/director of football operations. And Murphy made one more change: Instead of McCarthy and Ball reporting to the GM, they now, like Gutekunst, report directly to Murphy. Green Bay calls the triumvirate “football leadership,” creating natural checks and balances in the front office.
In Gutekunst’s introductory press conference, he said he had a responsibility to fans to, “communicate clearly.” He also made one more statement that seemed to create some separation between him and his predecessor: “We’re not going to leave any stone unturned in every avenue of player acquisition.”
The shakeup was the first time the football hierarchical order in Green Bay had changed since 1991, when Wolf took over as GM and was given full control over football operations. Wolf has said he never would have taken the offer if it was anything less than total control. According to Murphy, Gutekunst was happy with the new division of power when he informed him of the changes. (Through a spokesperson, the Packers declined interview requests for Gutekunst, McCarthy and Ball.)
Murphy denies any meaning the change in hierarchy might send about Thompson’s final seasons. He says 17 other NFL clubs have similar organizational structures—in which the head coach reports to the owners, not to the general manager. He says the Steelers are a club the Packers look to as a model, and in Pittsburgh, general manager Kevin Colbert and head coach Mike Tomlin both report to owner Art Rooney II.
The early returns are promising from a roster-building standpoint. One scout for an NFC team said he thought the Packers rarely had a complete draft under Thompson, but Green Bay always had Rodgers, so it never hurt them the way it would a team without an elite quarterback. However, he thought that the 2018 draft, under Gutekunst, was especially strong from top to bottom.
Thompson is still involved with the team, as a senior consultant, though he has moved back to his hometown in Texas. While Murphy is confident in the reorganization, multiple sources familiar with the inner workings of the franchise wonder if the Packers have created a new problem: too many cooks in the kitchen.
When the quarterback is the type of singular talent who can mask glaring weaknesses and make an average supporting cast look elite, it invites complacency. “I think the whole organization got lazy,” says another person familiar with the inner workings of the team. “We’re relying on Aaron. Aaron is going to do it.”
Rodgers is the smartest guy in Green Bay’s locker room, football or otherwise. Every Friday, Packers quarterbacks, the offensive coordinator and the quarterbacks coach take a QB test. It’s typically 30 football questions and then 10-15 trivia questions, ranging from riddles to Sporcle-inspired random facts. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Rodgers usually aces the test, which changes every week. The backups rotate putting the quiz together and try their best to stump Rodgers. “Aaron always knew about 90 percent of it,” says former Green Bay backup Joe Callahan. “He won a good amount.” Rodgers’s intelligence is one of his greatest strengths. It also makes coaching him a unique challenge.
“I desperately want to be coached.” That’s what Rodgers told The MMQB on the eve of the 2015 season, when the Packers were seven months removed from a heartbreaking NFC title game loss in Seattle. (Through a spokesperson, the Packers declined an interview request for Rodgers.) The quarterback holds himself to impossibly high standards, and he holds his coaches to those same standards. He doesn’t forget any slight or grievance, no matter how small. He still brings up the fact that he was drafted 24th overall, the second quarterback after Alex Smith went No. 1 overall in the 2005 draft. Former Packers receiver Greg Jennings told Colin Cowherd in November that Rodgers would needle McCarthy about that. McCarthy, the year before he arrived in Green Bay, was the offensive coordinator in San Francisco, part of the regime that drafted Smith.
McCarthy, like Rodgers, is an alpha male. When people familiar with the two were asked to describe their relationship, most say it is defined by tension. Until this year, it was a healthy tension that lifted both quarterback and coach. In 2018, something has been different.
McCarthy is the play caller, but because Rodgers is so intelligent and such a good improvisational player, the quarterback has the green light to change plays on the field as he see fit. He does, so often that it can be hard for McCarthy to get into a rhythm as the play caller. McCarthy might call the same play three times in a game, without the play actually being run as he called it. And if McCarthy calls a play that Rodgers doesn’t like early in the game, that can sour the mood for the rest of the game. Several sources familiar with the inner workings of the organization say that it devolved into a competition over who can call the better play, and both want the credit when things go right.
“Aaron won’t be upset this story is being written and some of these frustrations are getting out there,” says a source close to Rodgers.
The questions about the coach-quarterback relationship have heated up with every Packers loss this season. Even after a win over Buffalo, Rodgers criticized the offense and blamed the game plan. “It was as bad as we’ve played on offense with that many yards in a long time,” he said. “There was no flow to the game… We were championship defensive level and non-playoff team offensive level today. That was not great, by any stretch of the imagination.” (Rodgers later clarified that he put most of the blame on himself rather than the coaching staff.)
That mini-controversy was nothing compared to what CBS cameras captured during a victory over the Bengals last season. After taking a sack late in the third quarter, Rodgers looked to the sideline. It didn’t take an expert lip-reader to decipher his message. “Stupid f—ing call!” And then again for good measure. “Stupid f—ing call!” The following week, when Rodgers walked into his individual meeting with McCarthy, the head coach had the broadcast clip pulled up on the screen, ready to review and discuss. Early in Rodgers’s career, McCarthy spent a lot of time coaching him to better control his body language when he was frustrated. That day, they had something of a refresher course.
“When you are with somebody for so long, you are going to have those minor disagreements,” offensive tackle Bryan Bulaga said after the Packers’ Week 10 win over Miami. “They both want what’s best for the team. It’s like arguments between family members, those things happen. It’s inevitable.”
When Monday Night Football set up at Lambeau Field for the Packers’ Week 6 game against the 49ers, the crew sat down with Rodgers and then McCarthy individually for production meetings the night before. Sideline analyst Booger McFarland, a straight shooter, leaned back in his chair and asked Rodgers about his relationship with McCarthy, and whether there were any issues between them.
According to McFarland and play-by-play commentator Joe Tessitore, Rodgers responded calmly. “There’s a give and a take. There’s pushback, there’s conflict,” Rodgers said, according to Tessitore’s notes. “But the biggest thing is, there is resolution. We are closely connected on gameplan. We are fiery competitors and there is a lot of trust… We’ve evolved. He has, with the way he prepares. We used to spend three hours every Thursday talking through the whole game plan. Now we’ve learned how to communicate better.”
McFarland asked McCarthy the same question, and the coach was ready for it. “I want Aaron’s input,” McCarthy said, according to Tessitore’s notes. “I think we have a good relationship. When he said the offense is terrible, to me I think that just represents his competitive spirit.”
McFarland says he sensed something was off: “Maybe it’s their personalities, but to me, I find it very [unusual] that you get two people who really enjoy working together and enjoy being around each other, but you can’t sense or see that [they do]. I didn’t sense that from either Aaron or coach.”
You don’t have to look too far back in Packers lore to find how that tension can help fuel greatness. Former Packers head coach Mike Holmgren and quarterback Brett Favre were also known for their fiery spats. Matt Hasselbeck was a backup quarterback in Green Bay from 1998 to 2000. He says that Holmgren would threaten to fire Andy Reid, Favre’s beloved quarterback coach at the time, whenever he felt the quarterback was stepping out of line. “If you change the play one more time, I will fire Andy Reid. Do you want him to be unemployed? It was a good way to reach Brett, quite honestly,” Hasselbeck says. “Brett loved Andy, so it was like, No, anything but that! I think that kind of tension is fairly normal.”
On Saturdays before games, McCarthy and Rodgers go over which plays Rodgers likes and wants to keep and which plays he wants cut from the game plan. Though the two meet individually three to four times each week during the season, a source close to the quarterback says that, because McCarthy has other duties as the head coach, he misses several offensive install meetings or quarterback meetings, a source of frustration for Rodgers because McCarthy will add or change plays during the Saturday walkthroughs that mess with the established flow of the game plan.
Green Bay’s No. 2 quarterback, Kizer, and third string quarterback Tim Boyle, do their best to patch up any disconnect during games. As part of their roles as backups, they are both working to improve in-game communication between the head coach and the starter. Kizer and Boyle act as translators on the sideline, relaying checks Rodgers might make that McCarthy doesn’t have the angle to see, or the coach misses while looking at his play sheet. “We are kind of the liason from Aaron to Coach McCarthy,” Boyle says. “Our eyes are always on Aaron, seeing what he checks to, what he adjusts to, so when he comes back to the sideline we can relay that to Coach McCarthy.”
Because Rodgers has so much freedom, McCarthy’s frustration often comes from not knowing what check his quarterback went to and why. Kizer and Boyle have typically been in more conversations with Rodgers throughout the week, and sometimes explain his decisions to McCarthy in order to better set up future play calls. Early in the fourth quarter in Detroit this season, the Packers offense was running no huddle. Rodgers and Kizer had a few conversations on the sideline before the series about wanting to create matchup issues with Lions cornerback Darius Slay, bringing Adams inside, rather than lining him up outside. The QBs decided on a series of three playcalls focused on Adams, having him run crossers or sit down in the flat to eventually set up an out route that resulted in a red-zone touchdown. McCarthy wasn’t part of those conversations, so the quarterbacks explained that series to him afterward.
Boyle doesn’t dress for games. He stands near McCarthy on the sideline for most of the game and reviews pictures with him after every drive, while Kizer sits on the bench with Rodgers and quarterback coach Frank Cignetti Jr. “I’m trying to help him see what Aaron is seeing and improve that coordination,” Boyle says. “Aaron is so locked in, Coach McCarthy is so locked in, I’m kind of trying to help them communicate.”
McCarthy is coaching his 13th season in Green Bay, which ties him with New Orleans’ Sean Payton as the third-longest tenured of the 32 current NFL head coaches (behind New England’s Bill Belichick and Cincinnati’s Marvin Lewis). He survived the rocky transition from Favre to Rodgers. He’s taken the Packers to the playoffs nine times, including eight seasons in a row. He won a Super Bowl. Is it enough to save his job if the Packers miss the playoffs for the second season in a row? Nearly every source who participated in this story agreed: McCarthy’s time in Green Bay has probably run its course.
Several sources familiar with the inner workings of the organization say that McCarthy hasn’t done much to keep things fresh and change things up from season to season, other than making changes to the practice schedule based on player input. McCarthy has tried some unconventional ideas occasionally, but they usually don’t stick. For instance, one former player recalls the year in OTAs when, after a season in which the Packers didn’t force many turnovers, McCarthy tested out a new drill where all 11 guys on defense had to touch the ball and take a chop at the ball carrier on each play. This quickly turned into madness—the ball carrier was held up at the line of scrimmage until every guy took his shot, or defensive linemen ran 70 yards downfield to get their shot.
McCarthy meets with every player on the roster for an exit interview before they head home in June, but one source close to organization says most players don’t feel comfortable going to McCarthy with problems during the season and instead wait until the exit interview—even if it’s early in the season and a potential season-long the issue could be resolved. A Packers spokesperson denies that McCarthy’s door is closed to players, and adds that for anyone who isn’t comfortable going to McCarthy, the Packers have a players’ council made up of a representative from each position group that meets with the director of player development and can take things up the chain. McCarthy was never particularly close with players, but sources close to the organization say that as the culture grew more uptight in Green Bay under Thompson, McCarthy became more closed off to players.
When quarterbacks coach Alex Van Pelt wasn’t retained this past offseason, Rodgers took his displeasure public. “I thought that was an interesting change—really without consulting me,” Rodgers said on ESPN’s Golic and Wingo show during Super Bowl week. “There’s a close connection between quarterback and quarterback coach. And that was an interesting decision.”
Van Pelt has a history with McCarthy; he was a quarterback at University of Pittsburgh when McCarthy was a grad assistant working with the QBs (1989-91). Van Pelt spent six years on McCarthy’s Green Bay staff, the last four as QBs coach, and he and Rodgers grew close. Rodgers would often go over to Van Pelt’s house for dinners with the Van Pelt family, the coach’s wife and three kids.
Van Pelt (who declined an interview request for this story) turned down a contract extension from the Packers after the 2016 season, wanting to keep his options open in hopes of landing a coordinator job (NFL teams can block position coaches under contract from interviewing elsewhere). With Rodgers injured for most of 2017 and backup Brett Hundley unprepared to step in, the Packers had a down year and Van Pelt didn’t land a coordinator job. McCarthy chose to go in a different direction, hiring Cignetti, the Giants QBs coach the past two years, to the same position. One source close to Rodgers says the quarterback’s relationship with Cignetti is nowhere near as close as it was with Van Pelt, who is now QBs coach for the Cincinnati Bengals.
When asked why they think Van Pelt is no longer in Green Bay, several sources close to the team say they believe, because Van Pelt had Rodgers’s ear, McCarthy saw him as a threat.
“Which came first, the chicken or the egg? McCarthy wants credit for Aaron Rodgers, who he is,” says a source familiar with the inner workings of the organization. “I think too many people have tried to say they created Aaron Rodgers.”
So now egos have gotten out of hand. That never ends well. (See Jerry Jones and Jimmy Johnson.)
The NFL is a copycat league, but teams rarely seem to be lifting plays or concepts from Green Bay’s offense. However, that’s not necessarily an indictment of McCarthy. As one longtime NFL scout points out, “Aaron doesn’t necessarily execute the offense, so it’s not all on coach. So much of what [Rodgers] does is not the intended execution of the play, which is what makes him so good and dangerous, but their plays are not necessarily being executed as they are drawn up.”
The MMQB’s Andy Benoit made the point earlier this week: Criticism of McCarthy’s offense as stale no longer holds true. The Packers offense has evolved in 2018, moving away from the spread formations and isolation routes that defined the system for years. In November, the Packers lined up in spread formations about half as often as they did in September, and condensed looks (a la Sean McVay’s Rams offense, with receivers aligned tight to the formation) about three times as often as they did during the first month of the season. Those condensed formations lead to more naturally intertwined route combinations, create more traffic for defenders to work through, present more space to which receivers can run their routes, and put receivers in better position to block on run plays.
The spread system played into Rodgers’s strengths as a sandlot playmaker. But that style of play requires tremendous chemistry between the quarterback and the other 10 players, who must have a similar “feel” for how any given play is developing and what their quarterback will do on the fly. The roster turnover made that nearly impossible to pull off in 2018. Jordy Nelson, long Rodgers’s favorite target, was released in March, while Randall Cobb, the longest-tenured Packers receiver, has missed half this season with a hamstring injury and third-year receiver Geronimo Allison lasted just five games before going on injured reserve with a groin injury. Rookies Marquez Valdes-Scantling and Equanimeous St. Brown have been asked to take on significant roles alongside Adams and first-year Packer Jimmy Graham. Valdes-Scantling and St. Brown are too green to keep up with Rodgers’s improvisational style, making a more highly schemed system a necessity. Though, judging from how the offense has struggled to find its footing at times, the change might have been forced upon Rodgers and Co. before they were ready.
The defense has battled injuries and inexperience as well. Gutekunst’s big free-agent signing on that side of the ball, defensive lineman Muhammad Wilkerson, is out for the season with an ankle injury. The first-year GM was aggressive at the trade deadline, but it was to gather future assets rather than find immediate help. Along with sending struggling running back Ty Montgomery to the Ravens just days after his costly kick return fumble against the Rams, Gutekunst dealt fifth-year safety Ha Ha Clinton-Dix, an impending free agent who had played every snap for a secondary relying on first- and second-year players, to Washington for a draft pick. The Clinton-Dix trade sent mixed signals to the locker room, as it was seemingly a rebuilding move (though one that guaranteed Green Bay an extra pick in the 2019 draft, rather than waiting for a compensation pick that might not come in 2020 if they are aggressive in free agency this winter). Lately, the cornerbacking group has been ravaged by injuries, putting first-year defensive coordinator Mike Pettine, who prefers an aggressive man-to-man defense, in a bind.
It has also been a season of near-misses. A September meeting with the Vikings ended in a tie in part because of a controversial roughing the passer penalty on Clay Matthews, one that wouldn’t have been called had it happened after September. Veteran kicker Mason Crosby missed four field goals and an extra point—indoors—in a upset loss in Detroit. A potential comeback at Washington was foiled by another questionable roughing flag on Matthews. Back-to-back road losses to the Rams and Patriots turned on ill-timed fumbles. And head coach Mike McCarthy’s overly conservative decision to punt on a fourth-and-2 late in Seattle cost them a chance to win despite a defense plagued by injuries at all three levels, and a scheduling glitch that required them to travel two time zones and play a game on three days’ rest.
“We haven’t really gotten to that point where we are clicking on all cylinders,” says offensive lineman Lane Taylor. “When you look back at ’16, we went out there [in Week 12] to Philly and people didn’t think we were going to win that game and we had that big play to Davante [Adams] for the touchdown and it kind of snowballed into success. In ’14, we had a good team and we played well all year, really. This team, we play in spurts. Offense will play good, defense will play good, special teams will play good. It’s frustrating because we haven’t done it for 60 minutes.”
The “big play to Davante” Taylor is referring to is Rodgers’s perfect, tight-window throw to Adams, a 20-yard touchdown to give Green Bay the lead for good on that Monday night in Philly. It’s not just that the team’s play has been choppy; the galvanizing moment that sparks a big run simply hasn’t happened.
Across talk radio and social media, McCarthy has been blamed for “wasting” Rodgers’s career, as the Packers have racked up regular-season wins but only one Super Bowl since Rodgers took over as the starter in 2008, that lone championship coming eight seasons ago. Murphy is the man with the power to decide McCarthy’s future in Green Bay. He’s said in the past that big decisions like removing a coach would be a group decision, but ultimately, he is the one who has final say. He doesn’t pay attention to any of the recent reports that McCarthy is on the hot seat. When pressed, Murphy says he’s not thinking about making any changes right now. “We have a third of the season left to play,” he says. “We’re obviously not where we wanted to be, but I am focused on the last five games and I think we can finish the season strong … I think the continuity and stability has served us well. You see it across the league, I think you have to be careful not to make changes for changes’ sake.”
Reporters at Minnesota’s U.S. Bank Stadium are still prodding, trying to draw the right words out of Rodgers. They ask the same question again and again, each time with a slightly different twist, each one a transparent attempt to goad him into giving a passionate defense of his team, just like he’s done when the Packers have been in similarly precarious positions in the past.
Do you think the playoffs are still realistic?
You’ve been trying to find that galvanizing moment for this team. Are you worried that moment might not come and if it comes, it might be too late?
9-6-1. That gets you in?
What’s the feeling been like this season? It seems like the playoffs are a reach right now.
“We’re going to need some help from some teams and then we have to find a way to win on the road,” he says. “We’re 0-6 on the road.”
Rodgers pauses and looks down. Then the speech of 2018 commences. “We’ve got to go back home, get some rest, beat Arizona, and then come back and beat Atlanta, and then go to Chicago, a place where we’ve won a number of times, beat them, go to New York around Christmas, [pause] beat them. And then come home against Detroit, [pause] beat them, get a little help.”
He held his last pause a beat longer than the rest, as a familiar glint flashed in his eyes, a hint of a smile visible underneath his beard. But it was gone as quickly as it came. There is nothing more Aaron Rodgers can say.
Steve Prestegard.com: The Presteblog 
Leave a comment