The New Albany, OH, chief of police is advising parents not to let their kids go outside on their own until they are 16.
According to this piece on News10:
New Albanyâs police chief wants parents to understand that kids younger than 16 simply cannot defend themselves against an attacker.
Chief Greg Jones says 16 is the appropriate age to allow children to be outside by themselves.âI think thatâs the threshold where you see children getting a little bit more freedom,â he says.
Not a lot of freedom, mind you. Just a âlittle bit.â His stay-close-to-mommy rationale?
While the ultimate decision comes down to parents and personal preference, he says no matter how mature a child may seem, itâs what happens after a child is abducted that is the greatest concern.
Not if, but WHEN a child is abducted. Thatâs how heâs thinking of childhood: You go outside, you get abducted and then you have to deal.
So letâs take a little look at New Albanyâc crime record. Here it is. Last month the town of 8,829 logged, hmmm, let me get out my calculatorâŚone plus oneâŚTWO counts of criminal activity. One case of burglary/breaking and entering,  and one âother.â
Unless that âotherâ was âcrimes against humanity,â Iâm not sure just how many kids are being abducted right and left by strangers. But the Chief insists: âWhat if you were to allow them to take off at 7 or 8 and you donât hear from them for a while, where would you begin? What would you do? How would you even know what happened to them?â
This is just a classic an example of worst-first thinking: You think of the worst-case scenario FIRST, no matter how far-fetched, and proceed as if itâs likely to happen. (And by the way, not even to a teen. To a 7-year-old.)
The article goes on to describe the over-subscribed SafetyTown lessons the police are giving kids, and quotes moms who are eager to instill stranger danger in their kids (even though more than 90% of crimes against children are committed by people they know):
âWeâve never really had the talk with him about what to do to be cautious with other people that he doesnât know,â says Shannon Jap, who enrolled her son Oliver, who is 5-years-old. âMy son loves to say hi to everybody and he just goes up to people when weâre in restaurants and we just want to make sure that he knows to be careful when heâs talking to people,â she adds.
Chief Jones says thatâs the ultimate goal of safety town is to teach children than bad people can seem nice too.
âStrangers arenât always mean,â says the Chief.
And nice people, like police chiefs, arenât always sane.
Hereâs how New Albanyâs website describes the town:
[A] vibrant, pedestrian-friendly community with an unparalleled commitment to education, wellness, culture and leisure that inspires and enriches families and businesses alike.
Iâm not sure that wellness and leisure correspond to keeping kids indoors, frightened, unfriendly and infantilized. Iâm not even sure that anyone in a town that terrified would ever be a pedestrian. But boy are they safeâŚ
From the boogeyman.
According to Jones’ logic, a child is mature enough to leave the house, get a job and get a driver’s license on the same day. And, as a comment put it:
If Chief Jones thinks the town is that dangerous under his watch he should be embarrassed, admit failure and resign.
Leave a comment